Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Build Brighton Hackspace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will userfy on request. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 08:36, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Build Brighton Hackspace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. nothing in gnews. could not find any reliable sources eg in bbc LibStar (talk) 01:36, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agreed, I found nothing with Google US, Google UK news or Google Books. SwisterTwister talk 04:13, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

keep This is one of the more prominent UK hackspaces, having organised two Maker faires Andy Dingley (talk) 22:51, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

do you have sources to establish notability? LibStar (talk) 10:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should keep an eye on article histories after you've nom'ed them. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - had a look for some sources (don't think those in the article are great) and couldn't find much. All I could find was a google groups rallying cry from the original author calling on other subject group members to add to the WP article. Obviously COI, and created as WP:PROMO. They are clearly not being sneaky about it (commendable) but we need to be careful about the genesis. Am on the fence as to whether it meets WP:CORPDEPTH - probably not at the moment... Stalwart111 (talk) 04:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per WP:ORGDEPTH. (Declaration per WP:COI: I've attended Bristol Hackspace on one occasion, and have exchanged words with members there who attended/exhibited at the 2012 Brighton Mini Maker Faire.) Userfication should be granted if there is a subsequent claim of further sources demonstrating notability. There is a discussion about including such local information within Hackerspace at Talk:Hackerspace#List of hackspaces is WAY too long. -- Trevj (talk) 10:58, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.