Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Constantine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Constantine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable presenter. Searches showed nothing significant in independent/reliable sources. Rayman60 (talk) 21:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete surprised I can't find anything about him either, but there you go - perhaps there are printed profiles or something - David Gerard (talk) 15:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's one thing and that only listed here, that he's been a TV host, nothing else at all of information and sources, this is essentially a BLPPROD considering there are no sources, there's simply nothing else actually convincing from there to suggest the needed substance, let alone improvements. SwisterTwister talk 18:17, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He is a "regional" presenter. That rings CS7, no allegation of notability, to me. Bearian (talk) 00:26, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete regional television presenters are rarely notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.