Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Break Even (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Break Even (band)

Only notability is that they've toured with other bands. No sources found at all. Also listing their albums (one was already at afd):

Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge And redirect other articles. One article is better than three. One step at a time... ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why merge the albums if the band isn't notable either? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The band is notable. They're popular in Australia and tour with other notable bands. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Merging is really out of the question, a band that is notable should have their album articles seperate, if the band isn't notable - adding the albums to the band article isn't going to help. Okay, so Break Even have played with Rise Against [1], toured with Parkway Drive [2][3], Carpathian [4] and they're currently co-headlining an Australian tour alongside American band Ruiner [5]. But i think the main thing that should avoid their deletion is the fact they have a debut album out early next year, bands of a similar size have in the past charted quite high on the AIR charts and made a name for themselves, sure you can say we should delete the article until that day comes, but i don't really see the point. I think the article just needs a nice clean up. k-i-a-c (hitmeup - the past) 02:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No claims that even if proved would satisfy WP:MUSIC. Bongo matic 03:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article fails to meet any of the 12 criteria of WP:MUSIC. If the band does get deleted, the albums will take care of them selves under speedy A9. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 20:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see this band meeting any of the requirements of WP:MUSICBIO. WWGB (talk) 00:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All. fails WP:MUSIC. No awards, no airplay, no notable members, 2 cds released through a minor independent label. –Moondyne 13:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Break Even (Demo). –Moondyne 13:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.