Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boricua Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 18:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boricua Party

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Source 1 is secretary of state basic/contact information, source 2 is a passing mention, source 3 is a passing mention, and source 4 is a single sentence story about how it qualified for ballot access. Most other sources that I've seen through a search are passing mentions. reppop^talk 18:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Any sources not published by the party itself just give passing mentions, barely more than a sentence - basically just WP:ORGTRIV, and not giving any indication of what the party's purpose or intentions are. Recon rabbit 18:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.