Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blair Yaworski
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Blair Yaworski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 07:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 11:32, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - fails NHOCKEY and not seeing significant coverage to meet GNG. Weak even by Dolovis standards. Rlendog (talk) 21:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: NN minor league hockey player, unremarkable and ephemeral career, fails NHOCKEY, no evidence he meets the GNG. Article created by editor under community ban for creating hundreds of NN stubs to bolster his new article count. Ravenswing 01:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.