Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhitabaria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Bhitabaria Union. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bhitabaria

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NGEO. NGA is considered an unreliable source. Nagol0929 (talk) 16:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Nagol0929 (talk) 16:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Added two more references to verify existence.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bhitabaria Union - Places are not notable simply because they exist. WP:GEOLAND gives a presumption of notability to legally recognised populated places, but the only thing that has legal recognition demonstrated in the sourcing is the union parishad (Union council) of Bhitabaria, which we already have an article about at Bhitabaria Union. We have no information about the village separate to this union council. FOARP (talk) 20:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bhitabaria Union. Not seeing multiple sources meeting general notability.

Flurrious (talk) 00:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.