Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedi clan
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Khatri. GedUK 13:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Bedi clan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A user on Twitter raised the concern that this might be a hoax article. It's certainly extremely messy, and I think it might be better deleted or redirected rather than the unsourced mess it is at present. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 03:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular talk 03:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Stubify or redirect Doesn't seem like a complete hoax but a total mess, unverifiable, and doesn't really seem notable enough for a real article, with just a quick Google search. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 04:16, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- earlier revisions were much clearer. Uncle G (talk) 04:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Stubify or redirect as per Fetchcomms. --Kudpung (talk) 10:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 00:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.