Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bathroom attendant
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sandstein 16:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bathroom attendant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original research of an article. Not a reference in sight that would make anything in the article verifiable. Tavix (talk) 01:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think the subject is as worthy of an article as any profession, though the lack of sourcing is undoubtedly a problem. I added one reliable source, though only as an "External link". Lampman (talk) 02:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but it needs fixed up with sources I'd think CloversMallRat (talk) 03:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I don't believe it's OR, and I expect that there are sufficient RS to be found. Jclemens (talk) 05:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. What a strange profession! Anyway, the article might not have been at all good before, but it doesn't seem to have anything to do with a non-notable person at all anymore, nor does the topic. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 06:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep yet remove any additional original research which happens to find its way back into the article. RFerreira (talk) 20:29, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Washroom. As a standalone article this doesn't seem capable of legitimately being more than a dictionary definition. --Rividian (talk) 02:54, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable. Everyking (talk) 07:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, just needs some TLC from a sourceophilic person. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.