Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azhagu Nila

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Procedural keep as the nominator has withdrawn their proposal and there are no formal Delete comments. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Azhagu Nila

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any reliable sources; besides Wikipedia is not a database. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 08:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IMDB Website Link for the movie, youtube website link for the movie added to the article, so please remove the deletion tag. Alangar Manickam (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Alangar Manickam you need to familiarize yourself with WP:RS and WP:RSP because none of those and I really do mean none - are relaible, much less can they establish notability. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't consider IMDB, Youtube, Amazon Music library links, Ganaa.com links then you need to apply some basic common sense. Alangar Manickam (talk) 18:11, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, you need to read our policies because you're simply wrong and that isn't going to change no matter how many times you accuse everyone else of lacking common sense, my friend. Of course you're totally welcome to continue making baseless arguments, but they will be discounted and it will still result in deletion if you can't provide actual sourcing. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then you are here in wikipedia doing more destructive work, than constructive work. Alangar Manickam (talk) 18:22, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think you need to rethink your approach to calling experienced editors destructive or you're likely to wind up blocked. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:25, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a notable old Tamil film and is mentioned twice in Encyclopedia of Indian Cinema (pdf here). The official name of the film per CBFC and title card is Azhaku Nila. Newspaper sources here, here, here, here, and here. DareshMohan (talk) 07:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw: As the one who opened this AfD, I now say it be withdrawn. Congrats to DareshMohan for adding those sources (I found one too). Kailash29792 (talk) 10:43, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB Website Link for the movie, youtube website link, Amazon Music library links, Ganaa.com links for the movie added to the article, so please remove the deletion tag.

IMDB, YouTube, Amazon Music and Ganaa.com are not reliable or notability-assisting sources. You need to source the article to reliable source coverage about the film in media to stave off deletion, not directory entries or streaming copies of the film — because notability is not established by verifying that the film exists, it's established by verifying that the film got media coverage. Bearcat (talk) 16:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.