Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azeus Convene
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:19, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Azeus Convene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the content appears to lack substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources; too many links with promotional or straightforward informational coverage Assirian cat (talk) 13:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Routine coverage for a brochure article, adveritising the company on Wikipedia. Fails WP:DEL14, WP:DEL4. scope_creepTalk 21:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.