Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asianisation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Asianisation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article summary (copy and pasted from an internet dictionary) is completely unrelated to the body, which is a collection of quoted anti-Asian remarks from Australian and NZ politicians. Mooeena ● 💌 ● ✒️ ● ❓ 21:53, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:59, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:59, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Poorly defined topic in the article, and I can't see significant coverage of the term or idea in reliable sources. Adabow (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article has been built up by using news articles and quotes. There isn't a single academic source to confirm that this is an accepted term in both historical and contemporary discourse. (101.160.137.188 (talk) 07:52, 25 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]
Keep This phenomenon is real and can relate to many places in the world. Article should be improved by adding more demographic or culture statistics data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.160.65.9 (talk) 11:32, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.