Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Liao

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 20:14, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Liao

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR with no sources at all. Sheldybett (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:03, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lubbad85 (☎) 02:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR, the only thing I could find were pictures on Getty images. No WP:RS is talking/talked about her. Orville1974 (talk) 08:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject fails to reach the standard for WP:GNG Lubbad85 (☎) 18:06, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I may have voted Delete too soon. Perhaps this article needs some ambitious editors.

Secondary coverage where the coverage was about the actress

Thank you for the additional sources, but these are still either announcements of a future role in an unreleased film, or of a minor role in a TV show. I think we're looking at a case of WP:TOOSOON still. Orville1974 (talk) 18:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just attempted to improve the page by incorporating those sources and some more, as well as fixing the formatting of the page. Starklinson (talk) 9:15, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Keep as has prominent roles in notable productions such as Fuller House and the Kicks, the article has been improved since nomination, passes WP:NACTOR, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:13, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTRESS. I am not seeing several significant roles. Sounds like a case of WP:TOOSOON. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 21:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the improvements since this was nominated, another week to discuss the new sources seems like a good idea.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 13:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep she has had notable roles in several mainstream productions. I found some sources, and I see she easily passes WP:NACTOR. The article and sources have improved since nomination Lubbad85 (☎) 02:21, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reliable sources like this [1] and others found, proves she passes the general notability guideline as well as the subject specific guideline for actors. Dream Focus 04:59, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There seem to be plenty of sources out there. Here's another one. Andrew D. (talk) 09:43, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I still don't see how WP:NACTOR is met. All of these refer to one role in a television show. The criteria for notability of an actor is "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." (my emphasis added) Orville1974 (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter since WP:GNG is clearly met from the coverage found. As WP:NOTABILITY clearly states, you have to pass either the General Notability Guidelines OR one of the subject specific guidelines, not both. Dream Focus 16:38, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.