Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Hartzler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Discounting the rationales provided by sockpuppets, consensus seems to be that WP:BLP1E applies here. Aoidh (talk) 00:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Hartzler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a case of WP:BLP1E with all the coverage relating to a court case. SmartSE (talk) 17:41, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The subject qualifies for the clause 3 of article (WP:BLP1E). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twineforce (talkcontribs) 20:24, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- As it's said above, it passes the clause 3 of (WP:BLP1E), it's a significant event and the individual's role is substantial and it is very well documented. ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topboy101 (talkcontribs) 14:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.