Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anas Alfahdawy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anas Alfahdawy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication that this young Iraqi cosmetic dentist is notable. The article is sourced to a listing that claims he offers veneers; an article in which he's asked to comment on the cost of dentistry materials; a link to his own clinic; and a dead link. An online "before" search reveals his posts on social media, but nothing substantial in the way of SIGCOV in independent sources about him. Perhaps it is TOOSOON, but nevertheless, he clearly does not meet WP criteria for GNG. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone (talk) 21:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Medicine, and Iraq. Netherzone (talk) 21:56, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete I do not speak Arabic but I attempted to search for both the Englishized name and the Arabic name and found nothing at all that would even attempt to claim WP:N. Skynxnex (talk) 22:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'll also say writing the article entirely in two days in June 2020, not touching it all since then, and then moving to mainspace today is something I don't think I've seen before. Skynxnex (talk) 22:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Couldn't find anything establishing notability. No claims in the article to investigate either. I did find the subject's YouTube channel, which garners maybe a couple hundred views per video. Not notable. Blue Edits (talk) 11:53, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is not even worthy to be include in Wikipedia because I haven't see anything about this article. Again, no any reliable reference from this article, it needs speedy deletion than exhausting time for discussion.Ashavawani (talk) 11:51, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.