Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agumon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List_of_Digimon_Adventure_characters. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:02, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agumon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No out-of-universe context or notability, no independent sources apart from 1 trivial mention. Article consists of OR plot only. Fails WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:Pokémon test. ~Alison C. (aka Crazytales) 16:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Pokémon test describes an outdated arguement formerly used at AFD, and doesn't provide any sort of arguement for deletion (though it does mention that many Pokemon articles were eventually merged into lists). If you think the article should be deleted, please provide a reason why you think so, rather than referring to an essay that doesn't provide any arguement for deletion. Calathan (talk) 20:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Digimon Adventure characters. While the individual character may have no independent coverage, he is one of the main characters of the series and should be merged into the character list for that series. —Farix (t | c) 20:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 17:19, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as above - summarize the excessive in-universe material into one paragraph. Include the merchandising info. The IGN ref is really clutching at straws. Marasmusine (talk) 09:58, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Digimon Adventure characters: The article does not provide evidence that the fictional character meets the the general notability guideline to deserve a stand-alone article. Most of the article relies on primary sources and original research by synthesis, but there are some usable parts (all that's referenced with secondary sources) that should be merged to List of Digimon Adventure characters where currently there is no description of the character. Jfgslo (talk) 14:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Digimon Adventure characters per above, if anything the references will help out the main character list article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.