Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Everett
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Adrian Everett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP of a subject of doubtful notability, created by a now-blocked user. Someone may see a glimmer of notability here I’ve overlooked. Mccapra (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Military, and United Kingdom. Mccapra (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - [1] and [2] are borderline for me. There is some decent coverage, but a huge chunk of both are direct quotes from the subject. The rest of the sourcing appears WP:ROUTINE or not directly related to the subject. I cannot find much else myself doing a WP:BEFORE given the commonness of the name (see [3]). Thus, I'm leaning towards deletion. —Sirdog (talk) 05:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as the sources are Routine. BoraVoro (talk) 07:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.