Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AccuDial Pharmaceuticals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 00:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AccuDial Pharmaceuticals

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. Only references are directory entries and press releases. ubiquity (talk) 22:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:01, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete More promotional piece than an encyclopedia article. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 04:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing at all convincing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Their products could very well be just fine, with the firm also being a fine place to work, yet there's nothing that I see to indicate that the company is actually notable. I'm in agreement. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 12:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.