Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 UP T20 League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 UP T20 League

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do not need individual season articles for this tournament, as its individual seasons don't generate enough significant coverage to pass WP:GNG. All content can be handled in parent article. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket, India, and Uttar Pradesh. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page for the 2023 season:

Delete. Per nom. AA (talk) 09:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see nothing that would indicate notability for individual articles for these seasons. Garsh (talk) 03:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I would highlight that the population of Uttar Pradesh, over 241 million people, would make it the sixth largest country by population on the planit. To refer to this as a 'Local League' per some contributors above is slightly disingenuous. As the biggest sport in a sizable catchment area with considerable media interest it is clear that this competition, as well as the other state level T20 leagues in India, fulfils Wikipedia's Notability criteria. -185.13.50.178 (talk) 14:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)— 185.13.50.178 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete. Unnoteworthy league. The league is not notable (even majority of the players) and noteworthy enough nationally or internationally to warrant a page on. Fails WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 18:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.