Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12:34:56 7/8/9
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 23:48, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- 12:34:56 7/8/9 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable occurrence. Google returns nothing but blog posts, and admittedly the occasional reliable source, however none report on it in a way that actually asserts anything. They just repeat that, yes, at such and such time it will be 1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 05:08, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Happens every 100 years......it's called trivia, not notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Niteshift36. Trivia, not encyclopedia-worthy. • Anakin (talk) 09:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as plain trivia. Alexius08 (talk) 10:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - complete waste of time. Of course, most people use at least two digits to express the year, so the pattern has no real validity unless one accepts an unconventional notation of using a single digit for the year. How many other similar articles would we allow, e.g., 08:08:08 8/8/08? Racepacket (talk) 17:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As Racepacket indicates, this article is a complete waste of time. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I remember that 1:23:45 on June 7, 1989 got brief notice also (even to the point that it made page 7 news when a baby was born at that time). And 1:01:01 on January 1, 2001 was special, and so will 1:11:11 on January 1, 2011, but this article, created two days before the event, has served whatever newsy purpose it might have had. Mandsford (talk) 13:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.