Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.package
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Autopackage. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 05:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- .package (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Of the two entries, the DBPF one has been deleted, and the .package file extension in DBPF doesn't seem to be discussed anywhere that I could find using the article search function. It is mentioned once in the autopackage article. Not really serving much of a useful purpose in disambiguation. Hog Farm Bacon 04:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 04:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 04:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Autopackage (I would've done this myself, honestly). Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 09:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Autopackage – gpvos (talk) 13:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Week Delete or Redirect : Onursides (talk) 19:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.