This is an archive of past discussions with User:Zidonuke. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hmmmm I cant believe i fell for that i was looking up why it should of been nominated. I mean it shouldnt even come near any reasons to be so. But i had some trust i guess and went for it. Sigh.... Sidonuke (talk) 08:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Furthermore, if you use Twinkle in an abusive fashion again, that will be disabled also. Reverting Synergy's edit as "vandalism" using Twinkle is utterly unacceptable. Daniel (talk) 09:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Using IRC to officially warn me isn't acceptable ether. But since you contacted me here I understand what is happening. The logs will not be readded. Sidonuke (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I want to make it clear that I never thought you would request its deletion, or take it seriously. I thought you understood that since there was no real reason, that it was a joke. For what its worth, try to look past it and happy editing from Synergy09:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I would like you to know that since you asked me to do that deletion you also made me believe you would get an admin to take action against me so just to protect myself I did post those logs in my defense since it would of been all I had. Anyways as i said before you reminded me to never trust anyone again. I thank you for that. Sidonuke (talk) 09:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Look. If you would have thought it through more you would have seen that a featured article is never speedy applicable. You're just being paranoid. I never said I would get an admin to block you. Thats just silly. Synergy09:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
i left a comment on the talk page. i DID NOT change the frank mir article. it's my understanding that the talk page is for discussing the person place or thing that the article is about. if you watch TUF, you would see that my opinion of mir is justified. i chose not to add it to the article, just the talk page. just because you don't like my opinion does not mean that i am not entitled to that opinion. example: you are a douchebag. that is my opinion, whether you like it or not. 72.241.143.189 (talk) 16:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)dude72.241.143.189 (talk) 16:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey, just a friendly note: Make sure vandals have received at least four recent warnings (in today's date) before reporting them to AIV. Also you can't report them to AIV if they don't vandalize after final warning, as you did to 206.219.85.130;he has made just one edit today. I thought of dropping you a note because some of your reports are being commented as 'unblockable' by admins at AIV diff. Other than this, keep on reverting vandalism, Wikipedia always needs good vandal fighters :) --Unpopular Opinion (talk·contribs) 20:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry about your revert to the sandbox page and I have removed my warning. I didn't view that the page was the sandbox. So thanks for warning me of that and I'll be sure to watch out what I do. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 19:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Anderson Cooper edit
My edit to Anderson Cooper is not vandalism, it is true and has been proven many times even in the article. So many people know that he is gay, a lot of people who know him personally have seen him with his boyfriend. There is even a picture of the two of them. Please do not put frivolous warnings on my page. Thank you. JIM ME BOY (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
JS (chat) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I tell you, I have done that and used warning templates on IP users, that were the wrong ones! I got a right backlash from some of them! Ha, ha. Anyway, don't worry about it. Andy (talk) 19:50, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
please, take about only the part you think Vandalism, not all. it will be also appreciated, let me know what is Vandalism.thanks -
I am kind of new here, I have a lot to learn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4freedom (talk • contribs) 19:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
To Sidonuke, since you know a lot of things here, if you can let me know how to link the image of john B. alexander, it will be really appreciated. Can I make a hyperlink from other site? please let me know. thanks -
Fuck you.
Fag, I'll kick your fucking teeth in if you revert my shit again.
I wrote that article you dick, check my IP address with the original poster, it comes from the same region where I live, because I MADE IT.
What a dick.
We cant check IPs without an admin with checkuser doing so. Anyways you "The IP" Blanked a "User Talk" so if anything it was vandalism to a talk page and has been reverted. Any other complaints then please do reply. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 23:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
You'll notice the issue in article discussion is the lack of references. The way to fix the article is add references. Stop deleting references so that the article might be fixed so that it does not qualify for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.64.156 (talk) 03:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
If you need to change configuration settings to test things, it's generally better to copy the configuration to the test wiki and change it there, or to override the settings in the code itself, than to change the "production environment", as it were, given that it may affect other users -- Gurch (talk) 14:04, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Alright I did implement in code system to modify variables as needed without editing the page so editing the configs on wiki wont be necessary. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 16:46, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
You reverted an IP a few days ago that claimed to be his brother....as it turns out it really *is* his brother. Bizarre but true, haha.--§hanel23:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
The only word on the Rosie Live discussion page is "Ouch!"
I didn't think it was productive to any discussion but I do concede to your expertise. I now understand that I should not have undone someone else's remark on that particular page. Astroboyretro (talk) 05:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Sidonuke - Help ! :-) I noticed you have been editting the green roofs page. I have an image from the Green Roof referred to in the wikipedia text on Green Roofs in Greece and have been trying to upload it without success . Could you tell me how to do it - My email is [email protected] My Facebook account is Andrew Michael Clements
This subject was written by a Brazilian who does not have a good command of English. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against Brazilians - my wife is Brazilian. However, the English is often ungrammatical and even incomprehensible. My wife and I are trying to clean up an article on a subject we both love - samba. We understand what the writer is attempting to say and want to clean up the article to make it not only authoritative but also well-written. This was acknowledged by an editor who deleted the second graf because its English was so jumbled. Please do not consider that clearly articulating the language, including using proper adjectives (i.e., "icon" for "symbol") constitutes vandalism. I would like to work on this article graf by graf, but if my work will be reverted, what's the point. See if my edits are not an improvement before you delete them. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.23.201 (talk) 17:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Your edits seemed unconstructive at the time. I suggest using edit summaries and adding a
It seems that it may of been him but a level four warning should only be used on repeat vandals. For now I'll keep an eye on the IP and User. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 20:38, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Using a modified huggle to load a custom project configuration. I took the latest source from the google code page and recompiled a modded one. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 13:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm well aware that what I wrote on the NF article is considered vandalism. It was however, in response to previous vandalism on that page which contained racist, homophobic and nationalist slurs in light of the recent events in Manchester.
I WANTED this article to be deleted, I cannot verify proper info, people keep pissing at ME about it, no one is fixing it, abusive users are making life hard for me, and I'm very sick and tired of it.--JustInn014 (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
The process works by tagging an article for deletion using the proper reason then an administrator will review the deletion request and act on it appropriated. (At least in a nutshell that is) --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 05:35, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
I do not think that this article will qualify for speedy deletion, thus it will not be an administrator’s decision. It could qualify for a deletion discussion, in which case, it would be the Wikipedia community that decides, with an administrator making the final decision as to deletion consensus. The process for starting a deletion discussion is outlined at WP:AFD. But, JustInn, I wouldn’t worry about it: Eventually some deletionist will come along and do it for you, if the article truly cries out for deletion. If you don’t want to edit it anymore, just take it off of your watchlist and stop editing it. By the way, I ended up here because I followed the Huggle trail to this discussion. — SpikeToronto05:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
User Until It Sleeps told me that he got a modified version of Huggle from you which adds a Report Mistake to the edit summary. Is it possible for me to obtain the same? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Alright, I'll leave you to it. I reverted because in my personal opinion that it doesn't seem proper. Anyways I'm not reverting your stuff anymore for it. Thanks for the notification. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 03:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Sorry!
Sorry, no one in my household made those vandalistic edits, this punk kid in the neighborhood named Tuan Le stole my IP address by accessing our router and made changes.
213.203.189.130 please read some wiki policies, start with WP:FIVE. I'm simply following policy. If you would like that category added please discuss it with pther editors on the talk page of the article.
In case you didn't get around to actually reading it, the page at Teleforce is a joke. The sources are questionable and half the links are dead, and the article is full of speculative, unverifiable claims and original research. I'm surprised that someone can get that sort of crap past the radar in the first place, let alone that editors will actually work to make sure it stays there. So what can I do to get rid of stagnant, rubbish articles short of dedicating myself to writing an equally expansive new article with which to replace it? The talk page is clearly useless, and cutting out large chunks of the article is branded vandalism regardless of how low the quality of the article is to begin with. I shouldn't have to wait for a power user with some sense to come along and remove content that obviously doesn't belong.--203.206.115.8 (talk) 15:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Ok well, I've looked over it and read it a few times. From what I can see is that your making legitimate edits. I'm sorry to of labeled you incorrectly in this case. I guess I should slow down a bit. Thank you for the notification. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 15:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Writing pot pot bang bang or whatever it was on a page is considered vandalism. Please stop before you are blocked for vandalism. ToxicWasteGrounds20:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Nah I didn't open a sockpuppet investigation. But clearly those 3 accounts where socks. They all got indef blocked and the page got protected. I think its fine now but take it how you like. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 02:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Megafauna
Thanks for the feedback. I've added a more friendly note[1], since my comment about megafauna was obviously lost in the templated message. First Light (talk) 02:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
And I over-used the vandalism template in that case, period, since they were possibly good faith edits, so thanks again. First Light (talk) 03:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Then again, I just went looking to see if there were other critters mis-categorized, and found User talk:125.164.2.93 (same IP range) has been down this road before. But still, better to err next time on the side of assuming good faith. First Light (talk)
I've just come here to say the same thing as the barnstar (actually my talk page) . Award seconded! Ty10:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
PC power management - reverted changes
Hello. You revereted changes with the comment "seems like a link spam". I made contribution to a table with exatly same fields as other 6 or 7 references. If you consider that my contribution is a spam, why did you keep other contribution? Is a free encyclopedia or not? I just added information relevant to the topic using the same pattern as others. So it can't be considered as a spam.
Please be advised that you are enforcing a false positive which had already been reported to Cluebot. The changes I made improved the article significantly by removing out of topic information. Thank you. DrJenkinsPhd (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Just a heads up, I corrected your signature on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tide rolls. The double colons at the beginning of the links to your user page, talk page, and contribs were causing the report to have trouble parsing who had posted it. Considering the double colons aren't even needed to make your signature work, you might want to remove them. (though, really, it doesn't matter)
Your thread on Wikipedia talk:Edit filter has been archived because no one edited it in 20 days. It looks like you haven't edited in about two weeks. If you're just taking a break, I hope you'll be back soon. —Soap—13:11, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
I grabbed the source, and changed what you said for TTTSNB, etc etc... But it crashes in Debug Mode, saying that the drawing of queues had an error. The thing is, I disabled my queues in my personal Huggle.css. Any ideas? AllmightyduckWhat did I do wrong?20:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Ummm that shouldn't happen. More details would be nice... Include the stack trace it gives or a link to a dump file.
Thank you for editing the code of Huggle to prepare it for the new recent changes system, as well as any other improvements you've made. —Soap—20:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Also I would love to help out on huggle and keeping it maintained... If I could get commit access to the google code. I would push my fixes and updates throughout time. If not I can start a new competing huggle <.<. Sidonuke16:10, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Huggle is hosted on Google's code hosting service. Committing requires a Google account; you will need to create one and tell me what it is, by email if you don't want to write it here.
I'm not sure what "custom features" you changed in your version, but don't commit them unless you're confident they work as intended Gurch (talk) 17:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Sidonuke! Are you no longer going to be developing Huggle? I thought you had kind of taken it over when Gurch abandoned it in November. Thanks! — SpikeToronto03:04, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.
For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Hello Zidonuke! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 14:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyeswikimedia.org.
Hello, Zidonuke, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
STiki emergency
Hello! Due to a security update to the wiki software, older versions of STiki are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at Wikipedia:STiki#Download before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see Wikipedia talk:STiki#Errors for a discussion of this issue or to respond to this message. Thank you! 04:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
DiverseMentality 08:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank. I got your message in East Grand Forks Campbell Library I have been vandalizing in University of North Dakota. Thank for you revert or removed. It's me. My name is Ross Degenstein. I used the Wikipedia:Sandbox. How do I know about Wikipedia. My user got blocked 4 months ago. I am attending in Lake Region State College. Good Night! Typewriter #9535
Ross Degenstein (talk) 208.107.123.63 (talk) 03:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
wikimedia.org.
