User talk:Waka Waka
MDNA Tour
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to inform you that "Music Inferno" is not heard during "Turn Up The Radio." "Music Inferno" was used during the Confessions Tour in 2006 that contained elements of "Disco Inferno" and "Where's The Party." The video interlude before that was known as "The Duke Mixes the Hits" which contained excerpts of "Borderline", "Erotica", "Dress You Up", and "Holiday." The video interlude used before "Turn Up the Radio" on the MDNA Tour , however, is known as "Turning Up the Hits" which contains excerpts of "Holiday", "Into The Groove", "Lucky Star", "Like A Virgin", "4 Minutes", "Ray of Light", and "Music." While the interludes are similar, they are different. And whether you saw it in a magazine is regardless. Magazines don't always type factual information. As a result, your edit will be changed. Thank you for your time!
You seem to be missing the point. The altered version of "Music Inferno" as the spanish magazine points out is known as "Turning Up the Hits" which is already on the setlist. Music Inferno and Turning Up the Hits are different. I'm sorry but the magazine you have cited is incorrect. My source has come from the MDNA tourbook. So once again you're edit will be changed. :(
MDNA Tour
[edit]Magazines are not a reliable source, if you cannot find a reliable source then your edit cannot stay. You could be making up the whole thing as there is no proof to your source (I'm not saying you are). Your source is incorrect as the video introduction does not contain "Music Inferno", it only has a partial resemblance to "The Duck Mixes the Hits" which was a intro the former. I suggest you have a good read of these pages: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:Edit warring. Thanks jwad.... blah | blah | blah 08:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
bumchapeu — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.232.175.172 (talk) 01:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Waka Waka. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Waka Waka. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Selzer poll dispute Iowa 2024 election page
[edit]Hi! You have been reverting The passage on the Selzer poll On the Iowa 2024 election article. I do not want to enter an edit war, however, multiple contributors have added to that, and as far as I can tell, you are the only contributor who has a problem with it. I do not intend to discount the validity of your opinion in any way, however there are far better ways, To handle a legitimate difference of opinion. Earlier today, I opened a conversation in the talk page, and I hope that this can be resolved by all contributors to the article there. Losasta (talk) 10:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, No Game No Life, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You added "false" although the source doesn't say it is Doug Weller talk 09:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Manosphere, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Misogyny was correct Doug Weller talk 09:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.