Also: "it is an ideological fantasy to really believe that progress is possible so long as the state of Israel exists [..] The goal of Palestinian resistance is not to establish ‘love’ with those who are responsible for the suffering of the Palestinian people; it is to completely dismantle those forces at play." https://theaggie.org/2018/07/06/students-for-justice-in-palestine-kill-and-expect-love/ Also: "We identify the establishment of the state of Israel as an ongoing project of settler-colonialism that will be stopped only through Palestinian national liberation." https://nycsjp.wordpress.com/points-of-unity/:
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:
Also there are some potential original research out there, and the sections may need to be renamed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tachash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Vegan416!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Toadette(Let's talk together!)13:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I really appreciate your remarks at AE. I myself abstain from ever having recourse to AE on the same principle you expressed. Whatever one's differences with another editor, they can best be resolved by argument on the talk pages. I didn't note there that I for one have often been on the receiving end of ostensibly injurious insults or perfuctionary sneering. I don't react by running to whine in those tribunals. For I think that is just a waste of time, and not proper to grownups. We will probably (if I do continue here) find ourselves at loggerheads, but you certainly meet one of the most important criteria here, you do your homework, that sine qua non which guarantees that disputes can be rationally resolved or negotiated b y editors who accept that there are rules of evidence. Regards Nishidani (talk) 20:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you happen to have access to Hebrew legal data banks/e-libraries? Might need some for a niche use off-wiki, would it be possible to check with you if there is something of interest? FortunateSons (talk) 10:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Vegan416. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Reawakened with this edit on 20 October, shortly after the war started, adding contentious content about the conflict to a BLP.
Received a CTOP alert after several months of ARBPIA editing, resulting in a series of mass minor edits, including repeated changes on articles about numbers. Stopped shortly after clearing 500 edits.
The contributions of this account are certainly interesting. From 29 March 2024, the account has been editing prolifically and almost virtually exclusively in ARBPIA, editing almost every day (perhaps 9 inactive days out of 115 days), with over 1,650 edits. Yet, once the topic ban was applied, the account has gone inactive, possibly a sign of a single-purpose account. starship.paint (RUN)06:02, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to add here this account has been one of several that has been primarily active in Arab/Israeli conflict articles primarily after 07OCT2023 and engaged in rapid gaming once that topic required over 500 edits. On top of this the account has predominantly been active in arbitration discussions as well as gate-keeping many articles on the conflict against other users (such as myself) who did not engage in gaming to gain the extended access (I wasn't aware the articles were within the reach). This isn't the only account that has been doing this for the last few months, in particular abusing extended user access to gatekeep said topics. Galdrack (talk) 14:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
