User talk:Vartan84

Welcome!

Hello, Vartan84, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Arundhati bakshi 18:42, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hi, I relisted an AfD and it looks like you deleted it on today's log.[1]. Would appreciate if you could double check before reverting. Thanks. -- Samir धर्म 03:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need help? What are you trying to AfD and why? I'll show you how to AfD it or Prod it -- Samir धर्म 03:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How to do it

I'd do it for you, but here are the directions. Pretty easy to follow and you can use them for any future AfD's.

Add {{subst:afd1}} to the top of NameHere
The box will have a redlink with "this article's entry" on it. Click that to make the AfD page.
On that page, type {{subst:afd2 | pg=NameHere | text=Reason the page should be deleted}} ~~~~ , and replace Reason the page should be deleted with your reason.
Then go here: [2]
And add {{subst:afd3 | pg=NameHere}} to the bottom of the page.

That's it. -- Samir धर्म 04:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also

You can sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ which adds your name and the date/time -- Samir धर्म 04:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No probs!! Cheers -- Samir धर्म 04:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Laciner

Is it possible you hold a grudge against Laciner because of his edits to the articles Armenian Red Army and New Armenian Resistance Organization, seeing for example your very first edit? If so, nominating him and his organization on AfD is not the way to go about it. --Lambiam ^Talk 01:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vartan84. Please cool down. I asked on your talk page because it was a question directed to you, so that was the obvious and most appropriate spot. If you take even a cursory glance at my contributions, it should be obvious enough to you that I am not Laciner. Yes, I had heard of ISRO. Is that so strange? I read the Journal of Turkish Weekly regularly. Do you think Laciner would have written this article: Grikor Suni? Or this: Initial algebra? I have my own entry on Wikipedia, which I haven't even touched, because I prefer to remain anonymous. I further believe you (and Fadix, who appears to think like you do) are mistaken when you think user Ankaram is the same person. I cannot prove it, but I think s/he is a different person associated with Journal of Turkish Weekly. --Lambiam ^Talk 03:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DON'T BE RACIST - When you search 'Sedat Laciner' in Google you'll see more than 100.000 entries Google Sedat laciner search. Laciner is one of the famous Turkish academicians. Vartan84 is an Armenian user, and he is not happy with Prof. Laciner's studies on Armenian issue. That's why Vartan 84 nominates one of the most famous Turkish researchers for deletion. I do not know who created the page, yet many others contirbuted the page and I am sure many more will do. If Wiki delete this page there are more than 100.000 pages in the Google and racist Vartan and his vandal friends cannot delete all of them. Please be constructive instead of discriminative David Falcon 12:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Visit the following address and understand how much you are a provacatist:Davos YGL Laciner Official Page

100,000 entries...? Well that many does come up, but then when I scroll through them no more than 57 are unique hits! When you click on the "see results from other pages" you see these 100,000 comes from the Turkish Weekly page and page again, which of course is Laciner's publication that he tries to promote through wikipedia. If he had thousands of legitimate entries coming from all over the place, then yes I would say he's famous. But if he look at it realistically he only has about 50, a number which is not hard to accumulate on google especially when you have your own paper.
I am not racist, I have no vandal friends. I nominated him on my own because I felt that such pages on wikipedia were unwarranted and have set out to prove so. Also I think people are taking this Davos thing way out of control. If I get that linked shoved in my face one more time... Anyway based on the constant use of his title of GLOBAL LEADER and his apparant need for a wikipedia page to validate his own greatness, it just looks to me like the Cult of Laciner is one big megalomaniac trip which I think has no place on wikipedia, that's all. There is no racist motives or anything. And what do you mean by I try to censor all the greatest Turkish academicians on wikipedia? I don't think she's an academician, but the only other one I nominated for deletion was Tayyibe, but now that it seems she was a Turkish parliamentarian I'd say she deserves to stay on it. However I first nominated it because instead of talking about that her page merely highlighted her position with Laciner's organization! I think you must agree being the honorary chairman of the Turkish Weekly alone would not gain oneself a place on wikipedia, and that was what I was acting on, not racist motives (whatever that would mean...). Vartan84 15:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

........................................................................

To see someone's contributions, go to their User page or User talk page, and click the link "User contributions" in the toolbox. If you're using the default skin, you'll find that at the left below the search box.

There is a reason for WP:AUTO, which is that most people who write about themselves tend to introduce bias. However, this is a guideline. It is not against policy to write about yourself. What counts in the end is the content of the article, and not how it was produced (except for copyright violations). Bias can be edited away. The fact that person X starts an article about X does by itself not imply that X is not notable. In fact, the notability requirement leaves not only autobiographers but every article creator with a bit of a problem. You must assert notability in the article itself. Otherwise it may be deleted. So to avoid that risk article creators tend to hedge their bets by emphasizing and thereby often exaggerating importance.

I don't know if English is your first language, but if someone writes, for example, "He was nominated candidate for Nobel Prize", it does not necessarily mean "THE (only) candidate" but usually just "A candidate". Some confusion can be prevented by inserting "as a", but I see no reason to assume that it was formulated as it is in order to mislead the reader. Don't forget that in any case the author of the page is not a native English speaker, and the rules for the use of the articles in English are subtle and complicated. I'm sure the intention was not to come accross as ridiculous, as a suggestion of being THE world leader would indeed be.

When people are of sufficient importance to warrant inclusion in Wikipedia, it is often not for a single reason, but for a combination of factors, each of which is insufficient but adding up to a sufficient level. The difficulty of assessing that level objectively has led to all kinds of notability tests. There is no obvious test to apply in this case. Of course, if you think that ISRO/USAK is a totally insignificant institute, then it adds no weight to the importance of its director. And if you believe that all these books are self-published, well, then of course you reach such conclusions. But here is for example some outside evidence: amazon.co.uk, Antoloji.com (unless you thing the Antoloji.Com website is also being run by Laciner), Online-Katalog Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Halle (fill in Laciner to the left of "Suchen" and press "Suchen"; 5 of the 7 returned are from Sedat bey).

I'm sure the Ararat book was not a bestseller, but I don't think you can hold it against Laciner that Ararat is not Atom Egoyan's best film (not only in my opinion: [3] [4] [5]) and had only limited release. I'm afraid that your problem is that you have reached some conclusion, and now you can only see things in a way that supports that conclusion. No-one has claimed that Laciner is "world renowned". But you do not need to be "world renowned" to be in Wikipedia. The only claim made is that he is famous in Turkey. Unless you have proof that User:David Falcon is Laciner or an associate, you should not produce accusations such as that this is "proof" of a view of self-importance. It's not a big deal anyway. If you appear regularly on TV in Turkey, well, then you become well known in Turkey, which is all the article states. The main meaning of "famous" is: "widely known".

I don't think you can hold what this person wrote here above against Laciner. Of course I don't expect most Wikipedians to have heard of ISRO/USAK, but I assume that those who participate in the debate do so after having read the article (as per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#How to discuss an AfD/Wikietiquette), so then they would have encountered this. We need not examine Laciner's motives. All we need to examine is the articles themselves.

So if you are willing to believe that this organziation really exists (as it does; they employ a couple dozen people), that it is not "world renowned" but has a certain respectability, publishing several peer-reviewed journals and producing "think tank" reports that are read by policy-makers, it gives some weight to its director. And if he then is well known in Turkey, has written several books, not best sellers, but several published by independent publishing companies like ASAM Yayinlari[6] and Kaknüs Yayinlari[7], and teaches at not Turkey's most prestigious, but still a respectable university, and if he has been not the only, but one of only a few hundred people out of 6 billion inhabitants of this planet to have been selected as A "Young World Leader", doesn't it add up to something? --Lambiam ^Talk 03:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vartan

Just wanted to say hi and it's nice to see another Armenian user on here. We also have an Armenian Sisters Academy in California, I didn't know there was one in Pennsylvania. You learn something new every day. Hakob 18:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barev Vartan

Please feel free to ask any questions you might have about Wikipedia and also consider joining WP:AM.--Eupator 02:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sedat Laciner

Hi,

I agree in you reasoning for deleting this autobiography. However, I noticed that you didnt cast your own vote. Assume you forgot. Bertilvidet 06:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking that since I nominated it for deletion my view is clear and that nominators don't have to leave those "delete" comments. Vartan84 21:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi,

Can you please check out this comment? Thanks. —Khoikhoi 22:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Links to your blog

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've just removed another spamvertisement for your weblog from Greg Packer. You've been asked before, if you persist you may be blocked with no further warning. The "iLoser" text was removed from the image, too, per WP:BLP concerns. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 15:44, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RCAB

Believe it or not, it's not my blog. Promotion or not aside, why can't the picture remain on the site? Vartan84 15:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because of the iLoser spamvertisement bit. I think the picture adds nothing to the article (Wikipedia is WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of links and pictures) and is meant to be promotional for your website, but that's a content issue that would need to be resolved independently of administrative action. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 15:49, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:ILoserRCAB.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ILoserRCAB.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ASAEmblem.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:ASAEmblem.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nepotism cat

Please consider more efficient uses of categories in the future. There were 200 cardinal-nephews, 80 of whom we have articles for. They are all so categorized. Rather than adding the Nepotism cat to each of these articles, instead add it to the cardinal-nephew category. This is more useful on both ends. I have already done so. Please add the nepotism cat to no more members of this cat. Savidan 03:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Napoléon Joseph Charles Paul Bonaparte, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 07:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This source says nothing about a Napoléon Louis Joseph Jérôme. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 00:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying that, and sorry I didnt see it the first time. I think we should create Napoléon Louis Joseph Jérôme to record more information about this person. I'm willing to help to repay you for the annoyance caused earlier! John Vandenberg ^(chat) 02:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the picture? Before we can use a picture, we need to figure out its copyright status. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 03:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Sorry if I am being extra strict, but this article will soon be nominated for Good Article status and everything must be sourced using reliable sources. Blogs and websites like that will not due. What I am basically looking for, is a source for the claim of the territory by Azerbaijan. It does not have to relate to Eurovision, just the controversy in general. There is already a source for the monuments relevance and appearance in ESC. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Succession box

Take a look and tell me if that's the correct information. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is great, thank you for that random act of kindness! I am attempting to gather as much information on the Armenian pontiffs as I can. Vartan84 (talk) 14:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure - thank you for bringing much-needed coverage to an area that doesn't get the attention it deserves. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Vartan84! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Jacob I the Learned - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ARE YOU JOKING DASHBot?! Jacob I the Learned is an Armenian Catholicos from the 13th century!! Vartan84 (talk) 21:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArtistManuelAzadigianPortrait.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:ArtistManuelAzadigianPortrait.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (talk) 01:28, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArtistManuelAzadigianPortrait.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:ArtistManuelAzadigianPortrait.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (talk) 02:32, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:AzadigianPaintingHazelDawn.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AzadigianPaintingHazelDawn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:ArtistManuelAzadigianPortrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ArtistManuelAzadigianPortrait.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Manuel Azadigian Portrait.jpg

Hello, Vartan84. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Manuel Azadigian Portrait.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to [email protected]. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to [email protected] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to [email protected] and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]