User talk:Uspn
So, what say you?
New Photo Matching Service
[edit]Hi there,
I'm contacting you because you listed yourself at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Photographers. You might be interested in a new wikiproject page that lists photographers and articles that need photos by location. The page is located at Wikipedia:Photo Matching Service or WP:PMS GabrielF 00:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Use of the minor edit tag
[edit]I wanted to let you know that you are overusing the minor edit tag. It should only be used for minor changes such as spelling and grammar which do not alter meaning or content. Your edits were fine. I just wanted to let you know the tag has a very restricted scope. Novangelis (talk) 16:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Chichén Itzá
[edit]I can see the value of showing the unrestored side, but now I'm curious, what do you mean by with more height/visibility? --Dschwen 22:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Istanbul Sea Buses Logo.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Istanbul Sea Buses Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Included image in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/İDO , so that it is no longer an orphan.uspn (talk) 15:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Aerial photo for Atatürk Olympic Stadium
[edit]Atatürk_Olympic_Stadium I added a comment for the article, I agree and think you should re-add your photo Edw400 (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Photos
[edit]Just dropped by to say you take some good photos. Thanks for improving Wikipedia with them :) Arsenikk (talk) 21:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! It's nice to be of some use. #8D) uspn (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Hello. This is a personal message to you so you can delete this after you read it. You removed my section on akh tamar island. That was my first attemp to write that part thats why it was not looking good that time. I checked your photo blog. Since you went to the Eastern part of the Turkey maybe it will be very interesting to you learn much more about the history of eastern Anatolia. First you can check the Norwegian state archive since I think you are from Norway. http://www.arkivverket.no/webfelles/armenia/bodil.html she was a norwegian missionary and she was there when Armenian genocide took place. There are many good photos and her stories.
Secondly I see that you took a picture of the church of apostoles at Kars. That church converted to a mosque. But the story of that church is not finished here. When the Turkish government converted the church to a mosque the whole interior of the church was destroyed. All of the reliefs and incredible paintings. Several years ago when a tourist convoy from Armenia visited Turkey they wanted to pray inside the church but the authorities did not allow them and told them that this is a Turkish mosque you are not allowed here. Apart from that church you called the statue which is a little bit away from the church as an ugly sculpture. Do you know the intention of that sculpture ? That statue built by Mehmet Aksoy. He is a Turkish sculptor. The statue is not finished yet. The main theme of this sculpture is to apologize Armenians because of the genocide took place around 1915. There are two humans in the statue. One of them is looking down with guilt and the other one is reaching out his hand to him and forgiving him. This statue is so big that it can be seen from the Armenian side also. But guesss what ? The Turkish government decided to demolish that statue with no reason. The demolision decision was made last month. The statue will be demolished like the Taliban demolished Buda status. Mehmet Aksoy is one of the brave artists in Turkey who is not afraid of the government. http://asbarez.com/92769/kars-municipality-votes-to-demolish-friendship-statue/
Ali55te (talk) 23:11, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
|
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
| Thanks for replacing my blurry old image from a garden with a nicer one from the plant's natural habitat. Thanks also for all the image improvements you've been making. --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:25, 19 November 2011 (UTC) |
- My pleasure. #8D) uspn (talk) 16:42, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Romanesque architecture and San Gimignano
[edit]- When choosing images that are going into a gallery within an article, I spend hours sifting through pics, in order to find groups of pictures that look well together. The considerations are colour, lighting, sky, scale, angle etc etc. The chosen picture of San Gimignano sat well in the gallery in which it was placed. Your replacement image did not.
- I have reverted your changes to spelling in the San Gimignano article. Please don't change consistently English spelling to US spelling. In English verbs that end with a single consonant, the consonant is doubled before "ed" and "ing".
- I retained the corrections that you made
- I also retained the lead pic, but you need to be aware that although the foreground in that picture is sharp, it is not the true subject of the picture. If one wishes to illustrate the town itself, then it is preferable to have the buildings in better focus than the foreground. It's a good shot, of a town within a landscape, but the subject is essentially "Landscape with Hill Town", rather than "San Gimignano".
- With regards to the deletion of the quote, as a major art contributor, I am going to keep on saying this:
- The Wikipedia Manual of Style is not set in cement.
- In every category of object, there are some which require superlatives, or descriptions which, in lesser cases, would be considered overstated or, in Wikipedia terms, PEACOCK.
- For example: When describing the planet Jupiter, it is reasonable to use the superlative "largest". It would be inadequate to describe it as "a large planet in our solar system", since it is beyond doubt the largest.
- Among painters, it is quite unnecessary to say "Ghirlandaio was a famous painter of the 15th century". It is sufficient to say that he was a painter. On the other hand, it is necessary to say that "Leonardo da Vinci is the most famous painter of the 15th century. His fame became a phenomena within his own lifetime and has lasted unabated until the 21st century." The fame of Leonardo outstrips that of every other artist that has ever existed, even Michelangelo.
- Other subjects which fit into the "superlative category" for different reasons include: the Taj Mahal, La Sagrada Familia, Marilyn Monroe, Mahatma Ghandi, Hitler, the Mona Lisa, Michelangelo's David, Cleopatra, William Shakespeare, "Harry Potter".
- One of the ways of effectively describing a "unique" subject in Wikipedia terms is to use an apt quotation. Hence that quotation which tries to sum up in a single word the effect of that amazing town as one drives towards it.
Amandajm (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. I think that the photo you chose is just fine as the lead pic in that article. It gives a good impression of the way the town looks as you approach it.
- Thanks also for your comments about other hill towns. I must say I am very envious of your walk! Was it a pilgrimage?
- As for "unforgettable"..... well it sounds as if your whole experience must have been "unforgettable"..... and perhaps some of the towns were more "unforgettable" in other ways.
- I found San Gimignano wonderfully welcoming in 1981 and 1992. By the time I took my youngest son there in 2003 it had become much more tourist oriented and the people were beginning to take on the more cynical attitude found at other tourist venues. 1992 was, however, totally unforgettable! See: San Gimignano Red
- Re the gallery pics, I actually spend a lot of time cropping, straightening and sometimes adjusting the tone of the sky to make galleries that look good as a group.
- I continually come up against the problem of knowing exactly what building I want to illustrate and not being able to find a picture, or else having only a picture that is out of focus or has the dreaded white truck in front of the doorway.
- Amandajm (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Willemstad
[edit]I have reverted your edits because first of all, I did not messed up the climate data. The previous one is from a low quality source while the one that I added is from a better source since it is data from the national meteorological service for this region. Furthermore all of the language links are provided by Wikidata so it is not necessary to put in all those language links.Ssbbplayer (talk) 20:26, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, I don't know what happened, but the climate table that was on the page when I visited it earlier today just did not render properly on my screen, so I went back and reverted to a version that looked all right. It seems okay now, though, so if you say that these data are better, you are probably right. I'm sorry about the confusion and extra work I gave you. The language links were there before, and not originally added by me. uspn (talk) 20:35, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Sumela From Across Valley.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 01:23, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
|
 |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Mansudae-Monument-Bow-2014.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 00:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Hi. When you created the page Mansu Hill Grand Monument you wrote "Following the death of Kim Jong-il, a similar statue of him was erected on the north side of Kim Il-sung. At the same time, Kim Il-sung's statue was changed quite a bit. A new set of clothes was added and his facial expression modified somewhat." Do you have any reference for that? Or is the difference based on your own personal observation? I have searched widely to try and find a usable source. Thanks. Bangabandhu (talk) 15:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- It's right there on Wikipedia. :) See this photo montage where the differences are evident: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0e/Laika_ac_Mansu_Hill_Changes_(11976484824).jpg
- uspn (talk) 16:51, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Uspn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
upcoming POTD
[edit]Greetings!
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Sumela From Across Valley.JPG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 25, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-01-25. —howcheng {chat} 21:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)