User talk:Ultracapacity

Welcome!

Hello, Ultracapacity, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 02:45, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ultracapacity, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ultracapacity! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POV editing

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GBR and Rishi Sunak articles

Hey Ultracapacity.

Please make yourself aware of Wikipedia policies such as WP:PEACOCK and WP:NPOV. Your edits to the above articles inserted biased commentary and uncited claims, both of which run foul of how we do things here. Many thanks. doktorb _words^deeds 22:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Modussiccandi (talk) 09:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Humanists and Non-Religious in Defence

Hello, Ultracapacity,

Thank you for creating Humanists and Non-Religious in Defence.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for contributing. However, this article contains no references to verifiable sources: ie substantial coverage of HAND in reliable, independent publications or other media. It also appears that content may have been copied from affiliated sources ("unsung family members who support us in the background" is just one example), so may breach copyright guidelines in Wikipedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 14:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Humanists and Non-Religious in Defence moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Humanists and Non-Religious in Defence, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 14:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Humanists and Non-Religious in Defence (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Humanists and Non-Religious in Defence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Humanists and Non-Religious in Defence

Hello, Ultracapacity. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Humanists and Non-Religious in Defence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Humanist and Non-Religious in Defence.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Humanist and Non-Religious in Defence.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Humanists and Non-Religious in Defence

Hello, Ultracapacity. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Humanists and Non-Religious in Defence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]