User talk:Turaids

Hello, Turaids! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 22:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

The King's Ring

Hello, regarding your latest edit to The King's Ring article, please read WP:USERG. ^Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\^Work 11:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Mėnuo Juodaragis

I have restored Mėnuo Juodaragis and moved it to draft:Mėnuo Juodaragis. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! I will fix up the article. –Turaids (talk) 22:33, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Ethnicity

According to WP:ETHNICITY, we're not supposed to include a person's ethnicity in the lead section "unless it is relevant to the subject's notability". That's why I removed that info about Diāna Ņikitina. But please add the information to the Personal life section if there's a reliable source about this. I have not seen her confirm her ethnicity but I don't know Latvian or Russian. Thanks! Hergilei (talk) 14:30, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otava Yo has been accepted

Otava Yo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Renata (talk) 18:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Sounds of Angkor photos

Hi, I noticed you have been adding photos from the Sounds of Angkor exhibits. I wanted to thank you. I have wanted to visit Cambodia for some time now, with musical instruments as my fascination. I wonder if you had the chance to meet Patrick Kersale while you were there. I understand he has much to do with the exhibits and runs the Sounds of Angkor website. Thanks again and best wishes, Jacqke (talk) 15:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, nice to hear from a fellow musical instrument enthusiast! I wish I could have met Patrick Kersale, but unfortunately, it was just a quick stop at Тheam's, even though I spent most of my time in the room with musical instruments. It's truly fascinating how one man can have such an impact on restoring the musical legacy of a country. –Turaids (talk) 14:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Unexplained reverts

I reverted your edit to Bánh mì as non-constructive. Edit summaries are not required when reverting vandalism. Your edit summary was a link to someone's social media profile and your changes removed List of sandwiches from the See Also and replaced it with a red link to Num pang (already discussed in the article as the Cambodian term). Spudlace (talk) 06:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Would be a good idea to read WP:VANDAL before referring to an edit of more than a decade-long veteran as "vandalism". Littering the "See also" section with general lists is debatable and not necessarily a common practice. There's already a sandwich template at the bottom of the article. The claim that Cambodian num pang and Laotian khao chī are a derivative of Vietnamese banh mi is questionable and definitely not proven by a vague and passing mention in a newspaper article. And reverting just because the edit summary contains "a link to someone's social media profile" is a pretty absurd reason for reverting anything. –Turaids (talk) 16:32, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Institute of Kimchi has been accepted

World Institute of Kimchi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:38, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

no edit summary?

Hey, there was no edit summary with this edit, and it doesn't look like a better image to me. What was your reasoning? —valereee (talk) 22:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Resolution-wise, yes, but the previous image was a bad representation of fish amok, because a proper fish amok should have a mousse-like consistency, not a soupy mess. –Turaids (talk) 22:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Russian language in Latvia

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Russian language in Latvia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 23:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Russian language in Latvia

The article Russian language in Latvia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Russian language in Latvia for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 10:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Russian language in Latvia

The article Russian language in Latvia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Russian language in Latvia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 08:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Firestar464 (talk) 09:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

March 25

Hi! I reverted your edit on March 25 as any changes or additions to days of the year pages now require citations and any that aren't are being reverted, please see WP:DOYCITE. The guidelines were changed due to the high number of errors and the number of links to articles with no or little reliable sources. Any names or events added before these guidelines were implemented are currently in the process of being referenced or removed. If you'd like to find it more, please see WP:DAYS. Suonii180 (talk) 11:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lithuanian ethnomusicologists

A tag has been placed on Category:Lithuanian ethnomusicologists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Kampong Speu palm wine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kampong Speu palm wine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:30, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Zinkevičius revert

You said: that what most of you've written should be discarded instead as a non-neutral duplicate, first of all the duplicate is the part copied by @Cukrakalnis to the section of "Reception and legacy" from "Anti-polonism", my input is primary. Secondly, it was he who introduced the non-neutral elements such as Jundo-Kaliszewska simultaneously denied the existence of polonized Lithuanians and forced polonization in Lithuania's past (she never did that, which I explained in the discussion) or However, the Polish linguist Mirosław Jankowiak concluded that most self-declared Poles in the Vilnius Region actually spoke Belarusian simple speech instead of Polish., he never said that. He said, which is true, and nobody denies that, including me, that many Polish people in Lithuania speaks Belarusian dialect or Polish-Belarusian mix, Polish-Lithunian mix, many also speaks Russian etc. But they also speak Polish, qoute from the interview with him: Do you talk differently in different places in the Vilnius Region? Yes. In Podbrodzie or Niemenczyn people talk more in Polish. The Polish language is also dominant in Święciany, but Lithuanian is also used there. On the other hand, Dziewieniszki and the areas near the border with Belarus are more Belarusian. The second important factor shaping identity is education. People who went to a Polish school before the war feel more Polish and there will be more polonisms in their simple speech.

But that's not what this is about. Zinkevičius was one of many Lithuanian nationalist politicians who deprived Poles in Lithuania of the right to self-identification and education in Polish. It was based on pseudoscientific theories. This does not mean that everything about them was false, it is clear that the ancestors of most Poles living in Lithuania were Lithuanians or Belarusians. Many, however, came from Poland, from Latvia, from everywhere. But today they have a different self-identification. And this is not the result of "forced" polonization, because Lithuania was under Soviet rule for half a century, where polonization was not carried out. The only period where such a thing took place was the interwar period, but then the Lithuanian community was exceptionally resistant to attempts at Polonization, besides it was a short period of 18 years. Zinkevičius, on the other hand, used his reputation as an undoubtedly outstanding linguist to create theories such as that every Pole with a surname ending in "wicz" is Lithuanian, or that the Polish language in Lithuania is not Polish, but something completely different. Which is nonsense, because most Poles in Lithuania speak beautiful Polish, a northern borderland dialect. These theories are nonsense, because, for example, Vytautas Landsbergis has a German surname, according to Zinkevičius's theory he has no right to be called Lithuanian and to be educated in Lithuanian. Marcelus (talk) 12:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Spare your lengthy ramblings. You twisted my words to continue your disruptive editing with a still open report on you. –Turaids (talk) 12:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Turaids Ok, I'm done with you, seems you have personal grudge against me at this point. I just want let you to know that I will not allow you to remove, factual sourced material from Wikipedia Marcelus (talk) 14:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Hopefully, you'll be blocked from editing that and other articles where you can't keep your personal biases in check and adhere to Wikipedia rules. –Turaids (talk) 14:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Yet you failed to point out which Wikipedia rules I have broken. As I said that's a personal grudge against me. As seen here: User_talk:Cukrakalnis#Marcelus Marcelus (talk) 15:11, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

I already did it multiple times (WP:SYNTH) and even gave you concrete examples, yet was almost always met with WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, the last paragraph of which describes you perfectly. Now, stop harassing me! –Turaids (talk) 15:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@Turaids I'm not harassing you, we are just talking. You need to point out which exact sentence is against WP:SYNTH. You both pointed out that the first sentence was problematic, and I reworded it. Which one also have issues? Is the section title problematic? So once again, please indicate a name that would be acceptable. Would "anti-Polish sentiment" be better? Marcelus (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

You may be talking, but for me, it's like I'm talking to a wall. –Turaids (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean Marcelus (talk) 16:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Can We Collaborate?

Hello @Turaids: I want to introduce myself and to say I appreciate that you didn’t delete my unsourced edits while I collect references. I see on your talk page you are involved in a few constructive articles about Cambodian culture and I’m truly grateful that you are a seasoned editor and here to help build knowledge on WP. I think we can agree that we have created a certain narrative about each other which I want to dispel. Going forward, I will have good faith in your edits and I hope you will do the same with mine.

My initial edits may have appeared that I was “correcting wrongs” and “having grievances”. Slightly true, but going through the rabbit hole of learning by following the style of other editors gave me false impressions about what is acceptable. I was learning by following; being “Bold” as suggested for new editors and breaking a few eggs. I assumed WP was social media but now I see it’s more analogous to my industry and I can put my objective hat on, however, we are all still human and come with our own experiences that shape our views. If we can both recognze this, I hope we can work together to reach a common ground.

I want to clarify that Cambodians are indigenous people and the false narrative of us being “Cambodian Nationalists” or “nationalistic” fed to foreign media is a potent way to vilify our advocacy to maintain our existence. Our culture is one of the oldest and carries knowledge on how we protect our ecosystem with many biomes. That’s why we have no need to stake claims on other cultures or prove our culture in media. We have no need to falsify or skew our narrative, because our belief is that the truth will always come out whether it takes a year or decades. My goal is to collect the many “puzzles” that international scholars have built for us and piece them together for our younger generation.

I hope to gain more knowledge from your perspective on Cambodian culture as it is as valuable as my own. Debate is expected and you are probably disagreeing with what I’ve written, but I hope our goals are the same as WP editors and that we can be great collaborators.

If you agree, can it be royal consort? Cerie1914 (talk) 22:22, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Susadei, and thank you for your introduction, @Cerie1914:! I have to admit that my contribution has mostly been limited to Cambodian cuisine, creating articles about its chefs (Luu Meng, Nite Yun, Joannès Rivière, the Kimsan Twins and Seng Sothea), businesses (Malis, Sala Baï Hotel and Restaurant School and Samai Distillery), specialties (Mondulkiri wild honey, Kampot sea salt) and expanding existing articles, including the general article about Cambodian cuisine, which I've been continously working on since 2021.

Let's work together towards making Wikipedia a truly informative place about Cambodian cuisine, which means including both the favorable and not-so-favorable aspects. Things in the world are rarely black and white and none of us have been there 300 or 500 years ago to claim the truth, so it can only be theoreticized on the limited information available. If there are reliable sources saying how Khmer cuisine has influenced Thai or Vietnamese cuisine they should be included just like the reliable sources saying how afterwards Khmer/Cambodian cuisine was also influenced by Thai or Vietnamese cuisine.

I've met numerous wonderful Cambodians during my many months in Cambodia, but Cambodia has nationalists just like any other country. That being said, I've also had the pejorative "Khmer nationalist" directed at me on more than one occasion by some Thai and Vietnamese editors similarly offended by what some of the sources I've used say. Sonner or later you'll also encounter Thai and Vietnamese editors, so my hope is that even while disagreeing on many things with them you will still be able to have the same common ground of Wikipedia rules and principles.

As for the royal consort, it should be specified that they are female royal consorts, because the article defines them as "a person of either sex", while the source only speaks of women participating in the preparation of Khmer royal desserts. Other than that I have no objections, but I would prefer to have an third party be involved in it, so I can devote my time elsewhere. –Turaids (talk) 22:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kampong Speu palm wine

Hello, Turaids. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kampong Speu palm wine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Saraman curry

Hi Turaids!

Many thanks for the improvements on the Khmer royal cuisine and the saraman curry. I opened a discussion about the correct spelling of saraman curry, you might want to take a look. Pierrevang2 (talk) 19:37, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Turaids. Thank you for your work on Chanang. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Journal of Historical Review

You should know that your dear friend Egilus is now promoting the Nazi Journal of Historical Review in the Diary of Anne Frank article and said "Wikipedia and its editors should be neutral and show different point of views." to justify promoting the journal as a source. I ask that you as a fluent latvian speaker have a heart-to-heart conversation with him about way Nazi periodicals are bad and that promoting Nazi propaganda is not ok even if it is the name of so-called "neutrality"--QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 23:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Seeing that the only non-Latvian editor (Phil Bridger) who even engaged you on that claim concluded that, The sentence that that citation is used as one of three references for is "Although many Holocaust deniers, such as Robert Faurisson, have claimed that Anne Frank's diary was fabricated, critical and forensic studies of the text and the original manuscript have supported its authenticity." I don't see much wrong with that. I cannot help but to conclude that you've made a mountain out of a molehill yet again. Just like everyone else, I'm not getting involved in your personal campaigns against other editors. If you're still completely bought in everything you say about the "powerful" "fascist" Egilus and the Latvian Wikipedia "hijacked by Nazi sympathizers", you should really take it to the Wikimedia Foundation and see where it takes you, but as ActivelyDisinterested said, you need to show with evidence that what you say is true. So far you've made a lot of noise with very little actual substance. –Turaids (talk) 20:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kampong Speu palm wine

Hello, Turaids. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kampong Speu palm wine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

"Samlor mcheu" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Samlor mcheu has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § Samlor mcheu until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Turaids. Thank you for your work on Kampot Pepper Crab. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Please accept my thanks

I am writing this to express my graceful appreciation for your dedication time and help of recent cleaning up the article Songkran. Now it looks perfect!. Lately I faced the conflicts with personal-attack editor, Pierrevang3 made me fill sick of Wikipedia social. Please accept my deepest thanks. Quantplinus (talk) 10:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! To be fair, I don't think some of your responses like "Just keep rolling your eyes maybe you'll find the brain back there." were very appropriate either, but I'm glad my proposal reached consensus from both sides. The article still has a lot of problems as indicated by the maintenance templates, so hopefully more editors will work on it. As for Pierrevang3, I did warn him about the potential undeclared use of multiple accounts almost half a year ago, so his block is disappointing. but not too surprising. Hope you have a nice day and best of luck with your work! –Turaids (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cambodian Chinese cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chili.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fios de ovos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garnish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)