User talk:ThecentreCZ

A parliament diagram for you

I enjoyed the beer so much, I thought I'd make you a parliament diagram. --Slashme (talk) 11:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Communist Party of Czechoslovakia

It's a pleasure. :) Recently I'm working on the symbols from Eastern Bloc on Wikimedia Commons. By the way you may also find this interesting if you're interested in anthems [1]. --Ericmetro (talk) 09:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about the lyrics, but I'm able to identify most current/historical national anthems by melody, except for several African countries. I used contributed to that forum a lot, and collected over 20 GB recordings of anthems with the help of the forum. :) --Ericmetro (talk) 03:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sundostund

Hi, ThecentreCZ. I'm very glad to hear that I'm your favorite wikipedist, its always nice when other people appreciate your work... As for DPRK, what can I say except - its my opinion. Others may or may not agree with it, whatever they wish. Anyway, many of my political views are considered as, lets say, "unusual" by other people. I'm not bothered with it at all. I know there will always be people who will agree with me, as well as those who will disagree. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 13:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I just added your newly-created userbox supporting the reunification of Czechoslovakia to my userpage. I completely support that reunification, and I truly hope we'll see it in the near future. --Sundostund (talk) 22:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we misunderstood each other about North Korea. I didn't changed my mind about its regime, I still support it and I don't consider it to be "fascist and anticommunist"... As for reunification of Czechoslovakia, I strongly support it, in the same way as reunification of Yugoslavia. If Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia are reunified, and connected via the Czech Corridor, that would be 1000% success not only for our nations, but for the whole Slavic world. Anyway, we'll see what future brings for all of us. --Sundostund (talk) 13:07, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hey, Slavs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slovak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ThecentreCZ. You have new messages at This lousy T-shirt's talk page.
Message added 13:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 13:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ThecentreCZ. You have new messages at Walter Görlitz's talk page.
Message added 04:11, 12 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:11, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ThecentreCZ. You have new messages at Walter Görlitz's talk page.
Message added 11:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Walter Görlitz (talk) 11:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jsem Moravan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moravian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hi

Very nice my friend! :) I remembered once there was a discussion on the national anthems forum ([2]), and the word you selected matches one of the choice. By the way with a proxy software, Facebook will be accessible even when blocked here. :) I created a symbol of Socialistický svaz mládeže (File:Emblem of Socialist Youth Union of Czechoslovakia.svg), later on I'll create an article of SSM on Chinese Wikipedia.--Ericmetro (talk) 07:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tomáš Hudeček

Hi, I see you removed the more sources request on the Tomáš Hudeček page. As he is a living person and the article only has one source, at least one more should be provided before the tag is removed again. Thanks, C 679 19:27, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to People's Militias (Czechoslovakia) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''People's Militias''' (in [[Slovak language|Slovak]] ''Ľudové milície'', in [[Czech language|Czech]] ''Lidové milice'',

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coat of arms of Prague, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czechoslovak Republic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:14, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 1 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of anthems of non-sovereign countries, regions and territories page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In re: "This account was marked by the Central Intelligence Agency"

Why are you making these edits ([3] [4]), and why are you signing your name as "The United States of America and their allies?" I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 03:58, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that was fast, I just finished watching Homeland, and right away i found really disconcerting edits and uploads like: File:Anthem of Islamic State.ogg

Best regards,
--ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Just for convenience, I'm going to move your reply on my talk page back to here so our conversation is easier to follow.) So, let me be clear: these fake tags are inappropriate, regardless of the editor's behavior. I get that you are making a joke, but it's unnecessary to call further attention to this editor (or yourself). Also, even though it seems like it's OK to poke fun at blocked editors, there's no reason to be disrespectful like this, so I'll ask you to refrain from leaving these kinds of messages on blocked editors' pages. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 06:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of "location" in "infobox television"

Hi ThecentreCZ. I've been watching The Walking Dead (TV series) article and have noticed that you keep trying to add "Virginia" to the infobox. The "Location(s)" parameter for Template:Infobox television is production-specific and refers to the "production location, i.e. where the show is/was shot." The parameter is not for the location where the story takes place. This is why your edits keep getting reverted by Drovethrughosts. You need to show that there is a reliable source which clearly states that the series has been or will be shot in Virginia. If you find such a source, just (1) add it in support of the "Virginia" to the infobox, OR (2) add a sentence (or two) citing the source to The Walking Dead (TV series)#Development. If you're not sure how to phrase this additional information, just be bold and add it to the article. Other editors will see the source and clean up the phrasing as needed.

Finally, for what it's worth, sometimes the meanings of template parameters can be a little confusing. I personally try to check a template's documentation page before adding any parameters just to be sure I'm using them right. Hope that helps. - Marchjuly (talk) 00:57, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Díky za baklava!

Jsem velmi vděčný za dar --SuomynonA666 (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aabhar.jpg

Your edit adding the copyrighted Canadian coat of arms was a copyright violation

Please look at the image you were adding. It clearly indicates that the coat is copyrighted and no fair use rationale can be added for this article. Sorry. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of the "F" word

Sorry to bother you but in your explanation, you typed in "I AM f**king awesome" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_national_anthems&diff=prev&oldid=624711664 Due to the use of the "F" word, you are violating the WP:F*** policy. Please don't use it unless it is in a encyclopedic manner. Thanks. 174.113.217.132 (talk) 16:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious. --Troopersho (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Bulgaria national football team, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dawn - National Coalition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-Islam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of Severočeši.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo of Severočeši.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC) -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about your edits at WP:AN3

Please see this report at the edit warring noticeboard. Aparently nobody notified you, but the report has now been closed with semiprotection by User:Ymblanter. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Czech football logos

Hi, thanks for the upload of the FC Slovan Havlíčkův Brod logo. Are you able to add any for the following clubs?

Any uploads would be appreciated. Thanks, C 679 18:57, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 27 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Haló noviny page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Syria

plus,there is a civil war in the country,so the flag are put in order to represent each side of the war.plus resort to discussion instead of edit warring.Alhanuty (talk) 22:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 4 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Assume bad faith

Please watch the tone of your edit summaries. Edit summaries such as this are contrived personal attacks. You haven't much experience as an editor as yet, so I'll put it down to your needing to get a grasp on the learning curve. If, however, you continue to add your personal, acerbic commentary as edit summaries in lieu of informative and civil summaries, it will not bode well for you. Note, also, that you should be using edit summaries as a rule, not as an exception when you have some sort of crass comment to make. Thank you for your attention. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:50, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks please

Hello, I'm Marchjuly. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Андрей Погадаев that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Iryna Harpy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing.
Note that this kind of editing behaviour is unacceptable. It seems that you've been warned by other editors about personal attacks. I'd suggest that you actually start paying attention to policy and following it. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Maybe can be classified as guiltive. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 20:25, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Czechs.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Concus Cretus (talk) 12:18, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ThecentreCZ. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sobotka

It's not my consensus, it is policy. As is WP:CIVIL. Therequiembellishere (talk) 20:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikiproject!

Hello, ThecentreCZ! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 03:21, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Concus Cretus, you may be blocked from editing. --Concus Cretus (talk) 05:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Calm damn blbečku, you are the one who is vandalizing. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Concus Cretus may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette.
Please don't be a hot head. Note that you are further aggravating the situation by name calling. Please read WP:GOAD. Iryna Harpy (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Patriotic Movement for the Republic

added links pointing to Orange and Centre

Christian Historical Union

added a link pointing to Dark blue

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

L'SNS

It's nice that you thank me for my edits at Kotleba – People's Party Our Slovakia, but it would help more if you joined the discussion on the talk page, particularly since I expect you are more familiar with the situation in Slovakia than me and better able to evaluate sources written in Czech (or is it Slovak? I assume it's mutually intelligible). Huon (talk) 19:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Well, there is no more realiable source than CBS or Financial Times on the planet and local news are easily to blast. So I think they just will keep reverting, that have no substantiation unfortunately. We would have to call for some WP:Requests for page protection and that will be complicated :D --ThecentreCZ (talk) 19:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bohuslav Sobotka

Absolutely arrogant and immature !! Who are you to question my intelligence as well as to insult me and disrespect me in this way? Assume that your action will be communicated to the Wikipedia disciplinary authority. To finish, in Spain we have just received news of the resignation en bloc of the Czech Government. You may not have heard, but I have. Official sources, safe, and especially by people whose intellectual preparation and profession guarantees us respect and education, which you do not. A greeting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsoriano97 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alsoriano97: If you are editing Wikipedia you should know at least basic information about topic you are editing. If PM of Spain Rajoy resign he is still remaining Prime Minister until new PM is inaugured. That is like that in every country on the WORLD. And even if you would change this global rule as El Presidente of the World Sobotka even yet haven't give official resignation just stated that to the media. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kramář's Villa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jan Fischer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Residence

If Kramář's Villa wasn't the residence of Czechoslovak PM, where it was located? I suppose there was some sort of official residence in Prague... Do you know something more about it? --Sundostund (talk) 18:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundostund: Not sure about this. I know that current Prime Minister have residence in Kramář's Villa since 1998 and his office is in Straka Academy, which is residence of government since 1939, 1939-1945 (Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia), 1945-1992 (Czechoslovakia). I don't have any info about government in 1918-1939.

You are expert on this, so I'll text you here places which I know

Revolutionary National Assembly (1918-1920) - Thun Palace (w:cs:Thunovský palác)
Chamber of Deputies of the National Assembly (1920-1939) - Rudolfinum
Senate of the National Assembly (1920-1939) - Thun Palace (w:cs:Thunovský palác)

Provisional National Assembly (1945-1946) - Rudolfinum
Constituent National Assembly (1946-1948) - Building of Crops Exchange (w:cs:Plodinová burza (budova)) now known as Federal Assembly building
National Assembly (1948-1960) same
National Assembly of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic (1960-1968) same
Federal Assembly (Czechoslovakia) (1969-1992) same
Czech National Council (1969-1992) - Thun Palace (w:cs:Thunovský palác), Prague
Slovak National Council (1969-1992) - House of Counties, Župné námestie 591, Bratislava
Seat of government of Czech Socialist Republic (1969-1992) - Unnamed building in Lazarská 15, Prague

Well, I'm not sure whether I can be called expert on this... I certainly know much about Czechoslovakia and its history, but not really about official residences – beside that the President was seated in the Prague Castle. I assumed there was a permanent residence for the Prime Minister, similar to the Castle for the President, but apparently I was wrong and the PM's seat was changed on numerous times. Anyway, I really appreciate your effort to explain this. --Sundostund (talk) 00:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Election infoboxes

I think you might be better off using {{Infobox legislative election}} for the Czechoslovakian elections given the number of parties and electoral system used. See Israeli legislative election, 2015 or Dutch general election, 2017 as examples. Cheers, Number 5 7 12:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

I've protected your talk page for 24 hours for obvious reasons. If you don't want this page to have any protection, ping me and I'll remove it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:38, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Turkey, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dr. K. 22:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page-Russian National Anthem

It's not first in the list??? :) Ezhao02 (talk) 02:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ezhao02: Not at all, I like that, but I actually mostly promote Patrioticheskaya Pesnya more or even Bozhe Tsarya khrani and its modern version Nad otchiznoy velichavo. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 17:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

:) Ezhao02 (talk) 15:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Pkbwcgs. I noticed that you recently removed content from Slavisphere without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ThecentreCZ. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Long Live the Workers' Party of Korea.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Long Live the Workers' Party of Korea.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mirek Topolánek 2018 logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mirek Topolánek 2018 logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bosnia and Herzegovina anthem.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bosnia and Herzegovina anthem.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cuban presidents

Howdy, I had to fix up the numberings in the bio articles, in order to match the list that you restored. GoodDay (talk) 16:55, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bosnia and Herzegovina anthem.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bosnia and Herzegovina anthem.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Croatian Peasant Party logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:25, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Václav Vacek

The article Václav Vacek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability criteria. Most mentions are in passing, or of other persons named Václav Vacek.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Catrìona (talk) 05:38, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Centre Party (Sweden)

Hello. I have reverted your edit again since Wikipedia reports what the sources say, and the sources can't make up their mind, some say the party is centre, others say they're centre-right. So do not change it again! - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 23:10, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You = User:Klofáč?

Are you User:Klofáč? It looks to me like you are, given that you are transcluding this user's images on English Wikipedia. It would help to clear up confusion if you tagged your userpage so that I don't go deleting Klofáč's uploads as a copyright violation of your own work. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:41, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Czech Social Democratic Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Verde-nrourat.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Verde-nrourat.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ThecentreCZ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ThecentreCZ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:10, Thursday, November 29, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

A page you started (Czechoslovak Democratic Initiative) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Czechoslovak Democratic Initiative.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Hi! I believe you were trying to create a redirect here. Your attempt wasn't successful, but I've fixed it now in this edit.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 04:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Party names

Please use the common English names of the parties rather than trying to change them to direct translations; in the case of the ZRS, it is known as the "Union of the Workers of Slovakia" in English (see Google Books) but not at all by the direct translation (Google Books). Cheers, Number 5 7 20:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: That translation is false, word združenie (Slovak) is of exactly meaning like rassemblement (French), used for example in National Rally (France).

It doesn't matter whether it's false; what matters is how the party is known in English, which is "Union of the Workers of Slovakia". Number 5 7 20:40, 18 December 2018 (UTC)`[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SMER-SD Logo 2016.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SMER-SD Logo 2016.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blind reverts

Please look at what you're actually reverting before hitting undo. You just restored a line of whitespace plus unsourced/incorrect dates of formation/dissolution to the article. Number 5 7 20:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly the category for establishment is 1923 not 1926. Secondly, the months are still unsourced. Thirdly, you're still restoring the whitespace to the article. Fourthly, calling me a "retard" is completely unacceptable and I'll be reporting you for WP:NPA unless you retract and stop reverting. Number 5 7 20:04, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57: I am very very sorry, you are completely normal as long as you are editing tens of my edits and removing clickable names of parties. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vít Jedlička

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Vít Jedlička. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WikiHannibal (talk) 17:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bosnia and Herzegovina's national anthem.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bosnia and Herzegovina's national anthem.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Young Progressives

Hello, ThecentreCZ,

Thanks for creating Young Progressives! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on the Young Progressives of Slovakia, though I recommend much more evidence of coverage they may have received in reliable media sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:32, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019 unsourced

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Michael D. Higgins, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Democratic Party of Greens) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Democratic Party of Greens.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Right now, this article's subject is on the borderline for notability. Source #1 is an interview with a party member, and thus is insufficiently independent for establishing notability. I've started discussion on the reliable sources noticeboard to determine if source #2 is reliable, and I'd encourage you to participate. If #2 is reliable, then I think it's likely that the subject is notable per WP:NEXIST, although more sources should still be provided to further concretely establish that the subject meets WP:GNG.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:36, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Pavel Hořava.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Pavel Hořava, but please consider expanding it with information about his life and career that can be found in reliable and significant sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Flag of the Justice and Development Party (Turkey).svg

The file File:Flag of the Justice and Development Party (Turkey).svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non-free file of the party's flag is not needed per WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8 because it basically provides the same encyclopedic information to the reader as File:Justice and Development Party (Turkey) logo.svg. A non-free image of the party's logo used in the main infobox seems fine for primary identification purposes; so, taking that same logo and adding it to an all-white background just to show the flag is not needed. A non-free image doesn't need to be seen per WP:FREER for the reader to understand that the party's flag is its logo added to an all-white flag.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An emblem/logo request

Hi. I wrote it at Commons, but I also wanted to write it here: Can you design the emblem/logo of the Justice Party (Turkey, 1961-81) and upload it to Commons or Turkish Wikipedia, taking into account the flag in this photo? - Aybeg (talk) 08:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SPD Logo

Directly from Wikipedia's policy on non-free logos: "It is believed that the use of low-resolution images on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as fair use under the Copyright law of the United States." I did not make up that non-free logos should be low res you are simply just ignorant on the topic.

The logo that I believe is more suitable for the article is the logo featured multiple times in images on the front page of the SPD's website, the logo used on the SPD's official Facebook page and twitter profile, it is the logo used on posters and billboards and finally used at party events. Your version has less use and so I see no reason for why you are so opposed to the updating of the logo.Ec1801011 (talk) 17:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vector files are low-resolution too. There is no specific main logo as defined in graphics manual of visual identity or something similar. This logo is mostly used and vectored. You should stop arguing with experienced users and doing non-sensical uploads here. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 23:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Avante Camarada.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Avante Camarada.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Czech Pirate Party, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.--Concus Cretus (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Concus Cretus: It's not disturptive editing, I am correcting added incorrect information. Party is social-liberal and social liberalism is part of liberal group. Main-liberal is for example party TOP 09, which supports free-market. This party supports regulated market economy which is social-liberal section, this party have even Far-left faction, which attacks on right-liberal capitalism.^[1] Plus references from politically tinged media.</ref> --ThecentreCZ (talk) 15:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.seznamzpravy.cz/clanek/tozicka-pravicova-politika-stoji-za-utrpenim-desetitisicu-lidi-je-to-zlocin-89146

This is WP:SYNTH. Your actions constitute WP:OR--Concus Cretus (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Czech Pirate Party; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Concus Cretus (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Concus Cretus: You started edit war after your false edit was reverted, which is legal operation. You should not put back reverted editations, that is actually starting of Edit warring for you. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Report

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Concus Cretus (talk) 14:09, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Every time I edit any article relating to Czech / Czechoslovak history, I always see you in the edit logs expanding upon info or cleaning up some mistakes. You're diligent as hell kamo - keep up the good work! Active and vigilant :) Sp00n exe (talk) 15:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Flag of the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Para a Voz de Portugal ser Maior.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Para a Voz de Portugal ser Maior.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:National Technical Museum Prague.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:National Technical Museum Prague.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Likud Jingle.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Likud Jingle.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What Rules?

You reverted my edit simply with read rules. Which rules? Idan (talk) 14:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Zvikorn: Don't revert anything you don't know anything about. Copyrighted files are addable on Wikipedia, nothing to do with Commons. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ThecentreCZ,

that's a nice way to respond (:

Anyways, you could be helpful and send me a link. (to the rules you were referring to)

Other than that are only pictures on the commons or other forms of media?

In addition, I see that the file is up for deletion. Idan (talk) 16:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ThecentreCZ, Edit: You reverted my edit not the other way around as you are saying. lmao Idan (talk) 16:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is for deletion because you removed it without asking. Now its adding concern to more people. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 18:33, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ThecentreCZ, The fact that it is concerning is good because if its copyrighted it should not be here.

I should not have to ask anyone before I remove anything lmao. Idan (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Long Live the Workers' Party of Korea.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Long Live the Workers' Party of Korea.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Provocation

Provokácie

A summary in Slovak was written for the article. This editor wrote: Don't speak Hungarian to me. This is an obvious provocation that is inadmissible on Wikipedia. Please avoid this next time. Well thank you.

--178.143.103.113 (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of sources

Please do not readd content that multiple users note is not supported by the sources cited. This is a sanctionable offense if it is a continuing pattern. (t · c) buidhe 05:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. (t · c) buidhe 05:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: Lol you are such a admin, you even broken the article with your outdated sourcing of shortcut.--ThecentreCZ (talk) 05:58, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 16:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Para a Voz de Portugal ser Maior.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Para a Voz de Portugal ser Maior.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Likud Jingle.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:The Likud Jingle.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:03, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Long Live the Workers' Party of Korea.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Long Live the Workers' Party of Korea.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mirek Topolánek 2018 logo.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Mirek Topolánek 2018 logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:07, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:L-Innu tal-Partit Laburista.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:L-Innu tal-Partit Laburista.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:10, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Sbejħa Patrija.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Sbejħa Patrija.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:11, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Socijalistička partija Srbije.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Socijalistička partija Srbije.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:11, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Arise for Ghana.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Arise for Ghana.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Changer la vie.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Changer la vie.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Lied der Arbeit.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Lied der Arbeit.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Anthem of Jimintō (We).ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Anthem of Jimintō (We).ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Socialismo em Liberdade.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Socialismo em Liberdade.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:16, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Paz, Pão, Povo e Liberdade.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Paz, Pão, Povo e Liberdade.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Himna Srpskog pokreta obnove.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Himna Srpskog pokreta obnove.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:18, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Himno del Partido Popular.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Himno del Partido Popular.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Slovenska pomlad.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Slovenska pomlad.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Slavni sine hrvatskoga roda.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Slavni sine hrvatskoga roda.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:20, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Castaldo March.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:Castaldo March.ogg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Kolíne, Kolíne March.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:Kolíne, Kolíne March.ogg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:23, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Hoši od Zborova.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:Hoši od Zborova.ogg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 06:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Tyw7. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User_talk:Buidhe#Disputed_harasment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:38, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:34, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Long Live the Workers' Party of Korea.ogg

Thank you for uploading File:Long Live the Workers' Party of Korea.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Conservative Women's Organisation logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Conservative Women's Organisation logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Ntmamgtw (talk) 15:40, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CCP to CPC

I’m going to try to head off the metric shitton of shit thats coming at you by letting you know that Talk:Communist Party of China#Requested move 16 July 2020 exists so you can speedily self revert. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Horse Eye Jack: Interesting, its normal name is used for 20 years of existence of Wikipedia, Mr. great man uneducated Mike Pompeo start using this nonsense name, and gonna change it on that day. Thats a shit show. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 17:28, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was open for six days not one, the consensus was also overwhelming. It has also already been challenged Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2020 July and was endorsed so there really isnt anything you can do at this point. You have to wait. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela.svg

I was wondering if you could remove the grey bar on the bottom of the file you made since I don't think it was intentional? Thank you in advance. CentreLeftRight ✉ 06:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Song of General Kim Jong-il.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Song of General Kim Jong-il.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National symbols of the Czech Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linden. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Paul Dudley White, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 03:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: What the hell are you doing? Stop removing correct categories.--ThecentreCZ (talk) 03:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Leonid Brezhnev, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 05:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: Stop reverting my edits right now, you are disurptive editor. You are reverting editations to false information which were there before. There is no sources needed when it is correcting not true data. Wikipedia have habit to have categories without any so-colled sources to normal non-controversial data. You are making non-sense made-up rules. Even though you are reverting also wikidata sourced information. Categorization precept that you do this only in case of controversial information, this is not here. You have no right here. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 05:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ThecentreCZ, WP:CATV requires sources and support IN THE PROSE when adding categories. Elizium23 (talk) 05:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: I know thousands of articles where for categories is not neeeded any information in the prose. It is like that for 20 years. WP:CATV applies only on controversial statements. These reverts you doing is also on non-sourced categories. It is you bullying. Stop harass editors who corrects data. Find other job. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 06:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

False. Now cease and desist. I have amply warned you. Find sources and support the categories or stop adding them. Elizium23 (talk) 06:02, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: Sources are on WIKIDATA! I don't need to add anything. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 06:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ThecentreCZ, false. Per WP:CATV you need to support it IN THE PROSE in the article, plus attach a reliable source IN WIKIPEDIA so we can verify it HERE. There's no link to Wikidata's sources.

But the good news is, finding your sources should be easy! Elizium23 (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: No, I won't be adding any sources. Add them yourself. Thru your reverts you are readding categories (which are false), which don't have ANY support in the prose. (which is not needed by normal editors). So there is nothing changed. No prose in the beggining, no prose afterwards. So hurry and add your phrose or go start editing every second article on wikipedia and removing everything. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 06:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Socialist Party (Portugal).svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Socialist Party (Portugal).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the LDPB.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the LDPB.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom and Direct Democracy

As per WP:BRD you're reverting constructive edits (INFOBOX MOS:NOBR list) without a consensus. What is your explanation? Vacant0 (talk) 18:40, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion 2

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:ThecentreCZ_and_User:Concus_Cretus_reported_by_User:Vacant0_(Result:_). Thank you. Vacant0 (talk) 15:09, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:ThecentreCZ. The other party in this dispute, Concus Cretus, has agreed to stop warring. Will you please respond and say if you will do the same? Otherwise a block of your account seems necessary. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 12:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: I am not aware that user Concus Creatus agreed to stop warring, when he remained reverting in editing even after time that this case was notified in the noticeboard, me on the other hand stopped editing exactly after notice was issued as we can demonstrate. As he is the last one who reverted edit even after time of the noticeboard not respecting the issue, I ask to his editation will be removed. There is no reason, he wouldn't say this to you, as he's false edit is on. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 13:53, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am regarding this statement by Concus Cretus as his agreement to stop warring, to avoid a block. This is your last chance to accept the same deal. EdJohnston (talk) 17:39, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston: I've never even started anything like his actions after subject in solving, after the issue in the noticeboard. I am not going to edit anything on the subject page anymore. As the dispute is in solving in the talk, you can join the discussion. You are not arbitraitor with hegemony here and I am not subject of yours to give users any chances as him didn't cause anything. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 19:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Hradec Králové seal.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University of Hradec Králové seal.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Song of General Kim Il-sung.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Song of General Kim Il-sung.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Song of General Kim Jong-il.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Song of General Kim Jong-il.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Demokratska fronta logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Demokratska fronta logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of the Nationalist Party (Malta).svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of the Nationalist Party (Malta).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANO 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 18:25, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the United Socialist Party of Venezuela.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Evangelical Church of Czech Brethren.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evangelical Church of Czech Brethren.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for Edit warring after a block and multiple noticeboard threads about the behavior, such as Special:Diff/1020204229 at WP:ANEW. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ThecentreCZ, Concus Cretus's block has been reduced to the Article namespace, as they have proposed to start a discussion on the talk page instead. If this happens and you would like to join the discussion, I'll happily reduce your block as well. If you are interested, please create an unblock request as described in the message above, taking a moment to describe how you would like to continue. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:People–Animals–Nature logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:People–Animals–Nature logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IIHF: Czechia, not Czech Republic

Howdy. IIHF now uses Czechia, instead of Czech Republic, beginning with 2022 tournaments. See discussion at WP:HOCKEY, concerning this topic. GoodDay (talk) 19:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop being stubborn & realise that this is an IIHF topic. GoodDay (talk) 04:51, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS: If you don't like the IIHF change? Take you concerns to WP:SPORTS. -- GoodDay (talk) 04:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC) You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia‎. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.[reply]

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. (t · c) buidhe 06:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding this in here, I will be resolving this issue on buidhe talk page. Thank you. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 06:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Movement for the Restoration of the Kingdom of Serbia.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Movement for the Restoration of the Kingdom of Serbia.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Czech Republic national football team logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Czech Republic national football team logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Conrado Benítez

The article Conrado Benítez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BIO1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NoonIcarus (talk) 10:28, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of SK Slavia Praha.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of SK Slavia Praha.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of SK Slavia Praha.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of SK Slavia Praha.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eduard Chmelár for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eduard Chmelár is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduard Chmelár until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Newklear007 (talk) 10:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CS film logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CS film logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Largoplazo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lists of cities by country have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. What is this business of removing the second pair of brackets from Wikilinks and sticking "-cs" after the link terms in a number of articles? Largoplazo (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone broke Wikipedia or Google Chrome adding it automatically. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 19:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Austrian political parties

Please do not remove {{lang}} language tagging or {{start date and age}} microformats from articles. If you take a look at MOS:LANG and WP:μF, you can see the rationale, but those templates are there to make it easier for assistive technologies and for software to extract or highlight dates from articles (as well as showing how long ago a party's foundation was).

These edits are disruptive; please desist. Thank you! — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 12:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No I won't MOS:LANG doesn't apply on political parties. You are the first one who started to adding language tags which is not agreed to do in the parties. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 19:58, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of suicides

Hi. Please stop adding uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to List of suicides. Since you've accumulated over 8,800 edits here since 2013, you should know by now that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, as described here. You've already been warned about this several times on this talk page. Please add the required citations going forward. Nightscream (talk) 00:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent mass edits on a large number of articles changing the name Czechia to Czech Republic

I see that you're going through various Wikipedia articles just to change the name Czechia to Czech Republic. Czechia is a perfectly valid name for the country (and an official one). Please stop changing the name and censoring the name Czechia everywhere on Wikipedia just because you personally don't like that name. Wikipedia:If it ain't broke, don't fix it

Here are some examples of the edits I'm talking about:

Please also see Wikipedia:Mass_editing#Disputes, specifically:

Depending on the number of articles to be edited and the degree to which the edit changes those articles, it may be advisable (or even required) to obtain consensus before beginning to undertake a series of mass edits. It should be assumed that mass editing will always have at least some disrupting character, and that consequently the benefits should outweigh the disruption.

Neme12 (talk) 22:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Czech Republic#Requested move 13 September 2022. Someone wanted to move the article but did not provide any arguments in favor, so the request was denied. I recommend waiting for the results of a full move discussion to see if there is consensus to replace references to the Czech Republic with references to Czechia. See the list of past move discussions at the top of Talk:Czech Republic and notice how many times this move has failed in the past. EdJohnston (talk) 22:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This has nothing to do with the move of that article. All references to a particular topic on Wikipedia don't have to use the same exact form of the name as the article for that topic. For example, the U.S. is variously referred to as either the US, USA, United States or United States of America etc. in various Wikipedia articles and there's no reason to change all of those references to United States just because that's the name of the article for that country. Especially when it's not even a link to the article, although links shouldn't be changed for no reason either, as described in Wikipedia:Redirect#Do_not_"fix"_links_to_redirects_that_are_not_broken.

And as per Wikipedia:Mass_editing#Disputes and the quotation I provided, editors shouldn't make mass edits without first reaching consensus, especially on controversial topics. User:ThecentreCZ knew that this can be a controversial topic as they have engaged in conflicts regarding the name previously (see #IIHF:_Czechia,_not_Czech_Republic on this talk page), and *still* decided to mass edit all articles that happened to use the name Czechia to their preferred name (Czech Republic). Neme12 (talk) 23:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Party flags in infoboxes

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics/Political parties regarding the edits you recently made in articles about Dutch political parties. The thread is Party flags in infoboxes. Thank you. — Ætoms ^[talk] 23:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Useful User Page Copying

	Very Nice
	I thank you very much for being the source where I copied all of the templates to start creating an actual user page. This has not only helped me work on my user page, but also has helped me learn more about editing as whole, which will likely be useful in the not so distant future ;) Troopersho (talk) 10:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KdP emblem svg?

Hi, I was just wondering if you would be willing to make a .svg emblem of the Carpathian German Party like how you did the nice .svg emblem for the Sudeten German Party.
I think it would be easy for you, since they are so similar and you made the SdP one. Would be much appreciated!
Regards, Havsjö (talk) 11:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FK Teplice logo

Can you justify your last steps instead of edit warring? You violated WP:3RR, you don't respect consensus between other users and instead of using the edit summary to summarize and justify the editing, you use it for insults in a language other than English. You've already had a number of incidents, so you should know what the rules are and what may follow. FromCzech (talk) 20:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nebudu se s tebou o tom bavit. Zase nájezdy editorů. ThecentreCZ (talk) 01:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Czech Republic national football team logo.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Czech Republic national football team logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 19:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Czechia

Hi there. If you need one more reason not to move the country name back in those lists, that's the name the sources for the listed information are using. Cheers. Rkieferbaum (talk) 16:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atlanticism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catch-all.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing well- sourced content

hello and good morning,

I went ahead and reverted the recent changes to sourced content.

Thanks for helping, That'sHedley (talk) 19:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freedom and Direct Democracy logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freedom and Direct Democracy logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (M)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (M), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:25, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of foreign recipients of the Légion d'Honneur by country

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of foreign recipients of the Légion d'Honneur by country, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Raúl Castro

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Raúl Castro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced dates

Hello. Not sure why you made this edit. I wouldn't have removed the foundation year if it was in the text, but it isn't – so not sure why your edit summary was "sourced in b" (I assume was meant to be "sourced in body")? Cheers, Number 5 7 20:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is even worse; you obviously just copied the source from bg.wiki (where it isn't even an inline citation) without consulting it. Plus in the text you claim it was established in 1883 or 1884 and then just added 1884 to the infobox. You really need to bear in mind WP:V is a policy and copying sources from another wiki without even consulting them isn't on. Number 5 7 21:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On foundation date verifiability doesn't apply. It was always added like that, this radical sourcing purges are nonsense. When articles are basic information and not classic elaborative article, you will wait until article will be expanded in the future and then you can counter it. Exact equivalent of this is information about person articles of their sex whether is male or female. It is added automatically, only if proven otherwise can be added person is other gender or LGBT. ThecentreCZ (talk) 21:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course verifiability applies to the foundation date – WP:V states All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. Number 5 7 21:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in advanced articles. Infobox is not mainspace. This guidelines are for creators of new articles and improvers of quality articles. In 2007–2021 this was never enforced until you showed up and also others as a consequence of election of Donald Trump in 2016 and beginning of great internet trolling era. ThecentreCZ (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox is mainspace because it is part of an article. I've zero idea what you mean by the trolling era, but I have been editing since 2005, so I "showed up" long before 2021. There's literally a section above from 2019 when I asked you to stop adding unsourced dates to an infobox...

Very simply – infoboxes should not contain any information that isn't in the article – they are meant to be a summary, not introducing new information. I regularly see editors (particularly IPs) adding nonsense dates to articles, so I don't think it's unreasonable to request it be sourced. If it wasn't enforced previously (which I doubt is true anyway), that doesn't mean it shouldn't going forwards. Number 5 7 21:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bosnia and Herzegovina's national anthem.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bosnia and Herzegovina's national anthem.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Most–Híd 2015.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Most–Híd 2015.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orders, decorations, and medals of Slovakia

Hey @ThecentreCZ, you are engaged in an edit war with me on the Orders, decorations, and medals of Slovakia. In your last revert, you didn't even bother to provide an explanation, even though I asked you to discuss the matter on the talk page. Can you please tell me why you did that? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 23:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

protože jsi otravný trudeauovec. ThecentreCZ (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the way to engage in a discussion. Your attitude is disruptive, and now even abusive. I'm restoring my edit, and I suggest you leave it, or I will report you for abusive language. Don't forget that Google Translate is a thing. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 23:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Word "otravný" translated as "annoying" is abusive world probably only in Canada. I am not leaving anything as you suggest, I am even adding more of verified and sourced content. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 23:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bosnia and Herzegovina's national anthem.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bosnia and Herzegovina's national anthem.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citations are required

Hello, you have made unsourced contributions to List of banned political parties. Wikipedia:Sourcelist, a part of the list rules you linked to, requires sourcing, just as any other article on Wikipedia. Jon698 (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOURCELIST Jon698 (talk) 14:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not needed. As you can read in Sourcelist, necessary sources are only needed to Wikipedia articles of living persons, in Lists its unnecessary. Here is content of the article, Theres no source here, or you cannot read:

Name	Native name(s)	Ideology	Year banned
Communist Party of Ukraine (Soviet Union)	Комуністична партія України (СРСР)	Communism, Marxism–Leninism	1991
Russian Bloc (party)	Руський блок	Russification, Pan-Slavism, Russophilia	2014
Russian Unity	Руська єдність	Russian nationalism, Russian irredentism, Russian conservatism, Russophilia	2014
Communist Party of Ukraine	Комуністична партія України	Communism, Marxism–Leninism	2015
Communist Party of Ukraine (renewed)	Комуністична партія України (оновлена)	Communism, Marxism–Leninism	2015
Communist Party of Workers and Peasants	Комуністична партія робітників і селян	Communism, Marxism–Leninism	2015
Opposition Platform — For Life	Опозиційна платформа — За життя	Social democracy, Regionalism, Russophilia	2022
Opposition Bloc	Опозиційний блок	Social liberalism, Regionalism, Russophilia	2022
Socialist Party of Ukraine	Соціалістична партія України	Social democracy, Democratic socialism	2022
Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine	Прогресивна соціалістична партія України	Left-wing populism, Pan-Slavism, Russophilia	2022
Derzhava (Ukrainian party)	Держава	Socialism, Russophilia	2022
Union of Left Forces	Союз лівих сил	Socialism, Russophilia	2022
Nashi (political party)	Наші	Social conservatism, Regionalism, Russophilia	2022
Left Opposition (Ukraine)	Ліва опозиція	Left-wing populism, Russophilia	2022
Volodymyr Saldo Bloc	Блок Володимира Сальдо	Kherson regionalism, Russophilia	2022
Socialists (Ukraine)	Соціалісти	Socialism, Russophilia	2022
Party of Shariy	Партія Шарія	Libertarianism, Russophilia	2022
Party of Regions	Партія регіонів	Social democracy, Regionalism, Russophilia	2023

ThecentreCZ (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those are completely irrelevant. You should not be adding more unsourced content to a page that is already suffering from unsourced content. You clearly must have found that content from somewhere so it should be incredibly easy to add a source. Jon698 (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't found it anywhere its written and sourced at Wikipedia articles. You can't left-click on Wikipedia article link??? --ThecentreCZ (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my job to do your research. Jon698 (talk) 01:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its not my research, you have no right to wipe articles when you even didn't add tag for requirement of source to it, you are ruiner of information. ThecentreCZ (talk) 01:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My 19 GAs, 70 DYKs, 361 created pages, and 25,000 edits seem to disagree. One of the basic rules of Wikipedia is that sources are required. Jon698 (talk) 01:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You probably didn't learned the rules yet. You didn't got to the common habit sourcing in thousands of articles. Lists are not usual Wikipedia articles. As a example this article: List of political parties in Guinea. There are no sources for the list because LISTS doesn't require direct references. There are no sources for direct links to articles because its naturally not necessary. Or you have any other explanation? ThecentreCZ (talk) 02:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Lists, whether they are stand-alone lists (also called list articles) or embedded lists, are encyclopedic content just as paragraph-only articles or sections are. Therefore, all individual items on the list must follow Wikipedia's content policies: the core content policies of Verifiability (through good sources in the item's one or more references), No original research, and Neutral point of view, plus the other content policies as well. Content should be sourced where it appears with inline citations if the content contains any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. Although the format of a list might require less detail per topic, Wikipedia policies and procedures apply equally to both a list of similar things as well as to any related article to which an individual thing on the list might be linked." Jon698 (talk) 03:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Links on the list didn't anyhow break this policy about Wikipedia sourcing. I asked about article List of political parties in Guinea. WHERE are CITATIONS without which you are purging lists from links? There is NO inline citations. ThecentreCZ (talk) 03:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All you have done is linked to a terrible article that does not meet Wikipedia's standards. It's a shame too considering how easy it would be Abel yo fins sources for it. BTW see List of political parties in the United States for a good list article relating to political parties. Jon698 (talk) 03:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I asked why List of political parties in Guinea is okay to exist. Explain now. Explain it or I will revert your mass removal of 7,057 bytes of data in the article. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 03:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You question is completely irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Jon698 (talk) 04:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is not irrelevant. Both articles are LISTS, same rules apply. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your rude behavior and insults are extremely childish. You have been asked to perform a basic function of being a Wikipefia editor. An unverified claim is utterly worthless and lowers the integrity of this encyclopedia. Jon698 (talk) 04:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I don't have any rude behavior, I am just saying that you still haven't answered. You don't have words you've written gramatically correct. You must accept that lists are exception in Wikipedia policy. Inclusionism is not party of integrity, you can improve it by adding verification, but removal is only case for normal articles. ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Going through your talk page I have found multiple complaints regarding your refusal to follow sourcing rules and your frequent rude behavior. You should understand that you could face punishments for these kinds of actions. Jon698 (talk) 04:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No I could not. Stop your messaging, only answer one question:

why List of political parties in Guinea is okay to exist?

Thank you.

ThecentreCZ (talk) 04:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fyi, I have raised concerns about your behavior at ANI. While these concerns are unrelated to this particular discussion about sourcing, your misinformed statements in this thread constitute further evidence in support of an indefinite block. If you wish to continue editing here, you should consider your words very carefully before you respond at ANI. The community will not be impressed by further argumentativeness. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 05:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a note at ANI seconding Lepricavark's concern. You need to stop acting like you're above the rules. You need to stop petulantly lashing out against people politely trying to help you become more constructive. GR Kraml (talk) 11:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jon698 (talk) 14:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 18:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diff for ANI thread. Drmies (talk) 18:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See also the other ANI thread where their behaviour was being discussed. [5] AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now raised to indefinite, after more evidence of absolutely unacceptable behavior was shown. Drmies (talk) 21:30, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of the Great Unity Party.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of the Great Unity Party.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flag of the Democratic Party (Turkey, 2007).svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of the Democratic Party (Turkey, 2007).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThecentreCZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to request unblock of me because as I am informed, the block was raised to the strictest variant. I would like to acknowledge my mistake of inproper citations, especially that I did considered List of banned political parties and also other instances of lists as Stand-alone list, because I didn't take in consideration that there is also column which contains ideologies and year of occurance and I did not given proper citation in my first edits. I then reverted the edit more than once which let to the editor to report it as an incident there. Sadly, I didn't get a chance to properly repond to the most of the instances discussed and apologize again in the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, because I was blocked for a period of month on the same day that the incidents were raised, on 15 March 2024, and I couldn't respond anymore. Factically it was somehow connected to the instance of incident of other blocked user, who probably used his account for singe-issue editing, but he also did other benefitial contributions to Wikipedia so I just presented my concerns there. In the case of disruptive editing and and insults, I would like to say that I will no longer edit contentious topics and use such language I used. I would like to apologize for about 3 vulgar words in the last 5 years I used, which could have been rightfully taken as insults and about 8 edit disputes, where I wrongly accused someone of something they have not ment. I agree that vulgar-insulting words are unacceptable and it was proper reason for blocking. It was very bad of me, but as of my editing I many times got into situation that people removed sourced information and it is not always easy to keep cool thinking and distuinguish proper and inproper editing, as I did many sourced corrections in about 10,000 edits I've made. In the matter of what I will be participating in the future, as I created about 80 articles in the past on English Wikipedia, I will continue to create only sourced articles with proper information and I will not participate in any disputes and in disagreements in such disproportionate language I did in the past. Thank you for your consideration. ThecentreCZ (talk) 1:21 pm, 28 March 2024, Thursday (1 month, 22 days ago) (UTC−8)

Decline reason:

There was a strong consensus to indefinitely block you just two months ago. As such this can be considered a community-imposed block, and would therefore need to be reviewed by the community, but for now I am somply declining it as it seems much too soon. The standard offer suggests a minimum of six months. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 22:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Song of General Kim Il-sung.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Song of General Kim Il-sung.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Standard offer request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ThecentreCZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I would like to ask administrator to put forward my request to the Administrators' noticeboard for unblock, according to WP:Standard offer. I have been contributing to other Wikimedia projects meanwhile as is recommended for users at unblock requests.

I would like to acknowledge my misconducts and mistakes like of inproper citations, especially that I did considered List of banned political parties and also other instances of lists as Stand-alone list, because I didn't take in consideration that there is also column which contains ideologies and year of occurance and I did not given proper citation in my first edits. I then reverted the edit more than once which let to the editor to report it as an incident there. Sadly, I didn't get a chance to properly repond to the most of the instances discussed and apologize again in the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, because I was blocked for a period of month on the same day that the incidents were raised, on 15 March 2024, and I couldn't respond anymore. Factically it was somehow connected to the instance of incident of other blocked user, who probably used his account for singe-issue editing, but he also did other benefitial contributions to Wikipedia so I just presented my concerns there. In the case of disruptive editing and and insults, I would like to say that I will no longer edit contentious topics and use such language I used. I would like to apologize for about 3 vulgar words in the last 5 years I used, which could have been rightfully taken as insults and about 8 edit disputes, where I wrongly accused someone of something they have not ment. I agree that vulgar-insulting words are unacceptable and it was proper reason for blocking. It was very bad of me, but as of my editing I many times got into situation that people removed sourced information and it is not always easy to keep cool thinking and distuinguish proper and inproper editing, as I did many sourced corrections in about 10,000 edits I've made. In the matter of what I will be participating in the future, as I created about 80 articles in the past on English Wikipedia, I will continue to create only sourced articles with proper information and I will not participate in any disputes and in disagreements in such disproportionate language I did in the past. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 16:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Per the consensus here, you have been unblocked. Please read and take note of the commenters there. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to go ahead and copy this to AN for the community to evaluate. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:29, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.seznamzpravy.cz/clanek/tozicka-pravicova-politika-stoji-za-utrpenim-desetitisicu-lidi-je-to-zlocin-89146

[1]