User talk:Thardman22
- The speedy deletion tag was removed by User:Malcolm on the 13th of October. You can remove the CSD message above as the article is no longer CSD material. But you are doing a great job with the article since I saw it last week. Keep up the great work AngelOfSadness talk 16:09, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello there. Please see Talk:CASA of Maryland. I believe your whole-sale reversion was not warranted and I wish to begin a discussion of the edits you call "vandalism, slanted journalism supporting political viewpoint, weasel words." Scarykitty (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I removed the FARA statement because there was no source. The wikipedia standard is Wikipedia:Verifiability. The statements regarding the FARA are unsourced and should be deleted. In addition they contain weasel words "It is arguable that...CASA may be in violation of the FARA." Arguable by whom? This is the very essence of an unsourced statement and it should not be in Wikipedia. Scarykitty (talk) 23:56, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
I have been editing the article as well. The section you restored is full of POV, innuendo and poorly sourced material. Please discuss your changes on the tal page of the article in the relevant section. Philly jawn (talk) 13:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
August 2008
[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Aspen Hill, Maryland. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Kim Ki Whang (Ki Whang Kim)"
[edit]
A page you created, Kim Ki Whang (Ki Whang Kim), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
This is fixed now...
[edit]This is fixed now. Thx... Thardman22 (talk) 21:26, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
The People (Zenna Henderson)
[edit]Looks good to me. Thank you so much. --Bluejay Young (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of James Roberts Jr.
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article James Roberts Jr., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- non-notable per WP:BIO, no reliable third party references per WP:RS, can find no reliable sources supporting notability online
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MuffledThud (talk) 22:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
RE: Deletion of page on James Roberts, Jr
[edit]I've restored it. - Rjd0060 (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, what is the source for your contribution? --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 03:00, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of James Roberts, Jr.
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, James Roberts, Jr., has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Roberts, Jr.. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Will Beback talk 08:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Kim Ki Whang
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kim Ki Whang. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Ki Whang. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
re Deletion of article on Kim Ki Whang
[edit]No objections. Relisted. Back at AFD. To determine community consensus after additional comments are given there. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Ki Whang. :) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 21:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear Thardman22, sorry about the unhelpfull bit of my contribution to the Kim Ki Whang article. I was trying to help with finding sources to futher justify my keep vote. I had thought the book sounded perfect ... but I think it is a problem - no author/print on demand... etc. It seems clear to me there is sufficient to not delete the article... but I think others will want more. Might there be some Korean sources? Sorry again. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 09:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC))
November 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Skyline (film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. By the way, the correct way to escape a character in a URL is to use a %-escape. For a space character, this is . Elizium23 (talk) 01:33, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Tex Arcana
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The article The People (Zenna Henderson) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Mostly unreferenced article about an element of an authors science fiction books that themselves don't have articles. Not notable.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stowonthewolder (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prey (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sociopath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Thardman22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Thardman22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)