User talk:Skycycle

ITN Credits

ITN for February 2013 Quetta bombing

On 17 February 2013, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article February 2013 Quetta bombing, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 23:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ITN Credit

On 17 January 2013, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article In Aménas hostage crisis, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Jayron32 05:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Washi (Sendong)

For now i think it is best to keep the death toll to what it officaly per the Philippines National disaster committee as the media has this habit of announcing deathtolls that are higher than they actually are. Thanks.Jason Rees (talk) 15:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Subtropical Depressions in the SWIO are just depressions (even if they attain tropical storm force winds). Until they get to 75 mph they will be classified as tropical. Bruvtakesover (T|C) 08:41, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Armed conflicts and incidents

Nice work on the additions. Would just like to add though to watch out for copyvios and adding histories not pertinent to the attack itself. The page size is already 80k , so redundacies are better left to the perpetrator pages.(Lihaas (talk) 03:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

Daphne

Just a reminder that Daphne has not done any flooding in Fiji, it was TD 17F. Bruvtakesover (T|C) 10:00, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at List of terrorist incidents, 2012

Hi, you might want to weigh in on the discussion on IRA attacks currently talking place here. --Tyrannus Mundi (talk) 15:05, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fatalities box

Hello! Please be aware that there is an ongoing discussion here which I felt may concern you, given your previous involvement in the section. --Activism1234 20:56, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: NOtiriiation

We already had a previous one that you dint respond to. As such kindly do NOT reinsert your view vcontrary to the discussion and BRD and WRONGVERSION until we get establishd consensus. I tried, but you stopped. That does not mean you have ta right to go abut doing things your way aloneLihaas (talk) 10:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of your feelings on the subject are, a discussion is going to happen, since we clearly cannot resolve the issue between ourselves. You would do well to at least listen to other people's suggestions. Skycycle (talk) 04:22, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work

I noticed your edits to May 2013 Iraq attacks and just wanted to say, job well done. Thanks for improving this important article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We edit conflicted on 2013 Nanga Parbat tourist shooting

Hello,

I just wanted to inform you that we edit conflicted on the 2013 Nanga Parbat tourist shooting article. I had added quite a bit of information so I over-rid the Edit Conflict, and manually added almost everything you had added. Please check the article to see if I've missed anything.

Cheers,

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification, I already saw it as I was adding stuff to the page, duly waited until you placed everything back in order. Just added a map to the infobox, will maybe expand the article later today as more details become available. Once again, thanks for your contribution, nice to see some well-mannered and professional people on here for a change :))) --Skycycle (talk) 16:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for waiting until i was done processing the edit conflicts. I was half worried myself that you would be making another edit, which could mix it all up. I'm done with the article for the time being, so you can take over and make any changes you think I've missed. :)

I must note that your response to the Edit conflict has been remarkably better than most users I would expect to see. I'll check if the article meets ITN levels now. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Shias are mentioned as a majority and a minority both in the article. It needs to be clarified which one it is. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Cleaned it up. Skycycle (talk) 23:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Operation al-Shabah

Thank you for adjustments. I'm sorry for my grammar, I am a French user, but I prefer to work on the English Wikipedia I find more complete than the french wikipedia. I will continue to update this operation ;) Rogal Dorm (talk) 15:39, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your help is highly needed

New discussion about expansion of the 2013 Bohol earthquake. For the discussion, please click this link: Expansion discussion.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 13:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts on my war article

I was searching around for people who know what they are doing in war articles. If you have time could you take a look at mine, it is about some recent event in Iraq, I was hoping it could be added into the Iraqi insurgency (post-U.S. withdrawal) campaignbox. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jawahir_Mall_in_Kirkuk

Thanks--SourCreamShoe (talk) 03:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input, I took a quick look and it does need some editing significant parts of the attack are missing, including casualties. Another thing that needs to be taken care of is the way sources are presentedm, but I will edit it when I get a chance in the next day or two and you can see the results for yourself. It's always a good idea to use previous attack articles as "templates", where you can just change the info and pretty much use half of the stuff in there as it is. Also keep in mind I have been busy recently, so a lot of major attacks are missing from the campaignbox - not to mention that with the recent increase in violence we cannot realistically keep up with all of them and we have to select what to do and what to leave to the side. As you can see, I have added most attack before September to the campaignbox, and they will be edited and created - probably around the Christmas holidays when I have more time off. If you have any questions, feel free to ask! Skycycle (talk) 12:47, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I have moved the page to December 2013 Kirkuk attack for better clarity and also to reflect the way most of these attack articles have been named in the past. I will now put a template on the top so people know it's under construction, and when I get a chance over the next few days I will expand and clean up the article - just sit back and enjoy :) Skycycle (talk) 12:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have my thanks. And thank you for keeping bits that I wrote in the article. You're a good Wikipedian. --SourCreamShoe (talk) 13:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited December 4 2013 Iraq attacks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Qaim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iraqi insurgency (post-U.S. withdrawal)

I added information about the destruction of the Iraqi army two camps of Al Qaeda. I think. this is important information for articles Iraqi insurgency (post-U.S. withdrawal) Hanibal911 (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not like my contribution to this article then I will not more add my information in this article. Hanibal911 (talk) 14:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I love how passionate you are about the topic, but let's keep it tidy, WP is not a directory of every attack or every day of the conflict. Keep it simple, delete 2/3 of what you've written and leave the major attacks and developments only. We could use more context in the article, and way less attacks, no need to mention every single event of every single day, just the ones that are major. I have had less free time recently, but will soon rejoin in editing the article seriously, I can clip it a bit if that's fine with you. Skycycle (talk) 15:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I got excited and probably and I will be edit the article but I will be add less data than before. But you could help me to remove all the excess and not particularly important information. Hanibal911 (talk) 18:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Campaignbox Iraqi insurgency (post-U.S. withdrawal)

What do the numbers represent (e.g. "2nd Baghdad & 1st Nasiriyah", "4th Baghdad & 1st Hilla", etc.) here (Template:Campaignbox Iraqi insurgency (post-U.S. withdrawal))? Thanks for the clarification. Plot Spoiler (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! The numbers represted consecutive attacks - while Baghdad is attacked almost daily, if the attacks says Baghdad 7th (for example), then it was either a MAJOR attack in the capital, or the larger (lets say 75-80% ) of casualties for the day took place in that city. So for example 1st Nasiriyah doesn't mean that there were no previous attacks in that particular city - of course there were - but this was the first major one. Obviously with the escalation of violence in mid-2013, the list for that year is a bit incomplete after early September, lots of incidents during the last 3 months of 2013 have to be added. Skycycle (talk) 13:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anton Karachanakov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beroe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Floods in Europe in July 2014

Floods in Austria, Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, and Montenegro. Began on July 26 and is still ongoing.

http://sofiaglobe.com/2014/08/01/floods-hit-western-and-central-bulgaria-serbia-and-romania/ http://www.canadianunderwriter.ca/news/2nd-person-drowns-in-floods-in-romania-power-plant-floods-in-serbia-landslides-in-montenegro/1003184382/?&er=NA http://euronews.com/2014/08/01/clean-up-begins-in-romania-after-deadly-floods/ http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/07/30/us-romania-floods-idINKBN0FZ1WY20140730 http://sofiaglobe.com/2014/08/01/floods-hit-western-and-central-bulgaria-serbia-and-romania/ http://tvnz.co.nz/world-news/hundreds-evacuated-3-dead-in-east-europe-floods-6040991 http://globalnews.ca/news/1483044/floods-in-eastern-europe-kill-3-more-than-500-people-evacuated/ http://www.weather.com/news/weather-forecast/europe-flood-heavy-rain-balkans-romania-20140731 http://thesouthern.com/news/world/europe/floods-submerge-south-romania-nd-person-drowns/article_ebbb1cf8-fd56-56c0-9007-1a82d0fe9aac.html --91.150.105.68 (talk) 18:39, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Gorni Lom explosions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shrapnel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Watching for pro-Israel propaganda

Great catch on the Current Events page, though another visitor got to the edit first. I didn't even notice that Eframgoldberg had invented Fatah's involvement in the new social media campaign. Thanks for the tip on what to look out for in the future. Farolif (talk) 00:21, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually if you had bothered to follow the news source to MEMRI you would have seen the story and the actual screenshots of facebooks posts from Fatah's official page.Eframgoldberg (talk) 00:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

if you had bothered to follow the news source to MEMRI No, that's now how it works here. (Even -if- someone knew who MEMRI was...) Farolif (talk) 01:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legitimate articles covering current events in Israel are not a priori pro-Israel. The same way that an article describing an ISIS beheading an British aid worker should not be considered "pro-Great Britain". Nothing in the headline was subjective or not represented by plain facts in the articles themselves. Eframgoldberg (talk) 01:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let me put it this way - I am categorically against the actions of the Israeli government, but that does not influence the fact that the description was borderline-false. Fatah was not mentioned ANYWHERE in that article, and even if it was, that's not the main news event. Next time keep it simple, as in "A Palestinian civilian injures three soliders in the third car attack in as many days" or something of the sort. Everything other than a simple rephrasing of the content of a news post is distorting and not welcome, and will only waste everyone's time. 145.109.13.68 (talk) 11:57, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was me, forgot to log in :) Skycycle (talk) 11:59, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2015 Sana'a bombing) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2015 Sana'a bombing, Skycycle!

Wikipedia editor DocumentError just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

thanks for doing this so quickly and excellently

To reply, leave a comment on DocumentError's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

I wanted to ask you a few questions about your edit here [1] on the casualties of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict so I could better understand it. You edited in 28,000-38,000 dead per the sources. However: de Waal cites 17,000-26,000, Euronews makes no mention of a figure, Asia Times talks about the Iraq conflict and not Nagorno-Karabakh (I removed this source), couldn't find the concrete figure from Uppsala Conflict Data Program (provide a direct source if you could), Naharnet says 30,000. We also have this source [2] (that you didn't insert) which says at least 30,856-35,856 were killed (we can also add it too). As far as I can see, the figure is more in the 17,000-36,000 range and not 28,000-38,000 as you put. I thank you in advance for your reply. EkoGraf (talk) 06:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calligraphist (artist)

Dear Bulgarian Wikipedian: if you can find something in Bulgarian that might help the article Calligraphist (artist), please help! Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Secours Populaire Francais

Hi there. I reverted your removal of the mention of this on the Nepal earthquake page. I hope it doesn't bother you, I mentioned in the edit summary it seems like a relatively large initial donation for a single private organization, given that the U.S. gov't has only pledged $1 million so far. Also, I had just written an article for the organization to remove the red-link, so I was hoping to preserve my original intent in writing that. Anyway hope it's not a big deal, but please let me know if you think this should not be done. Centrify (f / k / a Factchecker_blah_blah_blah) (talk) (contribs) 20:37, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Hadzhi Dimitar Stadium 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hadzhi Dimitar Stadium 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Beroe Stadium 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Beroe Stadium 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Lazur Stadium Burgas 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lazur Stadium Burgas 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Arena Sozopol 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Arena Sozopol 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:2015 UEFA European Under-17 Championship map.png

Thanks for uploading File:2015 UEFA European Under-17 Championship map.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bulgaria national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgi Minchev. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of ongoing armed conflicts page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:FCSozopol logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:FCSozopol logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited November 2015 Sinai attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suicide belt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian Cup

Can you please update and create more seasons in Bulgarian Cup, not just the current one. Thank you !!Alexiulian25 (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of indoor arenas in Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo requests in Amsterdam

Do you take photo requests for Wikipedia articles? I have some ideas for those in Amsterdam WhisperToMe (talk) 22:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Live updates

Hi.

Please do not update statistics or scores while a match is in progress. Instead, wait until the match has finished before updating. At WikiProject Football there is a consensus not to add live scores and also a consensus not to update any statistics while a match is in progress. Without live updates it is easier to avoid duplicate information and errors from being published on the article.

Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 20:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please try and remember this. Qed237 (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The statistic was already there, I just fixed the bold on Aguero's name, and the number on the first line of the article. Thank you for the reminder, I am aware though :) Skycycle (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Obsidian Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian airports statistics

Hi, could you tell me where the nubers are from? http://caa.gateway.bg/page.php?category=27 has totally different statistics. Thank you. Teemeah ^{편지 (letter)} 08:32, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andria train collision

Please see 2016 Andria train crash. Please cull info from that article and then turn it into a redirect. Am unable to do this myself as I'm on a course and lunch is nearly over. Mjroots2 (talk) 12:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please put ACE in the correct basin

Hello. Celia just crossed into the central Pacific so its ACE now counts for the central, rather than the eastern Pacific. Please bear this in mind for future storms of this nature. Thanks.--Jasper Deng (talk) 16:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip, didn't realize a new tab was needed until it was too late, and by then you had it fixed. Busy start of the season! Skycycle (talk) 16:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Thank you for contributing to current war articles. Keep of the good work 👍 User..🌚 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GrenadierSoldi3rsKill — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrenadierSoldi3rsKill (talk • contribs) 02:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

For helping to contribute info to Hurricane Matthew — JJBers (talk) 22:32, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2016 Eséka train derailment) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2016 Eséka train derailment, Skycycle!

Wikipedia editor DatGuy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good start. I'll add {{current}} to the article. This is definitely still a stub though.

To reply, leave a comment on DatGuy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ITN recognition for 2016 Eséka train derailment

On 22 October 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2016 Eséka train derailment, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T♦C 16:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Skycycle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of ongoing armed conflicts page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Kuneru train derailment

On 24 January 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kuneru train derailment, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 21:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Heijn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject!

Hello, Skycycle! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2017 Lesotho Defence Force helicopter crash

The article 2017 Lesotho Defence Force helicopter crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this accident is noteworthy for a stand-alone article, helicopter crashes are not rare particularly military operated ones. Really needs to be the cause of death of a wiki notable person or another notable feature to have an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 19:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2017 Lesotho Defence Force helicopter crash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 Lesotho Defence Force helicopter crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Lesotho Defence Force helicopter crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I thought we were waiting for discussion on talk page, which never happened, so not sure why we are going straight to nomination but alright. No page created yet for the discussion, so I will wait for it. Skycycle (talk) 22:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2015 UEFA European Under-17 Championship Logo.png.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2015 UEFA European Under-17 Championship Logo.png.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2017 Nasiriyah attacks

On 17 September 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2017 Nasiriyah attacks, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Vanamonde (talk) 04:52, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Skycycle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Association football stats update

Hi, I'd find it better to update player's stats after when the latest match today has finished - to avoid possible confusion as some may think this is updated during a match and may be considered as a live update. Iggy (Swan) 16:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I thought that's the case either way but had a few minutes. Those few players' stats are prior to the games that just finished. Skycycle (talk) 16:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Your edits on 2018 Papua New Guinea earthquake have been numerous and important. Thank you for improving the article so much!

Alex of Canada (talk) 07:47, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Portals

The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.

Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.

It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.

The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.

A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

Let's do this.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 10:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cryptozoology Emergency

Just thought I'd give everyone that's a member of WikiProject Cryprozoology a heads up. I've been seeing a lot of that looks like vandalism by Bloodoffox, removing cryptozoology categories and rewording things to appear as though article topics are on mythological creatures. I believe this is an attempt to get his merger proposal for List of Cryptids merged with List of mythological creatures although I cannot be sure. You might want to give your input here--Paleface Jack 02:58, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Skycycle. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 April 20.
Message added 11:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Template:F1 Constructors Standings, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Corvus tristis (talk) 14:23, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In WP:F1 community we have a consensus that we order the table by best results of the team, not by the drivers. Corvus tristis (talk) 14:31, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire

There is no reason to remove plot information that is both sourced from the game and because of spoilers. Read WP:VG/RS and WP:SPOILERS. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 15:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Hurricane ACE Reports

My apologies for not including the original advisories from the NHC for Florence, Gordon, and Helene. I did not know I was supposed to include advisories for when they were potential tropical cyclones, and certainly did not intentionally publish incomplete content. I appreciate the constructive criticism. Thanks! Im Dreaming (talk) 17:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- No worries, I'm glad you are a reasonable person and didn't argue, unlike many others here - generally, all official 6-hour advisories are included, sometimes special ones - you can look at coverage from previous years if in doubt. Gonna be a busy week ahead in terms of ACE, and unfortunately likely to be a bad few weeks for the Carolinas... Skycycle (talk) 17:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Skycycle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of December 2018 Venezuela earthquakes

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from December 2018 Venezuela earthquakes, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! --Jamez42 (talk) 12:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And what is the difference? I googled how to delete articles, and the template is what I reached - the article has to be deleted for sure, because it doesn't meet notability standards with regard to quakes - no casualties, not a rare location, nothing. If we make articles for every quake that causes damage, that's hundreds of articles per year. Skycycle (talk) 12:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

F1 Drivers Standings table

Hello. Why I can't edit the template table? Following the official source by FIA, we need to put = for Albon. Can you do it? Best regards.--95.234.61.125 (talk) 11:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

European Parliament election 2019 in Bulgaria template - election fraud: numbers don't add up

Hello User:Skycycle, I am little bit confused: the numbers in the template for the election of the European Parliament in Bulgaria 2019 do not add up and must be wrong, see the relevant talk page. Could you explain that to me or correct it? I don't understand it. Thank you in advance! C-Kobold (talk) 21:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey C-Kobold, I already saw your message on the talk pages - just for the record, no need to post it once on the article and again on the template itself, article is usually enough and better in terms of visibility :) As for the numbers, these are not final so I assume some changes will occur - I am monitoring for that, and will double-check them regardless at some point in the next days. Skycycle (talk) 23:27, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your fast answer, @Skycycle:! I don't think the numbers will change, because on https://election-results.eu/national-results/bulgaria/2019-2024/ the vote share is presented as "final results" (I don't understand Bulgaria, I always use Google Translate). C-Kobold (talk) 23:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am Bulgarian myself, and I'll try to get to the bottom of it eventually. No need to necessarily rush it IMO since it's a minor difference, but thanks for the heads up C-Kobold! Skycycle (talk) 23:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening Skycycle, I don't have the time and language knowledge (Bulgarian) to analyse the election result open data in csv format from here: https://results.cik.bg/ep2019/csv.zip . Maybe you, as Bulgarian native speaker, can make use of the data and spot the error? In my opinion, this is not a "minor difference". I always assume the worst case, so for me, it looks more like election fraud. C-Kobold (talk) 00:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C-Kobold election fraud is virtually guaranteed in Bulgaria, as well as most of the region to be honest, one could probably find discrepancies in previous years' results as well - it's just reality of life in the Balkans, and the reason why many choose not to live there, including this user. My point is, however, that I will look into it, but let's not force the issue too much maybe? Thanks :) Skycycle (talk)

but let's not force the issue too much maybe

Why? Are you afraid to face consequences?!? Election fraud has to be made public; and has to be proven! You could help by translating the relevant laws / articles and titles into English! That would be awesome! C-Kobold (talk) 00:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C-Kobold dude of course not :D There will be no consequences because the wheel will keep on spinning, you should probably read up on corruption and recent political history in Bulgaria and the region as a whole. It's common knowledge that elections are rigged and votes are bought, although the degree to which this happens remains murky. One example in last month's vote had to do with a number of cases where candidates that were outside of their list's top 5 got huge percentages of all preferential votes in several small villages, or a neighborhood, and so on. Clearly someone paid for 20-30-50 votes at a time through back channels. This is of course without mentioning the oligarchy that controls most of the media and publishes blatant lies and propaganda - anything from European gays are coming for you children to Chemtrails: are they a threat?, and we're not mentioning the rampant corruption on all levels - from the cop on the street to the CEOs in the business towers. Hence, as a journalist and a liberal arts major I am just mildly amused by your response to all of this, in a very nice and polite way I hope - nothing personal. What I actually meant by let's not force the issue is that this is a small possible edit in a template, and we've written half an article about it already. Still, I will try and get to the bottom of it, let's leave it at this shall we? :) Cheers! Skycycle (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The news coverage across Europe about this blatant election fraud is non-existant:

* Google search "ballot rigging bulgaria" in the last week

* Google search "election fraud bulgaria" in the last week

* Google search "vote rigging bulgaria" in the last week

... so I don't think we should brush this election fraud under the carpet. It should be big news!

Apart from that: here in Germany, we also have the Springer press, which owns a lot of the media, pushing propaganda - but we didn't have election fraud so far. C-Kobold (talk) 00:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2019 Bulgarian Supercup

Hello, Skycycle,

Thanks for creating 2019 Bulgarian Supercup! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skepta discography

Sources placed directly below peaks inside wikitables are there for a reason: they are temporarily verifying said peak until the header reference (which is usually an archive) displays the peak. You clearly did not check said header refs at Skepta discography before removing the temporary references, because you would have seen they are not supported by those (as charts.nz and irish-charts.com have not updated with the new data yet). Do not remove them until the peaks are displayed at them per WP:V. Thanks. Ss112 07:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:33, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Super League

@Dear Wikipedian,

 Pakistan Super League is the world most unique tournament. As it is first time, this event is started inside Pakistan. Due to terrorism Pakistan Cricket Board could not organise Pakistan Super League in home grounds. Cricket is consider as the most famous game across the World. Thanks

--Knowiunderstandit (talk) 18:10, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 coronavirus pandemic in Bulgaria

Hi there. If you'd prefer to update the numbers and stats on this page yourself, that is fine by me, as long as someone does it carefully on a daily basis, as you obviously do. I've noticed on several occasions that you refrain from updating the medical cases template — I wonder if there is any reason in particular for that. Thank you for your efforts on the main article. Oksvobomchatka (talk) 18:43, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No particular reason, I just thought that the template is fine as long as someone updates it regularly. The information is very useful, thanks for all your work on the article as well! Skycycle (talk) 18:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 17:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Bulgarian Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Ahmed. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 Second Professional Football League (Bulgaria), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Varna derby moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Varna derby. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Varna derby has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Varna derby. Thanks! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Varna derby

Hello, Skycycle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Varna derby, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]