User talk:Sheffno1gunner

Welcome

Hello, Sheffno1gunner! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Petrb (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2011 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Opinium Research LLP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to West Midlands and Polling

Survation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Polling

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sheffno1gunner. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 16:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

January 2013

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. – Richard BB 11:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your TeaHouse question

Hello and Welcome to the Wikipedia,

I saw your question at the Teahouse and thought I should try and help. Unfortunately, I could not understand what you wanted. Could you try and rephrase what you wanted so I can actually help?

Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 05:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

You can also see this image - File:United_Nations_Members.svg
If you look at the bottom, you can find various versions of the image, as uploaded by the other users. But those previous versions cannot be linked to any article. They are only existing as a past version of the current image, nothing more. Is this what you wanted? TheOriginalSoni (talk) 06:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I know, that is exactly what I want to do, that list of images are chronological, they replace each other but at the moment we have been uploading new images and having to do everything manually! I have added to the question.Sheffno1gunner (talk) 06:10, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

In that case, you can find the "Upload new version of this file" on its Commons page. Use that, and you can do exactly what you want. Did that help? TheOriginalSoni (talk) 06:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

You've answered part of my question, so thank you very much for that! I know how to do this for a new image now but how do I do it with existing images, I mean the images I'm talking about are already on Wikipedia and they need to go into that list of thumbnails and not be seperate. How do I do that. Thanks again :-)Sheffno1gunner (talk) 06:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I am assuming all the images are on commons, and all have their separate pages.

1. What you need to do is to choose which are the images you want in one page only(chrono order)[say 1,2,3,4 and 5, 1 being the oldest]. Choose whatever name(say "ALL") you can have all the images to fall under and upload 1 using that name on Commons.
2. Look under the "File History", and you will find a "Upload new version of this image". Upload 2.
3. Repeat Step 2 for 3,4,5 so now the current image(5) is the latest image you want to be able to use everywhere.
4. Request the original images for Deletion stating that they have now been included as a previous version of "ALL". (You may leave it as it is. Doesnt really matter actually if its not used on any article.)

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 07:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

One problem though, not all these images live on my computer! Other people have created some of them. How do I get around that because I wouldn't actually be uploading anything?Sheffno1gunner (talk) 14:45, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Also there's a problem with file formats, one is .svg, the others are .png, any ideas? Could you maybe take a look?Sheffno1gunner (talk) 14:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Convert the svg to png, or all the pngs to svg (Which is advised) or just leave out the svg from the rest of them.

Use the "download" button above the image on its Commons page. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Sheffno1gunner. You have new messages at Talk:Owen Jones (writer)#Not Neutral.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited UK Independence Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Image thumbnails in the File History

Hi, just checking in... did you figure out the issue you were asking about at the Teahouse? Ocaasi ^{t | c} 03:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, yes all is well now! Although it has meant some files could do with being deleted, not sure how to go about that? CheersSheffno1gunner (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Good to hear. If you provide a list of the files needing deletion I can take care of that. Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

3rd party lead in table of opinion polls

I thought I would let you know that I've re-opened a discusion that you've previously been part of at Talk:Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election#3rd_party_lead:_OR_concerns. Bondegezou (talk) 19:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Second time - do not upload poor quality images

Hi Sheffno1gunner. Thank you for your interest in contributing to Wikipedia, a free-content encyclopedia project operated by the Wikimedia Foundation with the primary scope of providing high quality encyclopedic information (including images and media). Submissions that are non-free, of low quality, or otherwise unsuitable may be subject to deletion.

File:Webcam-toy-photo2.jpg has been identified as a possible image not in Wikipedia's scope. Wikipedia has guidelines on offensive material, and Wikimedia Commons (which has guidelines on nudity) already has a large number of photos of genitalia, specifically the male reproductive system and the penis.

If you have objections to the proposed deletion of your image(s), please see the links to the relevant deletion discussion(s) (listed above or below this message box). This message is not intended to be taken personally. Thank you for your understanding. -- Zad68 (talk) 03:38, Monday March 11, 2013 (UTC)

On January 8 2013, you uploaded a similar poor-quality image, you were notified that such images were not needed, and you acknowledged receipt of that notification when you archived it. Why did you do it again? Zad68 03:38, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

"Centre-left" Green Party

Hi,

You made an edit recently regarding whether the Green Party of England and Wales are "centre-left". I've just started a discussion about whether they are or not due to the numerous recent edits adding and removing this from the article. I'm letting you know about the discussion in case you want to get involved.

—me_and 10:45, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for sockpuppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 21:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Specifically, you have been blocked for editing using anonymous IPs in order to further your position in various content disputes. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 21:46, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sheffno1gunner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have not been using mutiple IPs and you will find that since I came back from my ban I have been nothing but constructive! What evidence have you got to back this claim up? What happened to assume good faith. In any case how do you suggest that I have been using all these different IPs, I can't be in 2 places at once! This is not a fair block, loock over my recent edit history, my edits have been constructive and my talk page comments have been polite! I have not edit warred, I have not been disruptive, this is just not right. Sheffno1gunner (talk) 23:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

At first, reviewing the edits, I was reasonably sure, but not 100% sure, that you were the same person as User:81.149.185.174 . Then I noticed the key giveaway. I won't mention what it is that gave you away, because I don't want you to start avoiding it in future accounts, but take it from me - you have a 'tell' that I can use to recognize you - in certain situations, anyway.FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sheffno1gunner - I didn't block you for edit warring, I blocked you for sockpuppetry. Using IPs to make it look like your position has more support than it actually does is disruptive, regardless of whether any edit warring has occurred. Finding consensus through discussion is an integral part of how we make editorial decisions at Wikipedia, and by using multiple IPs to make it seem that you were different people, you were circumventing this process. We assume good faith, yes, but not to the exclusion of common sense. Having said this, if you have any questions about the processes involved in appealing blocks, etc., do feel free to ask me. I'll be watching this page, so I can reply to your questions here. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{♪ talk ♪} 02:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Note - I have reset your block, due to your evasion of the block using the IP addresses 130.88.114.41 (talk) and 2.123.20.148 (talk). It is currently set to expire on 3 June 2013. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 18:33, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 14:58, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

I have changed the block length to indefinite due to your continued disruption from various IPs. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 14:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Buckinghamshire County Council election, 2013 (August 9)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buckinghamshire County Council election, 2013.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 15:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Sheffno1gunner, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buckinghamshire County Council election, 2013 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buckinghamshire County Council election, 2013, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buckinghamshire County Council election, 2013

Hello Sheffno1gunner. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Buckinghamshire County Council election, 2013".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buckinghamshire County Council election, 2013}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —rybec 08:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Place this notice on the talk page of the contributor of the copyrighted material:

Copyright problem: Opinium Research LLP

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Opinium Research LLP, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://ourinsight.opinium.co.uk/index.php?q=survey-results/voting-intention, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Opinium Research LLP and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Opinium Research LLP, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Opinium Research LLP. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Opinium Research LLP with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Opinium Research LLP saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! TheGGoose (talk) 18:11, 13 December 2014 (UTC)