User talk:Sameuf

Hello, I'm Hubble-3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Robert Jenrick have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.--Hubble_{Three_{Know me more}}🔭(talk with me)☢(contributions) 10:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions

Please stop editing the Robert Jenrick page by deleting large chunks of referenced information. Please see Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle and write a message on the talk page explaining your opinions to discuss this topic, rather than Wikipedia:Edit warring. If you want any help with this then feel free to write a message on my talk page or respond here. AustinRedd007 (talk) 12:40, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry am new to Wikipedia. Happy to discuss - don't see what the issue is with adding new source material and removing defamatory content. There is a difference on these pages between saying X did Y / and X was accused of Y, but said Z in defence. It just seems a little extreme how that page is presented. hope that's helpful :)

I understand where you are coming from and I also do not have an issue with you adding new source material, but in future if you edit pages, if you could try and keep the original source material as well from previous edits. It may be defamatory, but if this is the case then it is better to change the text and keep the original sources, rather than change everything as this is more likely to get your edits reverted. I will try and undo your edits less in future as it is clear to me that you are acting in WP:Good faith AustinRedd007 (talk) 07:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signing talk page comments

Hi,

Please type four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign comments you leave on Talk pages. The site will automatically replace them with your username and a timestamp. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]