User talk:S.G ReDark

Welcome!

Hello, S.G ReDark! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SkyWarrior 02:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:14, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uzina e Gramshit

I know that this is not a forum, but i thought you might be interested (if you didn't already know about it oc):

Can you believe this? https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/albania-arrests-two-russians-one-ukrainian-trying-enter-military-plant-2022-08-20/ FierakuiVërtet (talk) 23:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep I saw this, that's why I'm online now haha.S.G ReDark (talk) 23:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahahhaa FierakuiVërtet (talk) 23:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess they were trying to do this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Vrbětice_ammunition_warehouses_explosions and this https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/aug/01/arms-dealer-100-sure-russian-agents-blast-bulgarian-depot S.G ReDark (talk) 23:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Btw if you search on YouTube "objekti misterioz në ishullin Sazan" you can see some spying devices, also I remember in the "Defender21" some Russian turists took photos and videos of the exercises, equipment and military bases. S.G ReDark (talk) 23:12, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it could be. All they said is that the plant provide manufacturing services.

Still... as a military zone, I believe it should have more rigid controls.

Where are our intelligence services? They should prevent this kind of episode. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 23:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw the video on YouTube about Sazan. Sure, it would be nice some information from the government. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 23:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The control ain't bad considering the zone is semi-abandoned, I watched a yt channel that explores abandoned stuff and they went to Albanian, they tried to enter abandoned military zones, but they couldn't due to soldiers patroling. Now, uniza e Gramshit isn't abandoned and our military should provide a better security by installing cameras instead of throwing more soldiers to the woods. S.G ReDark (talk) 23:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SHISH... is I guess busy with the Iranian stuff (MEK base and hackers) and summer holidays ahaha S.G ReDark (talk) 23:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Sazan thing is very interesting and isn't covered much by the media or by anyone. S.G ReDark (talk) 23:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I was referring to Uzina e Gramshit. It still serves the Army, so the fact that two people could easily enter and take photos is sad. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 23:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I 100% agree with you. Now imagine if 97 didn't happen, uzina e Gramshit and other facilities would be in a better state and even producing stuff. S.G ReDark (talk) 00:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The collapse of the industry was not '97's fault. It was the Democratic Party's directive.

Listen to journalist Frrok Çupi (former member of the DP) in an interview for Euronews(14m49s):Video on YouTube

Moreover industries (everything owned by the state) started going for scrap since 1992. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 00:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I forgot the privatisation era, cough cough "Kompleksi Partizani" enters the chat (and many more).

S.G ReDark (talk) 01:03, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

XD Hey, I have question for you. Do you know something about 'Kryengritja e Fierit e 1935' because here on Wikipedia there is nothing about it. Moreover, there are no source on the internet, except Gazeta 55:(

Do you guys study these Kryengritje in school in Albania? FierakuiVërtet (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh i never heard of it, well...the thing is I'm diaspora Albanian so :p S.G ReDark (talk) 00:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are expanding your edits to other Albanian-related pages, good job! Btw did you see the SPAK-Meta news today? S.G ReDark (talk) 15:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My fault. I thought that you were a diaspora Albanian... But, then i saw the Doshi/Sanctions section, in which you wrote this: On dd.mm.yyyy, which is the format followed to write a date in Albanian (with the dots).

I saw Meta's news today. Let's see if they do something. FierakuiVërtet (talk) 16:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I saw the date in the article. Yeah let's see if they do something this time. S.G ReDark (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I hope you are doing alright (after what happened), check your talk page. S.G ReDark (talk) 23:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for telling the truth out there! Really!

I should report him for the ridiculous accusation. I don't know if it will change something though:( FierakuiVërtet (talk) 00:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's the least I could do! You had tough days here in Wikipedia and the last thing you need is another conflict lol. Maybe you should, I've been patient and hoped to solve this thought discussion but nothing was achieved so far and I doubt it ever will. S.G ReDark (talk) 01:13, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About the request: I have thought to ask an administrator to take some measures for his disruptive editing, but I don't know if it should be done this way. One thing is certain though: I am not wasting any more time trying to reason with him. His last edit showed his true face. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FierakuiVërtet (talk • contribs) 18:16, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to check her/his talk page. S.G ReDark (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

.

No I don’t have more, just those for Dominica and Togo. And also there can not be a withdrawal of recognition to any states. I hope you will add Togo and Dominica to the recognition list. And also add the other 11 countries to the recognition list Kosova666 (talk) 21:28, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]