User talk:Rupesh Kumar Saigal

July 2024

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Demetrios1993 (talk) 18:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Demetrios1993

Can you clarify which edit content you are referring to so that I can know so and so thing will cause a copyright problem. I had no idea as such for any of the edits I have done so far regarding copyright point. No way it was done purposely to violate copyrights. Rupesh Kumar Saigal (talk) 09:29, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to your edits in the following pages:

They were problematic both in terms of WP:COPYPASTE and WP:NOELBODY. I reverted your edits in three of the four aforementioned pages, and my edit summaries included the same reasoning (diff1, diff2, diff3). Demetrios1993 (talk) 05:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Firozabad have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 17:17, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Firozabad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Damtal moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Damtal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 17:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Montenegro

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Montenegro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead spam Wikipedia:Main article fixation

pls review WP:COUNTRYLEAD......Wikipedia:WikiProject Countries#Detail and duplication Moxy🍁 15:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any part of what Moxy said that you still don't understand? M.Bitton (talk) 18:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rupesh Kumar Saigal ...are you here? Moxy🍁 23:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Went through the guidelines. Understood the same. Rupesh Kumar Saigal (talk) 16:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:CS1 errors: dates

Hi -- your recent edits have mass-added pages to Category:CS1 errors: dates. Please fix the citations. Thanks! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Can you stop adding net worths to pages that already have it in the lead? They're already there, sourced and more up-to-date. Nswix (talk) 17:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I'm going to ask you to stop adding multiple net worth entries in lead. It's a hassle to have to go through and revert all of them, and as its already noted there, there's no need for another. Nswix (talk) 19:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I am taking care of the same and adding only after a thorough search only.

Still, if you feel there are any such instances happening now, please share the links.

Thanks. Rupesh Kumar Saigal (talk) 16:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent mass addition of net worth information

Please stop mass-adding what is basically the same sentence (except for figures and names, of course) to articles, since a) there are various formatting and style issues with the sentence, b) the reference is not ideal (the URL is dynamic, i.e., the displayed list is updated every year, and the list apparently cannot be archived; the individual Forbes profiles would also be much more convenient to verify and update), and c) the sentence is often not placed well or would have needed to be (slightly) adjusted to fit the surrounding text.

If you do want to add the 2024 net worth information, please use a sentence along the following lines (here for Mark Mateschitz as an example; adjusting it depending on the surrounding sentences) and cite the subject's Forbes profile site as the reference: In 2024, ''[[Forbes]]'' estimated Mateschitz' [[net worth]] at $39.6 billion, ranking him as the 31st-richest person in the world.<ref>{{cite web |title=Mark Mateschitz |url=https://www.forbes.com/profile/mark-mateschitz |website=[[Forbes]] |access-date=October 30, 2024}}</ref>

Please also go through your edits so far and adjust your additions accordingly. Note that sometimes you added the information even though a recent Forbes net worth was already in the article with the Forbes profile site as a reference (e.g., at MacKenzie Scott or Len Blavatnik). In those cases, you should just update the net worth, rank and month/year and not add any new sentence and/or the same reference again. Thank you! Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 21:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also be more careful in making sure that the article is about the person on the Forbes' list (e.g., your edits at John Mars or Ken Griffin, where that was not the case). Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 21:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine.

Deleted those edits at John Mars and Ken Griffin, Rupesh Kumar Saigal (talk) 17:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted the edits for MacKenzie Scott

For Len Blavatnikupdated the sentence. Rupesh Kumar Saigal (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those edits had already been dealt with and reverted, so you re-added your sentence again at John Mars and Len Blavatnik, but I've removed them again (at the latter one, you also ignored my suggestion and wrote "ranked #52" instead of "ranking him as the 52nd-richest person in the world", but I've fixed that already as well). The following articles are the ones you still need to go over: Ma Huateng, Gina Rinehart, François Pinault, Miriam Adelson, Rafaela Aponte-Diamant, Gianluigi Aponte, Reinhold Würth, Gérard Wertheimer, Alain Wertheimer, Li Ka-shing, Dieter Schwarz, Colin Huang, and Klaus-Michael Kühne. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 21:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you are again inserting this content, much of which isn't appropriate for the lede section (and often has formatting/tone errors). I'm likely going to remove many/most of these. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further, have you noticed that editors at these articles are regularly removing this insertion for being either unnecessary, duplicitous, and/or poorly written/formatted? I urge you to look for constructive ways to make contributions or update articles if the data is outdated. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. As you have noticed, multiple editors dispute the style, substance, and location of this content you keep adding. They remove it and comment to you here about it. Yet you keep adding it. Do not do that. DMacks (talk) 18:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]