Dalling married secondly, in 1770, Louisa, (died 1824), daughter of Excelles Lawford]], of [[Burwood Park|Burwood]], Surrey. Their only surviving son [[Sir William Windham Dalling, 2nd
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to De Salis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
Salis-Soglio (1890–1968) of [https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schloss_Gemünden Schloss Gemünden]].
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Benyon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ockendon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Further to that, thanks for the comments in the Deletion Review, if you find other media which was deleted (other than F8's-which means it got moved to Commons :) ) you can follow the instructions at the top of that page to request a review of the process, and where the material can be shown with a compelling but polite argument to be reasonable and compatible with Wikipedia's licensing and scope, it can be undelted, information added, and if it's 'free' it can be placed on Commons for the entire Wikimedia community :) , You cannot say that about some other archives and galleries. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
thank you! That's brilliant. I just found the list of files, and there are several which I had'nt tagged properly or were somehow or other taken off and would be great to get back. There are several photos, for example, loaded by me but taken by someone now 82 not au fait with e-mail so could'nt send her 'permission' e-mails.Rodolph (talk) 23:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. In this instance, you might have to do it the old-fashioned way, which is the formal (postal) letter/notice :( . The Foundation has in the past handled mailed in permissions. You'd need to ask someone else for the correct mailing address though. You probably have a better idea of what to put in formal letters of that sort than I do though. <smile> Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have recently updated the information on this image, to bring it's {{information}} block up to a very high standard.
It would be greatly appreciated if you could give this a review before the image is transfered to commons.
It would also greatly aid the reuse of other archive material you donated, if you would consider updating the descriptions
you have uploaded for other media, and archive material.
Thank you again for uploading what in many instances is unique archive material, which greatly aids Wikipedia's presentation of the topics to which they relate. If only some other archives were as gracious with donation of important archive material.
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Two longshots,
(i) Do you have a record of the silversmiths name?
(ii) Does the silver jug (assuming it's still accessible) concerned have an assay mark? This would allow a more specifc date to be added to the {{information}} entry?
thanks for excellent follow up and attention to detail, and thanks for your kind comments and encouragement. I will add maker and date to that image, (though there is scope in that case for confusion in that I don't think the engraving was done by the silversmith, and was added later), as soon as I can.Rodolph (talk)
(Aside) If Vincent Price's musing's on art in a radio play suggested anything to me it was that with arts and works of craftsmanship, nothing is 'ever going to be definitive. <smiles> Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
BTW {{infosplit}} is a recommended way of doing split credits (and I recently got the template implemented at Wikimed Commons, specifically for that reason. For more information see the template documentation.)
Another image improved. Note the {{infosplit}} has a third field that will let you note the designer of the interior and so on.
Please read the template documentation for details. Thanks you for working with other contributors to improve the "catalog entries" <smile> Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Removed the bio on Cooper, Robert. (It's still in the history though), as it probably better suited to a stub bio. Couldn't find much on them via Google, although a Google Books result indicated that there was a "Robert Cooper" recorded by the Goldsmiths company in London for the appropriate dates. Not sure where to find other sources for a stub as art history isn't my subject.
Another 'catalog entry' improved. - Ideally the term waiter (refering to the platter) should link to a suitable article,I've not done this because I wasn't sure where to link it,(the disambig page for waiter links to the occupation, or some films.)Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Does Wikipedia (or Wikimedia Commons) have a version of the full portrait, that I could use to transfer over things like
the artist name? 12:11, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
You might want to look through it, with a view to recovering some of the still deleted images (the red linked) ones.
Obviously, material that's still got copyright issues can't be un-deleted, but with a compelling argument many of the older
images that would be PD-UK or PD-art are potentially recoverable.
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:16, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS sent? Checking because it seems to have been deleted merely because it was orphaned. You seemed to be a 'bit put out' at the time if the original discussion is anything to go by.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Forgive any anger. I was a wee bit put out at the time because a certain 'editor' was I thought going after me, or at least it felt that way at the time, 2009-2010. Rodolph2 (talk) 22:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for all these enquires, but...
This image is now at Commons, I note the topiary choice here resembles a mitre? Was there a particular reason for this other then the choice of the topiarist? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:37, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This was deleted from Fingask Castle, probably because I had uploaded it under old rules and an rather officious supervisor then deleted it without much care. I mean it is clearly OLD-art. In the Fingask case I had read that where an article was getting too long the Wiki guide line was to make two or three articles in its place. This I did, only to then find some other uber-editor deciding that the subject should be re-consolidated back to one, which they then did, with some blood-shed!Rodolph (talk)
If it's this author (and the illustration is hers),- Catherine Eliza Somerville (Katie) Stow (1856-1940),[[1]] then it's PD-Australia. And given that Australia applies a 50 year pma term, was PD in Australia in 1990 ( prior to 1996). Does anyone reading this page have access to a library to check the book? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
well done! The London Library's copy is the same edition (greenish) as the one shown by the link, i.e. 1897.User:Rodolph
Here's what was written four years ago: File:AustralianMythsLondonLibraryBook (see below)
Australian Legendary Tales, Folk-lore, collected by Mrs. K. Langloh Parker, published in London (David Nutt) & Melbourne (Melville, Mullen & Slade), 1896. Mrs Parker died in 1940. Maker of cover unknown, done circa 1895/96. Book published in 1896. (Rodolph (talk) 17:04, 4 January 2010 (UTC) Rodolph (talk) 17:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC))Rodolph2 (talk) 22:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The cover may be fine (someone in Canberra Australia could look at the copy in the Petherick Reading Room of the National Library to confirm the provenance of the cover illustration) but where will it be used. The book has no article ? No copies stored in my neck of the woods sorry - Peripitus(Talk)10:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We have an article on the writer (under a later name) K_Langloh_Parker with a list of works. Use of a notable work by an author, to accompany a biblographic list has been done in other articles, especially where the cover image helps the reader identify the style of the works concerned. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:54, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
the library's label on the cover was mentioned as a possible copyright problem. The label is this: now superseded London Library label by Reynolds Stone, by Reynolds Stone. Stone died as recently as 1979, so assume his design is allowed as it it is fair use (and good for his reputation for it to be seen). Rodolph (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Eugène, 8th Count de Salis-Soglio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
_oval_portrait,_circa_1760,_grayscale_version.jpg){kind=link}
,_aka_Mrs._Robert_Carstairs_Drysdale.jpg){kind=link}
