Jump to content

User talk:Rbstrachan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Rbstrachan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! 65.94.170.207 (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


Teahouse logo
Hello! Teahouse invitation, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!


Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Rbstrachan! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! McSly (talk) 21:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --Killarnee (T12) 21:53, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your E-Mail

[edit]

Hello Rbstrachan, I have received your email. If you undo a change you should always go to the talk page of the user whose edit you have undone. If you have activated Twinkle in the settings in the "Gadgets" section, you can simply leave a template there with one click so that the user knows that he has made a mistake. You should also leave such a template on talk pages of IPs. If you have further questions you can ask your question in the teahouse or add {{Ping|Killarnee}} under your question. Regards, --Killarnee (T12) 22:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Assunta Marchetti

[edit]

It is already in the existing source (which says "Blessed" in the sources own title) IT does not need a new source since the existing one covers it. -- 65.94.170.207 (talk) 15:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Walsh (investor)

[edit]

Hi Rbstrachan. I just wanted to let you know that I declined a recent report you made to WP:AIV. The content that is being fought over at Patrick Walsh (investor) appears problematic to me because it doesn't seem to meet the standards of sourcing required of a biography of a living person (we have very strict policies about these kinds of articles). The first two sources do not mention Patrick Walsh, and the letter from the Attorney General is a primary source, making the text based on it at risk of being considered original research. For these reasons, I would ask that a consensus be sought on the article's talk page before reinserting the content. I hope this helps clarify my thought process here. Mz7 (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thankyou for your message. As you can probably see I only recently started RC patrol. I reinstated the content because I could not see a good reason to remove it, and none was provided. I also assumed it was being removed to "bury" the information.

Thankyou for clarifying.

rbstrachan (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I actually would not be surprised if there were some underlying motive behind the repeated removal, but regardless of that, we should strive to ensure that the sourcing follows Wikipedia policies. I have no problem with including the controversy provided it is adequately sourced. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 18:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Olga Tokarczuk

[edit]

She is antipolish writer, this is not vandalism 79.227.58.248 (talk) 17:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Izno. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:Citing sources seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Izno (talk) 02:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Hi, your last edit to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kali-Saṇṭāraṇa_Upaniṣad appears to have been made in bad faith, and I have had to revert the changes. Please remember guidelines against bias, including religious bias. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.163.179.143 (talk) 08:48, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Rbstrachan! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:34, Saturday, April 18, 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]