User talk:Ratipok

This is Ratipok's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Ratipok, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Eleassar ^{my talk} 06:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject:Europe/Slovenia

Hi! I see you've been editing articles related to Slovenian football. You're welcome to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/Slovenia. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 06:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can I still join?Ratipok (talk) 23:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course. Just add your name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Slovenia/Members. Have a nice day. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 00:00, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NK Olimpija Ljubljana

Hello Ratipok. I was the one "to blame" on having inserted the notable players list that included the previous Olimpija players, and I also thank you for pointing out that the website I found was not the official one, as I wrongly touth. However, you recently made a massive change to the article, that I´m not sure if it is supported by all footy editors. Many times, massive changes like these ones, even if correct, should have some previous discussion, even just to see what to do with the rest of the related content. The problem that we have here is that I´m not sure if it would be apropriate to have another article for the team with same name that ceased to exist. Resumingly, I´m not sure if the deletion of all info regarding the "old" Olimpija was a good edit of yours. I´m not saying yes, or not, just that we should see how other clubs in same situation dealt with it. Otherwise, with your edit, we lost all info about the previous Olimpija, and that is not benefitial to anybody, I even think you would agree with me on that. We should see what to do about it. Basically, in other words, you trouth to garbage all regarding the great historical Olimpija :) . I had already asked for opinions on this at the football project talk page (here Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#NK_Olimpija_Ljubljana), but there wasn´t much feedback on it. What do you think? Anyways, best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your post. I have made changes as the current article is the correct one. The old arcitle is about a different club that was abolished due to financial difficulties. That is the officall standpoint of Slovenian football association, UEFA and the board of Slovenian first league. However. The old article can still be made avaliable if a new article about the old club (1911-2004) is made as NK Olimpija Ljubljana (defunct). I think that in the case of Austrian club Admira Wacker has the similar case. One article is about the old club that was abolished (5 times AUT champions) and the other article is about the new club that has the same name but hasnt have the rights of the old honours, history, tradition just like in the case of Olimpjia. Would that be OK?Ratipok (talk) 13:28, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn´t noteced that you had answered to me, anyway, I see that there are 2 articles now, one about the current, and one about the old, Olimpija, just as it should be. Well, it is solved. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 21:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nov članek

Pogledaš si lahko Wikipedia:Article wizard in Wikipedia:Your first article, sicer pa preprosto vnesi naslov članka v iskalno polje in pritisni enter, potem pa izberi rdečo povezavo (You may create ...). --Eleassar ^{my talk} 06:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala!Ratipok (talk) 20:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Slovenia

Welcome, Ratipok, to the WikiProject Slovenia! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Slovenia-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject Slovenia}}. A few features that you might find helpful:

The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: , Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 37 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! --Eleassar ^{my talk} 20:52, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Glad to know that my comments are useful - thanks again for your work on these articles. Yours, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 12:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The lead usually does not have references because it is a summary of the whole article, which should have the refs. Even in the lead, a direct quotation should have a ref, and some people will add refs for extraordinary claims too. The other way to cite the lead is the same as the rest of the article (this is much less common, but sometimes seen). Please also note that print sources are fine (don't have to be on the internet to be reliable). Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 00:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made one last comment on the peer review about italics. I am not sure the language is as cleaned up as it could be, but if you are ready to take it there, the page for Wikipedia:Good article nominations explains everything needed to make a nomination in considerable detail. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The English is not bad, but there are some places that could be improved. There are people willing to do copyedits at WP:PR/V and at WP:GOCE. I understand completely as German is my second language. When I write in German I make all kinds of mistakes that I do not (usually) make in English (and some that are impossible to make in English ;-) . Keep up the good work, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 14:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Ziga Pavlin a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Andrewa (talk) 21:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please take care not to delete other editors' talk page comments with which you might disagree. This is a very serious thing to do. Thanks, ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 22:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Darwinek for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 17:18, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial article moves

Do not make controversial moves over redirects as you did at Rok Ticar. The Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle requires that you seek a consensus before making such controversial moves. if you feel this article should be moved, then the proper process is to make a move request on the article's talk page. Dolovis (talk) 15:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've been making all sorts of controversial moves, Dolovis. Without an RM on the talk page. Stop being a hypocrite. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 21:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

His name is Rok Tičar and it should be written as such. I dont see any controversies considering that majority of other international athletes (Jaromír Jágr, Teemu Selänne, Dejan Stanković, Júlio César Soares Espíndola) including other well known persons, such as the current President of Poland (Bronisław Komorowski), President of Slovenia (Danilo Türk), Prime Minister of Spain (José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero) and thousands more, use diacritics in their article names. Are you going to change them all? Unless you do, I will made "controversial" article move of Rok Tičar once more as I dont see why he should be an exception. And you can again make a "rightful" accusation of sockpuppetry.Ratipok (talk) 13:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2004

I don't uderstand the use of 2004 in the articles NK Mura, NK Ljubljana and NK Olimpija. I'm not sure for tha last one but NK Ljubljana and NK Mura were certainly dissolved in 2005. I followed the case with Ljubljana carefully back then and I can guarantee that.84.52.128.62 (talk) 09:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All three clubs were officialy dissolved at the end of 2004. The reason why they were allowed to finish the season was because they were at the time, competing in the first division. The Slovenian FA then had to decide what to do. Either to kick all three clubs out after the season was already in progress and therefore finish the season with seven clubs (which would efectivelly meant that the league would not be eligible to participate in UEFA competitions the next season), or to exceptionally allow the three teams to finish the season (2004-05) which they started. So, officialy the three clubs were in fact dissolved by the decision of Slovenian FA at the end of 2004 and closed all buissnes transaction at that time, however, theye were exceptionally allowed to play a - dozen more matches just so the season would be transparent. After their last match they effectively ceased all operations.Ratipok (talk) 12:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That may be right for Olimpija, but certainly not for Ljubljana. If the club would have been dissolved in 2004, there would be no dilemma about their licence in 2005, when they were in the game untill the end of licence procedure and even had options to resume in second league, so the club couldn't have been dissolved in 2004. Chech the journals of that time.Linhart (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since the dissolution year of NK Ljubljana is not referenced in the article itself, then you can change it to 2005 (if its correct) without any problem. Especially if you have a reference that confirms this. Personally I believed that all three clubs were dissolved at the same time, but I might be wrong since there are reliable references only in the case of Olimpija and Mura. Wikipedia is an encylopedia so if 2005 is the correct dissolution year for NK Ljubljana then it should be written as such. I do believe that I remember though, that after their license got revoked (i.e. was not extended) at the end of 2004, Ljubljana (I am not sure about Mura, but it might be as well) tried to appeal and get the license couple of months later, unsuccessfuly. Ratipok (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is correct. http://www.rtvslo.si/sport/nogomet/1-slovenska-nogometna-liga-2004-05/nzs-zavrnil-pritozbe-trem-klubom/106939 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.52.128.62 (talk) 22:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:46, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question about minor edits

An IP editor raised a question about the above at Help talk:Minor edit. I haven't looked at your edits and I don't have any opinion about it either way, but you might want to take a look at Help talk:Minor edit#Question about an editor, and reply there. Thanks! --Tryptofish (talk) 21:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i love lublijana

Hi my friend, i'm from israel and i was in slovenia long time ago and fall in love with olimpja lublijana. i need your help with something, how can i contact you personaly. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.229.201.76 (talk) 19:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Whatever you need you can contact me here and I will help you. Thx, Ratipok (talk) 19:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hello

It does look pretty good now, and you could probably send it to FLC. Lists usually don't need a lot of prose, so you don't have to worry about that. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All the instructions for that are at WP:FLC. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 22:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review of NK Maribor

Hello there! I'm reviewing NK Maribor for good article status per your nomination. I've left some initial comments on the review page and placed the nomination on hold for 1 week so you can work on the article. If you have any questions, please ask on the review page, as I am watching it and would be happy to provide clarification or additional feedback. I'll re-review the article next Saturday, 2011-08-27. —Darkwind (talk) 06:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you Ratipok (talk) 12:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of NK Maribor

The article NK Maribor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:NK Maribor for comments about the article. Well done! —Darkwind (talk) 23:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eternal derby (Slovenia)

Its actually two matches per line in the Matches list section table, so they played 20X in Yugoslav leagues. --Sporti (talk) 11:36, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You dont get what I was trying to do and I see again that you have made the same table stats section, despite the fact that the stats are wrong! Old Olimpija and Maribor played only ten matches in the Yugoslav league not twenty as your table shows it at the moment. This is the main problem (you acted before thinking and if you would just wait long enough I would fix the problem like I intended to). Ten matches were in first division, others were in second or third, however, your table shows it like they played all of the Yugoslav period league matches in first division, which is false. The same goes for the Cup section. Not all of the matches in the tables were part of the Yugoslav Cup. Some were from the Slovenian Republic Cup (regional cup in SR Slovenia, minor regional tournament in terms of SFR Yugoslavia). There are also some other mistakes (like the one where you claim that the best result of Maribor in the Yugoslav Cup was QF, yet in fact it was SF. Another thing. The whole stats from old and new Olimpija in comparison to Maribor will eventually have to be split into two sections and therefore there is no purpuse if you put them togheter, because when this article will be put to GA nomination I am certain that reviewers will demand this.Ratipok (talk) 16:18, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Iztok Puc

Thank you for your work on the article! In case that you haven't noticed, it is now nominated for WP:DYK. GregorB (talk) 21:40, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's something I'd like to see too. In part, that's because to me it is a bit more than just an article. Back in the day, I really enjoyed watching Puc play, he was one of my all-time favorite handball players.

I've just conservatively assessed the article as C class. It's close to B at worst, but I feel it may still need some work to approach GA. It would be great to make it a collaboration between WP Slovenia and WP Croatia, would you agree? GregorB (talk) 21:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've seen the PR but have not studied it in detail yet. It seems to be rather useful and constructive. I'm still interested in bringing this article up to GA class. Definitely more sources are needed for better coverage and depth, and - needless to say - PR remarks should be addressed. I'm going to try to find some more Croatian sources. (Statistics, for one.)

I'm somewhat busy at the moment so my general time frame for this article would be December-January. I might throw in a couple of edits in the mean time. GregorB (talk) 17:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very good work there. Indeed, nothing much left. I have some sources regarding his stay in Zagreb, so I'll hopefully use them to enhance that part of the article - shouldn't be a problem. Can't say when - this week or maybe the next. Hope you're not burning to nominate it right away... :-) GregorB (talk) 00:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good plan! GregorB (talk) 00:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First off, sorry not to have replied here earlier. Glad to know that my comments at the PR were useful. Second, if there are sources to expand the international play section, I would expand it too. It seems to me that print sources from that time would be a possible source of stats / results (even if they are not available on the web). I do not write about sports myself, so I am not super knowledgable about such articles. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Iztok Puc

On 9 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Iztok Puc, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Iztok Puc is the only handball player to have represented three different countries at the Summer Olympics: Yugoslavia, Croatia and Slovenia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iztok Puc.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

{{adminhelp}}

For the administrator

The reason I need help is because I would like to move the current Ljudski vrt Stadium article to simply, Ljudski vrt. The problem is that "Ljudski vrt" was already created as a redirection so I dont know how to change/fix it. As for the title change, I think that Ljudski vrt would be much better (especially with the upcoming work on the article in order to achieve GA or FA status). Thanks, Ratipok (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot move it as there is more than one edit on the destination page - I suggest format a WP:RM template (section "Requesting a single page move") on the talk page of Ljudski vrt Stadium to suggest a move. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:06, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Petar Stojanović

Hi, Ratipok, and thanks for the message, which takes me back to about 100 years ago (I exaggerate a bit) when I was helping out creating stubs for obscure composers who were listed in The opera corpus. At one point there was a Petar Stojanović dab page because someone had created a link for a Petar Stojanović (photographer) - click this link, if you're interested, to see what eventually happened. Anyway, my Petar S is better remembered as a composer than a violinist, and it's probably not a good idea to decide between Hungarian (born in Budapest) and Serbian, so Petar Stojanović (composer) would be the best bet for your dab page with the footballer. I've now moved the page to Petar Stojanović (composer), so feel free to create create Petar Stojanović (footballer). You may need an admin to create a Petar Stojanović dab page from the redirect (apologies if I've done my move in the wrong order). I've changed all the mainspace Petar Stojanović links to Petar Stojanović (composer), except that there's a bicyclist of that name in Istrian Spring Trophy which ought to be turned into a redlink, maybe Petar Stojanović?

Just for the record, I've never heard a note of the composer's music and know nothing of Balkan languages. But about 500 years ago (I exaggerate even more), I travelled through Slovenia on a train from Venice to Vienna which stopped in the middle of the night in Ljubljana or thereabouts to check my passport. Greetings ("Lep pozdrav", thank you, google) from sunny York and best wishes. --GuillaumeTell 15:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook

Please get this into your head: uploading an image to Facebook does not put it into the public domain. Worse, unlike flickr which has provision for giving copyright details on each image so that some flickr images may be copied here, Facebook does not care about copyright, but since we do, we must treat all Facebook images as "all rights reserved". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:15, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Slovenian football champions

Hello Ratipok, I've closed the PR on your behalf and look forward to seeing your list nominated at WP:FLC! All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BCFC

Hello. Not doubting your word, but I can't see why they'd be in Maribor, lovely place though it is. They've been training for some days in Bad Häring, which is the other side of Austria, and are playing Borussia Moenchengladbach tomorrow in Munich, and then they've got a first-team friendly in England on Tuesday. There are all sorts of reports on the Birmingham Mail website here. Does the BCFC website really expect people to register even to read stuff? that's a totally stupid way to run a club site. By the way, thanks for adding that photo of the fans at the Europa League match to the BCFC page: I'm in there somewhere... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:09, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up: the club's Academy and Development squads are in Maribor and according to this, have matches tomorrow (Saturday). cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:24, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Syria

It doesn't go on the timeline, instead please put it here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_reactions_to_the_Syrian_civil_war , under the Australia section. Also don't include Press tv. Sopher99 (talk) 17:53, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
Research: The most recent DR data
Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:24, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

2012 Maribor protests

Hi Ratipok,

You might find this link useful:

[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.129.50.161 (talk) 21:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have seen it before (will add it in the article;).Ratipok (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sheriff (Slovenia)

Hi, I'm Jesus Presley. Ratipok, thanks for creating Sheriff (Slovenia)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Only slovene sources found - please add some english sources, too.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 05:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Regarding Kangler; you just beat me to it. Na zdravje. U5K0'sTalk_{Make WikiLove not WikiWar} 22:15, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2012–13 EHF Cup, Ratipok!

Wikipedia editor Lukasz Lukomski just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi - it would be more informative if you could write a bit more introduction regarding what sport is involved and what sort of competition this cup is - at the moment it's rather enigmatic. Lukasz Lukomski (talk) 02:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Lukasz Lukomski's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Maribor players

Sem vido da si na forumu uredil zadevo glede avtogolov in so popravli statistiko (zdaj bom pregledo če so kakšne spremembe pri golih zaradi tega), vprašaj če lahko uredijo tudi glede dvojnega vnosa pri igralcu Veroljub Jovanović (enkrat je vnešen z "č"-jem, drugič pa z "ć"-jem), zato piše da ma 114 2 nastopa namesto da bi bilo skupaj 116 in se zaradi tega podere pravilen vrsten red (v artiklu na wiki je napisano 116 tako kot mora biti)

Sem zdaj opazo da je problem tudi pri Milan Šober (enkrat vnešen kot Milan Šober, drugič kot Šober Milan) Matej1234 (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nisem takoj videl da je napisan komentar da se tabela posodobi 1x na sezono in sem že posodobil, upam da ni kaj narobe, od naslednje sezone se ne bo več posodabljajo eno leto (do maja 2014), ker zdaj se itak ne splača 4 tedne pred koncem sezone nehat posodabljat, če bi to držalo "The table that follows is accurate as of 2011–12 NK Maribor season." potem bi bilo treba vse nastope dati nazaj kot so bili maja 2012, tako da mogoče je pametno da artikel ponovno nominiraš za FL takoj po zadnji tekmi proti Aluminiju ko bo vse posodobljeno. Matej1234 (talk) Matej1234 (talk) 15:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, bom pustil sedaj in updatal komaj po sezoni, pa pri Handanoviču je boljše da ostane z "č" in ne "ć" da bo isto kot v njegovem artiklu, ker NZS.si, PrvaLiga.si, UEFA.com, transfermarkt, nationalfootballteams itd. imajo vsi napisano Handanovič, nkmaribor.com pa itak zarad nekih čudnih razlogov pri VSEH nogometaših Maribora in nasprotnikov uporablja ć namesto č, je bila tukaj debata LINK Matej1234 (talk) Matej1234 (talk) 13:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pri UEFA linkih mora biti uporabljen "web" in ne "news", news se uporablja za članke, naprimer tole, tole ali pa tole, "web" pa za strani, ki niso novice, naprimer lista strelcev na nkmaribor.com, profili igralcev na UEFA strani itd. Matej1234 (talk) 09:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LP, delam artikel za Franc Fridl, pa me zanima če mogoče več če je on direktno iz Maribora prestopil v Olimpijo ali ne, 1999 je pol sezone odigral za Beltince ampak ne piše če je bila to posoja ali je pred tem prestopil tja. Matej1234 (talk) 12:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sem naredil še Boštjan Žnuderl in Marinko Šarkezi. Matej1234 (talk) 13:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The Treble ali pa "Domestic Treble", treba pa je zraven napisati da je vštet Superpokal Matej1234 (talk) 08:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of designated terrorist organizations

Hello Ratipok,

Thanks a lot for your help on the List of designated terrorist organizations article! Many of the references you provided redirect to error pages or do not contain the information, could you please check? I revert a few things meanwhile, I hope we will be able to re-add them when proper citations are found. Dates are important information for past groups, so I reinsert them.

About the UN column you added: Could you please add a paragraph in the "Process of designation" section, explaning how the UN maintains its official list of designated terrorist organizations? Like is done for the other ones. Thanks a lot for your research!

Thanks also for reverting vandalism! Nicolas1981 (talk) 03:07, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Players list

Hello. Happy to have another look, but probably won't be until Sunday. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed it had been archived. Pity, really. Comes of it waiting weeks for any reviews at all apart from those made by the FL delegates, and then getting an in-depth oppose that needed a lot of work. The list looks much closer to FL-quality now. When you do renominate, it might be best to respond individually at the FLC page to reviewers' points (done, or will do, or don't think that's needed because..., or whatever's appropriate) so that everyone can tell whether and how the work is progressing.

One thing I didn't think of when reviewing was the alt text on the images. Your captions are fine, but what alt text is supposed to do, is briefly describe what can be seen in the picture for the benefit of those readers who can't actually see it. So, for instance, the alt text for File:NK Maribor2011.jpg could say something like A group of casually dressed young men, some with arms round each other's shoulders, stand in a row. Two of them are holding up a silver cup, and then the caption identifies the men and why they're lined up waving a trophy. Or for File:Matjaž Kek.jpg, we can see something like A laughing middle-aged white man wearing a lightweight outdoor jacket, (assuming that is a laugh) and then the caption tells the reader who the man is and why he's relevant to Maribor. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:51, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, and better luck with it this time. It's a public holiday weekend here, it isn't raining, and I hope to have better things to do than spending hours on Wikipedia... If I haven't reviewed it by Wednesday lunchtime (timezone of your choice) please feel free to leave me a strong reminder :-) cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've noticed the new articles. Perhaps next time you edit the list to remove the nolink from a player with a new article, you could also remove the nolinks from the remaining notable listed players, i.e. those that have played in a fully professional league as listed at WP:FPL, and (in my opinion, anyway) those that played in the Yugoslav top division. Then we can see how many real redlinks remain. Judging by the way the new articles have been appearing, you're probably down to an acceptable amount.

You could safely remove the bits about flags and FIFA nationalities from the key, which aren't relevant now you've gone over to a Country represented column. Now the key and the footnotes are pretty stable, I'll give them a copyedit for English usage over the weekend, and have another look at the list overall, but I don't expect to find many problems. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just about to post a few comments at the FLC, nothing major. Still a little bothered by the redlinks/nolinks though. As said above, I'm comfortable with the way articles are appearing for the notable players, but there still seem to be some players not linked who in my opinion at least should be. According to the List of NK Maribor seasons, Maribor were in the Yugoslav top division from 1967/68 to 1971/72, so there are still several players e.g. Herbert Vabič, Herbert Klančnik, who played for several years in that division, and others e.g. Dragan Grbavac, Miro Petrič, who appeared in it. Are you unhappy with those players being presumed notable and thus needing to be linked – in which case please argue about it :-) it might well be that my assumptions about player notability in that league are not generally held – or did you just miss them when removing the nolinks?

Incidentally, when I was looking at List of NK Maribor seasons, the table didn't format properly, and clicking the sort buttons didn't do anything. Does it work for you? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thought it was probably just that you missed them... On the seasons list thing, I'd guess something in that templated header that worked at the time has been broken by WP software changes. The Maribor list is the only page that uses it now, apart from NK Olimpija Ljubljana (2005) and it's broken there as well. Looks like it needs changing to use ordinary wikitable-markup. Good luck to Maribor in the cup final, by the way... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:52, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For Milevski : {{cite web |url=http://www.11v11.com/matches/fyr-macedonia-v-egypt-29-september-1998-266266/ |title=FYR Macedonia v Egypt, 29 September 1998 |website=11v11.com |publisher=AFS Enterprises |accessdate=30 May 2013}} . The site is the official website of the Association of Football Statisticians, as their "about" page confirms. RSSSF only has the Egyptian lineup for that game.

For Nilton, I've spent some time looking for any news or non-user-edited statistical source to confirm his playing for Cape Verde, and can't; and he even doesn't appear as a national team player on NFT or footballdatabase.eu. If we had any idea when these appearances were meant to have been made, it might help, but I'd be inclined to remove his nationality represented until/unless it can be reliably sourced. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Back again, sorry. In note A, is that a full list of competitions included in the player stats? It should be, but using the form "(e.g. Yugoslav First League,..." rather implies those are illustrative examples rather than the full set. I can copyedit the note, but need to be sure we're on the same wavelength first. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pisete neumnosti

Pisete stvari, ki niso tocne. Glede N.C. navajate linke iz casopisov, ki so sporni... Posredno povzrocate veliko materialno skodo. A vam ni kaj jasno?? V Sloveniji se da izvedet vse. Tudi kdo je Ratipok oz. Kopitar... Pa lep pozdrav!

Brana (Srbija) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.161.90.57 (talk) 03:41, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Stozice Stadium Ljubljana.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Stozice Stadium Ljubljana.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:56, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Slovenian help needed

Hello Ratipok, I'm contacting you because we need some Slovenian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sl.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Slovenian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 23:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:South East Handball Association LOGO.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:South East Handball Association LOGO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emir Dautović

The article Emir Dautović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Article proposed for deletion

There are four standard deletion processes, two of which are relevant to the case of Emir Dautović. The currently on going process is called proposed deletion, which is used for uncontroversial deletions. You're welcome to disagree with me on this, but I feel the article falls into this category. If a proposed deletion tag remains in place for seven days the article may deleted. If someone objects by removing the tag, the process is stopped and the tag may not be re-added. If the original nominator (or anyone else for that matter) disagrees with the reasons proved with the objection, deletion may continue second process, called article for deletion. This is what I assume you were referring to in your comment on my talk page. Under this process, the deletion of the article would be discussed for at least seven days, at which point, if there is a consensus to delete, keep, merge, move, or redirect the article an administrator will take the appropriate action.

Second, allow me to expand on the delete rationale, and explain why the article is unlikely to survive a discussion if you do object. There are obviously rules as to which subjects may and may not have articles on Wikipedia. This is called notability. There are two notability guidelines that are relevant to footballers. First, the subject specific guideline on footballers. It says that any footballer who has played for his or her country at the senior level or played in one of the fully professional leagues listed here may have an article. The second, is the general notability guideline. It applies to all subjects and says that anything that has received significant coverage in reliable sources is notable. In the case of footballers, significant coverage means detailed, in depth coverage going well beyond the routine sports journalism (match reports, squad lists, transfer announcements and speculation, etc.) that you would expect of any footballer. Emir Dautović does not meet either of these guidelines. In fact the subject specific guideline explicitly excludes him in two separate ways, as a youth international and as having signed but not played for fully pro a club. Under these circumstances, the article is unlikely to receive much support beyond your own in a discussion. I hope that clears things up. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emir Dautović for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emir Dautović is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emir Dautović until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Oblak

Hi there RATIPOK, AL from Portugal "here",

can we please reach a compromise here, please? 1 - again, i stress, there is no need to say his SISTER plays for the WOMEN's team, for obvious reasons (i mean we should keep the wikilink of course, and the refs, i'm just saying to hide the word "women's"; 2 - i'm not a native English speaker as the intro to this message says, but i'm pretty sure you don't say "shares the same (last) name", either you say "shares name" or "has the same name".

Happy editing, "whistle if" you have any further comments --AL (talk) 01:30, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply. Regards back, happy sunday --AL (talk) 23:54, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zdruzenje.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zdruzenje.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 NK Maribor season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petar Stojanović. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield Wednesday v FC Arsenal Tula

Hello, it is 17:00 CET and 18:00 BST. Skyblueshaun (talk) 06:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 7 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ljudski vrt page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalistic/Ethnic edits

I understand your reverting of my posts because I didn't provide sources, and as you said, because ethnicity info doesn't belong in the intro (which I didn't know at the time). I apologize about that. But I would like to point out something: in some articles in the intro, for example Miral Samardžić, where it says "is a Slovenian football defender", the word Slovenian is linked to the article about Slovenian people which specifically states to be about the ethnic group ("The Slovenes are the northernmost South Slavic ethnic group"), and as such would imply ethnic belonging, which is an info that, as you informed me, 1.) doesn't belong in the intro, and 2.) for which there is no source. Slovenia is not home just to Slovenes, but to a number of ethnicities. All we know is that he has citizenship of Slovenia, but we have no sources how he identifies as ethnically. Considering this, I would suggest compromising by using the neutral form with the word "Slovenian" in the intro not linked to any article, as has been the practice with most articles about people, for example like the articles about Bastian Schweinsteiger or Mesut Özil, it both says "is a German footballer" but none is linked to the article about Germans. Same with David Beckham for example - the article says "is an English footballer" but doesn't link to the article about the specific ethnic group.Winepour (talk) 17:51, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marcos Tavares, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, Portuguese and Slovene. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 NK Maribor season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petar Stojanović. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NK Bezigrad

Your message tone was unnecessarily hostile. I previously made a number of changes to the article which I believe were helpful. I felt the article had a lot of POV (still does) in it which I was trying to reduce. Any references deleted were those where specific sources did not appear to be supporting the stated facts. No, I do not speak Slovene but a number were to do with dates or regarding text which seemed to be missing etc and hence I made the changes. Eldumpo (talk) 10:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for setting out some of your specific points clearly, with inclusion of url's. I will aim to look into them shortly. However I feel the detailed points are best discussed at the article's talk page and have thus moved the posts there, and will reply there. Eldumpo (talk) 07:54, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 26 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the NK Maribor page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zlatko Zahovič

Hello RATIPOK, from Portugal,

please don't remove the sub-section titles in this player again, it makes for a better read. You can ask anyone at WP:FOOTY to see that I am not making this up.

Thank you, happy editing --84.90.219.128 (talk) 15:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Slovenian under-15 League

The article Slovenian under-15 League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable youth tournament

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 17:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Slovenian under-17 League

The article Slovenian under-17 League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable youth tournament

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 17:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Slovenian under-17 League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slovenian under-17 League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slovenian under-17 League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 08:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maribor

Because everything in derbies sections is not updated, several references are dead, capacity of stadium was wrong, lead is too long, wrong name for mura-maribor derby, unreferenced "pride of styria" nickname, unreferenced sentence "The badge of the club is one of the most recognizable sport symbols in Slovenia." and few other things like too long "current stauts" section compared to other history sections where every unimportant things like supercup wins are mentioned, and no this article does not pass even GA criteria anymore, it was 5 years ago but not now anymore since it has been edited like 300 times since then 86.58.36.235 (talk) 10:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of course the lead is WAY too long, it has been even stated on talk page by someone, look at Chelsea F.C., Manchester City etc. how the lead should look on FA articles, only a very short summary of everything and not some lengtly senteces about olimpija and their status about being re-formed etc (why on earth would someone care about that on nk maribor article) 86.58.36.235 (talk) 18:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And Maribor-Mura derby should be updated in past tense since Mura has been disbanded so many times its pointless to writing that continuance of the rivalry is maribor-NŠ mura matches, they havent even played once against each other, same goes with Ljudski vrt section, there is no need to mention that the stadium hosted 2010 WC and 2012 Euro qualifiers, it hosted 2014 and 2016 qualifiers too, so either mention them all or even better, simply dont mention it, its enough to simply write "one of the main venues for the national team" instead of listing which qualifers it hosted 86.58.36.235 (talk) 18:55, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt deleted ANYTHING (except for nickname) from the page, I only re-arranged sentences, c/e updated derbies & stadium sections, and shortened the lead because it was too long, lead should consist of: year of foundation, full name of the club, league where the club plays, number of trophies won, the stadium at which the club plays, club colors, and thats pretty much it, max. 3 paragraphs...and dont worry, of course I did moved the references from the lead to rivarly & youth academy sections, none of the references were deleted (only one dead reference about maribor-mura was deleted) 86.58.36.235 (talk) 18:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And where is the rule that only adminstrator can delete things? If something is controversal/biased and not sourced (just an example, saying that one team has the best fans in the coutnry, statement that one player is good and skilled, saying that the stadium is the best in the country etc.), it needs to get deleted immediately if there is no source to back that up 86.58.36.235 (talk) 10:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See, you are adding misleading references, like the one in the "Crest" section, it is nowhere mentioned anything about the crest, but this could be the last sentence in the lead section, that "NK Maribor is the most recongnized sport brand in the country", not in the crest section because the crest is not mentioned in any of the three sources. I know your logic behind this, NK Maribor = the most known sports team in the country ---> their badge is automatically the most known as well, but this is not directly mentioned anywhere 86.58.36.235 (talk) 18:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And also, the lead was NOT the same lenght when the article passed "good article" criteria five years ago like you said on NK Maribor talk page, it was almost one whole paragraph shorter. So your whole point is, because the article is "good", it should now stay exactly the same for decades, even though the article obviously has issues? 86.58.36.235 (talk) 18:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of course the Maribor crest is the most recognized sports crest in the country, but the sentence is "The badge of the club is one of the most recognizable sport symbols in Slovenia" which is okay and is probably true, but then the references are about choosing the best sport brand in the country and not about crest, while in the wikipedia sentence, the badge is directly mentioned...this sentence could be moved to lead, replacing "badge" with "NK Maribor", while the crest section should start with "The club's crest is based on the official emblem of the city of Maribor, which is turn based on a 14th-century seal[75] with minor differences", it sounds more neutral like this, and no needing for additional references. 86.58.36.235 (talk) 10:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the whole article should be writen in a neutral tone if you want to be even considered for FA, for example, sentences like this: "Maribor's youth selections give, on average, at least 15 players per season to the Slovenia national football team selections and players from the academy are continuously tracked by top European clubs" sounds like some kind of club's propaganda and not wiki material, not to mention that the info is wrong, in 2015 only 13 players were called to the senior, u21, u19 and u17 teams (which is not "at least 15"), and which players are "continuously tracked by top European clubs"? The ONLY player tracked in the last 5 years was dautović, but he failed big time at chelsea/city trial or wherever he was, and is now playing in the worse league then Slovenian PrvaLiga 86.58.36.235 (talk) 17:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, since this text --> "Maribor's youth selections give, on average, at least 15 players per season to the Slovenia national football team selections" is in the ACADEMY section, it should include only players from the academy, so players from the senior and U21 teams should not be counted, academy = U19 (mladinci) and below, players like novaković, hotić, šme, bajde from the current nationals are regular first teamers and not academy. 86.58.36.235 (talk) 09:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to what is Maribor-Mura a "rivalry", while Maribor-Celje is not? Actually Maribor played more matches against Celje since 1991 than against any other team with several cup finals/semifinals, while Maribor-Mura is not even a rivalry just because of that one match in 2004, a lot of NK Maribor fans actually supported Mura back in 2012 so how is that a "rivalry"? Just go and ask Viole members if they hate Celje or Mura more 86.58.36.235 (talk) 12:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thats all reasonable what you said, but just the fact that Maribor and Mura matches have the highest attendances does NOT automatically make it a rivalry, and there were 6,000 spectators this February against Celje, while attendance against Mura was only 3,000 back in 2012, and remember how Maribor fans wanted Mura to finish 4th ahead of Koper, this is like arsenal fans would support chelsea to finish ahead of leicester or something like that. The rivalry is a match between two teams which "hates" each other, played many important matches during the history (the only important Maribor-Mura match was the title decided in 2004, so one notable match in 55 years), clashes and fighting between the fans etc., this never happened in Maribor-Mura matches, while in the 2010 cup semifinal, Maribor fans tried to attack away fans (Celje) during the match, and something like that happened only against Olimpija previously 86.58.36.235 (talk) 21:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, fans views are not really important if there are no reliable sources (forum is not reliable, its obviously that if you create a poll on Maribor forum Mura would win, but not because of rivalry but because of other reasons), if you google up "štajerski derbi" it would get MUCH more results than "štajersko-prekmurski derbi" (first six result for that search are one article for handball, three for volleyball, and only one Siol article for football), while "severovzhodni derbi" doesnt give ONE result outside of wikipedia (only one article from Večer, where author mentioned that Wikipedia calls it by that name), while for "štajerski derbi" all first five google results are about Maribor-Celje match (slovenske novice, prvaliga.si, rtvslo, nova24tv.si, 24ur.com) 86.58.36.235 (talk) 09:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, idiots from NZS have changed the website and merged prvaliga.si with nzs.si, so now ALL links all around wikipedia that starts with either nzs.si or prvaliga.si are dead, including several more dead links at nk maribor page 86.58.36.235 (talk) 09:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kit upload

Hi, I created NK Maribor away kit for 2016–17 but I cant upload since I dont have an account (and I dont even know how to, it probably needs to be uploaded on commons in a specific category), so I am wondering if you can uplodad it?

Here is the preview how it looks when zoomed; away kit Link to download kitbodymaribor1617a (save as .png)
kitsocksmaribor1617a (socks) 86.58.36.235 (talk) 10:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Nkmaribor 2013.png

Thank you for uploading File:Nkmaribor 2013.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ratipok. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NK Naklo (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on NK Naklo (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Gorthian (talk) 08:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grb simboli.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grb simboli.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Smartno 1928.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NK Smartno 1928.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ratipok. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zahvala in vprašanje

Zdravo,

najprej zahvala za ustvarjanje strani o NK Maribor sezonah. Zanima me ali imate za to sezono tudi namen ustvarit stran? Imam pa še vprašanje ali pri tem potrebujete mogoče kakšno pomoč? Hvala za odgovor. --Zigakos (talk) 19:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pozdravljen. V zadnjem času nimam več toliko časa kot prej in bolj malo ustvarjam na Wikipediji, ob tem pa tudi nisem bil edini, ki je ustvarjal v temah povezanimi z NK Maribor. V kolikor bi sam želel pomagati lahko to brez težav, materiala je več kot dovolj. Lp, Ratipok (talk) 11:48, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ratipok. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arena Petrol 2013.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arena Petrol 2013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- MrX 🖋 11:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]