User talk:Pietadè

waiting! --Pietade (talk) 15:38, 12 November 2011 (UTC) {{NoACEMM}} Võtsin eesti vikis Franciscuse artiklis viite Habemusele maha - põhjus selles, et 1) see, et paavst sai võimule 13. märtsil, pole vaieldav ja 2) Habemus ei erine vormiliselt tavapärasest, välja arvatud nimi ja isik, mis ongi loogiliselt iga paavsti puhul erinev. Kalev Kask 06:32, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Russian to English translation: 2014–15 Russian military intervention in Ukraine ?

Hello Pietade.

I see that you contribute to Wikipedia in both Russian and English, including a number of edits related to the recent Russian military intervention in Ukraine. According to your own information, you do so with a professional knowledge of those two languages.

Among the External links on the page 2014–15 Russian military intervention in Ukraine there are two links to openrussia.org, for which an editor has inserted an English translation of the original Russian title. Those two translations from Russian to English are clearly not very accurate. If you could improve these translations, then that would improve the article. Best regards. Lklundin (talk) 10:54, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting Mariupol standoff

I made my arguments at the talk page and am in support of the split. Like I said at the talk page, the title is missleading because the standoff is not at Mariupol but at Shyrokyne. Do you want to split it or should I? EkoGraf (talk) 13:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said: hitting tensely populated civilian areas with multiple rocket launchers deserves a separate article (even a bus had an article);
as for Shyrokyne — it is (anyway, what's left of) located about 10 km from Mariupol, forms a defence line of Mariupol and can thus be (to a cerain extent, of course) considered as (vital) part of the city. —Pietadè (talk) 17:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Case Request: Ukrainian conflict

Tobby72 has requested a case at ArbCom, but didn't include you as an involved party. — Ríco 22:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Wishing you and yours a happy and productive 2016! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:06, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Iryna Harpy! Wishing you and yours the same.—Pietadè (talk) 11:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think you might be interested....

.... in this BBC article. Although I was very moved by its content it does not really tells anything new about Pisky.

Thanks for your Wikipedia contributions. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 17:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crimea annexation RFC

I've opened an RFC on Talk: Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation on the question

"Should the information about opinion polls, currently in the subsection Crimean public opinion be moved into the subsection Crimean status referendum?"

As you recently edited this talk page, I thought you might like to share your views. Kalidasa 777 (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Kramatorsk Airport, control tower.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kramatorsk Airport, control tower.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Shyroka Balka (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Shyroka Balka (disambiguation), Pietade!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please review Manual of Style: Disambiguation: in general there should be only one link per entry: more links only distract from the intended targets. Also, flag icons should be used sparingly: see WP:MOSFLAG for more.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pietade. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Split

Hi Pietade. I was close watching this guy edits. As you can see, he is splitting the three-month timelines into monthly reports, apparently on the grounds of WP:READABILITY. After a brief analysis, I concluded that his idea is actually not to bad, but before further splitting, I want to consult you about the issue. Let me know if you agree or not. Thank you and Best Regards.--Darius (talk) 23:35, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @DagosNavy: As for splitting: against, and quite strongly:

— months ago there was a similar question in etwi (do notice, before acting it is/would be kind to discuss the question), and, the articles remained as they are;
— he/she has not started the separate articles as an article should begin (e.g., first instance of unfamiliar "things" to be linked);

— etwi and enwi articles, except for the 1st 3 months of 2016, are pretty synchronic; after splitting in enwi, the same has to be done in etwi too;

— these 3-month periods may contain errors (like Stari → Staryi), that would be easier to address before splitting,
— and much more, reasons
— it is much easier (and less time-consuming) to use the format (3-m period); have you looked, e.g., on the newly created article on Feb 2016, seems kind of abracadabra to me, no introduction, etc.
— Besides that, e.g., vedi Timeline of the war in Donbass (April–June 2014)#ATO, and, click on "What links here"...; 15 April is written there as: {{anchor|ATO}}15 April, meaning, this part of this article can be linked to...Pietadè (talk) 13:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The delayed data from "the third party" (OSCE, I mean) is added on very rare occasions. Like on 18 Dec the OSCE SMM counted about 1,900 explosions "produced" by Grads, neither side reported Grads, if I'm not mistaken...—Pietadè (talk) 10:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well mate, actually my support to User Kristijh was conditional on your opinion, given that you are the main contributor to the timelines. Therefore my next move is to revert the split, providing a link to this thread in the edit summary. In other issues, my ignorance of Slavic languages led me to transliterate Старый into "Stari" after my memories of the Bosnian War (remember the destruction of the Stari Most in Mostar). As for OSCE reports, I consider them an unreliable source, at least regarding events on the ground.--Darius (talk) 23:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DagosNavy: Glad we agreed!
BR!—Toivo (talk) 07:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assassination in Mariupol

Hi Pietade. Just after this edit I came across your hidden message regarding Col. Kharaberiush assassination in Mariupol. He was actually killed on 31 March, see here and here. I became aware of the incident as soon as the news was released, so I was about to add it to the January-March timeline since yesterday. Sabotage and assassinations behind the lines (Motorola, Givi, explosions of ammo depots) are definitely part of this war. Best Regards.--Darius (talk) 03:07, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pietadè. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hello, thanks for creating Zaitseve, Luhansk Oblast. Can you please add your source(s)? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Found the file (xls, zipped), "ïÒúá¡ßý¬á «í½áßÔý.xls" in my PC.—Pietadè (talk) 15:45, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:2018-04-30-www-facebookcom-ato-news-posts.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:2018-04-30-www-facebookcom-ato-news-posts.jpg, which you've attributed to Screenshot of Facebook wesbite. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file has served its purpose and can be deleted, I do believe.— Pietadè 08:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

JFO page at Facebook

Hi Pietadé, I've found the official JFO facebook page: Операція об'єднаних сил / Joint forces operation Still unsure whether or not there will be evening releases. Regards.---Darius (talk) 16:17, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!
Another page is https://www.facebook.com/jfo.news/ <noiwiki><title id="pageTitle">Прес-центр штабу АТО - Posts | Facebook</title></noiwiki>, with old title, and 1 more at <noiwiki><title id="pageTitle">Операція об'єднаних сил / Joint forces operation - Posts | Facebook</title></noiwiki>, yet nothing significant up till now.— Pietadè 17:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Unable to fix some technical problems

Hi Pietadé, unfortunately, our page is experiencing problems; newer citations don't display properly, and the navbox (Ukrainian crisis) only shows in its bare form, I guess we will need the assistance of an expert in this matter...Do you know the right guy? Hope we can fix all this mess as soon as possible, I waste two hours trying, to no avail. Darius (talk) 03:33, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps something to do with Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded?—Pietadè (talk) 04:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The last one had less than 750 references and there might be a software imposed limit, I guess.—Pietadè (talk) 04:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page source tells the following:
<script>(window.RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.config.set({"wgPageParseReport":{"limitreport":{"cputime":"4.712","walltime":"4.791","ppvisitednodes":{"value":28215,"limit":1000000},"ppgeneratednodes":{"value":0,"limit":1500000},"postexpandincludesize":{"value":2097151,"limit":2097152},"templateargumentsize":{"value":1065,"limit":2097152},"expansiondepth":{"value":12,"limit":40},"expensivefunctioncount":{"value":2,"limit":500},"unstrip-depth":{"value":1,"limit":20},"unstrip-size":{"value":1309240,"limit":5000000},"entityaccesscount":{"value":0,"limit":400},"timingprofile":["100.00% 4411.278 1 -total"," 47.74% 2106.140 531 Template:Cite_news"," 20.38% 899.179 244 Template:Cite_web"," 1.10% 48.493 5 Template:Navbox"," 0.96% 42.497 1 Template:Ukrainian_crisis_navbox"," 0.80% 35.105 1 Template:About"," 0.46% 20.460 1 Template:Use_British_English"," 0.37% 16.256 2 Template:DMCA"," 0.35% 15.650 4 Template:Flag"," 0.33% 14.471 2 Template:Dated_maintenance_category"]},"scribunto":{"limitreport-timeusage":{"value":"2.839","limit":"10.000"},"limitreport-memusage":{"value":4461438,"limit":52428800}},"cachereport":{"origin":"mw1342","timestamp":"20180601042149","ttl":1900800,"transientcontent":false}}});mw.config.set({"wgBackendResponseTime":136,"wgHostname":"mw1326"});});</script> —Pietadè (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One solution is to use the approach I just did on 27 May -

[uri title]<br />[uri title]<br />[uri title]<br />[uri title]

or, sth like this:

• [uri title]<br />• [uri title]<br />• [uri title]<br />• [uri title]

4in1 made 3 last refs visible, and, if there are 3 months, limit is ~750 refs per article, 250 refs per month is enough? Currently extremely busy...—Pietadè (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated the same action on 30 May and now all refs are visible.—Pietadè (talk) 11:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, mate, good work.Darius (talk) 22:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of the war in Donbass (July 2018–present) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of the war in Donbass (July 2018–present) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of the war in Donbass (July 2018–present) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pietadè. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One month timelines

Hi mate, and Happy New Year, may Peace finally prevail and our work come to a close! I think Onetwothreeip proposal about one-month timelines, even with the problems you have described on his talk page could be the best way to avoid further questionings like the ones we have suffered in the past (alleged WP:NEWS, unreliable sources and fundamentally pages' size). The broken syntax of month's end citations or the overpopulation of categories are items we can deal with. Let me know your opinion, Cheers!.--Darius (talk) 19:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, and Happy New Year to You too!
Currently there are 20 quarters, that is 58 months;
and not only the connection between months, but, You see, in a 4-quarter version one has to link e.g., LPR 4 times, at least, in a 12-month version this makes at least 12×LPRs, and all the other linkable articles.
Besides that, at least some of these 4-quarter versions are linked to other Wikipedias 4-quarter “sisters” (see the table in the Estonian version of the War in Donbass on Estonian page, clicking on entries opens an Estonian version, where You can see language links):

2014	2015	2016	2017
×	January–March	January–March	January–March
March–June	April–June	April–June	April–June
July–September	July–September	July–September	×
October–December	October–December	October–December	×

Let us think a little more; by the way, Onetwothreeip has split the articles, but hasn't bothered to make new ones Wikiarticles (not only the ref links in the end/beginning), but an article has to have "inlinks" (DPR, Pisky, mortars, BMPs, etc., etc.) too, at least so I have heard ;--)—Pietadè (talk) 20:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I've never heard of "DPR, Pisky, mortars, BMPs". When I split the articles, the references were all transferred into the new articles, as well as the external links, categories and templates. What does it even mean that when I split the articles I didn't make new ones "Wikiarticles"? Splitting articles creates new articles. Onetwothreeip (talk) 20:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In a 3-month article you can link DPR, Pisky, or what ever only in the beginning or in the beginning and in the end (articles in Wikis have inside links, and if you make 3 from 1 you have to link the articles that were otherwise linked in a 3-month version once); or, there is an anchored link to ATO ("anti-terror operation"), that is pretty often linked from other articles... (in this case you have to change all the links to correct ones), etc.—Pietadè (talk) 20:53, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In other words, say you have one artist with 100 works, if you make a list of these works, you'll link the artist, the school he/she attended, teacher(s), etc., only once, if you'll make one article per every work, you'll have to make 100 links.—Pietadè (talk) 21:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We can have those links in the new articles too, it's no problem. Onetwothreeip (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Later on, when pro-Russian media started counting and publishing every shell, the ref links in 3-months articles were customised, to match the ref limit per article; these should be made back too, links to 3-months' timelines in other language Wikis, checking typos (e.g., Ukrainian и written incorrectly)... as for me, I do not possess that much free time;
and your statement: "Given that DagosNavy and Pigsonthewing agree with me" — have not had the opportunity to read that; thus calling "the behaviour of yours disruptive, at least".—Pietadè (talk) 21:40, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Besides that, every article (and Talk page) has history, deleting history is simply deleting (though, sometimes "handy" — made a infobox template for one animal, still in use in 100 articles, thanks to illiterate "split" actions of someone, I'm not (formally) the creator of this infobox template, and no one has formal reason to bite me), and deleting it is.—Pietadè (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have not deleted anything, and I have certainly not deleted the histories. The edit summaries for the new articles make it very clear that they are split from a previous article, and you obviously are aware of that. It's not even possible for me to delete histories, that's something only an administrator can do. This is getting absurd, the consensus is for splitting these articles into months. Your reasons against them are completely incoherent, you're acting as if the new articles are much more flawed than the articles they were split from. We should move these discussions to the index page for the timelines at Timeline of war in Donbass. Onetwothreeip (talk) 23:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Onetwothreeip. Let me make clear that I would prefer to keep the original three-month format. Pietadè has made a great job here, correcting my transliteration mistakes from cirillic, posting the Ukrainian military reports or given us the right Ukrainian toponyms, so I will always support him. Pressure from some users, however, forced us to include the pro-Russian version of the conflict on the basis of WP:NPOV and counter-balance. This led to oversized pages, and detractors of the timeline charged once again with templates and requests for deletion. As I had already told Pietadè, my only reason not for supporting your position, but for refraining myself from reverting the one-month timelines is to avoid a new "offensive" by these "concerned users", whose only goal seems to be the outright deletion of this chronology.--Darius (talk) 23:40, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DagosNavy That is a very strange circumstance. Have any of these timeline pages survived an Article for Deletion request? Onetwothreeip (talk) 10:28, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing strange at all, the request was proposed by a user questioning the oversizing of the three-month format and its contents (just on one of the pages), but te RfD was overwhelmingly rejected.--Darius (talk) 12:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DagosNavy Do you remember which one? Onetwothreeip (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pietadè You have accused me of vandalism by "deleting article histories", which you claim I call splitting. What are you talking about? Onetwothreeip (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, extremely busy, to give you any extended answer. Short version: if you start an article, say “A”, and decide after some years to split it into A1, A2, A3, what do you think happens to the history?—Pietadè (talk) 07:28, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The pre-split history is retained in the history of article A, even if article A becomes a redirect. I didn't delete either the article or the history, and the history wasn't deleted at all. Onetwothreeip (talk) 07:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interiew Request

Dear Pietadè

I am part of a research project at the University of Westminster, London, that looks at contentious Wikipedia articles and would like to interview you about your work and the issues and intricacies within collaboration practices in article development.

We have observed that you are an active contributor in the Wikipedia community and you have been participating in an article of our interest for several years (War in Donbass). This experience is of great interest to us. If you would be interested in participating in this research or would like more information, please do not hesitate to contact me through the Wikipedia mailbox or my personal talkpage. I would be a great help.

Best regards, Etchubykalo doctoral researcher at the communication and media research institute (CAMRI), University of Westminster, London. Etchubykalo (talk) 14:58, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of the war in Donbass (January–March 2016) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of the war in Donbass (January–March 2016) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of the war in Donbass (January–March 2016) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 22:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need your email

Hi mate, given the current situation, I need to contact you in private, can you contact me by sending a message to my email link? If you see the "tools" column in my talk page, you will find a link to my email, the entry reads "Email this user". Thanks in advance.--Darius (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't find the entry "Email this user"...—Pietadè (talk) 14:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Toivo, a direct link for you [1].--Darius (talk) 00:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appears that one has to have his/her own mail address inserted in order to send emails to other users..., did it, for 5 minutes!—Pietadè (talk) 05:11, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

___________ Hi Toivo, 2017 done right now! Feel free to review it, Best Regards.--Darius (talk) 23:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UK data

Hi Pietadè, I can't see where the 49,063 deaths on 9 Nov comes from. I've looked at the [2] website but can't see it. Can you elaborate? Thanks, Arcturus (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arcturus, I do usually copy the data from below the heading "Deaths within 28 days of positive test" (currently "Total // 49,770"), copy-paste (not to err), below "Deaths within 28 days of positive test by date of death" there is a table, with columns Daily/Cumulative/Data/About, and, cf. data in column "United Kingdom total" with wiki table (they may update data “posthumously”, don't know...); their table starts on 02-01-2020 total 1 death / 03-03-2020 = total 3 deaths / 05-03-2020 = total 6 deaths, etc.). — Pietadè (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

... and all the data is downloadable ("Download card data" - downward arrow on the right)

areaType,areaName,areaCode,date,newDeaths28DaysByDeathDate,cumDeaths28DaysByDeathDate
overview,United Kingdom,K02000001,2020-11-09,94,49766
overview,United Kingdom,K02000001,2020-11-08,200,49672
overview,United Kingdom,K02000001,2020-11-07,249,49472

et cetera (314 rows, starting from "overview,United Kingdom,K02000001,2020-01-02,1,1") — Pietadè (talk) 19:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some countries (e.g. Sweden, Finland) update data in these tables backwards, often. On UK data, reminds the reel that was aired today: “Baroness Harding on requests for coronavirus test” — Pietadè (talk) 19:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean about the UK figures. However, I assume some of those daily figures, going back several days or even weeks, will be updated each day as the new "deaths reported" figures are published. We would then need to retrospectively update the figures in the template on a daily basis. This would be more accurate, but it's a bit of a maintenance overhead. Arcturus (talk) 11:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Why do you need to revert an edit just to correct a typo? LSGH (talk) (contributions) 01:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand at first glance, where the typo was, only the article (https://shendetesia.gov.al/covid19-ministria-e-shendetesise-1908-testime-631-te-sheruar-422-raste-te-reja-dhe-10-humbje-jete-ne-24-oret-e-fundit/) made it clear; and the corresponding article in etwi, where the numbers are displayed absolute, was odd; took some time (between 38 tables) to figure this one out. — Pietadè (talk) 07:04, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Surfside condominium building collapse, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You should know better. General Ization ^Talk 16:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miami Herald (22 Pulitzer Prizes to date) [July 09, 2021 10:42 AM, Updated 12 minutes ago]: "The overnight recovery raises the death toll to 78 people confirmed dead from the partial collapse of the Champlain Towers South condo on June 24, Miami-Dade Mayor Daniella Levine Cava said at a press briefing Friday. // At least 47 of the recovered bodies have been identified and their families notified, Levine Cava said. An additional 62 people remain potentially missing." — appears to be reliable, didn't have time to cite properly (besides, the numbers can change in hours...). — Pietadè (talk) 17:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Didn't have time to cite properly" and "numbers can change in hours" aren't legitimate excuses for making unsourced edits here. I also saw that the toll had changed, but knowing I did not have time presently to locate and add a citation and update all parts of the article that needed to be updated as a result, I did not edit. That should be your policy also, because it is Wikipedia's policy. General Ization ^Talk 17:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trillionaire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trillionaire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trillionaire (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 18:50, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic sources

Hello! For problematic sources (example), I have found that the reader function on Safari or Firefox is very helpful. Clicking the "reader" icon in Firefox, for example, and then reloading the page usually gives the desired outcome. --- Possibly ☎ 18:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know; yet not sure that all readers are...☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 18:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

Please note (I am surprised as an experienced user you need to be told this) that wp:talk pages are for discussing that article and are not general wp:forums for discussing other stuff, this [[3]] seems to have nothing to do with the subject of the article and seems to just be wp:soapboxing. Slatersteven (talk) 11:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted my mistake oneself y-day, yet forgot for unknown reasons to amend this, thanks for letting me know!☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 19:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Endurance (1912 ship)

On 14 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Endurance (1912 ship), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 11:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Pietadè

Thank you for creating Never Ever Can We Be Brothers.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Pietadè

Thank you for creating Sukhyi Stavok.

User:DIVINE, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good job.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DIVINE}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DIVINE 12:05, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DIVINE: Thanks! ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 12:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Ubergoat.

prat (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 18:26, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Pietadè

Thank you for creating Pivdenne, Donetsk Oblast.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi. Don't use social media in your referencing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 06:27, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Berestove, Bakhmut Raion moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Berestove, Bakhmut Raion, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berestove, Bakhmut Raion has been accepted

Berestove, Bakhmut Raion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ymblanter (talk) 09:31, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Board of Trustees election

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Water (2019 series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Deep Water (2019 series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Olhyne, Beryslav Raion moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Olhyne, Beryslav Raion, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Olhyne, Beryslav Raion has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Olhyne, Beryslav Raion. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tryfonivka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tryfonivka, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Pietadè. Thank you for your work on Novomaiorske. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thanks! Glad to hear! ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 05:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bohuslavka, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bohuslavka, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. While a reference to a census would satisfy GEOLAND, this reference does not point to the actual census source, and therefore does not pass WP:VERIFY.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:10, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: “reference does not point to the actual census source” not so— http://db.ukrcensus.gov.ua/MULT/Dialog/Saveshow.asp displays 'Кількість наявного населення по кожному сільському населеному пункту, Дніпропетровська область (осіб) - Регіон , Рік // с. БОГУСЛАВКА 36, to arrive there U have to reach 'http://db.ukrcensus.gov.ua/MULT/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=19A0501_07_012&ti=19A0501_07_012. Кількість наявного населення по кожному сільському населеному пункту, Дніпропетровська область (1,2,3,4)&path=../Database/Census/01/02/&lang=1&multilang=uk' and fill in "Пошук" box with 'БОГУСЛАВКА', to arrive there U have to open http://db.ukrcensus.gov.ua/MULT/Database/Census/databasetree_uk.asp and select 'Кількість та територіальне розміщення населення', then 'Кількість наявного населення сільських населених пунктів (1,2,3,4) (2001(05.12))' then ' 19A0501_07_012. Кількість наявного населення по кожному сільському населеному пункту, Дніпропетровська область (1,2,3,4) (2001(05.12)) [Регіон: ДНІПРОПЕТРОВСЬКА ОБЛАСТЬ, ДНІПРОДЗЕРЖИНСЬК (міськрада), БАГЛІЙСЬКИЙ (райрада), с-ще СВІТЛЕ, ЖОВТІ ВОДИ (міськрада), с. СУХА БАЛКА, КРИВИЙ РІГ (міськрада), с-ще АВАНГАРД (КРИВИЙ РІГ (міськрада)), с-ще ГІРНИЦЬКЕ, с-ще КОЛОМІЙЦЕВЕ, с. НОВОІВАНІВКА (КРИВИЙ РІГ (міськрада)), с-ще СТЕПНЕ, ... (1786). Рік: 2001(05.12) (1). ] ' that opens 'Таблиця: 19A0501_07_012. Кількість наявного населення по кожному сільському населеному пункту, Дніпропетровська область (1,2,3,4)' where U have to insert БОГУСЛАВКА in search box, push on blue button and U get result (btw, address is constantly 'http://db.ukrcensus.gov.ua/MULT/Dialog/Saveshow.asp') "с. БОГУСЛАВКА 36"
database.ukrcensus.gov.ua was changed to db.ukrcensus.gov.ua some time ago so that database.ukrcensus... is not valid for some yrs. ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 21:09, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yurii Butusov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yurii Butusov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Deep Water (2019 series)

Hello, Pietadè. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deep Water (2019 series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note regarding Male birth control pill

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Male birth control pill, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to Male contraceptive. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 06:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Deep Water (2019 series)

Hello, Pietadè. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Deep Water".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:40, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Militarnyi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Militarnyi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Militarnyi (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NORG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. REDDIT is not an acceptable source neither is Facebook, and the Ukrainian Military Portal is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Militarnyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pietadè! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bohuslavka, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast

Hello, Pietadè. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bohuslavka, Synelnykove Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yurii Butusov

Hello, Pietadè. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yurii Butusov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ultra-hyperprecise Google coordinates

Please round coordinates obtained from Google to four digits, as they have taken to providing 16 digits in what is believed to be a copyright trap scheme. That level of precision is in the range of 1/100th of a micrometre. Moreover, you pointed to a different location of Pizza RIA in the June 2023 Kramatorsk missile strike article. Abductive (reasoning) 11:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Google search for string "ria pizza kramatorsk" gives the location (Pizza RIA/@48.7301851,37.6058092). ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 11:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the photos of the buildings around the blast site. Then compare to Google Street Views. You'll see that they don't match. I also just fixed your bad coords for 14th Secondary School of Vladivostok. Abductive (reasoning) 11:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Militarnyi

Hello, Pietadè. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Militarnyi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Militarnyi (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Editor: Reddit is still not an acceptable source. We need to see at least three independent reliable places discuss this organisation in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Militarnyi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 08:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Strilecha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Strilecha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fredabila (talk) 13:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled right granted

Hi Pietadè, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! œ^™ 08:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 09:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hi Pietadè! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 12:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Popovo-Lezhachi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Popovo-Lezhachi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 16:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alexei Petrov (Lvova-Belova's advisor)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Alexei Petrov (Lvova-Belova's advisor) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/kremlin-aide-who-abducts-ukrainian-children-associated-with-neo-nazism/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: The above cited source (euractiv.com) was news to me, etwiki article Aleksei Petrov contains nothing of this kind. ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 18:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The copyvios report was a word-for-word match of the content, which itself actually appears to be a copy of this Reuters article published two days earlier. It seems that et.wiki editors may have translated it word for word into Estonian, and that you translated it back, but the end result was a copyright violation. In particular, phrases like have not previously been reported are a bit of a red flag, as they make total sense for a journalistic article but do not belong in a Wikipedia article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did create the etwi article on 10 August 2023, Reuters' article was mentioned as “The European Union's decision of 16 December 2022 imposed sanctions on Petrov.”[1] ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 19:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citing an article does not exempt you from violating its copyright. All information not from a compatibly CC-licensed or public domain source needs to be written in original wording per the US copyright law that Wikipedia is bound to. I would recommend reading through our copyright policy. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Popovo-Lezhachi has been accepted

Popovo-Lezhachi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ukraine place articles general fixes

Hello, thank you for your work on creating many articles on populated places in Ukraine. However, in the hope of standardizing them and adhering to the manual of style, it would be great if you could do the following things when creating these and other articles so I or others do not have to:

Do not make a hatnote to a disambig page if the article has any place disambiguators; as in, if an article is "foo, bar raion, foobar oblast" you do not need to place a hatnote at the top of the page; this only would be done (in this case) if there was a disambiguation page such as "foo (disambiguation)" and the article was "foo".
Make a talk page and add the article to Wikiprojects with the banner, usually with the Ukraine and Cities Wikiprojects.
You do not need to link to the definitions of "hromada" and "raion", etc. in the lead; they are already linked in the infobox and linking them in prose just adds clutter; the same goes with alternative names for these divisions; for the same reasons please do not link "selo" in parentheses or "district" with a link to the raion article. By extension, when mentioning the hromada, it is better to say "village foo is in bar hromada" than to say it is in "one of the hromadas of Ukraine"; again just clutter; imagine if on the Los Angeles article, we said "is in California, one of the states of the United States"
If a village is currently or was at some point occupied by Russia, please distinguish between the two in that saying "the village was temporarily occupied by Russian forces at x date" is unclear as to if the "temporary" means it is still occupied. This has been the case for at least one of your articles, so if a village is currently occupied it would be great if you could either say "and is currently under occupation" or simply remove the "temporary", and if it is no longer under occupation say so. Thank you.

Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 21:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted.
Although in many cases I have taken existing articles as a model; in some cases I have transferred literally sentences from Ukrainian ukwiki articles (was temporarily occupied by Russian forces). ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 06:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you keep citing MOS:INFOBOXFLAG in some of your edit summaries when removing the flags next to Ukraine and the oblast in infoboxes, however INFOBOXFLAG says that "Human geographic articles – for example, settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes", so I don't see the problem with having them, or at least there's no reason to go and remove them just to do so. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 04:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kolotilovka

Hi. About a year ago you added a 2nd map to Kolotilovka in Russia. However, it is showing the location as being 7 km away in Ukraine. It seems to be using Wikidata but I can't figure out why it is mislocating the village. Do you know how to fix it? Thanks. Nurg (talk) 10:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to Template:Infobox_Russian_inhabited_locality, now it displays correctly (Special “Wikipedary” Operation). ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 13:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, here, this way, it displays correctly — Kolotilovka... ☆☆☆—Pietadè^Talk 13:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Nurg (talk) 21:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]