User talk:PascalHD

This is PascalHD's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duke of Cambridge Public School (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It would be extremely unusual for an elementary school to be able to meet the notability guidelines for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Duke of Cambridge Public School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Duke of Cambridge Public School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 00:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! PascalHD, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Worldbruce (talk) 00:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Noel Brinn

Hello, PascalHD. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Noel Brinn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lorraine Segato, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, PascalHD! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 06:43, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Greene 1968.jpg

Hi PascalHD. I noticed that you changed the copyright license of File:Joe Greene 1968.jpg from {{non-free historic image}} to {{PD-Canada-Crown}}. This has caused the file to be flagged with {{Wrong license}} by a bot because there's a conflict between the non-free content use rationale on the file's page and the PD license. If you feel the file is truly PD and no longer or never needed to be treated as non-free content, then that's fine. If someone disagrees with your assessment, they will likely restore the non-free license. In the meantime, you can resolve the "Wrong license" problem by replacing the non-free use rationale template currently on the file's page with {{Information}}. You should do this whenever changing a license from non-free to PD or some other free license to avoid bots tagging the file in question with wrong license. Moreover, if you feel the file meets the conditions pf WP:MTC, you can also add {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} to the file's page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paulmartinsr.jpg

Basically, you did the same thing for File:Paulmartinsr.jpg that you did above for #File:Joe Greene 1968.jpg. If you're going to start converting licenses from non-free to PD, you need to be more careful and make sure you also replace the non-free use rationale so that you don't start creating a conflict that others are going to need to try and figure out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly apologies, fixed it. PascalHD (talk) 04:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parachute Club 1984.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parachute Club 1984.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!!

I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. Dantus21 (talk) 22:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.

Thank you for all your work uploading free publicity photos! Happy holidays!! Dantus21 (talk) 22:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the wishes. Have a great holiday yourself! PascalHD (talk) 00:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bronski Beat in 1985.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bronski Beat in 1985.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 05:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:J.J. McCullough

Hello Pascal. I found your page via Jamil Jivani. I'm looking for feedback to improve the draft about political commentator and youtuber Draft:J.J. McCullough. It's been rejected a few times, but I wouldn't say the first attempts were by people who made a decent effort. When I asked for feedback from wiki editors, I was told by a couple of editors they would not offer feedback because the subject was too political. Hope you might be interested in giving it a read. Count3D (talk) 23:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I spend the majority of my time at Wikimedia Commons, I'm afraid my Wikipedia knowledge is not as robust/on the same level. However, I see this article has been proposed many times, yet no success. I would encourage to add more reliable, and secondary sources to help prove notability of the subject. PascalHD (talk) 01:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WTC

Hey, I remember you restored the 2001 photo in the Infobox on the World Trade Center page, on the September 11 article editors are running wild changing photos everywhere without consensus even a gif now in the infobox? I've started a discussion on the September 11 talk page but i have not gone to respond so far. Cena332 (talk) 16:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only photos I’ve removed had been copyright violations. I just replaced it with the previously agreed upon photo. I’ll take a look at the discussion. PascalHD (talk) 16:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]