User talk:PQR01

Welcome to my Talk page

PQR01, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PQR01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bikroo Kanpur Gangster

The article Bikroo Kanpur Gangster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable future film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFF. Only things found were database sites and articles on the actors. Not enough to fulfill the notability requirements. Needs to be deleted or moved to draftspace until release and then notability can be established. WP:TOOSOON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:54, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bikroo Kanpur Gangster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bikroo Kanpur Gangster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bikroo Kanpur Gangster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 14:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Yashika Aannand, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Per WP:SDDATES: The inclusion of a date or date range in {{short description}} is encouraged for biographies if space is available. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 16:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bikroo Kanpur Gangster Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bikroo Kanpur Gangster Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ek Tukda Dhoop

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ek Tukda Dhoop, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bikroo Kanpur Gangster

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bikroo Kanpur Gangster, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement, it will probably be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a partial block may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

This draft reads like a catalog for the company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi PQR01! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited is notable but rejected, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bikroo Kanpur Gangster

Hello, PQR01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bikroo Kanpur Gangster".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yuvraj Singh Sandhu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yuvraj Singh Sandhu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 16:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sheetal Cool Products Limited

Hello PQR01,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sheetal Cool Products Limited for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hatchens (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Parth Ghorpade

Hello PQR01,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Parth Ghorpade for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hatchens (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parth Ghorpade for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parth Ghorpade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parth Ghorpade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 18:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheetal Cool Products Limited for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheetal Cool Products Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheetal Cool Products Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hatchens (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astral Limited (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The wording of the Presence in Building Material Industry section is particularly problematic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Astral Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Astral Limited, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 10:57, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too many of the references are from primary sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 11:06, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Astral Limited has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Astral Limited. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 04:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harold Lawrence Katcher

I would like to thank you for adding the unreferenced tag to the article Harold Lawrence Katcher. I did however notice that his birth date was given as Jan 38, 2034. First off, the month and day do not exist. Secondly the year of birth is 12 years in the future. It seems that Wikipedia may want to react very quickly to such obvious falsehoods being inserted into Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnpacklambert: you are welcome.-PQR01 (talk) 02:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yash Dhull has been accepted

Yash Dhull, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletation of Dhananjay Singh Masoom

I am still in the process of putting more reliable sources. Why dont u just contribute into creating this rather putting it on deletion, i am new on Wikipedia. Learning Vijaysvijay (talk) 13:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

add me on Wikipedia Nishant kumar (Dablu Singh Patel)

u can cont me 9308504404 2409:4064:2D9F:2C93:29FF:1D6A:7618:DD2 (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuvraj Singh Sandhu (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not passing WP:NGOLF

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuvraj Singh Sandhu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yuvraj Singh Sandhu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket infobox teams

Hello. The cricketer infobox is reserved for teams a player has actually made a top-level appearance for. Please stop adding teams that someone hasn't played for. Thank you. Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Square Thing Thank you for guiding.--PQR01 (talk) 06:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. By the way, when you update stats it's helpful if you can update the first-class or list a stats at the same time - you updated a few New Zealader Test stats but not the first-class ones. And don't forget to update catches at the same time! You missed a few - it happens. Blue Square Thing (talk) 06:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Square Thing I am new and learning. Hope we work together.--PQR01 (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I pointed it out rather than just correct it myself. As I say, it happens: I make mistakes all the time... Blue Square Thing (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Square Thing When player score some runs or take wickets in ODI and T20I, we need to add stats in First Class section also or List A?

- ODI, T20I is First Class? - Test is List A? Am I right?--PQR01 (talk) 04:37, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Test is first-class; ODI is List A; T20I is T20. Just go with what the stats sites update - CricInfo is the most reliable. Blue Square Thing (talk) 08:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notability for cricketers

Hi. Please note that the articles you've started for Mayank Yadav and Taranjitsingh Dhillon do not meet the notability for cricketers. Playing in matches in Indian domestic cricket has been agreed as not being notable. I've moved these two pages to draft for now. Please do not create any further articles for cricketers who do not meet the above requirements. Thank you. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts, So who is notable? I created because I saw some players who played just 1 or 2 List A or First Class cricket matches. That's why I created. Thanks.--PQR01 (talk) 10:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The notability was updated last year, with players in these domestic tournaments deemed to be notable. Now those two players could pass WP:GNG, which would then bypass the updated cricket-specific guidelines. Hope that helps. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts One question sir. If player played single Ranji Trophy match, then he is notable? And if player played single Indian Premier League match, he is notable or not. Please help, because I am new and want to learn.--PQR01 (talk) 11:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No to just one Ranji Trophy match, and Yes to one IPL match. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 11:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for help Lugnuts.--PQR01 (talk) 11:43, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HOP Electric

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on HOP Electric, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DMySon (talk) 11:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of HOP Electric for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HOP Electric is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HOP Electric until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DMySon (talk) 08:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for editing my first article!

Snowc776 (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. 😊 PQR01 (talk) 18:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roy Price, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Niru Kumar

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Niru Kumar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dhiran Salvi

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dhiran Salvi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Taranjitsingh Dhillon

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Taranjitsingh Dhillon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ashish Tandon

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ashish Tandon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Srikanth Vissa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Srikanth Vissa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srikanth Vissa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Megha Bhardwaj

Hello PQR01. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Megha Bhardwaj, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Claim of award winning is enough for CSD. Needs to go to AfD. Thank you. Ged UK 10:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, thanks. PQR01 (talk) 10:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Harnoor Singh

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harnoor Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shaik Rasheed

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shaik Rasheed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dinesh Bana

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dinesh Bana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aneeshwar Gautam

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aneeshwar Gautam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Manav Parakh

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Manav Parakh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Angkrish Raghuvanshi

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angkrish Raghuvanshi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ravi Kumar (cricketer)

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ravi Kumar (cricketer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Garv Sangwan

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Garv Sangwan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nishant Sindhu

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nishant Sindhu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kaushal Tambe

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kaushal Tambe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vicky Ostwal

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vicky Ostwal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mayank Yadav

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mayank Yadav, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ashish Tandon

Hello, PQR01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ashish Tandon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 21:51, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong players

Please do not create redirects for ineligible players. They must be notable through WP:NCRIC and WP:CRIN to have an article or redirect. None of them played and official form of created, or if they played, didn't appear in a notable series or tournament. Human (talk) 11:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Devikot moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Devikot, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article which is created by you are nominated for deletion

Proposed deletion of 2023 Indian Premier League Final

The article 2023 Indian Premier League Final has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Right now there is at least 6 months for IPL to start and end till then there is no need for this article. IPL 2023 until the knockout match is over.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jisshu (talk) 03:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of StockGro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article StockGro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StockGro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Maduant (talk) 21:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yuvraj Singh Sandhu

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yuvraj Singh Sandhu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of OneCricket for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OneCricket is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OneCricket until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Maduant (talk) 04:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Priti Rathi Gupta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priti Rathi Gupta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priti Rathi Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrt to Physics Wallah

Hi PQR01,

Your edits to the article are extremely promotional, and they are not in line with the NPOV and PROMO policy. The last line of the "History" section of the article as it currently stands read "As a result of its success, Physics Wallah has established itself as a pioneering platform in the use of technology to deliver accessible and affordable education.", which is both unsupported from any associated sourcing material and is blatantly promotional and marketing oriented ("pioneering platform" and "established itself" are indications of PUFFERY). You've have made no effort to address the concerns, but instead have just reverted my edits.

Regards, Sohom Datta (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you are in any way paid by any entity to make these edits (or have a conflict of interest with the subject of the article), you are required to disclose the same on your user-page. Sohom Datta (talk) 15:54, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Feedback. PQR01 (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yuvraj Singh Sandhu

Hello, PQR01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuvraj Singh Sandhu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Devikot

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Devikot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Devikot

Hello, PQR01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Devikot".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:35, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Saidharshan Kumar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Saidharshan Kumar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Totre moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Akshay Totre, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Gadar 2. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Your cut and paste move [1] has turned this into a complete mess with edit history across both articles. Don't do this again. Use the process at WP:PCM to request a page move and get consensus. Ravensfire (talk) 15:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. PQR01 (talk) 15:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neeru Yadav for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neeru Yadav is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeru Yadav until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CGGCA201 (talk) 16:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mayank Yadav

Hello, PQR01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mayank Yadav".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:47, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neeru Yadav moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Neeru Yadav, is not suitable as written to remain published per the consensus at AfD. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Star Mississippi 12:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PQR01. Thank you for your work on Godday Godday Chaa. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello there! I hope you're having a wonderful day. I'm pleased to inform you that your page complied with Wikipedia's policies, so it has been marked as reviewed. Please add a section about film reception. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 16:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, and yes I will add reception part. PQR01 (talk) 16:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why you delete crew list from Jengaburu Curse webseries

Hello , PQRO1 im add the crew name correctly but why you delete the list Rewrite Man (talk) 03:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was in wrong format, that's why I am deleting your edits. PQR01 (talk) 03:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PQRO1 Please try to correct these formats so it will work for the viewers. Thanks for your reply Rewrite Man (talk) 04:10, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PQRO1, Now that I have correctly added the names of the crew members in the correct format, please do not delete them. If there are any changes, please let me know. Please do not delete without warning. Advance Thank you Rewrite Man (talk) 18:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, whole credit not required in Wikipedia, so need to remove. For more information, kindly check other pages and then edit. Thanks PQR01 (talk) 05:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PQR01crew members is as much as important than crew members if you approve these then its not an big issues so plese try to approved...thank you Rewrite Man (talk) 01:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PQR01crew members is as much as important than cast members if you approve these then its ok. not a big issues so plese try to approved...thank you Rewrite Man (talk) 01:50, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Saidharshan Kumar

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saidharshan Kumar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Akshay Totre

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Akshay Totre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mohit Rathee

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohit Rathee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rahul Bhandari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahul Bhandari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Bhandari (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Charlie (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rakhee Gupta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rakhee Gupta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakhee Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Charlie (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Polina Nioly Pushkareva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polina Nioly Pushkareva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polina Nioly Pushkareva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Charlie (talk) 18:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gyan Prakash Upadhyaya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gyan Prakash Upadhyaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyan Prakash Upadhyaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Charlie (talk) 18:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shivam Singh

Hello, PQR01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shivam Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Akshay Totre

Hello, PQR01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Akshay Totre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saidharshan Kumar

Hello, PQR01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saidharshan Kumar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:08, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shivam Singh

Hello, PQR01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shivam Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! NM 20:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pratap Puriji Maharaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barmer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PQR01. Thank you for your work on Chamak (web series). User:C1K98V, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work. Kindly expand the Production and Reception section. Thanks

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|C1K98V}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 10:33, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V: Thanks for advice, Yes I will expand these sections too. PQR01 (talk) 12:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! NM 09:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll keep this in mind in the future. PQR01 (talk) 10:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 20:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neeru Yadav (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Out of process re-draftification, but submitters and acccepters were socks (cc @Spicy:), so restoring the status quo ante. Any established editor is welcome to take action as they see fit if the subject now meets WP:BIO and the sourcing is acceptable

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neeru Yadav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 01:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Your edit to Raisinghani vs Raisinghani has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir, I will take care of it from now on, can I fix it by editing page now? PQR01 (talk) 07:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't call me sir. We are all editors here. I recently came across some copyrighted content, which is a policy violation. Therefore, I removed it and requested revision deletion. However, as this is not my area of expertise, I am not in a position to advise you on writing a synopsis. Thank you. — C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 18:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. PQR01 (talk) 02:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When updating box office collections ...

Hello @PQR01. I am @Archer1234. I noticed in this edit that you updated the gross box office collections for Shaitaan (2024 film). Thank you for doing that.

However, you should always update the |access-date= parameter of the citation you used to verify the new amount. I have made that update for you, but please remember to do so when you make updates in the future. If you have any questions for me, ask them here or on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing. — Archer1234 (t·c) 12:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for suggestions, I will take care of it in future. PQR01 (talk) 13:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Raman Raheja (entrepreneur)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Raman Raheja (entrepreneur) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24 § Raman Raheja (entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Garv Sangwan" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Garv Sangwan has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 6 § Garv Sangwan until a consensus is reached. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello PQR01. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Raman Raheja (entrepreneur), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:PQR01. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=PQR01|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Rosguill, I would like to add that I haven't received any compensation for this, and I just thought the page falls under the notable people category, as he is the CEO of a cricket league. So, I created it. Thanks! PQR01 (talk) 16:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PQR01. Thank you for your work on Adrishyam – The Invisible Heroes. DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– DreamRimmer (talk) 12:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: Ok, will add reception section soon. Thank you. PQR01 (talk) 12:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PQR01. Thank you for your work on Raisinghani vs Raisinghani. DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– DreamRimmer (talk) 12:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: Ok, will add reception section soon. Thank you. PQR01 (talk) 12:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anand Prakash has been accepted

Anand Prakash, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PQR01. Thank you for your work on Anand Prakash. Another editor, Aviram7, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviram7 Thank you so much for your time. PQR01 (talk) 14:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Northern Moonlight 08:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PQR01. Thank you for your work on Auron Mein Kahan Dum Tha. Another editor, Aviram7, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work and well done, thank you for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

--- Infínítybσy7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 05:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviram7: Thank you! PQR01 (talk) 05:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bhilwara Kings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhilwara Kings, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhilwara Kings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karan Adani (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Consider redirecting to the father's article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karan Adani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PQR01. Thank you for your work on Narpat Singh Rajpurohit. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2022 Legends League Cricket

The article 2022 Legends League Cricket has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable event, and we had consensus to delete the parent tournament article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:11, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2023 Legends League Cricket

The article 2023 Legends League Cricket has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable event, and we had consensus to delete the parent tournament article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dharmaveer 2 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dharmaveer 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PQR01. Thank you for your work on Dharmaveer 2. Another editor, Aviram7, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you creating this article and please keep it up this good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

--- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 12:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aviram7 Thank you! PQR01 (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bhaiyyaji poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bhaiyyaji poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PQR01. Thank you for your work on Housefull 5. Another editor, Rusty Cat, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There is possibility for a section to be created in the Housefull article on Housefull 5, if it does not yet meet the criteria for a standalone article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rusty Cat}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rusty 🐈 21:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Legends League Cricket

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Legends League Cricket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legends League Cricket. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AA (talk) 17:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Legends League Cricket for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Legends League Cricket, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legends League Cricket (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Neeru Yadav

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Neeru Yadav, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:25, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Announcements from WikiProject Cricket

Annual Cricket Newsletter – Issue I, December 2024

• Published by the Cricket WikiProject •
• About the project • Newsroom • Subscribe • Archives •

Annual newsletter to be lauched

WikiProject Cricket's annual newsletter titled The Stump Sapient is slated to be launched in December 2024. Following is a list of things that are to be included in the newsletter. Your contribution by editing the newsletter is appreciated.

Project news: Project news from WP:CRIC including the list of Awards presented in 2024 and the final results of Contests held in 2024.
Article news: Article news from WP:CRIC including list of FAC, FLC, FPC, PR, GAN, ITN, RD etc. from 2024.
Cricket news: Summary of International Cricket events took place in 2024 from T20 World Cups to WTC pathway.

You're receiving this message because, you've been added to the mailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You!

Upcoming contests

Cricket Picture of the Year 2024: Nominations will open up in mid-October.
Cricket WikiContest 2025: More details will be revealed soon.
Visit the contests page for the latest information.

Ongoing discussions

A discussion about merging the child WikiProjects WP:IPL, WP:BPL, WP:PSL and WP:LPL back into WP:CRIC as taskforces is currently ongoing in the project talk page.

• Contribute to the newsletter • Subscribe to the newsletter • Join the WikiProject • Project discussions • Contests •

You're receiving this message because, you've been added to the mailing list and will receive the newsletter. Tell others about the newsletter as well. Thank You!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 – Nominations open now!


	Cricket Picture of the Year 2024

Nominations open from 15 to 31 October 2024 Submit your nominations here
• Organized by the Cricket WikiProject • • About the project • Contests • Mailing list • CPOTY 2024 • • Contest coordinators: AssociateAffiliate and Vestrian24Bio •

– MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PQR01. Thank you for your work on Nishant Sindhu. Another editor, Demt1298, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article for Wikipedia. I have marked it reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Demt1298}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Demt1298 (talk) 17:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Azaad (2025 film)

Recent AfD closed as Draftify. Submit the article for review and go through AfC rather than moving the article to the main space. GrabUp - Talk 13:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ajay Devgn filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azaad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Azaad Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Azaad Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:40, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azaad (2025 film) (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Pre-release publicity does not establish notability. Unreleased films are only notable in exceptional circumstances. Wait until this has been released and received some proper reviews and/or other attention.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azaad (2025 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]