This is an archive of past discussions with User:Outlander07. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Sources for the GWR 3031 Class Replica

As for my edits, I did provide them. However, if you didn't get them then I would be more than happy to show them. I do sincerely apologize for any past inconveniences. I also do apologize if this looks/comes across as sloppy too, but this is where I got the information from. Thank you for the feedback though.

URL Pages/References:

1. https://preservedbritishsteamlocomotives.com/3041-gwr-dean-3031-achillies-class-4-2-2/

2. http://www.greatwestern.org.uk/m_in_3001.htm

Kumbh Mela

What happened there? You have rollback rights right? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

My fingers just slipped through the rollback option by accident. This is what happened at Kumbh Mela. Sorry for the mistake. Outlander^07@talk 11:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Dustin O'Halloran edits reversed

Hi there, Can you please tell me why my edits to Dustin O'Halloran's wiki page were reversed? I work for his management team. Is it possible to undo that action? It takes time to add the new projects again, and put everything into chronological order. Thanks! Blue Weta (talk) 12:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

If you think it was a mistake from my side, no issues. Always please keep in mind to provide sources for the content you put in. Thanks Outlander^07@talk 13:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Done Outlander^07@talk 13:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Romy Haag

Hi, I'm new at this. Have included a reference for the information I added. Hope that works Calabear (talk) 14:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Kiryathil Nairs and Illathu Nairs are both same level or same group

Why you vandalise my articles with refernces. Revert the edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.70.199.26 (talk) 08:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

It seems you are on to vandalizing the articles Kiryathil Nairr and Polyandry in India by providing poor or no sources to push your point of views. As far as my knowledge the source 'Brittanica' that you provided is unreliable as per Wikipedia policies, and it will be reverted. Outlander^07@talk 09:23, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

HELLO OUTLANDER7

Hello sir , I am RICK CORNWALLIS who made the Article Ainatu family...... Sir please avoid tagging it for speedy deletion as it is not representing a single family or an individual, But it is representing a small community of Saint Thomas Christians who migrated from Tamil Nadu. No articles are there for this community even when sources and citations are very strong. Kindly recheck the article.

Faithfully ഒരു മലയാളി...... RICK CORNWALLIS (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Outlander07, they have posted a similar message on my talk page so I have answered them there. S0091 (talk) 23:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

@S0091: The guy here is a sockpuppeteer. These are some of his sock accounts. തുളുവേശ്വരി, RICK CORNWALLIS, MADHAV DIXT, RAMARAGHAVA IYYER, Ubhayogrithanamam, സംകൃതപമാഗരി, ARAVIND NAMBOOTHIRI, Poiuyananthapuri, VINAYAKA MENON

His sole intention is to highlight/promote some family or a group through Wikipedia by creating an article and citing them with some links as sources. Outlander^07@talk 06:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

I actually requested an SPI yesterday but did not know about the other accounts. Have you requested one as well? If so, mine is a duplicate. If not, please do add any additional information you feel will be helpful. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 16:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Fyi, they are now spoofing your username. See the history at Ainatu family, Outlander007. S0091 (talk) 16:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Please go ahead with WP:SPI. I get fed up with this guy after counting his sock accounts. Outlander^07@talk 17:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

I understand why, Outlander07. I will plug on with the SPI. S0091 (talk) 17:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI Outlander07/Archives/2021/May,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Blatant reverts

Do not blatantly revert without explanation, especially when it is disputed. It's a violation of WP:REVEXP and WP:FIES. I had told you to go to talk page on the first instance itself, but you showed a bad gesture by continuing to make unexplained revert triggering edit-war. You never put an explanation in edit summary, and you refuse to use talk page too? You have obligation to explain your actions. What was your problem with [1][2][3][4]? 2409:4073:10C:8F06:3004:8732:1DFB:494B (talk) 11:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Issues on the Kalaripayattu Page

Hey Outlander! I tried to tag you in the Kalaripayattu talk page discussion Infoxbox Parameters, but was unable to do so. That anonymous IP is reverting edits and saying that verified sources on the page are “Cherry picked” because they do not support his POV. He’s also made a large number of pending edits on the page. It is also worth noting I think, that this same IP has a record of being banned from editing, as well as block evasion. Do you think you could join the discussion and take a look at the pending edits? Thanks, KW Kalariwarrior (talk) 14:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Also, it might also be worth noting that in the Kalaripayattu talk page, he has posted his complaint over these reverts under a different IP from the one he has a partial ban and block evasion record on. This is the one he’s partially blocked on: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2409:4073:380:22F7:B8BC:C04E:4492:B679

This is the one he used to post in the Kalaripayattu talk page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/157.46.141.57 Kalariwarrior (talk) 14:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Kalariwarrior: Do you even know what is the meaning of POV? Show me a single POV I have added. Talking against POV is a POV? Great intelligence. I have explained in detail about your POV pushing at talk page. First go get familiarize about Wikipedia policies. 2409:4073:2111:5995:29FA:2A73:1601:A75A (talk) 08:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

With all due respect, you have a long record of POV based editing in a number of articles, and also have a verifiable history of bans for disruptive editing, as well as block evasion, to your name. For all your citations and implied knowledge of Wikipedia’s policies, you have clearly violated them multiple times, so much so that you have been banned multiple times for doing so. For the record, I have also left many of your changes unchanged if I felt that there was a logical reason behind doing so. I won’t reply to your rude and sarcastic comment, as I have no desire to sink down to that level.

I will merely say this again: Just because a verified source does not agree with your POV does not mean it is a “cherry picked source.” The source I provided for a traditionally held belief is from the official websites of verified, governing bodies of the martial art in question. The fact of the matter is that Kerala’s Kalaripayattu practitioners have not propagated their state’s martial arts as much as they should, so there are not many verifiable sources out there. The sources I provided are among the very few credible sources that are out there. You appear to be in denial of this, and want to deny the validity of credible sources simply because you do not agree with them.

I’m sure Outlander07 along with other editors that you appear to have edit warred with, would agree with me in saying that you are merely a refined POV pusher. Please refrain from using Wikipedia policies and rules to try to push your own POV in editing.

നമസ്കാരം

OUTLANDER07, നീ മലയാളി ആന്നോ .....നിൻ്റെ contributions കണ്ടിട്ട് നീ ഒരു മലയാളി ആണ് എന്ന് തോന്നി ട്ടോ....ഞാൻ അനന്യ കോട്ടയം കാരിയാണെ.... മലയാളി ആണേൽ reply ചെയ്യാൻ മറക്കല്ലേ okay ഡാ.... ANANYA TRIVEDI (talk) 09:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Vandal

Beware of such inferiority complex driven cyber criminals.

He is playing around in Ip and using vpn.

I'm not in to this street fight with him for obvious reasons.

Get him down immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.39.76.58 (talk) 06:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

I can't see anything much more problematic in these articles. I think the user might be 99v who is now on logged-out editing. Outlander^07@talk 06:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

It says you are the sock. Being involved in sockpuppetry and logged out edit will never be going to help you. Outlander^07@talk 08:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Outlander07! =

Happy New Year!

Outlander07,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Kalariwarrior (talk) 03:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year Outlander07! Thanks for the wishes, and wishing you the same!

Please help out

Can you please help me with this? It seem that the anonymous editor who posted here on Anarchyte’s talk page about your pending changes rights over a debate on the Kalaripayattu page has now filed a complaint in WP:ANI against me, claiming that I am biased and am using Wikipedia to promote my own views, when this is not the case. You have seen my edits numerous times, especially on the Kalaripayattu page, where he has taken most of the diffs for his report, so I wanted to ask you if you could help in any way with the report he has filed. The report is here. I’d appreciate it if you could help me out. Thanks. Kalariwarrior (talk) 22:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

How can I verify?

On the Smith blue butterfly edit, I am family to Claude Irving Smith. How do I help Verify this? 2600:8801:1F09:5200:4837:AB00:9BEA:1FBB (talk) 04:22, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

It appears you have added content based on your original research which is against Wikipedia policies. Please take a look at the tutorial on citing sources.Also read WP:SOURCES. Outlander^07@talk 16:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

അറിയാതെ സംഭവിച്ചത്

കുറച്ചു ദിവസം മുന്നേ outlender07 സുഹൃത്തേ താങ്കളെ തെറ്റ് ധരിച്ചു ഞാൻ റിപ്പോർട്ട് നൽകിയതിൽ കേതിക്കുന്നു. പിന്നീട് ആണ് അറിഞ്ഞത് ആ വ്യക്തി താങ്കൾ എല്ല എന്ന്. എന്റെ ഭാഗത്ത് നിന്ന് ഉണ്ടായ ഒരു തെറ്റിദ്ധാരണക്ക് ഞാൻ ക്ഷമ ചോദിക്കുന്നു സുഹൃത്തേ. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jijubahubali (talk • contribs) 08:54, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Please remember to use the common language on the talk page as it usually won't act like a private inbox and the content will be visible to others. Outlander^07@talk 15:43, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

As a sock, how do you explain this?. Outlander^07@talk 16:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

A phony apology to stop you from reporting him. 2409:4073:2110:E0B1:4092:9350:26F5:A5D2 (talk) 15:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, that might be the intention. Outlander^07@talk 16:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Sir Removed link

Sir all users has been accepted link why did you removed it is 2 months old link and not spam Anilchethackal (talk) 04:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, no one will allow such spam links on the article's main space. There is no point in providing such links that leads to nothing but conflicts. Wikipedia is not the place for promotions and your edit will be reverted as per WP:REFSPAM, also, remember the Three revert rule and the violation may often lead to a block.Outlander^07@talk 06:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

News and notes: 1,000,000,000 edits, board elections, virtual Wikimania 2021

Special report: Wiki reporting on the United States insurrection

In focus: From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia's First Two Decades

Opinion: Wikipedia's war against scientific disinformation

In the media: The world's press says "Happy Birthday!" with a few twists

Technology report: The people who built Wikipedia, technically

Videos and podcasts: Celebrating 20 years

News from the WMF: Wikipedia celebrates 20 years of free, trusted information for the world

Recent research: Students still have a better opinion of Wikipedia than teachers

Humour: Dr. Seuss's Guide to Wikipedia

Featured content: New Year, same Featured Content report!

Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2020

Obituary: Flyer22 Frozen

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Enquiry, Please reply it's a doubt...

Outlander07, I am talking about The recent edit you did that I noticed in the Wikipedia article Saint Thomas Christians, It is clearly cited in all sources that according to legend Nambudiri Brahmins were converted to Christianity by St Thomas, Then why did you revert my edit in which I had linked "Brahmin" with Nambudiri...???? kindly reply.... AARYA SAJAYAN (talk) 06:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Outlander07, I also noticed the recent edit you committed in the article Caste system in Kerala....As you know Wikipedia is not censored and it should be written in an unbiased tone....It is mentioned in all sources that Majority of the Syrian Christian community trace their origin to Nambudiris, It is even mentioned in the Wikipedia article "Saint Thomas Christians".Then why is it an issue if the Nambudiri conversion Theory is mentioned in the article Caste system in Kerala.... I am very sorry if I am being rude. I'm clearly here to build an encyclopaedia no other intention. I know that you're a senior Wikipedian so kindly reply to the enquiry. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by AARYA SAJAYAN (talk • contribs) 06:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

I can't find any valid sources cited in the edits that you had made. Do not try to push your point of views in Wikipedia by citing invalid/obsolete links as sources. Outlander^07@talk 16:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Outlander07, Thanks,now I have understood the error from my side....I had taken reliable sources but the problem was my citations were Autocorrected.... Maybe that is where the problem is.... THANKS for your genuine reply Regards AARYA SAJAYAN (talk) 05:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Please don't think I'm stupid to recognise you are not a sock of Vishal Elias Manesh.Outlander^07@talk 15:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Outlander07,I am not being rude, What mistake did I commit please explain... AARYA SAJAYAN (talk) 16:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

I had started my edits in the area I know, That is why I started editing about Syrian Christians, I just read about Sock Puppetry where I realised that you may be misunderstood...I am no sock, maybe you are mistaken....Maybe that User followed the same edit route that I had followed Thanks... AARYA SAJAYAN (talk) 16:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2021

News and notes: Maher stepping down

Disinformation report: A "billionaire battle" on Wikipedia: Sex, lies, and video

Opinion: The call for feedback on community seats is a distraction

In the media: Corporate influence at OSM, Fox watching the hen house

News from the WMF: Who tells your story on Wikipedia

Recent research: Take an AI-generated flashcard quiz about Wikipedia; Wikipedia's anti-feudalism

Featured content: A Love of Knowledge, for Valentine's Day

Traffic report: Does it almost feel like you've been here before?

Gallery: What is Black history and culture?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)