User talk:Oleola

Welcome!

Hello, Oleola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --ClubOranje^T 08:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chenzw Talk 12:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Helder Ferreira

sorry, it was my mistake. i see now in sources there it is different player, you are right. and one source was non-existent.

Stats

See 90minut archives and stop doing mess, it's verifed

Where exactly? His stats are only provided for 2005-06 and later seasons. If the information is available somewhere deep in the archives, you should provide a direct link to make it easier to verify.209.183.7.166 (talk) 02:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Helder Fereira

stop removing sourced writing like the one for Brazil. he played for Brazil and was called up, it is proven by source.

Wisła Kraków

I'd like to point out why I made the changes I did to Wisła Kraków - From Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs

Per consensus on WT:WPF players who have played international games should not be bolded. This is for several reasons.
1. For teams such as FC Barcelona almost every player will be bolded. 2. Playing at an international level means different things for different countries. To play at an international level for France/Brazil is on a different scale to say the Faroe Islands or Samoa. 3. Bolding makes no distinction between the number of caps. 4. If the fact that they have played for the national team is notable, then it will be listed on their individual and national team articles. 5. The current squad lists are discussing what they have done for their club and not what they have done for their country.

Hope that clears things up. Dancarney (talk) 13:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michal Czekaj and Filip Kurto

These players may not meet notability guidelines. You need to provide sources proving that they have played for their club in at least one fully professional match or at senior international level for Poland. Simply playing in Wisla's youth team or Poland junior teams is not enough. Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability Vsope (talk) 15:16, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sepuya

OK, you´re right. I´ll wait to see... FkpCascais (talk) 22:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Artur Łaciak

The article Artur Łaciak has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.221.240.201 (talk) 08:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sign talk page posts

Hi. Could you please remember to sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~) or the button provided on the edit screen; this will automatically insert your username and the date. Thanks. --ClubOranje^T 08:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give "Piłka nożna" magazine plebiscite a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your proposed move at Talk:Polish Footballer of the Year before you try to move it again. Changing the name of an article requires consensus. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the discussion between two or more editors? Where did you reach consensus? This looks like an attempt to enforce your point of view. Please undo your changes to the two articles, and if you try this again I will block you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:58, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Félix Dja Ettien

Hi there OLEOLA, VASCO from Portugal here,

regarding my edits in this player, i see that they have been classified by you as VANDALISM (?!!?!?). For what reason? I only tried to improve the article's display, and thought that season-by-season REFS was a little too much, given that we already had two EXT.LINKS with that info. Besides, i always thought REFS should be articles in newspapers, announcements from official sources (UEFA, FIFA, club websites), not sites with only stats.

You reinstated it, i will leave it be, i respect your work. Perhaps you could do the same by not calling me what i am not (i am one of the biggest vandal-haters in this site, and fight them with all my heart!)...

Continue the good work (i hope with no verbal injustices),

VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 15:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi there OLEOLA, VASCO here,

i know you will not answer, you never answer to me, but that's OK, just hear this simple message: Kalu Uche in not a pure STRIKER, and not a WINGER too. He plays as a FORWARD, and sometimes is put to use behind the STRIKER (to my surprise, as i see many Almería games, and he is not a player skilled enough for that position). Almería sometimes play without a pure STRIKER, and two open wingers, Albert Crusat and Pablo Piatti.

You don't want to answer the message, OK, but please respect other people's work and don't revert my changes.

Take care, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 02:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the REF my friend, it was good. However, there is one problem (and not small): i read the article 10 times, and did not see the word "WINGER" one time - i saw CENTRAL and ATTACKING MIDFIELDER, STRIKER (which he is not!), SECOND STRIKER, but not WINGER. I think we should change the second position to ATT.MIDFIELDER, it covers the other four more or less.

Uche has been playing for five seasons at Almería, and he has NEVER played as a winger, i think ATT.MIDFIELDER is more accurate OLEOLA. Don't worry, i will improve INTRO to make it more understandable.

Regards, keep up the good work, VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my mistakes in Kalu Uche again, i will not revert it again. However, i still think that B-teams do not buy players, the main team buys then moves them to the reserves. Also, since you edit many times here, please pay attention to a guy that has been making the link of his player position wrong, several times, in BOX: it's MIDFIELDER, he changes it to MIDFIELDER (ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL), reverted him now.

Have a nice weekend, sorry again - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 18:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo

Wiesz, tak mocno nie śledzę tej sprawy, tyle co widziałem artykuły, że Marcelo juz oficjalnie w PSV, ale widocznie się trochę pospieszyli z tym:P--marekchelsea (talk) 08:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eugene Sepuya

Sorry, a forum does not constitute a reliable source, if there is conflicting information then we go with what the most reliable sources indicate, such as the official FIFA player profile page. Camw (talk) 23:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One of the key principles here is verifiability not "truth" - we must be able to verify that information in articles and presented by sources is correct. A post on a forum cannot be verified as coming from the player, furthermore, even if it could, the player himself is a primary source and the reliable source guidelines say that "Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources." - such as the FIFA profile and the majority of newspaper articles I've seen. I'm not censoring anything, I am making sure the article confirms to the guidelines of the project. Camw (talk) 23:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pomoc w robieniu artykulow i aktualizacji zawodnikow Polskiej 1 ligi(dawnej drugiej) czyli Polish First League

Najpierw sie zapytam wstepnie czy jestes zainteresowany taka robota, ekstraklase juz w zasadzie ukonczylem (praktycznie cala sam aktualizowalem i robilem nowe artykuly), wiec chodzi o 1 lige, jesli sie zgodzisz to wytlumacze dokladnie co mialbys robic. Pozdrawiam. odp--marekchelsea (talk) 07:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Ale warto bylo sie zapytac :P A nie wiesz moze kto moglby mi pomoc? --marekchelsea (talk) 13:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

France youth source

Well, I used the French Football Federation's [site, UEFA's archive site, and sometimes the contesting federation's site if they had archival results. As you stated, on the FFF site, they didn't post lineups for the campaign, but they did post player interviews such as this one and this one where the players discuss their appearances. It's been awhile, so I'll check around to look for reports that list lineups. Later and good luck. — Joao10Siamun (talk) 17:51, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cikos

He played for Slovakia U-21 (date, opposition, score):
2008-02-06, Turkey, 2-3
2008-03-26, Austria, 0-1
2008-08-19, France, 2-2
2008-09-05, Belgium, 1-1
2008-09-09, Iceland, 1-1
2009-04-01, Italy, 4-0
2009-06-05, Sweden, 1-0
2009-06-10, Norway, 2-2
2009-08-12, Greece, 1-0
2009-09-05, Serbia, 2-1
2009-09-09, Cyprus, 1-0
2009-10-14, Cyprus, 1-0
2009-11-18, Croatia, 1-2
2010-03-02, Turkey, 1-0
2010-05-19, Croatia, 1-1
2010-08-11, Serbia, 2-1
2010-09-07, Norway, 1-4
Sorry, my mistake. OK, he played 17 games.

David Luiz

Hi there OLEOLA, VASCO here,

OK, it seems it was their mistake (FORADEJOGO.NET), problem solved, if you say it was two U-20 caps, i believe you :)

Happy weekend, continue the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 18:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kamil Glik

Okay, please find reliable sources for your claims. US Palermo website is quite a reliable source, and their information come from Football Data, which is considered the top Italian source of football-related statistics. If you look at the player's page, you'll see that yourself: [1] And please do not revert valid edits with reliable sources, you have absolutely no right to do that, especially when you make claims without any proper alternate source. Regards, --Angelo (talk) 16:08, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I am gonna notify your sick behavior at WP:FOOTY then. --Angelo (talk) 16:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Karimu Alhassan

Jak sądzisz jak powinien brzmieć tytuł hasła? Karimu czy Karim? PS. (talk) 13:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shelby printemps

Google say Shelby Printemps has played for CTC Bandit. Youtube official league stats User:79.213.82.64 01:15, 26 December 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.213.93.127 (talk) [reply]

Maurice Hongla AfD

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, it says, "While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the articles that you are nominating for deletion." Please bear this in mind in future. Many thanks and regards, Giant Snowman 14:41, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Oleola! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 14:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Melikson

No wiem, ale tak ogolnie rozszerzylem artykul i przy okazji to zrobilem bo to juz raczej formalnosc ze strony klubu.--marekchelsea (talk) 17:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sander Puri

Hello, Oleola. You have new messages at Lipik's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

If you are interested, you can find Estonian football players caps here: [2] and games here: [3]. Pelmeen10 (talk) 13:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Oleola. You have new messages at Skier Dude's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CSD notification

Please don't forget to notify the creator of an image when you nominate for CSD, e.g. File:Spartak fans.jpg, File:Rakovski sevlievo stadium.jpg,File:Hristo Botev Stadium in Blagoevgrad.JPG and File:Rakovski sevlievo stadium.jpg--SPhilbrick T 13:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oleola. You have new messages at Skier Dude's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Osman Chavez

Faktycznie. Byłem przekonany, że UNCAF z 2007r. i UNCAF z 2011r. to jest Puchar Ameryki Środkowej (w sensie turniej reprezentacji), a to są dwie różne sprawy. Swoją drogą, mało dokładnie ktoś to sformułował, co mnie wprowadziło w błąd. No, ale mogłem to sprawdzić, czego nie zrobiłem.

Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi i przepraszam za niedopatrzenie.

Pozdrawiam, Gelu6 (talk) 15:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lazur Stadium.jpg

The source you gave for File:Lazur Stadium.jpg - http://www.trivago.ru/бургас-593/спортивное-сооружениестадион/lazur-stadium-1094906/фото-i5395008 - doesn't look like the same image. However, I deleted the image anyway because the user's entire upload history consists of copyvio images, so I went ahead and deleted this one. --B (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Guðjón Baldvinsson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Giant Snowman 16:11, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The information is sourced by the KSI, please stop our disruptive editing. Regards, Giant Snowman 16:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But you removed information that did have a source, had you bothered to check. That, in my book, is disruptive. However, it's all been sorted now, so let's move on. Thanks and regards, Giant Snowman 16:24, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CSD notification

Please don't forget to notify the creator of an image when you nominate for CSD, e.g. File:Lokomotiv Stadium (Plovdiv).jpg--SPhilbrick T 03:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And File:Stadion gksu belchatow.jpg--SPhilbrick T 03:19, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Brud

Nie ma go ani tutaj: http://www.90minut.pl/kadra.php?id_sezon=77&wiosna=1&id_klub=423, ani w Skarbie Kibica 'Przeglądu Sportowego' w pierwszym zespole. Na 90minut.pl w jego karierze jest napisane, że na wiosnę gra w zespole Młodej Ekstraklasy (http://www.90minut.pl/kariera.php?id=10883). Na obozie pierwszej drużyny także go zabrakło. Nawet na sesji zdjęć portretowych na tą część sezonu go nie było. Twoim zdaniem jest częścią pierwszego zespołu?

Pozdrawiam Gelu6 (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ogbuke

No juz teraz wiem, bo nie zauwazylem tych "citation needed", dopiero po zapisaniu zobaczylem.--marekchelsea (talk) 15:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sergei Pareiko

According to Estonian media there's an option for 1 year extension. Pelmeen10 (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kingdombound

Any particular reason why you tagged Kingdombound (talk · contribs) as a suspected sock of Zombie433 in March 2011, when a SPI back in December 2010 (which you were fully aware of) said the two accounts were unrelated? Regards, Giant Snowman 03:10, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nei (footballer born 1980) - Reply

Hi there OLEOLA, VASCO from Portugal here,

thanks for the clearing up, sorry for the misunderstanding in this player's article. However, please write a summary in cases like this, to avoid any confusions.

Take care, keep up the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:32, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But now i saw your summary after you re-removed the stuff by vandal Jordanson, and it was quite aggressive (mine was a bit hysterical, but that's it, and it does not happen only with you, i react like this ALWAYS when i see unexplained removals): i prefer "unsourced crap"?!? How was i to know that the youth years were vandalism, you tell me that. Please mind your words in the future, i am a well-intended user like you, not a vandal or a newbie, OK?

That said, i congratulate you on your work against Jordanson's vandalism, these "users" must be punished always. - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Members activity

Hi. I am conducting another activity check for Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland. It seems to me that you are "semi-active". Feel free to change your status here as soon as you make 10 or more edits on Poland-related articles per month! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:15, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wisła

Brud zagrał dzisiaj, więc jest członkiem pierwszego składu. TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 00:01, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Kalilou Traoré

Hi Oleola. I noteced your edit at that article. I am wandering if you read the source you removed? I know we had problems with Zombie, but that edit actually seemed correct. It is a Malien source about their own player, and the info was right. The problem is that not all Zombies edits are wrong, so we need to be carefull. Another problem is that most European sites mix the info about Mohamed Kalilou Traoré and Mohamed Traoré, so most websites are actually wrong about the number of Mali caps for him. FkpCascais (talk) 23:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The U21 was the only subject I wasn´t thinking of... Did you checked the source you deleted, and do you understand French? FkpCascais (talk) 02:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What´s the big deal? Well, lets see, you removed a valid source (not high quality, but valid), you removed info about his first club (Korofina, well mentioned in that article), you did corrected that he didn´t played for U21 but the source does say he played for the Malien junior national team, and you most probably added wrongly 3 caps for Mali, because I have been following him and I am most certain he didn´t had more than 2 (even possibly only 1) as other sources say, because I already told you that most European sources just confuse him with the other player.

So basically happend something I was most affraid off, and that is that people automatically reverting Zombie without checking end up removing good info. FkpCascais (talk) 02:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • April 2011
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to our first issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised.

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 80,000 pages as Poland-related, out of which 1,500 still need a quality assessment, and 20,000, importance assessment.
we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ.
once an article is assessed it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is another good place to watchlist!)
also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on
newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, and its creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project
we are maintaining a Portal:Poland
automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s)

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

rlfoot

You are already telling me something I already know. I don't use rlfoot to get caps, I use it for certain match reports it provides that the FFF site doesn't, see here for example with the first two matches listed being the particular ones I was interested in. In April 2011, you posted Cabaye's Toulon Tournament stats. Your source for where you got this info would be greatly appreciate in the prose. rlfoot.fr has the stats, but given that France played five matches in the competition and Cabaye was called up for all the matches, shouldn't his stats say five. I'm not arguing rlfoot's reliability, my point is, while it has its negatives, it still has its benefits. — JS^{Rant Away} 22:23, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't really get the gist of your second message. For the second time, I don't get my caps from rlfoot. rlfoot says Cabaye had 17 under-19 caps. When I totaled his caps personally, it came up to 15. I can only confirm 12 of those appearances, but the three other appearances are likely the friendlies against Northern Ireland in October 2004 and the May 2005 friendlies against Benin and Nigeria. I don't have the match reports, though. I have things to do, so I won't go into details on the other caps because it is what is it. I'll search for references when I get the chance. Also, I don't understand the "I've all France lineups from Toulon 2006, so this is the source of my Cabaye's edit". Do you have them off-line or something? — JS^{Rant Away} 23:33, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No need to fix anything, as I haven't. Speaking of verifiability, if you made edits using the unverifiable offline excuse that you are a "football statistician so I've got many match reports", then that's wrong and if you did the same in other biographies I hope that you'll fix this. — JS^{Rant Away} 16:30, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Helder Ferreira

Please discuss this with the user rather than edit warring, you are well past three reverts and need to stop reverting and start discussing please otherwise both of you may be blocked. I have left a warning with the other user asking them to do the same. Camw (talk) 11:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Helder Ferreira

Hello Oleola. I have investigated WP:AN3#User:Cyperuspapyrus reported by User:Oleola (Result: ). You are continuing to revert the article. Both you and Cyberuspapyrus seem to have broken WP:3RR. The most logical way for an admin to close this report is by blocking both of you for 24 hours. If you reply at the noticeboard and promise to stop reverting, you may be able to avoid sanctions. Thank you , EdJohnston (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've broken 3RR. That was not obvious vandalism that you reverted. It is up to you whether you want to be blocked. If you don't, you should promise to stop reverting the article. For example, you could agree to take a break from the article for seven days. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:36, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong in Dynasty Cup

http://www.fifa.com/associations/association=hkg/fixturesresults/gender=m/index.html Hong Kong sent Hong Kong national football team for Dynasty Cup. You should check the record first. You are wrong. hoising (talk) 12:58, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In addiction, please don't use rsssf as references of Hong Kong team without no better one since there're full of wrong data in rsssf website. hoising (talk) 13:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- I see 1995 matches on FIFA, but not 1998 so why you made this edit?--Oleola (talk) 13:11, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- - For 1998 Dynasty Cup, FIFA had allowed Hong Kong sent her national football team with 3 HKID-hold expatriate players, that as same as edition of 1995, but the promise was overthrew by FIFA later. Anyway, Hong Kong sent her national football team for the tournament; even they are not count as 'A' matches. So, some of the overseas misunderstood that team is HK-IX. hoising (talk) 14:29, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stat

The stat is greatfully sure- http://levskisofia.info/

Lee Addy

You want a source for information about the relationship between Addy and Desailly. Here you go Wikipedia (French), Serbian sport site (Serbian) and the last one French sport site (Franch). --7even.up (talk) 19:24, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Oleola. You have new messages at MarB4's talk page.
Message added 10:35, 24 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

MarB4 •ɯɒɹ• 10:35, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you deleteing information that is true and sourced, like the one on player Ortega Deniran. It was full true information, and I don't understand who is giving you right to deal with it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.154.222.98 (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Saša Ivković

Why is he not notable!? He signed a pro contract. Please let's work this out.

Tempo21 (talk) 20:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um, yes it is, kind sir!

Tempo21 (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you win :D But as soon as he debuts for Partizan, I'm making him an article :P

Tempo21 (talk) 02:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Nwosu Kanu

Just to let you know that I've had an email from the editor you were reverting on the above article. Juice80 (talk · contribs) claims to be the article subject and is upset about some inaccuracies in his bio. I've unblocked the account and advised him to explain who he is and request changes on the article talk page rather than edit warring on the article. Hopefully you'll be able to sort this out amicably between you, though I have also let him know about our OTRS system in the event that you can't. Obviously we want bio articles to be as accurate as possible per WP:BLP and we certainly don't want to upset article subjects, but sources must still be provided :) If you need a hand, let me know or ask at the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Regards, EyeSerene^talk 17:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing???

Everybody knows that Wisla only have 13 championship. Stop messing arround. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David-golota (talk • contribs) 22:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kasali Yinka Casal

Hi, I don't understand why you have reverted the wikipedia of the player Kasali Yinka Casal when I provided valid sources for all my amendments? A lot of the information that you put on the players wikipedia is inaccurate especially about the player going on trial with Gaz Metan which is why I changed it and added references to back up everything that I done. The player never went on a trial with Gaz Metan, he was sent there on loan and was registered with the club Gaz Metan from February 2010 to July 2010, that is why before you just change an article you should have looked at the references first, then you would have know they are valid. EUsports —Preceding undated comment added 10:12, 19 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I believe the best way to resolve this situation is to look at all the links I have provided, which is clear evidence that the player was sent on loan to Gaz Metan not on trial:

http://www.goonersguide.com/football-pick-07626-Gaz-Metan-Medias-v-FC-Vaslui.htm

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/gaz-metan-medias/historische-gastarbeiter/verein_8104.html

http://www.fifapro.ro/?p=1234

http://footblog.gr/?p=411&lang=en

Look at all the above references, this is enough proof to demonstrate that the player was sent on loan to Gaz Metan not on trial — Preceding unsigned comment added by EUsports (talk • contribs) 10:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also look at the link below, it shows how many games the player has played. 4 for Dc United, 17 for Cambuur not 16, and 6 for Swindon Town, 5 in the league and 1 in the carling cup:

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/kasali-yinka-casal/leistungsdaten/spieler_60877.html

EUsports —Preceding undated comment added 10:27, 19 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Ok thats fine, by why did you remove the information on the player running track and field and currently holding a United Kingdom record in the relay? Take a look at the link below because this is a valid reference and a good source of information:

http://www.gbrathletics.com/uk/mu13.htm

scroll down to the section that reads the following:

4 x 100 METRES RELAY 50.32 Shaftesbury Barnet Harriers 1 Stoke 5 Sep 1999

            (Yinka Casal, Matthew Hislop, Denzil Davidson, Victor Nyasiri)

The above reference is a good source and I would like for you to put that information back or I will do it myself --EUsports (talk) 10:40, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the information on the football club in Hungary Ujpest making a bid of 80'000Euros? The bid of 80'000Euros was accepted by the players current club in Holland SC Cambuur but the deal fell through at the end. Look at the link below:

http://www.swindon-town-fc.co.uk/Person.asp?PersonID=CASALKAS

Read the information on the above reference. It clearly states that a deal was in place for the player to transfer from SC Cambuur to Ujpest, but the deal fell through at the end.

--EUsports (talk) 10:49, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Below is another link to support that statement:

http://spakenburg.citysite.nl/link/1/nieuws/734598/160_Cambuur Casal giet, Tol komt.html

--EUsports (talk) 10:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wisla Krakow

Tylko mam jedno pytanie: Jestes fanem Wilsky Krakow.? Tylko mow prawde.

Ross Greer

You are so careless that Ross Greer played 3 FIFA "A" matches!!

http://www.fifa.com/associations/association=hkg/fixturesresults/gender=m/index.html

check it by yourself, okay? hoising (talk) 10:26, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If game is on FIFA doen't mean that this is official. For example Denmark has got game vs Poland from 2010 when they played league team not A team. The same Bosnia - Poland from 2007, Bosnia played with Olympic.--Oleola (talk) 10:31, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I told you that is special case of Hong Kong before handover and it is FIFA international matches and official matches of HKFA. It recorded as Hong Kong national football team. Where is your standard come from? It is your idea only. hoising (talk) 10:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No you're wrong, FIFA didn't count this match as a full international because Hong Kong used some foreign players[4].--Oleola (talk) 10:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RSSSF is not any official organization and they record it wrongly. RSSSF could not differentiate Hong Kong national football team and Hong Kong XI. It is very clear that FIFA & HKFA has ensure that these 4 matches are international A match which played by Hong Kong national football team.hoising (talk) 10:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to told you that there is no 'Hong Kong nationality' because Hong Kong never was a country. She was colony and is special admin. region. For her unique, these 4 matches liked abnormal but they had been approved by FIFA anf HKFA. Do you know what I mean? PLZ... hoising (talk) 10:49, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Provide a sources of your claims, so far we have only RSSSF which is widely consired as very reliable.--Oleola (talk) 10:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use Voice search for Yue, Chinese hoising (talk) 13:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to told you that this news is a common sense in Hong Kong. If you don't listen these Chinese, how to estimate it is not Hong Kong national football team? They announced the announcement of HKFA but you said it is not reliable... you replaced the truth with ignorance. hoising (talk) 15:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian stats

Yes Oleola, apologies, I was unaware about the exact leagues that count for infobox purposes in the Brazilian leagues stats. FkpCascais (talk) 20:53, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zhivko Milanov

The stats I edited today, were exactly the same you added a few months ago. I was confused by the Levski site, where there were others stats, but then I realized that those were wrong, so I switched them back. Whatever, considering that the stats were correct, why you reversed my edit? Alexynho (talk) 1:59, 20 September 2011 (EET)

Ok. I`ll keep in mind. Alexynho (talk) 6:28, 20 September 2011 (EET)

Biton

Hello, Oleola. You have new messages at HonorTheKing's talk page.
Message added
– HonorTheKing (talk). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

– HonorTheKing (talk) 20:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a ref to show that Biton actually won the league championship medal with Haifa? I know Haifa was the league champion but he only took part in just one game and it possible that a player must play XY games to earn a medal.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 01:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ekstraklasa

You gotta stop. You just gotta stop acting like a little girl. Stop using the same thing that it is about Ekstraklasa and not polish football champions. You now as well what we are talking about when we are talking about ekstraklsa. So please stop editting and stop making Wisla the most winning team in Ekstraklsa. I mean it. Stop it now! — Preceding unsigned comment added by David-golota (talk • contribs) 19:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kalou

I undo the deleting and I sited my source, why did you deleted again?... If you want to check, go to References. It is number 24... Knowitall355 —Preceding undated comment added 15:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Image?

What image have I recently uploaded?

Knowitall355 —Preceding undated comment added 17:05, 10 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hello Oleola,

I just noticed you have reverted my work on Ahmed Musa

I have been editing Ahmed Musa for quite sometime now, I know all about his stats.

Musa has played one game for the NIG U-23 I noticed you have reverted it but it is referenced pal....

http://www.afriqueavenir.org/en/2011/06/20/nigeria-beat-tanzania-3-0-in-under-23-london-olympic-2012-qualifiers.

Musa also played two games for the Nigerian senior team at the weekend in Abuja against Guinea in the Nations Cup http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/news/newsid=1524040.html

and again on Tuesday 11th Oct in Watford England against Ghana http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/match-centre/Ghana-vs-Nigeria-article797980.html

I will be updating this soon.

Please don't revert me, everything is referenced, finding the right ref article can be a chore so its quite discouraging as an editor. Additionally most times after the reverts and undos the initial contribution seems not mine anymore. May i suggest perhaps instead of reverting you can modify etc, that way my input is noted.

Thanks for understanding

Regards,

Tony(London) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.154.166 (talk) 07:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Country of origin

There was a lengthy discussion about this quite a few years ago - I don't have willpower to dig it our right now, sorry (I really should bookmark it). The consensus was that we'll use the geographical area for locations in biographies, as regimes will change but the geographical area remains the same.

I think this is the only logical way to do it. Otherwise, my grandfather was born in the Tsarist Russia, got married in the Republic of Estonia, first child was born in the Nazi Germany, second child in the Soviet Union and died in the Republic of Estonia. All that while living in Pärnu. Kinda silly, isn't it?

Also, as you said yourself, Estonia was occupied. Most countries of the world did not recognize the incorporation to the Soviet Union de jure and viewed post-1991 Republic of Estonia as if the independent Republic of Estonia would have continuously existed. That adds an another layer of confusion - will we go with the prevalent view or the Soviet view of Estonia having happily and voluntarily joined the glorious Soviet Union? No, I think it would be better to go with geographical area or current political division - and in case where it matters for some reason, we could use "Estonia (Estonian SSR)", but I must admit I cannot think any reason to include this.

Sorry, if it was a bit of a ramble, but I am dead tired from work right now - long day and a project deadline in 10 days. Time for a bed for me!

--Sander Säde 19:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I digged this discussion, there was no consensus.Oleola (talk) 23:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the link - I was not aware of that discussion, the one I remember was from 2006 or so. It was strange to read it, with some now-permbanned racists piping in.

Perhaps it would be a good time to re-initiate the discussion and try to create a formal guideline. Or maybe just use common sense, case by case.

--Sander Säde 07:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, I have reverted your (Sander Säde's) edits for two reasons - firstly they were marked as reverting vandalism (which it wasn't) and secondly because I think it's clear you have to use the political situation at the time of someone's birth to denote their birthplace. Having worked largely on Israeli political biographies I have come across people born around early-1900s Europe and the Middle East, and using the current countries just looks bizarre - someone born in Haifa in 1913 was not born in Israel - they were born in the Ottoman Empire, someone born in Kiev in 1910 was born in the Russian Empire, not the Ukraine. I think it is misleading (and of course factually incorrect) to say that someone was born in a country that didn't exist at the time. I know the argument about Estonia is that some countries didn't recognise the fact that it was part of the USSR, but we have to accept the fact that it was part of the USSR whether people like it or not (the closest modern example is probaby Taiwan/China, and we do not describe people born in Taiwan as being born in PR China despite the fact that very few countries recognise Taiwan and most support the One China policy). Number 5 7 10:07, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I find your reasons rather unconvincing. Let's take, for example, Kalle Lasn, born in Tallinn in 1942. Estonia was occupied by the Nazi Germany at the time, so shouldn't his birth place be Tallinn, Ostland? Or, if we would go with the view of Soviet Union and consider Estonian SSR to be established and existing continuously starting from 1940 - so Kalle Lasn's birthplace would be Tallinn, Estonian SSR. Or we could choose to go with the prevalent modern-day view, which sees Republic of Estonia as existing continuously since 1918 and have him born in Tallinn, Republic of Estonia.

I hope you'll see what a slippery slope this is. Better just to use the modern-day name - Tallinn, Estonia. Political regimes come and go, geographical places stay. If anyone wants, they can always click on the link and see during which political regime the person was born. Let's not consider all readers to be idiots.

I will not start some kind of pointless edit war, but I invite you to revert your changes and use common sense from now on.

--Sander Säde 11:06, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see it as a slippery slope at all. War conditions are totally different to something like the USSR so you're not exactly using the best example, but I would also have no problem with using Ostmark if it was a recognised entity at the time of someone's birth there. Would your "common sense" approach meaning claiming that a Roman emporer was born in Italy or that Jesus was born in Israel, or do you have some arbitary cut-off point for how far back we can go using current countries? Number 5 7 12:04, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, yes, we even use puppet states (recognised obviously) for the Second World War period. Occupations count as well. FkpCascais (talk) 16:13, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So basically you're saying you're intentionally misleading readers by using non-recognized entities? Estonian SSR was de jure recognized by a bare handful of countries. It's kinda silly to go against international consensus, basically claiming we're smarter than scholars.

As for "Roman emporer" and "arbitary cut-off point" - I must say I like how this has been solved at Julius Caesar article. His birthplace is given as "Subura, Rome" without making Rome a wikilink. That might be the best way to solve the issue - always link the actual village/town/area, not the ever-changing political entity. This gives readers a fixed point where to start if they're interested to see more. So, "Tallinn, Estonia" - or even just Tallinn, thus avoiding the whole issue.

--Sander Säde 09:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Sergei Pareiko. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. causa sui (talk) 16:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Michael Uchebo Hello its noted, thanks buddy. Regards and keep up the good work, Andy Wilkonson(London) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andywilkonson (talk • contribs) 10:17, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello mate, Andy from London. If you feel you you have facts to disprove the statistics on Uchebo why dont you update my edits instead of deleting my work as if i am some vandal? I know Uchebo has only played in the U-20 in Kigali and also in the Wafu... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andywilkonson (talk • contribs) 15:00, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oleola normally i wont bother once its you or Vasco cos you guys are diligent but i believe that the way you edited Uchebo/ Rangers makes the player look bad. He said he left because he wasnt properly seen to and shortly after the club claimed they dropped interest. Theres obviously conflict so i believe both sides should be in WIKI i also attached a linkfrom the Guardian where mcCoist confirms he didnt see the player when questioned about it so I believe that when parties involved acctually make quotes or claims then it should be included and it is not fair to tell me that this is not wiki quote because I can show you hundreds of quotes on other footballers Wiki. we all all editors trying to contribute and i am only trying to contribute. please look into this because i am not trying to annoy anybody by reverting etc i am only working with facts and based on this we can also say that Uchebo dropped his interest in Rangers. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.220.129 (talk) 00:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also just noticed that you even removed the references that I added to Uchebos page.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.220.129 (talk) 00:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Michael Uchebo: Well constructed mate, Thank you! Yon mentioned writing you on a different page.... Can you please explain to me how to do this as im not too conversant with this. Greetings! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.220.129 (talk) 00:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

China League One stats

There is no website about the player statistics of China League One. But I had got the official statistics tables by some means. I can send you these tables if you need. (The tables are all in Chinese). --Alexchen4836 (talk) 08:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent to your mailbox. Please check the attachment. Happy editing! --Alexchen4836 (talk) 14:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried again and again, and the mail could not deliver. We must try another way.--Alexchen4836 (talk) 01:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent to your new mailbox. --Alexchen4836 (talk) 08:19, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Izuchukwu

Hi Oleola,

How are you doing? Hope all is well with you..I noticed that you have undo the changes i made in my page(Joshua Izuchukwu)..First of all,Am no more playing for Nea Salamina as you stated..I play for APEP FC now..Though my previous clubs are correct but you didnt put the goals i scored in each club.I have done several times and you keep deleteing them..You can also check (www.soccerassociation.com) for more details concerning how many games i played in my previous clubs and how many goals i scored,also how many games i have played so far for my new team (i.e APEP FC) and my 3goals.. Pls always ask question before deleteing or undoing any page..ThanksDailyshark84 (talk) 23:03, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Armando Sadiku

Hi, just wanted to know did the sources that I added did not support the claims? Plus the Blick site did state that Grasshopper and another club are after the player. I would just like some explanation to why it is that my contribution was deleted thats all. Oltianruci (talk) 19:36, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

You said me to not change anything if i dont have reliable sources... i have lot of sources and everything changed with that sources every stat changed from Anorthosis web site he current play for that club i mean Marcos Antônio Malachias Júnior — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisAnorthosis (talk • contribs) 09:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Laban.png

can you answer me please my question on Laban.png file my english is not the better and i cant read 2-3 wiki pages with more than 1000 lines — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisAnorthosis (talk • contribs) 09:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Laborde image=

U Erase my pictures for the 1st rule?

Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. This includes non-free promotional images.

i have the permision of Laborde from faceboom to use him image on facebook i cant understand why image it deleted u said me i have some days to edit and u delete it today!!!

btw i dont know what i do wrong i mean some other players like Ronaldo,Kaka,Messi have the same sources and the same rights to hims images and it not deleted !! Anorthosis players why deleted? because is not the same value players?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisAnorthosis (talk • contribs) 10:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I Think You kidding me

Where is the problem on Matúš Kozáčik??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisAnorthosis (talk • contribs) 11:16, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Momodou Ceesay

Just to inform you as you might revert my revision. Ceesay has a total 7 caps and 4 goals so far. The only other appearance he made from the missing data at NFT is against Namibia on 3 Sept. 2011 which is proven with this source, but giant strikers Momodou Ceesay and Jarsu Mustapha were kept at arm's length by some steady defending...[5] For the other matches which are also still missing data; 29 March 2011, he missed the match [6], 7 June 2011, missed the match [7], 24 July 2011, only a loacl based squad named [8]. He also should have four goals and not 3, he scored in the 3-1 loss to Burkina Faso on 9 OCtober 2010 [9]. Also, his U-17 stats are inaccurate. It only reflects his appearances & goals at the 2005 FIFA U-17's. He was also a regular at African U-17's earlier that year where they became champions, also scored twice. Banana Fingers (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it be obvious why I (strongly) think Ceesay scored? I just provided you with a BBC report, surely their reports are accurate. Soccerway (which is Global Sports Media) says its Ceesay and same goes for other sources. I also found a screen shot from a Gambian forum [10] (scroll down about a bit) from the end of that match which shows the final score and scorers. Although its a bit blurry, you can sort of see it says Momodou Ceesay and not Omar Jawo. Plus, are those match reports from CAF Online really official reports and therefore accurate? As for the U17 stats in the 2005 African U17's, he scored against Mali in the group stage and against South Africa in the semi-finals, that's already 2 caps & 2 goals. He played in their final group stage match against Ghana, Although Ghana dominated play, the Gambians thought they had levelled scores in the 30th minute, when Momodu Ceesay netted. But the strike, which came off their best move of the match, was ruled offside. [11] and in the final [12] (he's mentioned throughout the article). I'll admit though that I can't find a source which mentions him playing in their opening match but I'm sure he did. Banana Fingers (talk) 17:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jovan Krneta

I think you may have got the wrong tag there. I've changed it to db-bio as it's in Serbian not Nonsense. It seems to be a copyvio too anyway... Peridon (talk) 23:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kalu Uche

Hi there OLEOLA, VASCO here,

i know how we can solve this problem between you and User:Raulseixas. I have inserted the ref regarding his position in the article's introduction, it's the same as in box and i'm sure he won't remove it now. If he does, i'll have a word with him.

Regards - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 14:17, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi

hi i dont know if you are mod or anythink else but why u destroy Ricardo Laborde page???

Visit all big player page please...

All players have lot of external links and you erase Laborde links without reason. You erase Assist infos And you erase a part of the season 2011-12 (100% With sources (2 sourcess))

please edit this and i will read it

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.228.35.247 (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why you destroy Laborde page????? YES you destroy it and u r fault now!!! i dont know why u do that!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisAnorthosis (talk • contribs) 18:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent Laban

Hi can you help me please witch other sources you need to add to erase this two boxes

from Vincent Laban Page

ty Regards - --User:ChrisAnorthosis (talk)

Richard Mpong

Hi, Oleola, you know me too well now to know that I' am a genuine editor of articles and do not vandalize articles but instead I try to improve on them, but unfortunately I did not provide the correct sources or should I say accurate sources to the information in the only one Wikipedia article of Richard Mpong, as you could see the article was at its beginning stages and the player Richard Mpong is also genuinely a "new up and coming player", so obviously the sources were limited and were not a 100% accurate with the additional information inserted into the article, I just try to do my best editing various articles not just association football players.

You really did not need to threaten me with a ban from Wikipedia as many administrators know of my good editing and know I do not vandalize articles but instead I try to improve on them, I just made a one-time innocent mistake with 1 article sources then you threaten me with a ban from Wikipedia. I want you to know that I just do my best and all that you needed to do was just to write a message on my talk page explaining the issue with the sources I had provided in the Richard Mpong article, but instead you claimed that I am inserting unreferenced information when all I did was provided sources for the information that I had additionally inserted into the Richard Mpong article, but they were not a 100% inline with the information written in the article. Oleola I honestly really do like and admire your correction editing on the association football players articles, but instead of threathning me with a ban maybe you could instead please share your association football players article editing knowledge and help me on my editing mistakes by leaving me a kind and instructive message and correction advices on how to edit association football players articles on my talk page instead of a threat of a ban from Wikipedia. Mark Mysoe (talk) 03:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POLSKA

You are not an admin. So dont play something you are not!

Discussion notification

FYI - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#User:MarkMysoe. Regards, MarkMysoe (talk 23:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Márcio Ivanildo da Silva

Hi there OLEOLA, VASCO here,

OK i respect your decision, we'll leave 0 games/0 goals for SÃO CAETANO in his infobox. But please remove CAMPO LIMPO there, only FORADEJOGO.net makes reference to that, it could be wrong (PT.WIKI does not speak of that club, and ZEROZERO also not), and references in infobox are very ugly.

If you don't agree with my new approach, we'll take it to WP:FOOTY, but please let's not edit war. Attentively, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 08:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here, found this link for you, from a Brazilian website, no reference to CAMPO LIMPO as well (see here http://www.sambafoot.com/pt/jogadores/2632_Marcinho.html). Regards. --Vasco Amaral (talk) 08:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

these are not the call ups buddy. these are the apps of the players.

Hi I edited Henry Isaacs page because alot of the info is wrong, he no longer plays for Vittoriosa Stars aswell.

WP:NPA and comments to User:Plexus14

Hi, I think some of your edit summaries to this user could be taken as personal attacks, please make sure to stay cool when editing, especially in a content dispute, and to discuss changes with other editors. Especially with new users, who may be less familiar with the way Wikipedia works, it is important to try to assume good faith whenever possible. I explained to him to use Talk:Murat Duruer, where you'll be able to explain what he is doing wrong, or what you disagree with, so you can develop consensus for that page's content. You two should be working on that page. Thanks! Prodego ^talk 02:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Oleola. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Matthew_hk t c 01:39, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Artiom Rudnev

Stop reverting my changes. I have included the official page of Lech Poznan as a reference about the decision of Artiom Rudnev about changing his name to his native Russian. You can't revert something just because you don't like it. IT IS OFFICIAL. He requested the name change from the leadership of Poznan. He even has talked about that in interviews. Watch the page of the Lech and you will see, I linked it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.249.242.15 (talk) 20:57, 1 April 2012‎

Please do not revert true information. Here You got what is his name: http://lechnews.pl/kadra/artiom-rudnev. He decided to play as a Rudnev not Rudnevs. Respect that. Andrzej19 (talk) 14:27, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't revert true informations. Rudnev is currently playing as a Artion Rudnev in Lech Poznań. He is Latvian-Russian footbalist. On Latvian Wikipedia false informations are given. Andrzej19 (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zobacz jak jest podane na polskiej Wikipedii. Na chwilę obecną gra pod rosyjskim nazwiskiem - więc warto to chyba uszanować. Andrzej19 (talk) 15:25, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Petar Shopov

Hi there. I noteced your strugle with the IP at that article. Incredible how some IP´s insist in adding unsourced information and then make enormous effort to edit-war in order to keep it in the article, instead of making, a possibly less complicate, effort to find a source for it. Particularly in this case of Shopov, I remember reading somewhere a long time ago that he represented the national youth team, but I think I actually read it in a magazine, so, no source, no info. Anyway, you have been doing a great job in keeping numerous articles in order and clean of vandalism.

But, what I really wanted to talk with you is about something else: Brazilian club stats in infobox. I know we have been adding only national level stats, and I fully agree with that as makes absolutelly all the sense, however it also kind of seems as an unsolved issue, in the sense of somehow being a good solution, but not perfect as it could/should be. What I mean are two things; the first that the rule is not explicit anywhere to a new editor or any IP unfamiliarised with it; and second, that it also kind of looks strange to have a player that played several years in some medium size club, as often is the case in Brazil 3rd level, and has 0 (0) in the infobox. An unfamilirised reader will certainly think that one of two: either the guy was injured all time or sanctioned or something, or the stats are wrong... Another problem is that we often find stats for much less notable 3rd (even 4th and more) clubs in other countries, and then we have the zero´s situation for Brazilian ones...

So basically we have the problem of having IP´s adding stats not knowing about the rule, and us reverting and cleaning the edits. I mean, this could potentially go on for the eternity, and it is kind of ungratefull to both sides, as they assume they are doing right by searching and adding those stats, and without us going into detail and explaining all to them, they will mostly leave frustrated and wandering why is someone removing their stats. So I was wondering if we could have some better solution that the current one, some solution that will obviously keep the zero´s for this cases, but that would at least be more clear and more easily understandable. Perhaps an asterix indocating bellow the rule of having only national stats and having the regional stats mentioned, or........ well, I don´t know but, was this ever discussed? Cause I don´t remember this discussions, but I was also abscent during some periods so maybe I missed them? Anyway, if you have close to you the link of any of the discussions regarding this could you send it to me? If not, don´t bother, but what do you think about this matter, do you have ideas or proposals? I was kind of thinking of opening a thread about this at Footy but I wanted to see with other editors first about their stand on this, and it´s nothing urgent anyway. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 03:29, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not the BOSS

You are not a boss or anything. You are nothing. Dont try to scare me. It maybe works on others. But it does not work on me. You cannot scare me, because you are not or anything. So dont pretend to be anything your not!

And stop writing Wisla have 14 wins. They dont. Face it.

Your friend and pen pal.

David-golota (talk) 00:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Umowa

Dobra. Zrobmy umowe. Usun swoich oskarzen ze strony administracji, a ja nie bedzie dotykat stronie o Ekstraklase. ??

David-golota (talk) 20:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nie postepoj jak stara baba. Nie Nie odpowiedziales mi. To co mam robic jak nie das odpowiedzi?? To odpowiedz na moje pytane o umowe?

Postempuj jako mezczyzna

Speedy deletion declined: File:Hon. Samia Nkrumah and Romano Prodi speaking to Parliament of Italy 2011-11-22-..jpg

Hello Oleola. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Hon. Samia Nkrumah and Romano Prodi speaking to Parliament of Italy 2011-11-22-..jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: File is a screenshot with appropriate licensing information. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: File:James Kwesi Appiah, 2012.jpg

Hello Oleola. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:James Kwesi Appiah, 2012.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: File is a screenshot with appropriate licensing information. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive Editing?

I spend hours finding the correct up to date statistics on footballers , hate to see people putting up way too many caps and goals for players you simply can find no truth for. All my edits have been done by soccerway/scoresway are you saying they are unreliable sources? where so you get your info from then Oleola? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shindiggers (talk • contribs) 08:18, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cristian Tănase & Paul Papp

Now it's good? Sorry I've given you headaches my friend. I make the difference now between reported (official from club) and undisclosed (still undisclosed if it's from media).

i think you are the one doing the vandalism

why do you keep deleting the information I have put for Gideon Baah? What is incorrect about the information?

Could I get a response please? I started the page and I have been adding to it, so how can I be vandalising a page that I started?????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazelnike (talk • contribs) 14:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hazelnike (talk) 14:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then tell me what was wrong with the information for you to remove it in the first place.... You have removed a lot of important information in your attempt to 'clean up' a topic you know nothing about.. Are you full time on here or just jobless???? Maybe you should go through Michael Essien's and give that a clean up too...

Hazelnike (talk) 16:00, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miloš Božović

Hi! I saw that you CSD tagged Miloš Božović. I saw that the article was originally created by a user with a very similar username. I have filed a sockpuppetry case and have gotten both the current creator and the old creator blocked. I have also tagged the article for CSD, as per WP: G5. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 21:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hijani Himoonde

My mistake, I thought you have reverted my good edit because his birth date and the location were wrong. When I have realized I tried to remove that too but it was an edit conflict. All the best, mate! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BusquetsFCB (talk • contribs) 23:02, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are true. Very good remark, I will pay attention in future to check the FIFA source. I only try to improve pages. It was a CCL against Esperance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BusquetsFCB (talk • contribs) 23:40, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hallo , I am Borislav Stoyanov goalkeeper ,why you delate my carrer ,this is my carrer and tis is oficiale match for the club and my history Bobi Stoyanov (talk) 12:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Borislav Stoyanov

Hi i'm Borislav Stoyanov Goalkeeper , now i play in Bregalnica Stip , i want you make my carrer and statsitic ,Please my friend ! I send you my history and you make my carrer please !— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobi Stoyanov (talk • contribs) 13:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andraž Kirm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Prva Liga

Dariusz Dudka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Defender

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email [email protected] your Wikipedia username.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FK Vojvodina

Yes,it is, its a very important club and fan side. Also the official side support this. --Nado158 (talk) 14:19, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sadiku

This edit takes out info on the transfer. The source is reliable and is coming out of the mouth of the player himself. Why should the club disclosure be more important than that of the player? In addition, many clubs have transfers whose details are not disclosed, but the media has other sources. We in wikipedia refer just from reliable sources, not necessary the clubs' sources. Thanks.Atdheuyne (talk) 11:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfried Bony

I don't think you were right in deleting my recent edit to the Bony page. His two goals against NEC were significant because Vitesse is in the title hunt 13 games into the season and only have won twice at home and NEC had three men sent off, a very rare occurrence. I realize every goal is not important but I think this past weekend's game was very intriguing and should be included on his page. I just try to make every football player's page as best as they can be. Take Ruben Schaken and Igor Denisov for example, two stubs that I have recently updated and expanded into good pages, I think. Thanks and lets keep communication open between us. Rupert1904 (talk) 18:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Tawiah

Regarding the ongoing series of edits at Michael Tawiah, I'd be grateful if you would state your case at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Michael Tawiah. Thanks. —SMALL JIM 11:24, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zézinho and Zezinho

Hi there Oleola! In fact, I was unaware of the existence of the Move tab, so, instead, I moved by myself the content of that page using the cut and copy move. I've now moved Zezinho's page, in order to distinguish both players: José Luís Mendes Lopes, known as Zézinho, and José Luís dos Santos Pinto, known as Zezinho. Thanks for your help, and sorry for any inconvenience. RRR22 (talk) 15:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adrià Carmona

Hi there OLEOLA, AL from Portugal here,

please assume GOOD FAITH and stop removing the stuff related to his FC Barcelona youth career in box and storyline. I'll try to arrange a ref tonight OK?

But you were correct to add the AFD tag to this page, it's not notable, i warned the creator of the page that it might happen. Happy week - --AL (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spent nearly one hour in the Spanish web, could not find anything. Do what you want, remove the stuff if you want, but i assume good faith (it does not make the article poorer, does it?). --AL (talk) 21:42, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Veljko Batrović

Hi as you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veljko Batrović a year ago I thought you should know that I've just declined a G4 on Veljko Batrović and restored the pre AFD edits. Not only is the new article substantially different, but it looks like his career has moved him into our notability zone since the last AFD, with 7 rather than zero top flight appearances. In my view he has gone from a clear delete at the time of the last AFd to a clear keep this time. Ϣere SpielChequers 19:23, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Salah

Hallo Oleola,

Please, I would like to ask you to remove the refimprove tags from Mohamed Salah. I have also been watching this page, since spring 2012, because Salah is now playing for FC Basel. Please see the following articles (amongst others) that will show quite a bit of evidence to the number of games and goals:

You've probably got your reasons why you added the tags and there are indeed very few refs, this is why I have not removed the tags myself. Thanks for your understanding of my views because I respect yours. I send the kindest greetings from Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aboubakar Oumarou

Hello Oleola,

I was wondering about this guy, why should it be only league matches? I mean, national cup games and European League qualifies are as competitive as any other league match. And, also, I'm 100% sure for what I'm talking about. It's easy to check. And, yeah, one more thing about him. In Serbia, there is huge public pressure about calling him in Serbian national team. He confirmed that he would be very happy about it. So he might get Serbian passport and become national forward in the close future. So, probably, lots of people are gonna check his wikipedia article these days. Maybe it wouldn't be a bad thing to improve his career stats. What do you think? Except my "not so good" english. :D

Thanks.

EDIT: Sorry man, it's unbelievable how idiotic some people can be. In this case I'm the major one. I had totally not noticed that only league stats go on wiki generally. Sorry once again.--Elmih (talk) 23:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michał Nalepa

The article Michał Nalepa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:39, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Raulseixas

Hi there OLEOLA,

Regarding this (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Raulseixas), two things: 1 - as you can very well see, have already commented there, NOTHING to hide; 2 - you could have messaged me regarding it don't you think? In summary i only worry about vandals, this guy is not.

Happy weekend, from Portugal --AL (talk) 14:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Salah

Dear Oleola, there is no unsourced information on this page. Please read Egypt national under-23 football team, plus the goals are all sourced on the page Mohamed Salah itself. Please read Egypt national football team and look at the refs. Please read Egyptian FA official site. Please read Profil auf national-football-teams.com. Please study the Egyptian and German version of this page and the refs. Please do not start an Editor-War. I wish you much fun whilst reading and/or studying and send you my kindest regards and the most sincere greetings from Basel and from FC Basel --Huligan0 (talk) 22:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Oleola, I do not need an Editor-War --Huligan0 (talk) 23:01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Oleola, I do not need an Editor-War Please read properly... --Huligan0 (talk) 23

01, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Oleola, It's YOU who is making the edit-war, not me. I have all the refs. You have none... --Huligan0 (talk) 23:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sincere goodwill and Edit request

Dear Oleola, my Wikipedia username was Enzo Rivos, which has now just been blocked due to an understanding suspicion that you had and which also was backed by User:Basalisk of me User:EnzoRivos of being a sockpuppetery of an one User:MarkMysoe. How you can User:Oleola come to this conclusion is not far beyond my understanding. I EnzoRivos am not at all in any way angry at you Oleola at all, you were just following your instincts and doing your job.

Dear Oleola, I only ask one favour please; Can you please be kind and fulfil one "Edit Request" for me EnzoRivos by "un-reverting" the last helpful small and simple grammar improvement and reference addition that, me EnzoRivos sincerely contributed to the Kevin-Prince Boateng Wikipedia article, please Oleola. I will personally guarantee to you Oleola that I will never again bother you on Wikipedia ever again, please take my honest words. EnzoRivos; My last helpful and sincere correct information contribution to Kevin-Prince Boateng Wikipedia article was --> (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kevin-Prince_Boateng&diff=556165885&oldid=556165386) Please Oleola help me to fulfil the "Edit Request" by "un-reverting" please and I EnzoRivos will forever be grateful to you --> (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kevin-Prince_Boateng&diff=556165885&oldid=556165386). Yours truly sincerely from EnzoRivos and I wish you Oleola a succesful future. EnzoRivos (talk) 22:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.126.15.108 (talk) [reply]

Mohamed Salah

Hallo Oleola, you are continuing a personal edit-war against me.
You write: <actually you provided some wrong and unsourced info>: But the infos are indeed all sourced. However your sole source is wrong: with your ref^[1] one game and the goal from that game is missing in this source. Please read Egyptian FA official site for infos about the U-20 team.
Please also read Egypt national under-23 football team; here the dates, the games and goals for the U-23 are sourced, in fact, in addition all the goals are all sourced on the page Mohamed Salah itself (goals dated from 29 July 2010 to 1 August 2012).
Please study the German version of this page which contains further refs. Further infos can be found under:

Please read these sources and please stop your continued edit-war against me. --Huligan0 (talk) 21:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Oehrli

Hallo Oleola, I have noticed that you are continuing your edit-war against me. In the meantime you have deleted my photos of Jennifer Oehrli on Wikimedia Commons, both those that I took myself and those that were given to me personally by Jenny Oehrli. Please stop your continued edit-war. Thanks --Huligan0 (talk) 21:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Oleola, again I see that you are still continuing your edit-war against me. Yet again you have deleted my photos of Jennifer Oehrli on Wikimedia Commons. These are photos that I took myself and that were given to me personally by Jenny Oehrli. Somehow you are getting your fun by doing this, but I don't understand your fun. So please stop your continued edit-war. Thanks --Huligan0 (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franciszek Smuda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poland national team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

your are NOT the boss

dont threaten me. I know your neither a boss or a admin. so get over yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David-golota (talk • contribs)

DOnt make fake accusations or I will report you. There are plenty of sources on the article I created. Stop false accusations now.

Hello =

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

June 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at List of Polish football champions. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oleola (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You can read about background here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:David-golota_disruptive_editing_and_personal_attacks. After I read User:AndyTheGrump message at WP:AN I filled List of Polish football champions article with references, so the article was completely sourced, but User:David-golota started to reverting my work completely, which means removing content and sources from the article, also reinstating unsourced and unaccurate tables he copypasted from Ekstraklasa article. I simply reinstated fully referenced content and removed unsourced material, I thought that it's allowed per WP:3RRNO #7

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM and Bbb23's comments below. David-golota is also blocked. It's only 24 hours, take a break and come back tomorrow. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm familiar with the background. Claiming edit warring exemptions is a risky business. Generally, only obvious exemptions are recognized. For example, if someone says in a BLP article that the subject is a criminal, and it's untrue and unsourced, that would be a BLP exemption. Or if someone adds meaningless vulgarity to an article, that would be a vandalism exemption. It was unwise of you to continue battling in the article, particularly while the ANI discussion was proceeding.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So if you familiar with my report why don't you revert his last edit in List of Polish football champions, now the article is completely unfererenced, 0 sources, content should be removed per Wikipedia:Verifiability.--Oleola (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are lots of articles with unsourced material, and I'm not going to take a position on the content. If it's as bad as you think it is - and I'm not expressing an opinion on the merits - someone else will take care of it. Much of what editors believe to be urgent isn't.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oleola (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As Wikipedia:VANDALISM#Blanking.2C_illegitimate say vandalism is "Removing all or significant parts of a page's content without any reason". In this edit I created a lead section from scratch[13], but then David-golota blanked the whole section whithout any reason[14]. Per WP:3RRNO #4 I think I've got grounds to claim that it was an obvious vadalism. He also removed important verifiable references which is also a vandalism per Wikipedia:VANDALISM#Blanking.2C_illegitimate

Decline reason:

There is no humanly-possible way of seeing those edits as "obvious vandalism" - this is a content dispute, plain and simple. Further such ridiculous claims will result in this talkpage being locked for the duration (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:07, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for June 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahatma Otoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hearts of Oak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

U-21 Euro squad-templates

Hi there. Two years ago, you participated in this discussion regarding squad-templates for UEFA under-21 championships, so I wanted to let you know that some of the same templates again are up for discussion here. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques Zoua

Hallo Oleola, once again I have noticed that you are still continuing your edit-war against me. In the meantime you have reverted youth clubs and figures on page Jacques Zoua stating unreferenced. If you had looked at the German, Spanish or Italian Wiki-Version you would have seen the refs. You are continuously reverting my edits, somehow you are getting some pleasure doing this, but I don't understand this and I don't want to. Just, please stop your continued edit-war. Thanks --Huligan0 (talk) 14:07, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patryk Fryc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to the second issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; we get close to a hundred discussion threads each year and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. Last year we were featured in the Signpost, and our interviewer was amazed at our activity. In the end, however, even as active as we are, we are just a tiny group - you can easily become one of our core members!

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 83,000 pages as Poland-related - that's an improvement of over 3,000 new pages since the last newsletter. Out of which 30 still need a quality assessment, and 2,000, importance assessment. We have done a lot to clear the backlog here (3 years ago those numbers were 1,500 and 20,000, respectively). Can you help assess a few pages?
- assessing articles is as easy as filling in the class= and importance= parameters on the talk page in the {{WPPOLAND|class=|importance=}} template. See here for a how-to guide.
once an article has an assessment template, it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is a good place to watchlist if you just want to stay up to date on possible deletions of Poland-related content)
we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. In addition to this automated list, you are also encouraged to help review articles from our B-class reviews requested list found here.
also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on. We have tens of thousands articles in need of cleanup there, so if you ever need something to do, just look at this gigantic list. (I am currently reviewing the articles tagged with notability, either proving them notable or nominating for deletion; there are still several dozens left if you want to help!).
did you know that newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, occasionally nominated for deletion, and their creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project if they show promise as new authors of Poland-related content.
we are maintaining a Portal:Poland
automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s)
Breaking news: we are looking for a Wikipedian in Residence for the New York City area. See Wikipedia:GLAM/Józef Piłsudski Institute of America for details.

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

It took me three years to finish this issue. Feel free to help out getting the next one before 2017 by being more active in WikiProject management :)

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a member at WikiProject Poland.
Please remove yourself from the mailing list to prevent receiving future mailings.
Newsletter prepared by _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} and sent by Technical 13 (talk) using the Mass message system.

Brazil U20 caps

"False caps" or unsourced (Sidnei)? SLBedit (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. SLBedit (talk) 21:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

U21 caps / goals

Where did you get source for U21 players, like Kevin Kampl or Rajko Rep? You removed U19 stats from Rep's article but not U21, so there probably is a source for him / other Slovenian players? 86.58.36.235 (talk) 20:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HankMoodyTZ

They have some questionable edits and some good edits. Overall I think they're constructive, just new to editing. Giant Snowman 22:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paulinho (footballer). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 11:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HankMoodyTZ

I've blocked him, thanks for bringing it to my attention. Giant Snowman 19:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Oleola. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kiko Ramírez

Read this article (which is actually ref #1 of the page): "Después de esos dos años de esplendor el delantero tarraconense trotó por diferentes equipos como el Ceuta, Cartagonova hasta llegar al Tàrrega, con 32 años. Última parada de aquel futbolista «con muchas aptitudes pero con importantes carencias», como se define el mismo Kiko Ramírez desde la distancia. Llegó, de nuevo, la llamada del Nàstic. Esta vez le ofrecían un puesto en el banquillo. Al lado de Juan Carlos Granero." (TRANSLATION: "After these two years of glamour the Tarragona-born forward represented different teams as Ceuta, Cartagonova until reaching Tàrrega, aged 32. It was the last stop of that footballer «with much eager but with important deficiencies», as Kiko Ramírez defines himself later on. Later on, Nàstic called again. This time they offered him a place on the bench. At Juan Carlos Granero's side."

Juan Carlos Granero was Gimnàstic's manager in 2002, per here. Then, PLEASE, stop editing and removing stuff that you don't know or don't bother to search for. MYS 77 ^✉ 02:29, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, indeed. However, this article also says that he was the manager of the Juvenil squad after leaving the assistant role. He remained manager of the youth side until 2010 (per here and here). I'll add the info, thanks for your input. MYS 77 ^✉ 15:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carlitos (Spanish footballer)

Hello there, from Portugal,

Please don't threaten me with blocks OK, i was only trying to assume good faith and i thought you would/could the same, in this article or in Kiko Ramírez (in which you reverted and were yourself reverted). Hey, but don't worry, article stays as you want, i won't touch it anymore.

Attentively, sorry for any inconvenience --Quite A Character (talk) 18:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not know how i did not think of this earlier: FUTBOLME.com (link #2) is Spanish as him, and it shows him playing youth football for at least Torrellano and Torrellano Illice. Do you think you can allow me to add that to box or it's too much to ask?

Thank you --Quite A Character (talk) 22:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference #1 (recently added to the article) shows his youth spells correctly. Now PLEASE, stop reverting other people or I'll treat this as a WP:NPA. Thank you, MYS 77 ^✉ 01:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, great work from User:MYS77! Please read this part ("Empezó en 1998 en el Alicante, para pasar después al Hércules, conjunto en el que permaneció cuatro años. También pasó por el Torrellano, en dos etapas, con un intervalo fuera de la provincia, en el que perteneció al Murcia"), if you don't understand it even with Google Translate then i'll help you, no problem. --Quite A Character (talk) 01:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are so full of yourself that you didn't even realize that Elche and Torrellano had a partnership back in that time. So if the guy is listed in Elche's website, he could be playing for Torrellano (as this website shows) instead. But no, you prefer to be "better" and show everybody no respect. We're actually trying to IMPROVE things here by RESPECTING the others, thing that I recommend you to learn.

But whatever, I'll use Quite A Character's words: "article stays as you want, i won't touch it anymore". You do not know how to work with others, so then I'll stop worrying about somebody like you. Thank you, MYS 77 ^✉ 19:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will take the situation to WP:FOOTY, in the meantime article stays as it is, you removed almost everything again and completely denied the merits of WP:BOLD, OK... --Quite A Character (talk) 20:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, WP:VERIFY is very important. I have started the discussion at WP:FOOTY as promised, please participate if you want. --Quite A Character (talk) 02:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Mz7 (talk) 03:35, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Oleola. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolai Brock-Madsen

Hello. I'm not sure about your change to his international stats. His DBU page counts all 22 matches as under-21 in the summary table – probably because the table layout doesn't have rows for U23 or Olympic – but in the list of matches, matches 17–22 are footnoted as under-23.

Matches 17–19 are noted as Olympic preparation matches and 20–22 are the Olympics proper. So the three warmup games could go in the infobox as under-23, if you think it's misleading to count them as Olympic, or all six could go in as U23 for simplicity, but they're definitely not under-21. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Asmir Avdukic

Hey, get off your high horse when editing. Learn to read the source. He was subbed on once in a friendly, which is 7 caps. Look at the dates. The other 5 are in official U21 contests. Stop reverting and actually read instead of taking out your anger when you are revealed to be wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:CA:8101:5BAB:18D3:43D2:DA7D:D0F1 (talk) 00:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Oleola reported by User:2A02:27B0:4C00:5080:8505:B54D:9EC9:6D (Result: No violation). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:56, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Pirin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Pirin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Reminder"

Same applies to you. "Oleola is warned against tag bombing, issuing warning templates unnecessarily, and any other behaviors that would indicate he's involved in bad faith harassment. In cases of genuine concern, Oleola is advised to clearly and civilly discuss his concerns and attempt to help resolve the issue in good faith, rather than unilaterally reviewing another editors contributions."

User:Mega60 is a very trustworthy provider of stats of Spanish youth NT teams. He added those stats back in 2015, and we had it here on WP:AGF (it seems that you can't understand this guideline).

Hope you understand, get out of your own "box" and interact in a more civil manner. MYS 77 ^✉ 02:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Oleola. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Night of Swiss Football for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Night of Swiss Football, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night of Swiss Football until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Mohamed Salah". transfermarkt.de. Retrieved 21 May 2013.

[1] "Mohamed Salah". transfermarkt.de. Retrieved 21 May 2013.

[1]