User talk:Moeron

Talk archives
	February — June 2006; July — August 2006; September 2006 — November 2006; December 2006; January — April 2007; May 2007 — November 2007; December 2007 — December 2008;
Did You Know acceptances
	December 2006 — ;
Hey ... I got some Barnstars!
	User:Moeron/Barnstars;

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

NOTE:If you create a section here, I will respond HERE.

Hi!!!

Dear Moeron, thank you so much for the welcome! I have been reading Wikipedia for a long time and have decided to finally start editing! Thanks for welcoming me! I've been reading the intro guides and how to write articles. Do you have any suggestions? Basket of Puppies (talk) 01:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What are your interests? When I first started at Wikipedia, I worked on pages for bands that I enjoy as well as creating album pages. Pick something you have a passion for and start looking for articles; just be sure that when adding material to adhere to a neutral point of view, using reliable sources when adding specific information. If you don't have a particular interest, hit the link to the left that says Random article and see how you can help that page. Sometimes, when I get a bit lethargic, I will click Random article and find a page to improve. Again, welcome! ... if you have any more questions feel free to ask me or to put {{helpme}} on your page and someone should be around to help. Cheers! -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 01:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks for the hints, Moeron! Say, I alread have a question. I saw this thing for a service called Twinkle. I tried to install it but I don't notice anything different. Am I too new to use it yet? Also, at what point will I be able to edit without having to type in the confirmation code? And also how do I get a custom signature like yours? Basket of Puppies (talk) 01:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle is a user script that helps people revert WP:VANDALISM. While wanting to help with such a task is commendable, I highly recommend you try some basic article editing, basically to get a feel of policy and procedures.
You pretty much just created your account name, right? If that is the case, you may either have to confirm the account (through your email) or it might just go away after some editing. I have been around for awhile, so I don't recall that additional deterrence.
Finally, for changing your signatures, I guess it would be best to visit WP:SIG, in particular the section called Wikipedia:SIG#Customizing your signature. That will explain where you change it and give some suggestions.

Anything else, just let me know. Cheers! -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 01:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Moeron! You've been incredibly helpful. I've been reading a lot of the policies and guides. I hope in a few weeks I'll start being able to contribute to both the content and integrity of this encyclopedia. I am really thrilled to be editing and thank you for the welcome! Basket of Puppies 01:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Supernatural Role Playing Game

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Supernatural Role Playing Game, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article is one year old now, but the game has still not been released. It seems that this look into the crystal ball was unsuccessful.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding (talk) 18:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Wigglesworth

Hi

Could you tell me why you have not accepted the updated biography I put on Mark Wigglesworth. The one you have reverted to has used unreliable sources and I would prefer the fuller biography that was written on January 8.

Thanks, Mark --MarkWigglesworth (talk) 12:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinserted some information that you removed; please state on the talk page for the article why these are unreliable and then these may be removed. You also removed a number of necessary items, such as the successor box, and changed reference templates; for this reason, it was reverted. BTW, are you a fan or actually the person in the article? -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 21:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I apologise for having left some important technical aspects out of the edit. My computer skills are limited so I am grateful for your corrections in that regard.

I have two questions. Have you left out things that you have not been able to find citations for? If this is the case I can easily get those to you, especially if you could give me a better idea of what is considered a reliable source. I find it surprising that Wikipedia seems to value newspaper articles more than other aspects of the publishing media. If that is the case, of course I have to respect that, but I would have thought that there were other more trustworthy sources. It is a frightening world where we follow the 'it must be true, I read it in the papers' philosophy! Is 'Who's Who' considered acceptable, I wonder?

I feel an obligation to some of the orchestras, and operas, that you have omitted. I appreciate that it might be considered boring to read the list but Wikipedia is nothing if not extensive! Incidentally we should omit the double reference to the Kondrashin competition. My role with the BBC Symphony Orchestra also gets a repetition which, despite its different context, might be a waste of space

The unreliable source that is cited is No 14 from Shirley Apthorpe. This article was based on interviews that do not give both sides of the story. The specific matter at La Monnaie that she refers to is at present legally sensitive and so I cannot make any comment but until these issues are resolved, I think it is better to omit this reference. Once the situation is sorted out I would be happy to point you towards an appropriate citation.

I appreciate the opportunity to have this correspondence and look forward to hearing from you.

Mark Wigglesworth (MarkWigglesworth (talk) 23:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Okay, first off, you may want to read our guideline on "conflicts of interest" on articles; editing an article about yourself is highly frowned upon because it goes against one of our five pillars, that of always providing a neutral point of view. When I re-added your material, the only deletion I made of your material is limiting some of the orchestras you listed. Wikipedia may strive for being extensive, but it isn't a collection of all information. I suggest just highlighting three of the most important "things" (in this case orchestras), perhaps through citations, but not all of them. You say you have an obligation to these orchestras, so therefore they should appear on your page, but again, this goes back to being a conflict of interest.
As for the unreliable source you mention, it is from a reputable publication and the sentence in the article comes from news, not commentary. Therefore, I don't see a reason why it should not stay. I would accept a following sentence that presents the other side of the story if you could provide a reliable source for it.
I hope that may answer some questions you have about the edits to this page. I am going to copy/paste this over to the articles talk page so it can continue there. I will also direct some WikiProjects there so others can weight in on the discussion. If you have any other technical questions about Wikipedia, feel free to ask me. Cheers! -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 00:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I appreciate the conflicts of issue but am happy that the version as it is now is a bit more detailed than it was. Do you want to edit out the double reference to the Kondrashin competition or shall I? (It might be a smoother process if you could do it!)

As to the issue of the unreliable source, the problem is that the people who would put the other side of the story are at the moment honouring the confidentiality agreement that was put in place. It seems strange that something that is untrue should have to stay in the article simply because of a lack of evidence, but when and where that is forthcoming, I'll let you know.

Unless you've already done so, don't worry about posting this correspondence elsewhere. I'm happy to leave things as they are - especially now that I understand a bit more about the philosophies and guidelines of Wikipedia.

Best wishes, Mark (MarkWigglesworth (talk) 01:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

An editor's displeasure with my crop of his PD pic

Can you offer your thoughts on this matter? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonlance GA

Hey there! Just letting you know that we have nominated Dragonlance to be a Good Article, and it is currently up for review. :) BOZ (talk) 00:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Hi, I recently reverted your deletion of an External Link at Human Evolution, and wanted to explain in order to avoid misunderstandings. I also patrol EL additions and delete those that don't meet the EL guidelines, especially commercial links. However, I reviewed the link that (Suki?) added to this article, and it seemed to fit very well and enhance the article; in other words, I think it was properly compliant with guidelines and a useful addition, that's why I restored it. Apparently the same editor may have added the same link to other articles as well, as indicated by your edit summary. I haven't reviewed those and have no idea whether or not they belong; it was only the link at Human Evolution that I reviewed. If you feel I'm mistaken I'll be happy to discuss this further either here, my talkpage, or the article's talkpage, whatever you think appropriate. Thanks for your time, Doc Tropics 16:22, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dread Zeppelin Page

Hello Moreon,

I've noticed that you have recently visited the Dread Zeppelin page and added an alert for more citation/references. I am actually the creator, original guitarist and producer of the band. I have not been with them since 1995, but am very interested in having the TRUE history of the band recorded on Wikipedia. I am in process of rewriting the entire page using as many references and inclusions from other original members as I can.

My problem is that someone going by the name Billraheb keeps editing the page with misinformation designed to be complimentary to the current group. My edits leave the current band information alone, but I did edit the parts that had to do with my version of Dread Zeppelin (which also happens to be the time spent on major record labels that most fans know).

I also wrote to Billraheb on his talk page and asked him not to remove links to legitimate CD and record releases and to, essentially, stop trying to re-write history, but I have a feeling my work will be removed again.

What can I do to stop this? How can I get the real story up and for it to stay?

Thank you for any help you can give me.

Alkarpus (talk) 17:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dread Zeppelin Part 2

My work has been removed again despite adding several sources (they have been removed, too). This time, the user's name is "Cleanserman" although I'm pretty sure that it's the same person as as they have made the exact same edits. Probably trying to avoid the three undo rule.

PLEASE let me know what I can do to stop this.

Cleanserman??? That's a bit creepy, isn't it?

- Alkarpus (talk) 19:59, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

do not remove FACTS from wikipedia

You recently removed my FACTS from Winback - I will be reporting your vandalism--your wrong 17:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parallel Universe 11 (talk • contribs)

Your facts may not be wrong, but what you wrote was already covered in the very first paragraph of the article. Hence, your edit was redundant and brought no new relevant information to the Winback article. If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask. Cheers! -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 17:04, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I would like to thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. Nice to see a watchfull eye ;) --Frankie 0607 17:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Respond2 Cmedia

Just a courtesy note to let you know I've removed your CSD tag (A7) from Respond2 Cmedia. You may want to go back and take another look at the merits of the article. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 18:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Person

Hi Moeron,

I saw that you had flagged my post on Matt Gibson for deletion. I'm a bit new to Wikipedia. I found the guidelines regarding notability a bit vague.

Matt Gibson and his magazine, Xpat (which I'm also writing an entry for) was quite well known when I lived in Taiwan (although I'm not sure about now. Kind of a minor celebrity in the foreign community.

I've read many other entries that seemed to be less notable than these. I guess my question is, what kind of citations would be required to show the notability of this person and his magazine?

Thanks very much for your help.

Cheers, Jeff —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff Mirionuck (talk • contribs) 21:29, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George Fitzhugh

Moeron--

While I agree that the block of material to Fitzhugh's entry, regarding his major work "Sociology for the South", was a bit bulky, by the same token calling it "fluff" and reverting to the original (a mere six sentences) throws a hospital's worth of babies out with the bathwater. Fitzhugh's thinking is substantially more nuanced than the entry previously contained, and is of much greater interest to students of American political thought than most (or all) other defenders of slavery. Perhaps the better solution would have been the harder row to hoe: to improve the added material through judicious edits. It needed a scalpel, or maybe a butcher's knife, but not a chainsaw. Pdwschmidt (talk) 05:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Doherty

Hi Moeron, hope you don't mind but I've downgraded this speedy to a notability tag as I take appearing on TV and in film as an assertion of importance or significance. and someone else has now notched it back up to a prod.. Ϣere SpielChequers 17:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check the deletion log? This looks like someone has been trying to add this person multiple times. Also, there is only one entry for this person as a unnamed nurse in one movie. I have seconded the prod and hopefully it will be deleted soon-ish. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 17:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes deleted multiple times before. But this time it mentions her TV and film and doesn't mention either of her two previous claims to fame. So in effect a different article. Probably won't survive the Prod but not really a candidate for speedy.Ϣere SpielChequers 17:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nelson Serrano - thank you for your edits

I appreciate your comments that entries must be substantiated with sources. I have also posted to the person's talk page my comments regarding his/her changes and cited the sources. Please review my entry to his/her talk page and comment on how I could best interact in Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and consideration to my request.Sisco3 98 (talk) 15:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BT-Truth.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:BT-Truth.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Snoedown.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Snoedown.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 22:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, again!

Greetings Moeron - some time ago you kindly left a welcome on my talk page in which you offered to help me out with any doubts, etc. I have just tried to archive my talk page and made a hash of it, even though I tried to follow the step-by-step instructions I found somewhere. I have since requested speedy deletion of the experiment.

No hurry, 'cos I'm still smarting from the embarrassment, but if you have time, I'd appreciate it if you could post a link to a page that gives a wizard or any other foolproof way for folks like me to do simple IT-related stuff. Cheers, and thanks for being out there! --Technopat (talk) 18:56, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Moeron! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 213 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Alan Goldsher - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 13:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At aero 088

Hi, my first contrib was the page At aero 088, maybe you remember asking me on which page the weapon was (226) but now I'm beginning to think that I might have been wrong. Maybe you noticed that some weapons have the wrong image for the name, for example the type 99 has the image of the type 92, and the Chauchat of the Hotchkiss, and at least another three mistakes. So my point is, if the image of the At aero 088 is so completely similar to the one of the Steyr MPi 69, might it be that the image is wrong? Do you think they put the image of the Steyr at the place of the At aero? I noticed because the measurements are almost exactly the same (in proportion to the cartridge). Thanks, --Amendola90 (talk) 16:36, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're the moe. guy, right?

Just thought you should know there's a proposal to change "moe." to "Moe (band)" over at Wikipedia:Requested Moves. It's almost backlogged down at the bottom of the page. I thought you might have something to say. (I personally think it's ridiculous and am currently working on a sort of manifesto about proper band names that I'll submit to the Wiki admins... hopefully soon!) Cheers, Wikkitywack (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Firebrand.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Firebrand.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~==discographies==~~

~~hello,~~

i just looked at your works, like phish discography or grateful dead discography, and i must say that the tables aren't very beautiful. maybe you read here. if you want i can help you to improve the articles. cheers.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 13:58, 31 October 2010 (UTC) sry wrong talk page :/-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 14:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JWGangsterofLove.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JWGangsterofLove.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Jam bands

Template:WikiProject Jam bands has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kumioko (talk) 02:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kiddiepool.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kiddiepool.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GB-ASM-Interlude.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GB-ASM-Interlude.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:56, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GB-ASM-Wallcrawling.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GB-ASM-Wallcrawling.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:56, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DEAS012.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DEAS012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At aero again...

Hi, sorry but I have to ask you one more time about this SMG, as much as I hate it. We talked about it once in 2008, and in 2010 (User talk:Moeron#At aero 088) I expressed some doubts on the image, that now I'm sure is wrong (see Talk:At aero 088). You're the only one I'm sure knows about this weapon, so I ask you for suggestions. Thanks again, --Amendola90 (talk) 17:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prisoner of Haven

The article Prisoner of Haven has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grateful Dead - Dead Zone - The Grateful Dead CD Collection (1977-1987).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grateful Dead - Dead Zone - The Grateful Dead CD Collection (1977-1987).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DB-CrippleCrow.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DB-CrippleCrow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Practicaldemon lg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Practicaldemon lg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PhishCompanion2.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PhishCompanion2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PhishCompanion2.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PhishCompanion2.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Phishing Manual for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Phishing Manual is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phishing Manual until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Run Like an Antelope (book) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Run Like an Antelope (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Run Like an Antelope (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Phishing Manual.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phishing Manual.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Court Square Place for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Court Square Place is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Court Square Place (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TG16-DeadMoon.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TG16-DeadMoon.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DeadMoonBoss1.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DeadMoonBoss1.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DeadMoonBossFinal.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DeadMoonBossFinal.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:At the Cafe Bohemia, Vol 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:At the Cafe Bohemia, Vol 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Undermind/New example" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Undermind/New example. Since you had some involvement with the Undermind/New example redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 19:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Addams Family (Game Boy).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Addams Family (Game Boy).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

تمامی مجوز ها غیرقانونی است. حساب کاربری من هک شده من شریک قانونی ویکی مدیا هستم لطفا تمامی اطلاعات را مسدود و مجوزهارا لغو کنید — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.147.137.45 (talk) 20:01, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DB-Expansion.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DB-Expansion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:L (moe. album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:L (moe. album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:L Version 3.1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:L Version 3.1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warts and All Volume 3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warts and All Volume 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]