User talk:MehulWB

Welcome!

Hello, MehulWB! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Amortias (T)(C) 18:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ahmed Hassan Imran has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ahmed Hassan Imran was changed by MehulWB (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869361 on 2014-09-14T10:29:16 00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:29, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:54, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MehulWB, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MehulWB! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Amortias (T)(C) 17:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am extremely sorry if I unknowingly violated any rules. I undid the defamatory reports from Ahmed Hassan Imran page for which I have emailed the Wikipedia team. I will use the talk page guidelines as you mentioned. Thank you.

Hi MehulWB, it would be worthwhile mentioning this at the report filed at WP:ANEW as there is a comments section where you can post information you feel is relvenet to the report. Amortias (T)(C) 18:06, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for mentioning this. I posted my comment there. I hope it resolves without any punishment to me.

Continuing to revert edits on this page is not going to help your case. it would be wise to leave the page alone and let the administrators look at the issue. If they find the information is defamatory or libelious they will remove any record of it from the article. By continuing to revert edits after appoligising for edit-warring it makes your apology seem false. Amortias (T)(C) 18:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your guidance. I leave it now but I found the addition of the same content by two editors suspicious so I edited it again but if this also violets the rule then I will not make any further edits until the administrators take this case. And I apologies again for my fault.

I have put several links at the top of your page that might be beneficial to have a read through. Hopefully they will help with future contributions. Amortias (T)(C) 18:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are really great for giving me proper guidance. I deeply appreciate it. I will go through those links to learn more. Surely, there are lots to learn from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Thank you once again.

I found Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and Wikipedia:Verifiability worthy for the current context of my edits. Thank you.

I've fully protected the article for now. I encourage you and other involved parties to take this time to discuss the controversial changes on the article's talk page. You can make edit requests as needed. Thanks for your cooperation — MusikAnimal ^talk 23:05, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note. I am participating in the discussion with him on the noticeboard.

ANI

I opened a discussion on the ANI about your own behavior. You can find it here: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#MehulWB Serialjoepsycho (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for arbitration Comment

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Ahmed Hassan Imran and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, BengaliHindu (talk) 17:35, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MehulWB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not know who is user:MonaPisser. I am even blocked from posting my replies to Ahmed Hassan Imran talk page. The MonaPisser a/c was created perhaps to block me. He may have made similar edits like me. But I have been posting my reasons on the article's talk page. I am even in middle of a discussion. Please, understand why even I need to use another account? Honestly, I do not know user:MonaPisser.MehulWB (talk) 14:59, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Two admins with access to checkuser agreed that you're one of Mona's socks. — Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sir, please, trust me I am not Mona's sock. I don't know him/her. I am unable to reply at the Ahmed Hassan Imran's page. At least is there any way I can participate in the discussion with fellow users on the article's talk page?MehulWB (talk) 14:20, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I'm not sure they were clear about Mona but you would be her sockmaster if that's what they found. Your problem is more Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_MehulWB That category below. Says sockpuppets of MehulWB.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, see my all contributions. I was participating in every possible discussion. I always reply whenever there is a message related to my edits. This suspicious MonaPisser suddenly showed up in the middle when Jayantanath started editing. Why I would need his a/c. while I was in middle of a discussion? He seemed to me an experienced a/c. My interest is with Ahmed Hassan Imran page and I am still willing to participate in the talk page. I do not know how I became the sockmaster! I am from Hooghly district of West Bengal and my edits are associated with only Ahmed Hassan Imran page. This is seriously a big mistake.MehulWB (talk) 07:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tell about your future plans after reading Wikipedia:STANDARDOFFER. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:50, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the kind help. My future plan is to first read the Simplified ruleset and understand it. If I do not understand any rule from the set then I will ask for help to any experienced editor before doing anything further. I will Make contributions (as per my ability) to the cleanup process. I will always first post my comments on article's talk page and discuss my editing reason there. I will resume my discussion at the Ahmed Hassan Imran's talk page to improve the page. I will always do my best to abide by the Wikipedia ruleset. MehulWB (talk) 17:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You actually have to open a new unblock request if you want them to review it. I doubt they will accept the above though because it doesn't address the behavior that got you banned. Two check users have connected more than 23 sockpuppets to you.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 02:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I emailed admins. What do you recommend? How can I improve the page? Am I permanently banned from the website? Do I need to open a new account? Please, help sir.MehulWB (talk) 14:17, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need type unlock in between brackets like you did in the first place. Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_MehulWB <<those are 23 sockpuppets that two Admins with checkuser status have found evidence that they belong to you. That's alot of socks. I don't really know what to tell you to get unblocked. You have to convince them you will no longer be disruptive. What I would suggest, no guarantee it will work, that you assure them you will not make anymore socks or abuse multiple accounts. You agree to a topic ban on Indian related subjects, any subject that you've used another account for a single purpose for, and any subjects that you've used multiple accounts to edit. I think this may work but then I can't be sure.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 04:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]