Jump to content

User talk:Markh/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

25th dynasty template

Dear Markh, I had to undo your 25th dynasty Nubian template: [1] and made the appropriate corrections to the table because it erroneously placed Alara as a member of this dynasty. Kashta, his successor, may or may not have been a member of this dynasty (since he controlled parts of Upper Egypt) but Alara certainly was not a 25th dynasty king since he never controlled any region of Egypt in his reign. Perhaps you can delete that template which you created to remove Alara and create a newer one because I don't know how to edit templates. Regards, Leoboudv (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Good Article reassessment for Valley of the Kings

Hello, I am reviewing Archaeology articles as part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force GA sweeps. I reviewed Valley of the Kings today and placed the article on hold for a week to allow for my concerns to be addressed. I am contacting you because you have been a major contributor to the article and may be able to help. The reassessment can be found at Talk:Valley of the Kings/GA1. Please get in touch or comment on the reassessment page if you have any questions. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 01:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Wow! I'm really impressed with all the extra work you put in to add more footnotes. I passed the article for GA in the first place, knowing that you had talent, and now feel very reassured. I came very close to reverting all of GaryColemanFan's fact tagging, a practice which I hope [s]he doesn't continue as it was totally excessive. Although there are a plethora (read: too many) of inline comment tags such as {{fact}} and {{huh}} etc. extensive and detailed commentary on specific passages goes better on the talk page or on the reassessment page imo. But I'm glad you responded and added so many. Well done! Regards, dvdrw 02:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
When I put this article up for FAC review, all I got was vague 'not enough references', etc. So it was actually useful to have all the citation requests - although there were a large number of them! Markh (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
I see that you have expanded the lead section, and it looks good. I am confused about the first sentence in the second paragraph: "With the 2005 discovery of a new chamber, the valley is known to contain 63 tombs and chambers, and the majority of the burial places of the major royal figures of the Egyptian New Kingdom, together with those privileged nobles." Does this mean that it contains 63 tombs and chambers and that it includes the majority of the burial places of major royal figures, etc.? If so, would you be okay with something along the lines of "...63 tombs and chambers, which comprises the majority of the burial places..."? The way it reads now, it seems like something is missing (like something will be said about the majority of the burial places in the second half of the sentence). GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:11, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, never mind. You've fixed it a bit already. GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:12, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Hopeful it is a bit clearer now! Markh (talk) 16:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
I like it. Your new version is much better than my attempt. GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
The only thing that leaves on my list is the "Decoration" section. The more I think about it, however, the more I realize that it would be hard to say much more without creating a need to go into great detail. There are 63 tombs, so the current section might be best kept as is to give a general overview. Readers who want to know more about the decoration of KV62 could just read the article on KV62. You're more knowledgeable in this area, though, so do you think it's best left how it is now, or is there more that you think should be added? GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:25, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
There is lots that CAN be added, but whether it should be is the question. Each of the tombs is unique, only the progression should probably be noted here, both in decoration and layout. Markh (talk) 16:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Sounds good to me. That's what I was thinking, but I thought I'd check with you. I believe that wraps up the reassessment, so I'll close it and keep the article listed as a GA. Thank you so much for all of your help. This was my first GAR as part of the sweeps team, so I've learned a lot from the experience (and I learned a lot about the Valley of the Kings as well). Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:49, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Recovery
Thanks for your hard work in addressing the concerns in the GAR for Valley of the Kings. GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:49, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Commons Account

Do you have a WikiCommons account? Have you considered uploading your Egyptian images to Commons like this: Image:Bubastis portal at Karnak.jpg so that non-English WP sites can use it. If it is on English WP, I believe only English language WP sites can use them. Just curious. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Both these are at New Kalabsha, and I have been there. I can provide some pictures if you need - not sure how good they are. Markh (talk) 22:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
  • If you have 1, 2, 3 or more good and clear photos of the reliefs and/or architecture of Kalabsha and/or Beit el-Wali temples, I can always arrange them in an image gallery like I just did for this article on the Achaemenid era today: [2] (I believe there was a pylon in the Beit el-Wali temple, for instance and some columns. I just uploaded a few pictures of the unique Oxus gold statuettte, chariot, medallions from a flickr owner who was happy to place them on Wikipedia in this image gallery--I had told him all Commons images are CF free. I can do the same for Kalabsha and/or Beit el-Wali...as long as the images are clear and not fuzzy or out of focus, or too dark or bright. As they say, a picture or two (or three) says a thousand words. I mostly wrote the article on king Ps. I of the 21st dynasty but without a good Commons image like this which a flickr image owner agreed to alter the license: Image:Psusennes I mask by Rafaèle.jpg, it would have lacked context sadly. Well, I hope you can help. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Dear Markh, On second thoughts, don't worry about Kalabsha. Someone on flickr agreed to allow an image to be placed on it. I also have a new Commons image for Beit el-Wali. Thanks for your help though. Just remember: if you upload images on WikiCommons, everyone on all the foreign language sites can use it. I ran across a beautiful picture of a temple in Nubia--only one problem. It was uploaded on German WP which meant it could NOT be used on English, French, Spanish, Indian, Chines, etc WP. I tried to use it on English WP...and got a blank screen. Its much preferable to upload images on Commons. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Gerf Hussein

What happened to the colossal standing statues of Ramesses II in the peristyle court of Gerf Hussein? They are not in this new picture: Image:Reconstructed Gerf Hussein.jpg Were they abandoned to the Nile or moved to Aswan museum. Just curious. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

I think that they were largely destroyed (before the reconstruction). If you look at the picture carefully there is the bottom half of a figure in front of the rear right hand column. There is a statue in the Nubian museum that is Gerf Hussain (I think). Markh (talk) 22:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
  • What a shame! I can't believe the Egyptian authorities abandoned the statues. They were a mini-Abu Simbel. Perhaps, they were under time constraints due to the Awan project. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
The underground part of the temple is obviously now lost under Lake Nasser. From what I remember of the statues they were rather dumpy and not classically Egyptian. Markh (talk) 19:34, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

New articles

  • Just to let you know I created 3 articles here on Egyptian temples in Nubia: Amada, Temple of Maharraqa and Kiosk of Qertassi. I think they are well sourced and written overall...given the (rather) few book sources I could locate on them. I also managed to find a few images for them...thank god! By the way, would I be impertinent to briefly ask if you could tell me the general region where you live--are you in the West, or East coast of the US or in Europe? I find it can be hard to contact the best editors and Admins on certain issues since they are mostly in Europe which is 8-9 hours ahead of Western Canada where I am. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:59, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I am in Europe - London specifically. I have changed the New Kalabsha article to highlight the kiosk. By the way it is nice to see my Egyptology lecture (Lorna Oakes) quoted in Wikipedia! Markh (talk) 12:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the response. I did not know your Egyptology lecture was included by Lorna Oakes. Her book was very detailed--by far the best analysis of the Egyptian New Kingdom temples in Nubia. I am in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Now that I have finished writing my articles on the smaller Egyptian tombs, I will take a break from writing new articles now as I was a little fatigued by the research. At least, some photos existed for these sites...mostly from flickr. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Are you by chance an Egyptologist? I know a few real Egyptologists but I write articles on Ancient Egypt mostly as a hobby since it caught my interest when I was at University in the 90's. I would say the biggest problem with WP articles on AE is not that they are inaccurate or filled with WP:OR but that they are mostly just stubs or completely unsourced...one cannot determine where a piece of information came from. I wonder what is your take on the situation? BTW, I [re]wrote this article on TT8. Before I got involved, someone labelled it a 'dead end page' which shows the poor quality of the prose on the subject--one of the greatest finds in Egypt before Tut. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
    • I have a qualification in Egyptology, but I am truely a rather obsessive amateur. Good work on TT8 by the way. Yes, most articles are full of utter rubbish, especially the Great Pyramid article, I've stopped even looking at it. Markh (talk) 16:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
    • There are Admins including Weller who monitor these sites which tend to be populated by crackpots. He is in your city too and comes from a family of academics. My impression is that most AE articles are generally good but since they are unsourced, no one knows where the info comes from. At least AE is not like this article Kush which is a disgrace...because no cares about it. I'm written a few articles on some Kushite kings...but nothing more since I don't know much about the topic. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Akhenaten

A quick apology. I think my tone was a bit off last week. You were right to identify the copy violation and you were right to ask that it be re-edited to avoid breach of copyright. Sorry if I came across a bit peeved. Regards. Contaldo80 (talk) 09:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks OK, no offense taken, I meant to leave a comment, but forgot. Markh (talk) 17:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Dear Markh may I use Image:Medinethabu.jpg as an illustration in a book that I am writing on Ancient Egypt. I do hope this is ok, hope to hear from you soon. Yours truly Aaron Watson--Ajwatson82 (talk) 11:27, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Ancient Egypt list

Hi Markh, I told Doug that Captmondo (Keith) dealt with the AE list and he contacted Keith here here but I think you are even more involved with it. Feel free to make a comment to Doug if you wish after you review his work here. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Note

If possible, please create a banner for these 2 articles: Temple_of_Taffeh and Trajan's Kiosk. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Ancient Egypt To Do

Hello Markh,first, as others said, thank you for your contribution to the cause of the Ancient Egypt. I looked at the To-Do list you created, and I was wondering for the sub-category section, did you want us to help categorize stubs into things like Ancient Egyptian Viziers and Ancient Egyptian Scribes? Also, considering the milestone achievement, do you think it could be the number of A-class articles we have? Sorry for asking so many questions. Zuzzerack (talk) 23:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

No content in Category:Non-article Ancient Egypt pages

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Non-article Ancient Egypt pages, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Non-article Ancient Egypt pages has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Non-article Ancient Egypt pages, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Archiving Talk:Ancient Egypt

Hi Markh, why is the archive set to /Archive 5 when no Archive 3 or for exists? --Joshua Issac (talk) 13:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

"Any sections older than 28 days are automatically archived to Archive 5 (for historical reasons)". Markh (talk) 20:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
What are those reasons? Archiving was set up in this edit. Is it related to that? --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I really don't recall, does it really matter ? Markh (talk) 09:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
No, I was just curious. --Joshua Issac (talk) 21:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Vole Clock

you created the page and I just want to let you know that I proposed a merger with the parent Vole article. Northfox (talk) 12:20, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Egyptian hieroglyphs-Gardiner listed

Hello Markh. I wanted to start a small dialogue, since I know you know Ancient Egyptian material. I pretend I know some things; all I know is that after one works on the Rosetta Stone, the Stone of Canopus, the Amarna letters, and the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Hieroglyphs and Cuneiform, there is just no end to discovery. Mr. Budge must have felt like a Kid in a Candy Store, as many other adventurers of Archaeology, and undiscovered Human History. (Wikipedia, and wikipedians have now entered the same space!.)

Your adding the banners to the hieroglyphs is the purpose of talking: I assume that since you chose to put everything into "importance: Low" it was just the easy path. When I started the big "hieroglyphs of Egypt", I went to 'Commons' for the first time. It was about a 5-month effort creating the location for the compendium of "Category:Hieroglyphs of Egypt". I lately added the two "Utcheb" hieroglyphs, and was looking at the "tongue of land", but when looking up the word in Budge's 2-volume dictionary at utcheb, found the "dikebanks, etc". That was the s-shaped, the "Festival Parade Routes", as used in the Rosetta Stone, to celebrate festivals, with women with "garlands"(hieroglyph) in their hair. (I finally understood that the Big S hieroglyph isn't really related to its adjacent "intestine curl". (I questioned that it was.))

So I am talking of this: I am not sure what Egyptian H. deserve higher than "importance: low", but I want to suggest (since you Know) that the "Bread-cone" is super important. (MEDium). (It is on so, so, so many Pharaonic scenes.) See the Sed festival photo: (Pepi Sed festival goblet) [5]. What is so amazing about this is that I was showing somebody the photo, and saying that it says in both directions: "Given Living Kingship Forever", (the Kingship =Power), and while not facing her, she said: "Long live the King". It was a highlight of my day, and week. More amazingly, another 'psychic event' occurred (about this Sed goblet), because a very student-like person (who knows some Runes, and is a young-gamer-person) helped me work on the three columns-(for 4-6 minutes). (I was telling him of the Hieroglyph: Archaic dagger: (vertical dagger) [6], but he helped me understand the actual meaning of the 5-fold title: (Ancient Egyptian royal titulary). The three hieroglyphs above each column are 3 name-Categories for the Pharaoh: The first inspite of the what everybody may think is actually (according to my friend) the "Champion Name", (it is also the "Warrior Name"). I will not reveal more, but I now know the other two names for the other two columns read 2-1 to the right vs the left column-1. ....so I'm just establishing a little dialogue, and cheers, (from the HotDesert, SonoranDesert,Arizona, USA)... Mmcannis (talk) 01:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Pyramid of amenemhet hawarra 01.jpg

File:Pyramid of amenemhet hawarra 01.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Pyramid of amenemhet hawarra 01.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Pyramid of amenemhet hawarra 01.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Khasekhemy.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Khasekhemwy.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Markh

You initiated the article Ancient Egyptian literature back in September 2007 and edited it as recently as May 2008. Well, I thought it would only be fair to alert you (albeit after the fact) that I have rewritten and expanded the article, as well as submitted it as a Featured Article Candidate. I hope that you don't mind, although I did make an effort to cite a Miriam Lichtheim source as you originally had done. Regards.--Pericles of AthensTalk 07:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

That is great! Well done, I've kind of been giving all this stuff a rest, so this is great progress. Markh (talk) 19:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Markh! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 170 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Jiro Kondo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

"List of Heiroglyphs" pages

Hey, I was just over at the New Pages section. Just thought I'd let you know that your heiroglyph pages look awesome. Cheers! AlexHOUSE (talk) 00:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunatley The idea wasn't mine, I found the new setup on one of the pages, and have copied those that I can. So the kudos should go to someone else - I just did some rearrangements. Markh (talk) 09:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kalabsha in original setting.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kalabsha in original setting.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DivineAdoratrice

Template:DivineAdoratrice has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Any interest in peer reviewing the Rosetta Stone article?

Hello there:

Another user and I have been working extensively on the Rosetta Stone article. It has undergone extensive revisions in the past month and I am looking for potential reviewers who can ensure that it will be able to pass Feature Article review. Since you have been active in the past on articles having to do with Ancient Egypt, I thought I should call on you to give it a once over.

Hope you can help. Cheers! Captmondo (talk) 00:58, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ECOTM

Template:ECOTM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Egyptology/ECOTM

Portal:Egyptology/ECOTM, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Egyptology/ECOTM and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Egyptology/ECOTM during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Gerf Hussein.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Gerf Hussein.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:37, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Old Kingdom Egyptian Dynasty list

Template:Old Kingdom Egyptian Dynasty list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 08:32, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:PharaohFull

Template:PharaohFull has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DH85868993 (talk) 10:14, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Important Question

I need your email to ask you about the source of an info that you wrote before... It is of an enormous importance to me.... can you please advise me with your email on: [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.233.4.110 (talk) 09:26, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Ancient Egypt

Thank you very much for your contributions relating to Ancient Egypt articles. They are very much appreciated.

—-- That Guy, From That Show! (talk) 2006-02-21 13:26Z

I need your email to ask you about the source of an info that you wrote before... It is of an enormous importance to me.... can you please advise me with your email on: [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.233.4.110 (talk) 09:26, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to workshops on editing Wikipedia

Dear Markh,

We are a team of researchers at the University of Oxford and AU Sharjah, researching the experiences of editors of content about the Arab world on Wikipedia. We are interested in your experiences of editing Wikipedia and are organising two events that we think you would be an excellent contributor to.

First, we are hosting an online wiki focus group about contributing to Wikipedia in Arabic and to articles about the Middle East and North Africa. We are interested in what barriers you perceive to exist in Wikipedia, how articles can be made better and generally what can be done to expand and improve Arabic Wikipedia and Wikipedia articles about the Arab world. This discussion will take place on a MediaWiki hosted at our institution and be available in English and Arabic. We will allow users to create their own discussion pages in addition to our discussions.

Second, we are hosting face-to-face workshops in Cairo from 21st-22nd October 2012. If you are interested in this we should be able to pay travel and accommodation costs for up to twenty participants. This workshop will cover similar themes to the online discussion but will allow participants to meet one another and benefit from being together.

We will take care of the organization and planning and all you have to do is show up and be ready to discuss. But if you would like to help shape some of the discussion themes in advance, please let us know. We have booked time in the workshops for Wikipedian-led discussions.

More details can be found by expanding our “Frequently Asked Questions” below.

We would be delighted to welcome you to either (or both) event. Please let us know ([email protected]) if you would like the opportunity to participate and we can send you more details.

Sincerely,

Mark, Bernie, Ilhem, Ali, Ahmed, and Heather

Dr. Mark Graham, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford; Dr. Bernie Hogan, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford; Dr. Ilhem Allagui, Department of Mass Communication, American University of Sharjah; Dr. Ali Frihida, National Engineering School of Tunis; Heather Ford, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford; Ahmed Medhat, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford;

OIIOxford (talk) 11:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC), tidied 11:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Bentaxis.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Note

Wrong picture description and license. Regards, --Oltau (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TheAmarnaLettersRef

Template:TheAmarnaLettersRef has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Improving and expanding new articles

Hi. Recently I have understood that you're interested in Ancient Egypt's articles. You had made Valley of the Kings a good article 6 years ago. I just came to say that please also improve and add reliable sources to articles Valley of the Queens and Theban Necropolis. Actually I liked to expand them but I haven't got enough sources and also enough knowledge for doing that. So please make their material better every time you can. Thanks a lot. Keivan.fTalk 13:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Talatat.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Talatat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Contests

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Twenty-fourth Dynasty Pharaohs

Template:Twenty-fourth Dynasty Pharaohs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 23:10, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Markh/Archive_2&oldid=1140397219"