Jump to content

User talk:Kaybeesquared

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Woman of the Day!

Thanks for all the help so far - at 26 October 2021 my talk page content was archived to User talk:Kaybeesquared/Archive_1

File:Agnes Husband's Burgess Ticket.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agnes Husband's Burgess Ticket.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gandhi

[edit]

I was astonished to see how you piped a link from Indira Gandhi to make it read Indira Ghandi. Did you really think that Gandhi was a misspelling? Johanna-Hypatia (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry poor eyesight. Feel free to unlink it. Kaybeesquared (talk) 08:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == deleted no longer applies

Florence Nightingale

[edit]

Hi, and thank you for the thank yous regarding my edits to Florence Nightingale. I notice that, of the nine "Primary sources," only Goldie and McDonald might be viewed as primary sources; the rest should be moved to "Secondary sources," except that Bostrich, Gill, and Strachey are included as both Primary sources and Secondary sources, and should be only the latter. I'll make these edits unless you care to.Maurice Magnus (talk) 11:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this and please will you proceed as you have suggested, I think it is one of the few pages I view regularly where these lists are clearly set up for ease of readers' understanding, though some use 'publications' sections - if it is the subject's own work - only - of course.
Thank you. Kaybeesquared (talk) 16:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

[edit]

The Kenney sisters

[edit]

Is there any reason, apart from bone idleness, why the famous five should not be dealt with in one article?

A lot of material - parents - eleven of 12 - Lees, Saddleworth - 71 Redgrave Street, Oldham - cotton mill - WSPU - Blathwayt - Eagle House - &c. - is pentuplicated. A combined article would not be as long as the sum of individual lengths suggests.

81.140.215.185 (talk) 20:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please would you log in if using opportunity to discuss? There is a case for the most notable Kenney sisters to have their own articles imho. It is not idleness to have included common data, although it could be reworded into different language in each article to avoid an argument of it is N-uplicated, but the others arose as more material emerged about their activities. A Kenney Family article with the common biog info. only /mainly could be drafted up without losing entirely the useful individual articles for those who were most to the fore in the UK suffragette movement, imho. Happy to help. Kaybeesquared (talk) 20:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Preet Chandi

[edit]

On 24 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Preet Chandi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Preet Chandi, the first known woman of colour to walk solo to the South Pole, contacted friends to be bridesmaids during her expedition? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Preet Chandi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Preet Chandi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use image loading

[edit]

Here's step-by-step instructions, as discussed. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:St Thoma Church Tilda plaque to Sister M.N. Conacher.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov / 14:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
Hi Karen - a Teamwork Barnstar for you, for helping me find the barnstar file - many thanks! Emcee47 (talk) 14:51, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kaybeesquared, Hope you are well. I noticed you made some edits to the IOD's page and I was wondering if you'd be interested in helping me with a project relating to one of their former directors. Charlotte Valuer was the chair of the IOD (2018 to 2020) and founded a charity called "Board Appreitnce" which aims to end inequality in the boardroom by giving the next generation of business leaders experience on company boards. I'd written up the page and had ago referencing a draft of the page (it's in my sandbox) but I'm struggling with the referencing. Do you have the capacity to take a look at it and help me get it up to scratch or point me to where I'm going wrong? m https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:MIAAccount/sandbox&redirect=no Thanks so much MIAAccount (talk) 15:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MIAAccount. Thanks for reaching out. Unfortunately I don't have capacity at the moment, but comparing your Charlotte Valuer article draft with the Board Apprentice draft shows that the latter is relying on and repeating the org's own web etc (primary source, is not independent of the subject). Quick Google shows a few secondary sources, and also some 'rival'/ 'similar' orgs. You could write about board room apprenticeships in the round and reference these schemes,too and cite any independent debate in the more reputable business press or academia.

Sorry I can't be more helpful at this time. Obviously any COI needs resolved/declared for the person to publish it. Best wishes, Kaybeesquared (talk) 19:09, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talk:Helen Nicolson (child psychiatrist), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jp×g 04:38, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == deleted no longer applies


Alexandra Bulat

[edit]

Hey,

I was just wondering why you spend so much time on editing the article for Alex Bulat, was it part of your Women in Red editathons? ~~ Kind Regards, NotAnotherNameGuy (talk) 12:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

yes it was part of WomenInRed project work. And then aimed to improve original (written in an editathon) when notability was questioned. Any further information to improve the article is welcome. Thanks.

Kaybeesquared (talk) 07:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

brief history of activities - so I don't forget

[edit]

My example citation[edit | edit source]

[edit]

I read an interesting article in the Guardian site.

I have used the 2018 book from Diane Atkinson on a number of Suffragettes pages to add detail and citations.

My blogpost on wiki-editing on International Women's Day 2019[edit | edit source]

[edit]

This is hosted on the page of the Wikimedian in Residence Ewan McAndrew

You can see it herehttps://thinking.is.ed.ac.uk/wir/women-and-wikipedia-open-learning-and-a-hobby-for-life/ March 12, 2019

So I then learned about the remarkable lives of the suffragettes, and updating their wiki-pages.

On 19 December 2019, Did you know ... Louie Cullen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status..... Her Holloway medal is in Australia where she went after suffering from force-feeding for women's right to vote

More recent February 2022[edit | edit source]

[edit]

Adding women in Humanities - a possible hit list developed from WIR occupations (Academics to Art Historians only) is here

Building content more on notable women from the Scottish Women's Hospitals for Foreign Service

See my sandbox for work in progress. We can edit poster

Collaborations[edit | edit source]

[edit]
  • Working with User: IanTheArchivist, we have been adding women suffrage activists and other notable women - now working on SWH

... that when the Conservative Mary Morris claimed "never to have been a militant suffragette", the audience laughed?

  • we created new article for Xhosa/Scottish suffragist contralto Jessie Soga

... that Christina Adane's free school meal campaign created a UK government U-turn?

.. that Preet Chandi, the first known woman of colour to walk solo to the South Pole, contacted friends to be bridesmaids during her expedition? see Template:Did you know nominations/Preet Chandi.

Other sources[edit | edit source]

[edit]

On embroidery and needlework, from memories of Scottish members of the International Brigade, from a book on Wild Women  e.g. adventurer and climate scientist Felicity Aston and from the news, another female polar explorer Preet Chandi

Also worked on Sinking of the Oscar or the Leith High Constables Kaybeesquared (talk) 14:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


DYK 300 year old opera - for singers watermelons and blue roll?

[edit]

A new edit might be an interesting one for DYK ? see Élisabeth Jacquet de La Guerre#List of works re an opera 'by a woman about women and for women, being performed for the first time in 300 years.'[1] @Victuallers:

A piece of cake for you!

[edit]
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
A piece of cake for you! Thank you for participating.

WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 20:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the piece of cake Kaybeesquared (talk) 21:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == deleted no longer applies


Some baklava for you!

[edit]
I though you might be interested in this. Pizza? Victuallers (talk) 10:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
looks fab, sorry I missed it...when I had COVID last year, couldn't see any new dates on link.
Baklava..Pizza? Of course ..... Kaybeesquared (talk) 08:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help with creating Wikipedia page

[edit]

Hello, i was trying to create Wikipedia page for 'Gehad Hamdy'but it got deleted so i thought you might help as you already were part of the discussion before. Thank you so much! 50.221.225.229 (talk) 03:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Scottish Castle for you!

[edit]
Awesome Participant Award
Thanks for joining us at our Scottish Castles and Witch lore event! Stinglehammer (talk) 12:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome Women in STEM champion

[edit]
Ada Lovelace Award
Thanks for joining us for some Wiki Women in STEM knowledge activism today! Stinglehammer (talk) 14:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanks - moved page to live - Zöe Webster Kaybeesquared (talk) 16:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

  1. ^ "Operas focused on women set for stage debut 300 years on". The National. 2023-06-04. Retrieved 2023-06-04.