User talk:Jfire

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jfire.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

moved from userpage

Regarding Herman op den Graeff May be you should try a google book search (since if you do a regular search only the nonsense produced by family members turns up). you will find that the only facts on the wiki article are that a guy called Herman up den Graeff was a Mennonite immigrant from Germany. Anything else (plantagenet, de Graeff-link to the Netherlands, Holy Grail) is COMPLETE NONSENSE. if any of the claims made (obviously made by family members) on the wiki page were true, don't you think that such an important person (remember, he was allegedly a "guardian of the Holy grail") would be mentioned extensively in historic literature on google books; obviously this is not the case. F.ex. he claim that he was a descendent of the De Graeff family in Amsterdam or a descendent of House of Cleves is plain B*llsht*t. Check Nederland's Adelsboek, Europäische Stammtalfen etc. Hence i think it's better to let the public decide; that's why i suggested that the page should be deleted.

Elias Huizar

I'm assuming you're going to be putting things back piecemeal as you can source/verify them? The Tri-Cities Herald appears to have reliably sourced the background on the 17-year-old girlfriend, and didn't name her. I expect this will be deleted in due course per PERP and NOTNEWS, but in the mean time, we should have a DUE summary of RS'es for people who do want our take on it, right? Jclemens (talk) 04:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, not planning to. As you say, it's likely to be deleted shortly. Jfire (talk) 04:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not likely to be deleted before seven days: no speedy deletion criteria apply. I've added a bunch of the news coverage to the talk page, and in a brief review there's apparently sourcing for most of what was there before. If you're not interested in re-adding it, I might, but have other things to do at the moment. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 04:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Al Hamed AfD

Thanks for the SPA tags. I was about to do that. Maybe WP:SPI next? I don't have time tonight but will gladly do it tomorrow if you don't. A few hours is plenty of time (rope) to give them for their efforts. Cheers! JFHJr (㊟) 05:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! Jfire (talk) 05:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was crazy fast for an SPI. Thanks again! JFHJr (㊟) 20:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Letby

86.156.164.152 has been editing Lucy Letby without consensus for a while, and continued after a warning, should I warn them again, or should I wait for someone else to? I'm pretty new, so I'd appreciate your input. MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 15:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like they may have backed off. If there is more problematic editing from IPs, I would put in a request at WP:RPP. Jfire (talk) 16:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice. MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve gone ahead and requested page protection. Jfire (talk) 22:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 13:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]