User talk:Invaluable22

Welcome!

Hi Invaluable22! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 11:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. The reason I joined was because my book was extensively plagiarised and I needed to correct that. Can I please draw your attention to the contributor jamesmcardle. This person contributes to a large number of entries. If his treatment of the one entry I am involved with is anything to go by, his contributions rely heavily on lifting large amounts of material direct from published sources without citation or acknowledgement, and patching them together. This is in direct breach of copyright generally and Wikipedia's citation and copyright protocols. In addition, because he has no direct knowledge of or expertise in the subject, he cannot discern whether the source is reliable or correct and the the entry is therefore erroneous. An example in the Christian Waller entry is that he cited the opinion of one critic, made a long time ago, that the artist was a poor draughtsman. This is totally incorrect and no other source would agree; in fact she was a superb draughtsman with works in all major collections. Additionally, a copyright art work was inserted without authorisation. I have rectified these defects in this entry, but feel strongly that other entries by this contributor need to be checked and he needs to be advised of the necessity to adhere to copyright and citation rules. As he is a former academic, he must be well aware of these. I note that in his personal statement he states that he does not concern himself with these and leaves it to Wikipedia to sort them out. This is very poor. Thank you. Invaluable22 (talk) 00:10, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

April 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HeyElliott (talk) 04:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. HeyElliott (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Invaluable22! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Dylan Mulvaney several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Dylan Mulvaney, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Beccaynr (talk) 04:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Elgin Marbles

Hello there

I reverted your recent changes to the lead for the following reasons: 1) The lead already states that a British parliamentary inquiry found that the marbles were removed legally. 2) It isn't just "some in Greece" who dispute this, it is a large number of legal scholars over the world. The article explains this. 3) There has been international controversy over the removal since 1835, therefore it is a longstanding controversy.

Please note that the lead is supposed to be a concise and accurate summary of the article as it stands. If you think it isn't, please take your concerns to the Talk Page. You will find various discussions there, including a current one about whether the name Elgin Marbles is appropriate. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 08:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Invaluable22. Thank you. Relm (talk) 17:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Formal warning

As a result of this arbitration enforcement request I am formally warning you against misgendering people, as well as warning you that you must provide sourcing for any contentious material you add to an article, especially in contentious topics such as gender and sexuality. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

I take it you refer to a highly contentious, highly biased article to which I made some slight emendations in order to attempt to mitigate some of its palpable bias - in line with Wikipedia policies. I have no idea who you are or why you have taken it upon yourself to issue me with a 'formal warning'.

'Misgendering' is an artefact of gender identity ideology. As I am not a believer in this ideology, I do not feel obliged to adopt special forms of speech mandated by it but not generally shared by the community. I will therefore continue to use the usual forms of speech of my culture and language, always keeping in mind that freedom of belief and of speech are guaranteed to me under international human rights conventions and under domestic legislation. No rules or policies of any individual, organisation, or even sovereign State, can abrogate such laws and freedoms. Invaluable22 (talk) 14:59, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

I am an uninvolved administrator enforcing WP:CTOP rules. I provided a link to the discussion that resulted in this warning with the warning, so that should make it clear why I have given the warning. As far as No rules or policies of any individual, organisation, or even sovereign State, can abrogate such laws and freedoms. you do not have a right to edit Wikipedia, and if you do not follow our rules and policies you will be blocked from editing. My warning was clear, further misgendering or insertion of contentious material without proper sourcing will result in sanctions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

I think you misunderstand your right to freedom of speech. It doesn't apply here. Wikipedia is not required to allow you to say anything you want. As to why SFR is giving you this warning, it's because of this arbitration enforcement request, now linked three times on this page, where you didn't participate after being notified (see above section) nearly a week ago. Valereee (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)