Jump to content

User talk:Informant16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

--t m yan OMG 13:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Caroline Kennedy, 1991 In Our Defense interview.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Caroline Kennedy, 1991 In Our Defense interview.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yolanda King, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages JAG, St. Mary's Medical Center and Walt Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Bernice King at Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial, October 2011.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bernice King at Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial, October 2011.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —howcheng {chat} 19:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Bernice King speaks at the Martin Luther King, Jr. memorial dedication on the National Mall in Washington.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bernice King speaks at the Martin Luther King, Jr. memorial dedication on the National Mall in Washington.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —howcheng {chat} 19:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yolanda King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 21 December

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arndrea Waters for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arndrea Waters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arndrea Waters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:52, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Rosalynn Carter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Palestinian and Governor's Mansion
Julie Nixon Eisenhower (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Amherst

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kitty Pryde

[edit]

You uploaded an image of Kitty Pryde. The article seems to contain too many images of her, so some risk being deleted. See the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 January 18#Kitty Pryde. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:07, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Bush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Governor's Mansion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Martin Luther and Coretta Scott King wedding day, 1953.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Martin Luther and Coretta Scott King wedding day, 1953.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Coretta Scott King, 1970s.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Coretta Scott King, 1970s.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Coretta Scott young.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Coretta Scott young.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Jackie Kennedy and Coretta Scott King, 1968.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jackie Kennedy and Coretta Scott King, 1968.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:13, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Coretta Scott King 1958.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Coretta Scott King 1958.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dexter Scott King 1968.png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Dexter Scott King 1968.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Yolanda King Human Rights Campaign, 2000.png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Yolanda King Human Rights Campaign, 2000.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:28, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Yolanda King at 16.png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Yolanda King at 16.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Yolanda King Smith College, 1976 Yearbook.png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Yolanda King Smith College, 1976 Yearbook.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry about all the notices, but non-free content should only be used where no free alternative exists or could be created and your uploads suggest you weren't aware of this. I would recommend familiarising yourself with WP:NFC before uploading any more non-free content, particularly points 1 and 8 of WP:NFCCP. January (talk) 16:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

[edit]

I noticed when I was replying to you at File talk:Coretta Scott King 1958.png that your signature was missing a </font> after it, which caused any text posted below your signature to appear in red (my reply came out red when I previewed it until I added this myself). If this is a custom signature in your preferences, I think adding </font> at the end should fix it. January (talk) 22:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Luther and Coretta Scott King wedding day, 1953.png listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Martin Luther and Coretta Scott King wedding day, 1953.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. January (talk) 00:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coretta Scott King, 1970s.png listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coretta Scott King, 1970s.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. January (talk) 00:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coretta Scott young.png listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coretta Scott young.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jackie Kennedy and Coretta Scott King, 1968.png listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jackie Kennedy and Coretta Scott King, 1968.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Dexter Scott King.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dexter Scott King.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dexter Scott King 1968.png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Dexter Scott King 1968.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Yolanda King Smith College, 1976 Yearbook.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Yolanda King Smith College, 1976 Yearbook.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Martin Luther King and Yolanda King, 1964.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Martin Luther King and Yolanda King, 1964.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Yolanda King at 16.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Yolanda King at 16.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Yolanda King Human Rights Campaign, 2000.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Yolanda King Human Rights Campaign, 2000.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Angela Bassett sidebar

[edit]

Template:Angela Bassett sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gloss • talk 06:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John F. Kennedy, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Kennedy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Bernice King 1983.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bernice King 1983.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 19:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bernice King 1983.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bernice King 1983.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernice King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yolanda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yolanda King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Message for you

[edit]
Hello, Informant16. You have new messages at Talk:John F. Kennedy, Jr.#Disappointed in how this article has turned out - we are not a tabloid.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 00:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Degrassi J.T. Yorke.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Degrassi J.T. Yorke.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited J.T. Yorke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mia Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Luther King III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angela Bassett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notorious. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Aaliyah does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Dan56 (talk) 08:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gabrielle Union, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bad Boys, The Box and Jeffrey Wright. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caroline Kennedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Today Show. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyvios

[edit]

Hello - I've noticed that some of your edits appear to be cut-and-paste with minor changes from non-free sources, like The New York Times. For example this edit contains word-for-word copy from this source with a few word changes. In fact the relevant information was already in the article, with that source, without a copyvio. Please take a look at WP:COPYPASTE for more information. This kind of addition can be considered plagiarism and is not allowed - it's also not really necessary to include small details that aren't notable to her life in her biography. I've corrected some of the copyvios that I noticed, but if you know of others, please remove them. Thanks. Tvoz/talk 15:19, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done. Informant16
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John F. Kennedy Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aaliyah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DMX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aaliyah's Header Image

[edit]

I don't understand why you changed Aaliyah's image to that filtered low quality one. The image I used was HIGH Definition and the photographer Eric Johnson even released those HD pics of Aaliyah on his website to the public so there was no need to delete it. It wasn't "colored", it was high definition. I have all of the links http://www.loeildelaphotographie.com/2014/01/16/portfolio/23963/eric-johnson-aaliyah-by-miss-rosen --Datyger (talk) 09:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From the way it appeared to me, the image was a variation of what I believed was the original coloring, that of the one I uploaded. Now that you've confirmed that the image was high definition and not some mere minor variation that you found, I apologize. I need you to understand that I was unaware of this and believed I was using the more common, original image. Whatever I can do to make it up, let me know. Informant16 24 August 2014

Speedy deletion nomination of Karrueche Tran

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karrueche Tran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 22:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karrueche Tran for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karrueche Tran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karrueche Tran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aaliyah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One in a Million. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angela Bassett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Townsend. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Angela Bassett may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John F. Kennedy Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Death of Aaliyah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Robert F. Kennedy template

[edit]

Thank you very much for creating the template, a very good addition to Wikipedia's Kennedy material. It was surprising to me in the past that nobody had put up an RFK template, and I never got around to it, so your nice work is well appreciated. I've added to it and distributed it to the pages mentioned, and if I were "here" in person I'd shake your hand (shaking cyber-hand) and say 'Job well done!' Randy Kryn 12:37 18 October, 2014 (UTC)

Thank you in return. I had believed he had enough material for one and I was kind of interested in doing it, so I did. Informant16
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meagan Good, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Usher. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murder of Tupac Shakur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page America. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:28, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Degrassi Manny and Paige.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Degrassi Manny and Paige.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Degrassi Manny Santos.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Degrassi Manny Santos.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

[edit]

Thank you, very much for your contribution. The article looks even better than it did a few hours ago. If Wiki decides to not delete Asami Sato's article, I would love to work with you on creating separate pages for Bolin, Mako and Tenzin. G. Capo (talk) 03:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That was the point that I don't think some of those opposed to keeping the page are realizing. This series was highly anticipated and reviewed throughout its entire run. I'm sure the other three will be just as easy, if not easier to create. Informant16 3 January 2015
I completely agree with you! I've created separate pages for Bolin, Mako and Tenzin. It's currently in its skeletal phase, with only the basic structure of the article in place. Feel free to edit as you see fit. G. Capo (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions on Asami Sato's article G. Capo (talk) 02:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suge Knight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Medical Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John H. Davis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Ain't Mad at Cha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ebenezer Baptist Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Daisy Buchanan.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Daisy Buchanan.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clint Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

please check your work

[edit]

You've added material toJacqueline Kennedy Onassis that is full of errors - misspellings, incorrect cites, out and out errors ("her previous two marriages"?) etc. This article gets thousands of views a day - over 50,000 in the last month - so it is important that we not post incorrect or sloppy material. Please use your sandbox to refine your entries and check your work before entering - hours or even days can go by before another editor looks at edits, and we have a responsibility to get it right for our readers. Thank you. Tvoz/talk 21:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ted Cruz presidential campaign, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Davis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ted Cruz, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. General Ization Talk 05:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I split the positions onto another page. They are extraneous and it is already customary for politicians to have their positions on another page. Informant16 31 October 2015
Please provide an edit summary when removing content from an article. General Ization Talk 05:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. I didn't intend for there to be any misconceptions. I wasn't seeking to dismantle the edits of my fellow contributors but rather make room for content that was suitable for another page. Informant16 31 October 2015
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Political positions of Ted Cruz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

copyvios again

[edit]

Please see above section "copyvios" from last year regarding Wikipedia policy about cut-and-paste additions to article text. I again found numerous instances in Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis that are almost word for word lifts from the original source - in this case I was looking something up in Leaming 2014 and came across these. I don't have the time or inclination to go over the many additions you've made, and am concerned that there may be more such violations. Please go back over your edits in this article and others and remove or change the wording - this can be considered plagiarism and it is not allowed. And please take care with future additions to not do this. See WP:COPYPASTE for more information. I'm also posting this on the article talk page, and we can discuss it there if you wish. Thank you. Tvoz/talk 09:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What additions are you referring to? I've gone out of my way to change it. Informant16 2 November 2015
The problem is that in many places the article text that was cited to the Leaming (2014) book, for example, used the exact words - or too close paraphrases of the original. Even though you did put citations for all of them, Wiki policy requires that we write our articles in our own words, not in the words of the source article, in this case Leaming's words. We are supposed to summarize what we are taking from sources, in our own words. This is my edit, some of which were copyvios, or close paraphrases. Also some are just trivial details that aren't adding anything significant and by including in the article gives the appearance of more importance than is reasonable.
So, one example is as follows - this is way too close, barely even paraphrasing. There are others that I either rewrote or just removed. I don't have time to check every source - it's the responsibility of the editor who is writing to make sure this doesn't happen. There also is a major question about whether a detail that might be appropriate for a book length biography is appropriate to include in a biographical article that has to cover a subject's entire life, and should include only things that are significant, so that we can keep the piece to a reasonable size.
They met at a seasonal party which he had driven down from New York to attend. your text
She met John G.W. Husted, Jr. at a seasonal party for which he had driven down from New York. Leaming (2014) p 22
Tvoz/talk 23:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get it. You come to me with this and I credit it for seeming legitimate, but then the page gets slapped with a disclaimer that its content only interest a particular group? This is my difficulty that I've been having a hard time understanding since last year. The same thing happened over at the John F. Kennedy, Jr. page, but nowhere else. What is with this monopoly on the immediate Kennedy family pages? I don't get it. Informant16 2 November 2015
Ok - I didn't put the banners on the page, as I thought I would start out by talking with you here and posting on the article talk page since potentially anyone editing there may have inadvertently contributed to the problem. But the banners are really not out of line, in my view, and are supposed to serve as a reminder that there are some issues on the page, and hope to attract people who are willing to put in a little time to look into it and correct it. There are two different matters: one is strictly a matter of form, as I've outlined here - we need to be super careful not to copy/paste or "close paraphrase" from sources. The second banner is about the issue of details - as I said elsewhere, this is more subjective than copyvio issues which are straightforward. We have to think when we add material whether it has significance to the subject's life or if it's just an interesting but ultimately insignificant detail, lest our article start to sound like a gossip piece or just be a collection of sourced trivia. As for other Kennedy-related pages, I haven't been over to John Jr's page recently, but I assure you any concerns over trivial detail goes well beyond Kennedy family pages - it is a concern everywhere.Tvoz/talk 03:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It just seems as if nothing I do is good enough to avoid these types of charges. I don't know why I should even bother since it just keeps popping up. I tried to change the information. I don't know what else I can do besides that. Informant16 3 November 2015
THey're not charges, and it's not meant to be personal. I know you put a lot of effort into editing, and it's appreciated. Avoiding plagiarism is essential -if you flag any questionable segments, I'll help with rewrite. Your call. Tvoz/talk 05:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I just really want you to know that I don't try to do it and I've been trying to avoid it ever since then. I'm in no way trying to steal material from any sources. Informant16 3 November 2015
I don't doubt that, and I know it's sometimes difficult to avoid - if you flag any, or note on my talk page, I'll see if I can recast in different words. Tvoz/talk 20:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Following my comments on the Jackie Kennedy talk page, I would respectfully suggest it would behoove you to take part (with some other editors') in bringing an article up to GA status for the experience and/or consider seeking an experienced editor to mentor you for a time. It is nothing personal. Kierzek (talk) 14:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Collingwood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malikah Shabazz for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malikah Shabazz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malikah Shabazz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kingsindian ♝♚ 08:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Edison. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Michelle Obama without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. Never mind, your edit was fine and I have restored the article to your version. But please leave edit summaries. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Edison (talk) 00:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heidi Cruz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rafael Cruz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ted Cruz presidential campaign, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rafael Cruz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heidi Cruz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Romney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daisy Buchanan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill O'Reilly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Hampton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michelle Obama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Lewis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Ted Cruz presidential campaign, 2016 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! - theWOLFchild 01:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michelle Obama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloody Sunday. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heidi Cruz for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heidi Cruz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Cruz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert F. Kennedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Communist China. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of Biographies of Living Persons

[edit]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jonathunder (talk) 03:34, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Discretionary Sanctions for American Politics 2

[edit]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Please note that this is simply a courtesy notice prompted by your edits in the area and what appears to be a dispute about Heidi Cruz. I only took note of the dispute, but have no opinion on it. Just wanted to inform you of the discretionary sanctions that are related. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 06:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks identical to the one above it. Informant16 23:55, 23 March 2016
They're slightly different. The first one is about WP:ARBBLP (Biographies of Living Persons) and the one I posted is about WP:ARBAP2 (American Politics 2). EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 18:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeanette Dousdebes Rubio for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeanette Dousdebes Rubio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanette Dousdebes Rubio (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--ML (talk) 15:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Heidi Cruz

[edit]

Informant, please stop edit warring over that awful cropped photograph. You may discuss the issue on the talk page--but that image is so awful that placing it in the article almost amounts to a BLP violation. Drmies (talk) 15:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We have no other picture of her apart from the same one that is not cropped, where she is with her husband. I'm violating a rule by using a picture of the person the article is about, because somebody thought it looked bad? From what I recall, Wikipedia is supposed to a source with neutrality. Would it not appear that by expressing our views on an image, we are therefore violating that concept? Informant16 25 March 2016
We make editorial judgments all the time about which photo is best in a particular place, and sometimes that means using a photo that includes more than the subject of the article, or even none at all. Jonathunder (talk) 15:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If that's the case and the consensus has been reached then I'll comply. I just have a hard time understanding how I'll get blocked for adding a picture without prior knowledge that there was an issue with it being used. Informant16 25 March 2016
I don't think you'll be blocked for your opinion about which image to use, but edit warring about it would lead in that direction. I'm glad to hear you don't intend to do that. Jonathunder (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's the edit warring part, and you did not participate in talk page discussion nor explain your change in a summary. On a high-volatility article covered by two sets of discretionary sanctions. In addition, there's this edit, reverted by Meatsgains, which you reverted without commentary here (1R), though you then removed it here while changing the picture but then you reinstated it here again, which was reverted by JohahThunder here, whom you reverted here (2R). Drmies (talk) 16:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That was a discussion I was not aware of nor checked for, because I was under the impression that there was no issue with my editing or that only a single user had conflict with my contributions. Informant16 25 March 2016
OK, that's fine. Now you know there were more. :) Thank you, Drmies (talk) 22:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black liberalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get discouraged

[edit]

Hi Informant16. Just my two cents worth, but I think you should not get discouraged. I haven't followed your edits in depth but I think any issues regarding excessive details can be fixed without losing you as an editor. I also think you are a capable and conscientious editor. Best regards. Dr. K. 01:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so too at one point. Just feels as if 95% of what I do isn't wanted. Thank you for the compliment. Informant16 3 April 2016
You are very welcome. I think the 95% estimate is way too high and you shouldn't think so negatively of your contributions. Discussion and patience may be needed but I don't think any problems are insurmountable. Take care. Dr. K. 02:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's the thing. I didn't think badly about them at all until I received feedback. I was under the belief that I was contributing but the consensus is that my edits are anything but good. That doesn't influence my opinion about them but it certainly does about how I'm perceived on here and why be somewhere you're not wanted? Informant16 3 April 2016
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Megyn Kelly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill O'Reilly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Heidi Cruz, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Both the Washington Examiner and Breitbart are considered unreliable sources for Wikipedia purposes. Further, the content you added is not exactly encyclopedic. See the reversion edit summary for more. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WV, as of now I'm done editing that article. Also, those comments received attention to such an extent that they were on Fox News as was Trump's response to them. Informant16 1 May 2016
The content read as a backhanded way to say Cruz is not an American citizen, that made it gossipy and defaming, rather than encyclopedic. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 16:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert F. Kennedy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fifth Amendment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tupac Shakur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ready to Die (album). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware of the three revert strike rule and that giving actual information was a crime. I apologize for being productive. I will try to be less productive in the future. -Informant16 13 June 2016
Being productive isn't the problem; my concern is making so many reverts in quick succession without discussing the matter beforehand. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But being productive is the problem. When I didn't add anything I didn't have these issues. Furthermore, my edits were reverted in quick succession by two different users who did not get this message. It appears to me that I'm being singled out for having written the disputed material, which was productive and thus has caused for that message to appear here. Informant16 13 June 2016
It's not so much about productivity...(what's the definition of that, anyway?), as we are not in a hurry to get anywhere fast. This is a long standing article, and for any big changes to be implemented it would be wise to first get a consensus on the talk-page. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 09:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nora Dannehy

[edit]

I assume that your behavior at Nora Dannehy is some kind of retaliation over me reverting you at Sarah Palin and not a serious attempt to improve Wikipedia. If not you should seriously rethink your definition of the word "trivia" as the outcome of an investigation that she lead is not trivia. In any event, you should be aware that WP:HOUNDING is frowned upon. Bonewah (talk) 16:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My behavior at an article where I argued against what you had posted was not a serious attempt? Funny. I thought the same of your continued reverting of my edits to the Palin article. You did it about five or six times before I realized you believe that adding actual is a crime. I didn't think it was serious, as anything I posted was removed for the most part. I would almost call it WP:HOUNDING. Informant16 27 June 2016
Ok sure, whatever. If you want to discuss this further, feel free to address this issue on the Nora Dannehy talk page. Bonewah (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cell (Dragon Ball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teleport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marilyn Monroe. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 23:12, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented on the talk page. This really needs to be removed. It's against policy. Informant16 July 17, 2016

Hinata Hyuga

[edit]

Good work in Hinata Hyuga. I see you are trying to make it pass WP:Notability but it still feels lacking. Did you use this source? It says somethings about the character. If you still can't find sources, I would suggest moving it to your sandbox. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 13:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to. I've got several more right now and I'll use that one if I haven't already. Informant16 July 19, 2016

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Informant16. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Pokémon Chikorita art.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon Chikorita art.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 December

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential Timelines

[edit]

Hey Informant16,

A list of presidential timelines can be found here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:US_Presidential_Administrations. Enjoy! --Ethanbas (talk) 22:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you!

[edit]
Great work on the presidential timelines! Ethanbas (talk) 02:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thanks for continuing to work on the George W. Bush presidential timeline. Ethanbas (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential timeline work update

[edit]

Hi Informant16, I'm wondering, what's your plan for working on the presidential timelines? Is there anything I can do now or in the future to make it easier for you to work on the timelines? What's your vision? Ethanbas (talk) 21:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I started editing on Bush first so I'm going to finish that before I seriously pursue the others. Are you planning on making one for every president? Informant16 27 February 2017
I think so, but I'm taking it slow. I think that for older presidents, the timelines can be shorter than modern timelines like the Bush/Obama/Trump timelines. If you look at the timelines I've been creating for presidents like Coolidge, Hoover, FDR, Eisenhower, etc., you'll see I generally populate them with a few major events, and try to make sure each year has at least two events when I create it. I generally put down major events, stuff like Pearl Harbor, Black Thursday, etc. I don't think it's *necessary* for the older timelines to be super detailed in order for them to be useful to readers; besides, detailed timelines for 40 presidents seems unachievable for this year, or at least very hard. I've been trying to recruit other editors to work on the timelines, to no avail. Oh well; like I said, I think a limited timeline, say with less than 30 events, can still be useful, as long as the really major events are included and the writing is good. Ethanbas (talk) 05:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I should AfD one of my timelines so that people will come and work on it? :P Ethanbas (talk) 05:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I think after I publish Wilson timeline, I won't create other timelines. Maybe I'll do Teddy Roosevelt. But in general, it's too much work, and not enough value. I might be interested in creating timelines of foreign governments though! Ethanbas (talk) 04:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. I'm trying to go backwards from Bush after it gets completed and it still isn't even halfway done. I was wondering what you would think of timelines on certain senators' careers. Informant16 3 March 2017
We'd have to fight on the precedent for writing a timeline on a senator's career. I think making say, a timeline of the premiership of Gorbachev has more precedent (because of US presidential timelines), and would probably survive an AfD, and also be higher value than a senator's career. Ethanbas (talk) 21:08, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I get what you're saying. I'm starting to lose motivation for the timeline though. Informant16 3 March 2017
Work on whatever your heart desires :) Ethanbas (talk) 08:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of the presidency of George W. Bush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treasury Department. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of the presidency of George W. Bush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Timeline of the presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson
added links pointing to Charles Percy and George Christian
Timeline of the presidency of George H. W. Bush
added a link pointing to John Sununu
Timeline of the presidency of Ronald Reagan
added a link pointing to James Edwards

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How do you write the presidential timelines?

[edit]

For example, I'm wondering where you come up with all the really old newspaper citations. In https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_presidency_of_Lyndon_B._Johnson, where did you get all the Chicago Tribune stuff? But also, I'm wondering where you find say, all the CNN links in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_presidency_of_George_W._Bush. Best, Ethanbas (talk) 04:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Google. Just type a day in and you should get some corresponding newspaper or article. I wish I could find some for a Lincoln one, but the Chicago Tribune won't go as far. Informant16 2 April 2017
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of the presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Barnabas Episcopal Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Betsy DeVos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John King. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

American politics 2

[edit]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Lord Roem ~ (talk) 20:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bernie Sanders. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization Talk 03:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Edit warring on an article covered by discretionary sanctions is especially frowned upon. --NeilN talk to me 03:14, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of the presidency of Harry S. Truman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles G. Ross and James Byrnes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So the 'comments on Drumpf' thing

[edit]

Why did you not use the real name on this new section on the Hillary Clinton page?--Yellow Diamond's Pearl (talk) 20:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Timeline of the presidency of Ronald Reagan
added links pointing to John Young, Richard Allen and William Armstrong
Timeline of the presidency of George W. Bush
added a link pointing to Rose Garden

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reflist|4

[edit]

Hi. Just letting you know that reflist|2/3/4 are all deprecated per Template:Reflist#Columns. If you don't know the best ways to format these are:

  • {{reflist|35em}} for 2 columns (equivalent to reflist|2)
  • {{reflist|30em}} for 3 columns
  • {{reflist|40em}} for 4 columns

Thanks --Jennica✿ / talk 02:11, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hubert Humphrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Christian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aaliyah last picture.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aaliyah last picture.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Early life of John F. Kennedy (May 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This reads largely like an essay/school paper and is likely already covered under his article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 10:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Informant16, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 10:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing

[edit]

Please note that canvassing opinions from multiple editors in order to gain sympathy or change the outcome of a decision is highly frowned upon. Please cease posting the same message to multiple editors. Primefac (talk) 14:51, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Primefac, Please note that talking with multiple people on the same sight about the same thing without trying to change the outcome, as otherwise I would have asked them to come over and say something, is not a federal offense under current US law. - Informant16 25 May 2017

Reverted deletion of your edit

[edit]

An editor deleted your edit to the Betsy DeVos page. I undid the revert, since if she wasn't Secretary of Education, any mention of her support for the Paris withdrawal would have been on page nineteen of her home town paper, if that. She was clearly using her position for a bully pulpit, so your edit was appropriate. Activist (talk) 08:39, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your byte add stats to Wikipedia

[edit]

Your stats here. Lots of red and nothing else is pretty good. People tend to get sucked into non-red areas after a while, so don't do that!!!! Ethanbas (talk) 19:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ethanbas:, I didn't even know any of that existed. So what are your thoughts on the progress of the presidential articles? Informant16 13 July 2017
Good work; I don't have any updated opinions from last time. I consider the work on the presidential timelines to be better for the world than work on most Wikipedia articles. Note that my co-conspirators have been working a lot on https://timelines.issarice.com/wiki/Main_Page since they kinda got kicked out of Wikipedia; you might get ideas for additional timelines to create for Wikipedia (you seem to like timeline work!). Ethanbas (talk) 22:09, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ethanbas:, I don't suppose you would be up for making the Timeline of the presidency of William Howard Taft? Informant16 13 July 2017
Nah; like I've said before, I've judged that I've started enough US presidential timelines or even made a few too many; there are simply things I consider more important to work on (if I had time; I work less on Wikipedia nowdays anyhow). I recommend starting timeline of Putin/Russia since 2000; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Russian_history#21st_century for the bit of relevant information. That's one example of something I would consider to be higher value; maybe I'll even start it. Ethanbas (talk) 03:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G. W. Bush presidency TL

[edit]

Given the growing size of the Timeline of the presidency of George W. Bush I plan on dividing it into separate year-by-year articles, like the Timeline of the presidency of Barack Obama articles. While it will likely be a few days until I do this, I wanted to let you know in advance, as you are the current article's primary editor. Cheers. Drdpw (talk) 03:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would say this is unnecessary, although I would say we should do whatever Informant16 wants to be done. Dividing the article into 2 articles (for the 2 presidential terms) is a possibility; I am significantly against dividing it by year. Ethanbas (talk) 03:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would go by presidency, if someone were to ask me. Primefac (talk) 13:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
My main complaints against the year by year thing are two-fold. I wanted each year to be able to eventually stand as its own article, filled with information for each month and images, and I only see about three of those eight that might suffice in their current state. Two, what would this mean for the other timelines? If I were to add a full two years to the Reagan timeline, say for 1986 and 1987 and it became 300 bytes, would you want that split despite most of the years not having anything there or massively lacking? Informant16 21 September 2017
Informant16 is completely correct. I strongly oppose dividing the timelines by year, and will revert such a move. Ethanbas (talk) 02:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of the presidency of Richard Nixon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm Beach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George H. W. Bush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union, New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Split of Jimmy Carter

[edit]

I see you split this article. The attribution tags were added on the talkpage by myself but please remember to do this in the future to comply with copyright polices. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I've had little familiarity with removing content to another page. I appreciate the assistance. Informant16 24 October 2017

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Informant16. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of George W. Bush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Menorah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Android 18.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Android 18.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
I just wanted to thank you for your well referenced edits to Dianne Feinstein. It's appreciated! KNHaw (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Bill Clinton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Burton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pete Wilson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Timeline of the presidency of George H. W. Bush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to John Rowland, Lynn Martin, Bill Price and Head Start

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick Leahy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harrison Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

[edit]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_+_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_0jR77yhNIWd9eaV&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 23:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strom Thurmond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Simpson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Jimmy Carter, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Henry Jackson and Clean Air Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Jimmy Carter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Jimmy Carter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at George H. W. Bush, you may be blocked from editing. WP:POINT, but you knew that, right? VQuakr (talk) 23:59, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to get blocked for adding content and leaving it in the same state that a user who deleted my additions made? I don't understand why you don't concede that was a bit much for bio article. Informant16 14 May 2018
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Jimmy Carter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gilligan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

James Eastland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Russell
John C. Stennis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Russell

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

James Eastland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Russell
John C. Stennis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Harold Brown
Timeline of the presidency of Bill Clinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Roger Stevens

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Bill Clinton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Stanford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Harry S. Truman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Speaker of the House of Representatives, Drew Pearson and Robert Taft (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Bill Clinton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Ickes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Bill Clinton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Bradley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Bill Clinton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President of China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Kuvira (character).png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Kuvira (character).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Lin Beifong.png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Lin Beifong.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ron Wyden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Byrd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page War Powers Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chuck Schumer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Cohen and Jack Reed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chuck Schumer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Tom Price and Richard Foster
Strom Thurmond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alan Simpson

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chuck Schumer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Foster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recommending talk archives

[edit]

Hi,

Given that your talk page has reached nearly 200,000 bytes, I recommend that you archive it by moving the page to User talk:Informant16/Archive 1 or maybe splitting that into 3 pages by copying and pasting discussions. Many users archive discussions when they reach 30,000 to 80,000 bytes and it is recommended that it be done at around 75,000 in order to prevent page lag (said page lag that I received when coming to this page). Please see Help:Archiving a talk page for more info about this.

Just a friendly tip since I definitely noticed page lag here. To list discussions, you can use the template that I have on my talk page. You can also auto-archive with multiple user scripts such as Lowercase sigmabot III (fully-automated) or OneClickArchiver (semi-automated). Redditaddict69 03:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shop's closed

[edit]

I'm finished with this website. I have spent over a year as the sole contributors to most of the presidential timelines and while having a few articles outside of that where people have exercised some common sense in regards to how they treat my edits, disagreeing with one or two here but allowing most to remain or at least discussing the merit of them, the rest have been an ongoing headache showing that there is more defaming in contributing than rewarding in attempting. A few months back, I went out of my way to contribute to the George H. W. Bush article and received a flurry of nonsensical retorts about how my contributions were too much when they were smaller than those on articles of the same profession and then told I was vandalizing for leaving it in the way that the person who deleted what I wrote had left it in. Then I spend several days contributing to the Mitch McConnell article only for another user to appoint themselves the decider of all that is worthy of contributing and delete over 30,000 bytes of content while vaguely proclaiming it was a timeline when every single article on this site lists content in order of sequence and when it happened. It's too much a headache for a person that just wanted to add to the site and I don't see the trade off for being treated so poorly. I do think that moderators and other users on here should realize that there is a human factor involved and that one person trying to add to an article for the period of several days or weeks isn't someone that is merely exercising "good faith" edits. They are a person, who like myself at one point, believed they could make a difference on the website most people would go to first if they wanted to learn about a topic. But I don't expect Wikipedia to become Wikihumanity anytime soon. Just further down the path of turning users away by treating them like excrement. - Informant16 September 7, 2018

  • Uh... what is it something I said? Redditaddict69 20:03, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Informant, surely there are better ways to handle an editorial conflict. I'm sorry you feel this way, but at the same time, if you basically increase the size of an article by 30% without much explanation, and if it looks like what you're adding are all single paragraphs citing single facts, positions, whatever, and nowhere does one see an overarching idea of why those individual things matter, IF, in other words, you turn articles into timelines and give no rationale for inclusion besides basic verifiability, you can expect others to take issue with that. Drmies (talk) 21:10, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Drmies, I see that you deleted everything I wrote you. Very fitting. Anyway, the McConnell article had several sections. If I add sentences having to do with immigration in the "immigration" section, and add a summary, that would have stopped you from blanking out every single thing I wrote? This is why I quit. I'm done negotiating with deletionists. - Informant16 September 7, 2018

"What I see" suppression

[edit]

Drmies deleted my post from his page to erase my critique of what he did so I'm leaving it here: "What am I supposed to think when you unceremoniously delete every single thing I've added to an article without so much as a discussion? That all of my submissions are not worthy of this site? I know you don't care about me or anything I post on this site, at least in a positive manner, but the one thing I tried to do with my submissions was contribute. Do you know how much of a slap in the face it is to spend days working on an article and everything gets removed because somebody thought it wasn't good enough for their standard? It's like you guys have this bizarre standard where anyone that writes something should get punished for trying to do anything that isn't part of the norm of deleting and messing with anything written by another person. There is no way in hell out of 34,602 bytes EVERY SINGLE THING was not worthy of keeping. It's just more generalized lack of humanity and empathy for another user attempting to do something. And I can already picture your mentality of "It's just a website", but those edits wouldn't have all been deleted if they weren't making such a fuss about. This should be the part where I try to argue the merit of keeping them but you won't change your mind. Doesn't fit your non-contributing, deletionist bias. Instead I'll let it slide. If I attempt a communication with you, I walk away with nothing restored and if I try to add it back, I get called out for edit warring and have a coup of users try to tell me how evil I am for bothering to be upset when I put effort into something and see another person stomp all over it. I'm not powerful enough to complain." - Informant16 September 7, 2018

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Dwight D. Eisenhower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Burton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Brooks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Richard Shelby‎ does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

[edit]

Some of the content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from elsewhere online. See the article history for specific urls. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. It's okay to add brief quotations, but it's not okay to copy the surrounding prose. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Informant16. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

[edit]
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Informant16, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Meatsgains(talk) 01:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thoughts about my new talk section?

[edit]

Talk:Political positions of Kirsten Gillibrand - Environmental policies. 47.40.52.156 (talk) 12:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Bradv🍁 05:41, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to articles and content relating to living or recently deceased people and to abortion

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 06:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ron Wyden series

[edit]

Template:Ron Wyden series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 05:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kirsten Gillibrand series

[edit]

Template:Kirsten Gillibrand series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 22:53, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mitch McConnell series

[edit]

Template:Mitch McConnell series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 23:09, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kuririn.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kuririn.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angus King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Bolton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:02, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Susan Collins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Cohen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joni Ernst, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Speaker of the House of Representatives and Andrew Wheeler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Political positions of Susan Collins

[edit]

Hello, Informant16,

Thanks for creating Political positions of Susan Collins! I edit here too, under the username Graeme Bartlett and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The big quote in the lead is excessive

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Cotton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speaker of the House of Representatives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Manchin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Wheeler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Joe Manchin has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:41, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing philosophy

[edit]

Informant, I've taken a look at some of your other contributions to Wikipedia, and I really believe that you fundamentally misunderstand what Wikipedia is supposed to be. Please take a look at Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that is supposed to provide a comprehensive-but-concise summary of the topic, and is not an indiscriminate collection of news reports documenting every single public comment ever made by the subject. For example, you filled the Joe Manchin and Susan Collins articles with inconsequential comments and actions, and then got upset when other editors objected. Please reconsider your editing philosophy. Orser67 (talk) 16:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as I mentioned at the Dwight D. Eisenhower talk page, please review Wikipedia:Article size and Wikipedia:Summary style. Orser67 (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As far as the Collins and Manchin articles are concerned, my contributions were made to eventually split the material into a political positions article. Please review the category "Political positions of United States senators" for nearly two dozen examples of these articles, just in case you thought I was the architect of making most of those. While I objected to some of the comments that were made on the talk page, I had no objections to making the Collins positions article and even created it myself, as that was always my intent. I'd recommend not assuming what mood I was in when I read comments on here or what my understanding of Wikipedia is. Please review Wikipedia:No personal attacks. "Comment on content, not on the contributor." The only material I kept was a summary of her positions (which is the norm for when someone has a political positions article) and in the "Senate career" tab added instances of bills that she sponsored becoming laws since I believed those would have more "lasting impact" than ones she had merely cosponsored. I only stopped on the Manchin article because I don't see the point in me adding a bunch of material and then having it removed because someone decided that it wasn't good enough for an encyclopedia that adds such trivial information as dates. I'd note that your reaction to the Eisenhower reverts is near identical to my reaction to the Manchin reverts, fundamentally not understanding why it was rolled back. User:Informant16 01:32, 30 November (UTC)
No, you are trying to obscure the issue here. It is clear from your talk page comments that you only split those articles because other contributors insisted that you do so. And there are many, many other articles that are still bloated because of your contributions. Orser67 (talk) 01:47, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And User:Display name 99 was more than justified in removing some of the things you added to the Joe Manchin article. Orser67 (talk) 04:06, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at some of your other "greatest hits", Informant, you have also added a whole lot of crud to article such as Strom Thurmond, Robert Byrd, Robert A. Taft, Mitch McConnell, and Jimmy Carter. I am grateful to various editors for removing some of the most unnecessary things you have added, though it appears that much of the bloat you contributed to Wikipedia is, unfortunately, still in place. Orser67 (talk) 06:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I split the post-presidency of the Jimmy Carter article without anyone telling me to. When Display name reverted my edits, I didn't write half of an essay on his talk page or try to disparage his contributions to the entire site. You can look on his talk page. I complimented his contributions to the John Adams article. Looks like you discovered my magic ability to "write crud" and somehow have a majority of it stay. It takes for the person who won't add anything to any of those articles (barring Carter) to complain about the person who will. Informant16 11:17, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm hardly the first to object to your editing philosophy; just looking at your recent history, I found plenty of examples of people who objected to your non-stop additions to various articles: here, here, here, here, and here. You did somehow manage to transform Strom Thurmond from an article with 26kb of readable prose to one with 117kb without much pushback, so congratulations on that I guess. Anyway, I really hope that you consider changing your editing philosophy to take WP:NOTNEWS more seriously, or that you stick more to political position and timeline articles where you seem to do a perfectly fine job. Orser67 (talk) 14:50, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And if you're determined to only edit Wikipedia with free, online sources, I recommend looking into getting a (free) JSTOR account from the Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library (they also have other resources that might be worth exploring). I think that if you engaged with sources other than news reports, you could get a much better understanding of what types of things do and don't warrant mentioning on Wikipedia. Orser67 (talk) 15:05, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I have no immediate recollections of any interaction with you beyond the Manchin page. While I respect your contributions and while it appears that some of my edit summaries were a bit too harsh, I agree with Orser67 that you had a tendency to add excessive material to the article, making it more difficut to navigate and decipher the information that was actually important. I'm not at all familiar with your contributions outside of the Manchin article, but if you edit other articles the same way you do that one, I agree that it would be good to reconsider your general editing philosophy. Display name 99 (talk) 02:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I goofed when I left the following comment unsent to you as a result of not correctly typing your User name. This was the comment that I'd meant to include you on. It was correctly sent to the other two editors involved in the discussion. Activist (talk) 03:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Missent comment from DDE article Talk page

[edit]
    • Informant16, I wrote a long response to the concerns of the three of you yesterday, but my PC crashed and I lost it all before publishing it. I'd read each of your thoughts and efforts to tighten up the article. However, in trying to understand the problems that you all were sorting through, I found it extremely difficult to follow the changes that had been made since the first contested by Informant16. I've had this happen where I've been involved before, when someone has made substantial changes to an article and in the course of doing so, moved a good deal of text or sections around, and made changes within the text at the same time. Trying to follow all those changes becomes extremely difficult, and I expect that most editors simply would not be willing or able to follow them all, or to have the time available to do so. I've had to print out such articles at times to sort through the edits, and that's not an option for everyone who edits the encyclopedia, given the logistics and/or the expense. Most editors of any articles probably are making minor edits, or adding relatively brief new material or subtracting minor amounts of existing text while aiming to improve the article. So I fully understand Informant16's reversions of the initial deletion. I should say that I greatly appreciate the efforts each of you have made toward improving this particular article. I note further that since this consensus process began to evolve, three editors who were not previously involved have made comparatively minor changes to the article. In the task of my understanding and absorption of the proposed changes, I was surprised to learn so much about a president and officer whom I have admired. I also noted that there have been more than two dozen editors who have worked on the article this year, making 100 edits. Given that Ike retired as president almost 60 years ago and died over 50 years ago, I was quite surprised that the article has gotten so much current involvement of so many editors and interest of so many more readers; the page views have been remarkable as well. So I look forward to reviewing the proposed changes, a workable piece at a time, and hope I can spare as much time as possible to be a part of the process. Thanks once again to you all. Activist (talk) 22:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)−[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Heidi Cruz.png

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Heidi Cruz.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Come Back!!!

[edit]

Please Come Back!! It's a shame you left because that old bitch spent days trying to demean you. You're the only one who bothered to update the pages of Senators and Congressmen and that doesn't come around every day. Thank you for all that you gave!

File:Gohan Lithograph.PNG listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gohan Lithograph.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Gohan victory over Cell.png

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Gohan victory over Cell.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFCC 8. Image is being used for a purely decorative purpose in the section of the article on the character's reception.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kamala Harris into Political positions of Kamala Harris. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Political positions of Lisa Murkowski for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Political positions of Lisa Murkowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political positions of Lisa Murkowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:38, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Political positions of Lisa Murkowski for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Political positions of Lisa Murkowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political positions of Lisa Murkowski (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lin Beifong.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lin Beifong.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chikorita for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chikorita, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chikorita until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokémon Chikorita art.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon Chikorita art.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:17, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daisy Buchanan.png listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Daisy Buchanan.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Mike 🗩 21:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Degrassi J.T. Yorke.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Degrassi J.T. Yorke.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Strom Thurmond into US Senate career of Strom Thurmond. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Also, when copying from one article to another, please be sure to also copy details of the supporting citations and texts. Thank you, — Diannaa (talk) 13:01, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rosalynn Carter series

[edit]

Template:Rosalynn Carter series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:11, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HinataHyuga.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HinataHyuga.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Strom Thurmond has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Philipnelson99 (talk) 23:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Android 18.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Android 18.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Informant16&oldid=1258277310"