User talk:Hybridlily

Welcome!

Hello, Hybridlily, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Khoikhoi 08:25, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish people

May I ask you, why, you keep changing the picture on the Turkish people page? Thanks. --Khoikhoi 08:25, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion page for it, read it. Why don't you read them before ?

Because I can't understand what you're trying to say. --Khoikhoi 09:12, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let's speak Turkish;

Söylemek istedigim şey, FATİH, MEVLANA, ve bir sürü kişilik varken, Orhan Pamuk beni kızdırdı. Bir Amerikalı bizi Orhan Pamukla hatırlamak istiyor diye bunu sürdürmenin bir manası yok.

I'm not Turkish. I can't understand your English is what I'm saying. Please add below why you keep changing the picture. --Khoikhoi 09:34, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, I have received a Turkish message from you. Besides, if you don't understand my English, how can you understand my answer? No matter, I will express my own, again.

At first, when you search ' Turks ' you are redicting to the page. Turk is a general word used to identify 25 different culture. The page should include information from all cultures, but it isn't

Secondly, Even if it was opened for Turks who lives in Turkey, Orhan Pamuk cannot be a representative for those people. We have a lot of important characters. Perhaps, you think Orhan Pamuk is one of them. However, he isn't. For instance, Fatih Sultan Mehmet, Yunus Emre and so on. You cannot shape the page which shape you want to change. Turkey's Turk have a natural right to present themselves according to thier own.

The Turkish message that you received was probably from User:-Inanna-. Wait, why isn't Orhan Pamuk a Turk of Turkey? --Khoikhoi 19:29, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps message was sent by other user who can speak Turkish. ı am sorry for it. ı didn't write that Orhan Pamuk isn't a Turk of Turkey. ı am all trying to say that there are many Turks of Turkey who can be better represantative than does Pamuk.

But why? Why do you think he isn't a good represantative? --Khoikhoi 19:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you read what I wrote ? I think Fatih Sultan Mehmet or Nazım Hikmet or Mevlana or Yunus Emre would be better than him. Fatih Sultan Mehmet created a new century by conquering Istanbul, Mevlana brought Anatolian style of Sufism. Yunus Emre, as a poet wrote mant poems and Turks of Turkey still read his poems.

Why do you persist for Orhan Pamuk ? Dou you have any personal link ?

Also, it is a fucking lie that Anatolian Turks are mostly convert of Kurds, Greek and Armenians. I followed the link which writer put on the page as DNA map of Anatolian Turks. The research doesn't make a compration of those people's DNA. Actually, at the result section, the researcher draw its result as " the results are satisfactory for the fact that Anatolian Turks mostly immigrated from Central Asia "

Blocked

Blocked for three-revert rule violation

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for 24 hours for violating the three revert rule on Turkish people. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} to this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also e-mail the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username and IP address in your e-mail.

Izehar 11:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}}Turkish people page contains many folks about Antolian Turks. Two boys who hate Turkish people are working as lobby actors. Username:Khoinoki reverting the page without attending any talk and presenting his ideas. He only thinks that it is just a competition. He is bothering other users to change the page during his blocked time. As a historian and an Anatolian Turks, I am strongly protesting Wikipedia admin. and accusing them to act not to be objective.

In my opinion the page needs an expert, or should be deleted.

You have blatantly ignored Wikipedia policy by reverting six times within 24 hours, as well as engaging in a personal attack. Your request to be unblocked is denied. Owen× ☎ 00:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Istanbul

Hello. The rephasing you keep reverting to on the Istanbul article is grammatically confusing. I can't tell what you are really trying to say. Can you elaborate here or on the article talk page and stop reverting, please? Jonathunder 19:38, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for reverting, I was confused. --hybrid lily 23:08, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Famous turks

Selam, I noticed you are Turkish. Could you help add in some prominent Turks to this particular list List of Turks ? - Enter sandman 15:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mamund

I will shortly be transferring the proposed version of the Mamund article to the article space. If you haven't already, please take a vist to the discussion page (talk:Mamund) to make sure you are happy with the text. If not please make some comments. Kcordina 12:10, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba

"Turks" sayfasında ki resim için oy vermek istermisin? Teşekkürler!

-Inanna-

SELAM

Selam ,

Adana sayfası için yardımlarını bekliyorum. Helal sana, şimdi aptal aptal onu bunu geri alıp duruyorlar. Ben geceleri giremiyorum sana zahmet bir el atıver.

3RR Warning

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on an article. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --Khoikhoi 19:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]